Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 2nd December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Fanfare heralded nothing but a great train robbery



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 August 2008
When National Express took over the east coast train line with great fanfare in December, there were empty promises about "stimulating demand on the rail network".
As a Scot living in London, I used to enjoy taking the train home twice a month but now find peak rail fares prohibitively more expensive than flying – and the trains overcrowded.

Despite booking two months in advance, I have never been able to
book an elusive "discount ticket" and have had to opt for cheaper air fares.

Rail minister Tom Harris may have got it wrong when he defended the National Express deal on Radio Four's Today programme last August, saying: "I don't buy this idea that people are being priced off the railways; the very opposite is actually happening. The whole deal is very good news not just for passengers but for the taxpayer".

Richard Bowker, the chief executive of National Express, was nearer the mark in his comments to the Telegraph: "We have won a bid which is ambitious, deliverable and structured to generate shareholders value." He failed to mention this would be achieved at the expense of passengers.

DANIEL AITKENHEAD

Fulham Road

London


It's generous of Colin C MacLean (Letters, 6 August) to support First ScotRail's 158s. These trains, the poorest long-distance rolling stock in Europe – and whose attractiveness and comfort ranks with that of a 1950s Soviet tower bock – need all the support possible.

I travel from Aberdeen to Inverness monthly, and I'm only too acquainted with the existing 158s and the updated versions. Imagine any railway company having to remove seats to make way for luggage. Why wasn't luggage space designed into them on the drawing board? Why did First ScotRail ever acquiesce in accepting such poor-quality trains?

The refurbished 158s yield not a millimetre of extra legroom that I can find, and the first-class section remains a through corridor at all times.

It really isn't good enough that Scotland as a European nation relies on second-rate stock for long-distance services. Our rail aspirations have to rise higher.

GORDON CASELY

Beaconsfield Place

Aberdeen







The full article contains 358 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 August 2008 8:35 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.