Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


World first as woman gets organ made from stem cells

View Video
Download Video

Video

A video explanation of how an organ was grown in a lab before being used for Claudia Castillo's transplant operation
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 19 November 2008
A WOMAN has become the first patient in the world to receive an organ created in a laboratory, in a pioneering operation that could change transplant surgery, doctors said yesterday.
Claudia Castillo's body part was grown using her own stem cells harvested from bone marrow.

Professor Anthony Hollander, part of the team behind the breakthrough, described it as an example of "stem cell science becoming stem cell medicine".

Using Ms Castillo's stem cells to create a new airway for her means there are none of the tissue-rejection problems that are a major issue for transplant surgery and which usually mean recipients have to take powerful drugs for the rest of their lives.

Researchers from the UK, Italy and Spain worked together in the extraordinarily complex procedure to grow tissue from the 30-year-old mother of two to fashion a new bronchus – a branch of the windpipe – and carry out the transplant operation.

Scientists believe the same approach will be used in years to come to create engineered replacements for other damaged organs. In five years, they hope to begin clinical trials in which laboratory-made voice boxes are implanted into patients with cancer of the larynx.

Professor Martin Birchall, a member of the team from the University of Bristol, said: "What we're seeing today is just the beginning. This is the first time a tissue-engineered whole organ has been transplanted into a patient.

"I reckon in 20 years' time, it will be the commonest operation surgeons will be doing. I think it will completely transform the way we think about surgery, health and disease."

He predicted the technique could be applied to other hollow organs similar in structure, such as the bowel, bladder and reproductive tract.

Colombian-born Ms Castillo, from Barcelona, Spain, had suffered a serious tuberculosis infection that ravaged her airways, leaving her short of breath and unable to carry out the simplest tasks.

Disease had caused her windpipe, or trachea, to collapse at the point where it entered her left lung.

A series of complex steps pushing the boundaries of medical science led to the transplant operation, performed on 12 June by Professor Paolo Macchiarini at the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona.

A section of windpipe was taken from a female donor who had died and the trachea was stripped of its cells, leaving only connective tissue. Stem cells from Ms Castillo's bone marrow were then grown in the laboratory. Next, the donor trachea had to be "seeded" with two different kinds of cells – those made in the laboratory and those derived from tissue taken from Ms Castillo's nose and healthy airways.

The trachea graft was placed into a rotating "bioreactor" and the machine allowed the cells to migrate to the correct locations, where they began to grow naturally.

Finally the trachea, now covered in cartilage and lined with cells all bearing the patient's own genetic hallmark, was cut to shape and slotted into place. Without the pioneering operation, the lung would have had to be removed.

Today, Ms Castillo is living an active, normal life, and is once again able to look after her children, Johan, 15, and Isabella, four. Yesterday, she said: "I was scared at the beginning because I was the first patient but had confidence and trusted the doctors. I am now enjoying life and am very happy that my illness has been cured."

So far, doctors have seen no sign of her immune system rejecting the transplanted organ, even though she received no immunosuppressive drugs.

Prof Birchall admitted the decision to turn to tissue engineering to help Ms Castillo had been a "leap of faith" and the same procedure had only been attempted on pigs before.

Details of the transplant were described in a online edition of The Lancet journal.

Prof Macchiarini said: "We are terribly excited by these results. Just four days after transplantation, the graft was almost indistinguishable from adjacent, normal bronchi."

Dr Allan Kirk, from the American Society of Transplantation, said: "They have created a functional, biological structure that can't be rejected."

However, Dr Josh Brickman, from the Institute for Stem Cell Research in Edinburgh, urged caution. "It is fantastic that they have been able to do this with her own stem cells, which means there is no risk of auto-immune rejection. However, the application to other organs could be difficult," he said.

Sue Pearson, from the Transplant Trust, said: "This is great news, but we don't want to give false hope to people who are waiting for organs. We're sure that this will come to fruition in the future. In the meantime, we would encourage people to sign on to the organ donor register and talk to their next of kin."

Scientists are already looking to the future and seeking European Union funding and commercial sponsors for the more ambitious larynx trials.

Up to 60,000 people a year are diagnosed with cancer of the larynx in Europe, about half of whom may be suitable for tissue engineering transplants.

Since the larynx is a complex organ containing the vocal cords, engineering one from stem cells will be a major challenge. But Prof Birchall said the first trials could take place in about five years.

Professor Martin Birchall - 'I think it will completely transform the way we think about surgery, health and disease'

How the procedure works

1 A section of windpipe, or trachea, was taken from a 51-year-old woman donor who had died, to provide the scaffold or "matrix" around which the new bronchus would be built.

2 Using a pioneering technique involving detergent and enzymes, the trachea was stripped of its cells, leaving connective tissue. The process removed almost all the material that could trigger an adverse immune reaction.

3 Stem cells from the patient's own bone marrow were then grown and multiplied in the laboratory, and treated with "growth factor" chemicals to turn them into cartilage cells called chondrocytes.

4 Stem cells are immature cells with the ability to develop into many kinds of tissue given the right chemical instructions.

5 The 7cm-long donor trachea had to be "seeded" with two kinds of cells – the chondrocytes made in Bristol and specialised epithelial cells derived from tissue taken from the patient's nose and healthy airways. The epithelial cells line the inside of the tracheal tube and carry tiny hairs or cilia for moving debris out of the airway.

6 The seeding process was carried out by placing the trachea graft into a rotating "bioreactor" developed at the Polytechnic of Milan in Italy. The machine allowed the cells to migrate to the right locations, where they began to grow naturally.

7 Finally the trachea, now covered in cartilage and lined with epithelial cells all bearing the patient's genetic hallmark, was cut to shape and slotted into the gap left by the diseased and collapsed bronchus.

Overcoming the problems of immune rejection by using a patient's own cells is a major breakthrough

THIS work is important because it demonstrates how tissue engineers can work together with stem-cell biologists to produce material from a patient's own cells that will not be rejected by their immune system.

To produce something that can be surgically implanted and – so far as we know – not suffer any complications is really quite remarkable.

To get over the problem of immune rejection by being able to use the patient's own cells is a major breakthrough in its own right in terms of transplant.

At the moment, this cannot be used on a huge scale because it is such a patient-specific treatment, but it is a wonderful demonstration of the fact that stem cells can be used in this way and to the benefit of patients.

I can see a time when a treatment like this will be used on the NHS in specific disease cases.

The research is a major step forward to realising regenerative medicine. It is certainly important and one more step along the way. We are not yet where we aim to be in regenerative medicine, but this is helping us get there.

In terms of the developments being made in stem-cell research at the moment, we have a number of clinical trials using treatments based on adult stem cells under way in the UK. There are even more under way in the United States.

The theory has always been there to use adult stem cells and expand them into more than just blood stem cells.

It will lead to potentially more surgeons trying this sort of surgery and using tissue engineers alongside stem-cell biologists to create parts of organs that can be transplanted. This is a procedure that is risky. It does not have any guarantees, and no doubt this patient has been very bold and gone through with it because she has confidence in the doctors and the surgeons.

Patients who are suffering from chronic conditions should be able to look at this piece of work and make their own mind up based on the risk.

If they see in the longer term, as I hope it turns out, that this patient has improved quality of life and for a long period of time, then that ought to encourage others to try this sort of surgery through their own doctors.

It is always important that we have patients who are willing to take part in clinical trials.

One issue in progressing with stem-cell research is having the patients who will enter into this kind of work. This is one of the issues that the network will be discussing at a meeting in London next week.

Though we may be cautious while we await the longer-term results, all the signs are there that this is a tremendous piece of research and surgery.

I think it is a major advance and hugely encouraging in our aim to develop regenerative medicine further.

• Ben Sykes is co-ordinator of the UK National Stem Cell Network.


Page 1 of 1

 
1

Rufus T. Firefly,

18/11/2008 22:43:42
What a great story.

This could be the start of something big.

Imagine the diseases that are likely to be cured in the future.

No doubt Cardinal O'Brien will think that this is a "monstrous attack on human rights, human dignity and human life", and that it will allow experiments of "Frankenstein proportion".

21st century science v. dark age dogma.

There can surely be only one winner.
2

weeshooie1,

Wollongong 19/11/2008 00:24:28
1 up for good old fashioned commonsense :0)
3

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 19/11/2008 00:34:42

Yep! 'well said' Rufus ~1,

'Aye' we would all be dying in our early years, if it was not for the reseach, that goes on and on.

Not a bad looking Woman either. :)


4

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 19/11/2008 00:39:25

Don't know if I would felt the same, if this had been our,...
....'Boy Wonder, who for all we know, at the best of times, looks like,..
....'Frankenstein's Monster'! :))
5

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 19/11/2008 00:48:04

On my last note on this subject!

Great News Indeed!

Ya-see, if your "Charles" is to carry-on, in his 'Baby Making' venture, on may need,...

...this technology's of "stem cells" to produce, spérm cells.

:)

6

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 19/11/2008 00:51:34
re: error, *one may need*
7

Jim Dean ,

New York, US 19/11/2008 00:54:33
I'm a regular online reader--usually The Scotsman is better researched. "A WOMAN has become the first patient in the world to receive an organ created in a laboratory." Very much false, bladders grown in the lab have been transplanted for years. Associated press, 2006, Scientists Rebuild Bladder in 7 Patients. "For the first time, scientists have rebuilt a complex human organ, the bladder, in seven young patients using live tissue grown in the lab."
8

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 19/11/2008 01:30:44


Jim Dean ~9,

That's Scotland for you, we are a little 'bonkers' at times, and get it all, Sooo Wrong!

Glad you made the 'correction', less of the 'Malt' would not,...

..'Go-a-Miss', for some of these reporters! :)

Maybe they are hoping for a New Malt, to be made out of,...

...."Stem Cells" :)

Got to keep-up with the, reputations you know! :)

9

glaswegian at heart,

florida 19/11/2008 03:59:34
What a long way medical science has come,in fact all the sciences It's a bit late for me,I have emphysema ,ah canny walk the length o' masel' withoot gettin' oot o' breath(smokers take heed).If I was younger this breakthrough would help,but stem cell research isn't allowed in these United States.Hopefully our new president will try to get a bill passed to allow the research.
10

US Cavalry,

Virginia USA 19/11/2008 04:11:59
And to think GW Bush rejected Stem Cell research here in the US. He was a real peice of work.
11

glaswegian at heart,

florida 19/11/2008 04:43:27
Idon't think DUBBLYA could be helped unless it was someone else's brain cells CAN'T WAIT FOR Jan 20th
12

,

19/11/2008 08:18:05
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

Iain's,

Barcelona 19/11/2008 08:27:42
Well, well.

I wonder why the operation was done here.

was it because of our cleaner hospitals or just because the Spanish NHS paid for it?

14

Conan the Librarian™,

19/11/2008 08:46:11
1
I would never describe Rufus as brilliant fakey.

Although I agree with him, strangely enough.
15

thinking,

Scotland 19/11/2008 08:49:50
#15
Actually, you are wrong. He rejected embryonic stem cell research which involves killing an embryo and hasn't had good results yet, but funded adult stem cell research which has proved effective.
16

hertscot,

19/11/2008 09:11:27
#20,

Maybe, properly funded embryonic stem cell research will produce better results?
17

An Greumach Mor,

Scotland 19/11/2008 09:13:22
Stem Cell technology seems to be finally moving from theory to medical application.

This may provide a whole new solution to many problems.

This is a positive story lets try and not let it become a west coast drama.

I note Rufus has already tried to kick it off with a dig and Vincent as ever is stright in there to bite the bait.

This is a good news story. Should that not be enough.
18

,

19/11/2008 09:30:08
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
19

thinking,

Scotland 19/11/2008 10:17:50
#21
It doesn't make sense to create a life in order to kill to save another life (embryonic stem cells) when lives can be saved without killing another life (adult or cord cells)
20

It's life but not as we know it,

The Oort Clouds 19/11/2008 10:27:26
When will they be able to create a working brain for Gordon Brown?
21

Lochiel,

West o'Glasgow 19/11/2008 10:42:15
Best wishes for the wee little lamb
22

,

19/11/2008 10:55:22
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
23

Observer. 1,

Glasgow 19/11/2008 11:08:17
Hello Numpty Heid long time no see, hope you are well.

What's your problem Vincent ? The Embryo Bill will pass and that could mean even more good news for people suffering from disease. If you don't like the research, don't take the treatment, but don't attempt to impose your morality on others. The matter was debated, it's done.
24

,

19/11/2008 11:17:47
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
25

Observer. 1,

Glasgow 19/11/2008 11:29:40
Vincent - there is no doubt of the benefits of adult stem cell research. Hopefully the same will hold true for other research methods too. We won't know until we try. I personally find the ''killing an embryo'' to be the more terminological inexact phrase on this thread, but I'm not rising to that particular hysterical bait.



26

,

19/11/2008 11:41:21
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
27

Fred Quimby,

19/11/2008 11:51:21
22
thinking,
Scotland 19/11/2008 10:17:50

It doesn't make sense to create a life in order to kill to save another life (embryonic stem cells) when lives can be saved without killing another life (adult or cord cells)



What religious nonsense you talk.

28

,

19/11/2008 11:59:11
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
29

Fred Quimby,

19/11/2008 12:09:50

So we are making and killing we babies?

Many atheists and agnostics hold the same view.

Never met them, only the religious nutters and Police like you.

I'll put you in one if you want, cartoon that is, not embryonic transplant.
30

,

19/11/2008 12:22:43
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
31

Fred Quimby,

19/11/2008 12:33:54
I am certainly not attempting in any way top Police anyone.

I just have no time for people who through religion attempt to assert their views over me. The adherents of religion have done so for millennia through organised religion. They are still doing so.

Have to go now and work

32

,

19/11/2008 12:34:21
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
33

,

19/11/2008 12:43:31
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
34

Observer. 1,

Glasgow 19/11/2008 13:08:31
Vincent - I didn't call you hysterical I said that the most terminoligically incorrect post, as you said you objected to factually incorrect information being posted, was the post at 18 about killing embryos. That is sheer unadulterated hysteria.
35

Observer. 1,

Glasgow 19/11/2008 13:11:45
Actually 18 just gets thr runner up prize for hysterical nonsense, 22 is the winner.
36

Observer. 1,

Glasgow 19/11/2008 13:20:37
39 What is your post at 15 all about then if you don't see a religious context to this ? And are you trying to claim, because it reads as if you are, that only adult stem cell research is ethical ?

You made the statements Vincent, you shouldn't be surprised if supporters of the embryo bill (the silent majority) take issue with you.
37

Talha Ahmad,

London 19/11/2008 14:25:43
Major Advancement!!!

This is an extra-ordinary achievement, a very big turn and can lead to big changes in the medical world. It can avoid alot of major problems coming with various diseases including tissue-rejection as well depending on the heavy dose of medicines for the rest of life...
38

georgia,

outside waukegan 19/11/2008 14:41:53
As a former Catholic who changed her mind because of ethical reasons (e.g., no Pope should wear Prada shoes when the world is in a financial quagmire; no church should cost its peasantry their meager savings when they can barely support themselves; no church should tell a woman how many mouths she can reasonably feed, sometimes at the sacrifice of her own life), I find the thought that the church would get involved in this medical issue repugnant and far beyond its scope.

However, I realize I am bucking the church's worship of suffering. It has always been a church doctrime that suffering is the human path to heaven, right next to giving more than one can afford to support all the "princes of the church." If people seek the abolition of human suffering, they are looked upon with suspicion, because heaven knows how that would cut into the sales of masses, litany candles, novena cards, and the ever-popular scapulars, which I wore as a little girl as one would wear a garlic-sack around the neck to ward off werewolves.

If there is any way to heal others by harvesting stem cells from the placenti of newborns, or by using the stem cells of frozen embryos scheduled for destruction anyway, why shouldn't we do it???? If God, who condemned our whole human race to pain and suffering on a single act of "Adam and Eve" because he was so jealous of his omniscience, has now let us have this knowledge, why shouldn't we use it? Obviously, it's OK with God, isn't it???
39

Fred Quimby,

19/11/2008 14:55:50
Well said Georgia
40

Hardrations,

Canada 19/11/2008 15:09:46
Might I add my, " well said to Georgia". There will always be religious nutters who see advancement in health care as something to rant about. God made us in his image. To me this means as Georgia so well puts it, Quote: If God, who condemned our whole human race to pain and suffering on a single act of "Adam and Eve" because he was so jealous of his omniscience, has now let us have this knowledge, why shouldn't we use it? Obviously, it's OK with God, isn't it???.
41

,

19/11/2008 15:11:41
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
42

doublescotch,

U.S.A 19/11/2008 15:30:22
You know we all have to die of something.Some sooner than others. If you want to be a little bit immortal, become an organ donor. By the way we always wonder why children become feral Take a look around. There is no respect for human life whether through abortions ,destroying embryos or euthansia. It doesn't matter if you are Catholic,Protestant Atheiest Agnostic Humanist. All Life is Beautiful.
43

doublescotch,

U.S.A. 19/11/2008 15:40:02
If we as adults don't show respect for each other how can you expect young people to bother. And remeber they are the ones who are following in our footsteps. Just look at the horror Baby P. went through. So stop and think. If from the top to the bottom of that sad lonely little boy's life someone said this is a life worth saving he would be still alive to-day. Now you could say it is a retrograde abortion. so why cry about it. No o-one seems to cry about partial birth abortions and the suffering and horror that is. And this is life in the 21st centuary.If anything goes nothing matters
44

Observer. 1,

Glasgow 19/11/2008 15:41:02
Vincent - you only have to look at post 48 to see why people get so annoyed about this subject.

Firstly we have the canard about destroying embryos - as if the embryo research material has a chance of any alternative. It doesn't. And then the poster brings in abortion ! What does that have to do with the subject matter ? Hee haw.

Your post number 15 makes two references to ''ethical'' stem cell research as being adult, and appears to cite the Churches as authority for doing so. I think people are entitled to draw conclusions from that.

The further posts at 18 and 22 are hysterical nonsense, and to quote yourself:

''to stand by and allow the promulgation of untruths is to condone these untruths''.

I, and others are not prepared to condone the untruths which are regularly promulgated in connection with matters covered by the embryology bill.

45

Observer. 1,

Glasgow 19/11/2008 15:43:28
And add 49 to the list of why people get annoyed about this subject. Because nutters like that think nothing of using child abuse as a faux reason to impose their morality concerning abortion upon other people. And it's go hee haw to do with the thread.
46

doublescotch,

U.S.A 19/11/2008 16:56:09
#51 You left out euthansia. I am not pushing anything on anyone. I am justsaying life is a fatal disease. Get use to it. You poor sap.
47

doublescotch,

U.S.A 19/11/2008 17:04:23
#51 By the way I am an organ donor.
48

doublescotch,

U.S.A 19/11/2008 17:19:34
#51 I should have added "Jackass" as that is exactly how you sound especially when you say "HeeHaw"
49

Observer. 1,

Glasgow 19/11/2008 17:41:15
52,53,54 you unilaterally introduced abortion and euthanasia onto a thread which had hee haw to do with the subject. And you are not pushing anything on anyone ? Aye right.
50

,

19/11/2008 18:20:02
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
51

,

19/11/2008 18:53:39
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
52

,

19/11/2008 19:08:36
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
53

doublescotch,

U.S.A 19/11/2008 19:14:20
#56 Forgive me I should have said I carry a card which says I will leave my organs to anyone who needs them. I have O type blodd I go every month to hospital and donate that. I have had bone-marrow taking so yes I do donate sasly not my brain yet:)
54

doublescotch,

U.S.A 19/11/2008 19:15:52
#56 that should read bload and sadly
55

doublescotch,

U.S.A 19/11/2008 19:23:21
#55 For someone who is using observer for a non-de plume you will not allow anyone else to put their observations down. It is wonderful that young woman was able to use her own stem-cells. What would she have used if that didn't work? And no I am not pushing anything love. But you go ahead and push your point of views. And we still have to die. You do know"Appointment in Samara"
We can't escape Death.
56

Roy Forrester,

Bloomsburg USA 19/11/2008 19:27:34
Thanks for the report. Another example of just how beneficial Stem Cell Research is. Hopefully the change of president in the US will bring about a change in the research policy in the US. They have the means and money to contribute enormously to this research.
57

Observer. 1,

Glasgow 19/11/2008 23:17:49
57 You are being disingeneous. Cardianl O'Brien Arch Bishop Conti and Bishop Tartaglia have all spoken out against (hysterically) embryo stem cell research. Adult stem cell research is universally approved of. You make a distinction - and it was you who rose to the bait I didn't lay it. Just admit your position.
58

Observer. 1,

Glasgow 19/11/2008 23:20:56
62 You have introduced topics which were entirely irrelevant to this thread. That is my observation and I stick with it.
59

,

20/11/2008 13:52:43
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.