Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 7th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Woman wins £3,500 whiplash award after taxi nudged at less than 5mph



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 February 2008
A MOTORIST has been ordered to pay £3,500 in compensation after nudging a taxi at a speed of less than five miles per hour.
Alana Baron, a lawyer, has been ordered to pay up despite the accident not leaving a mark on the other vehicle or "affecting the pursuer's life in any way".

Magistrate and charity runner Caroline Spencer, who was a passenger in the taxi, went to c
ourt to seek compensation after suffering whiplash in the low-speed accident.

Although she was able to return to work immediately and was back running two weeks later, a sheriff has now ruled that she should be paid £3,500.

The case has revived suggestions that a "compensation culture" now exists in Scotland.

Bill Aitken, Conservative justice spokesman, declined to comment on individual cases, but said: "There appears to be a growing thinking that when stuff happens, as it does, someone is responsible and someone else is entitled to a claim."

Cameron Fyfe, one of the country's leading litigation lawyers, said there had been a noticeable increase in compensation claims in recent years.

"The law hasn't changed, but people are more aware of their right to claim," he said.

"It's probably partly because there are more claims companies advertising on television. There is also a feeling that the system has become Americanised, with so many eye-catching stories coming across about compensation claims."

Mrs Spencer raised the claim at Edinburgh Sheriff Court after her private hire Mazda MPV was struck by Miss Baron's Volvo on 11 June, 2006.

The 44-year-old lay magistrate and her mother and sons were on their way to the finishing line of the Edinburgh marathon to watch her husband run. Their vehicle was about to make a turn when Miss Baron hit them from behind at a speed which could have been as low as two miles per hour.

Sheriff Nigel Morrison, QC, said: "The driver of the Mazda, Grahame Allan, 61, gave evidence for Miss Baron. He felt a slight nudge.

"There was no damage to his vehicle. He asked his passengers if they were OK and they said they were fine. He thought the speed was under 5mph and may have been 2mph.

"He said the noise of the collision was significant enough to hear but was not a thump. The collision was the fault of the defender.

"There was no damage to the Mazda. There was damage to the front of the number plate of the Volvo which was cracked around the nearside screw."

Alan Bathgate, a consultant automotive engineer, told the court that the crash happened at less than 5mph because neither bumper had been damaged.

The court was told that an accident at such a low speed would have the same effect on the passengers as going over a normal pothole in the road.

In a written judgment issued yesterday, Sheriff Morrison said:

"The pursuer sustained a whiplash injury to her neck in the accident. Over the next few days she felt stiffness in her neck and a tingling sensation down her left arm."

GOD, I'LL SEE YOU IN COURT
THE "compensation culture" has led to some truly bizarre court action.

A man from Pennsylvania attempted to sue God over his dismissal from USX Corporation after 30 years of service. According to the lawsuit, the Supreme Being failed to take "corrective action" against those who had wronged him.

In 2004, Timothy Dumouchel, of Wisconsin, sued a communications company, arguing: "I believe the reason I smoke and drink every day and my wife is overweight is because we watched the TV everyday for the last four years."

But seemingly frivolous lawsuits are not a uniquely American creation. A Russian woman who drank an estimated 5,000 litres of Coca-Cola successfully sued the company for making her ill. Natalya Kashuba, 27, the owner of an upmarket clothes shop, drank up to three litres of Coke every day for five years.

Two courts agreed that Coca-Cola had failed to warn of the health risks of drinking too much Coke and awarded Miss Kashuba £62.





The full article contains 696 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 February 2008 10:41 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Ross Fyffe,

Scotland 09/02/2008 02:08:31
what a farce, this is sick .................
2

Scullion,

Canada 09/02/2008 02:13:41
In most provinces in Canada this claimant would either not have a right to sue for pain and suffering due to the legislated inability to sue or her damages would be severely capped due to having a minor injury.
It appears the U.K. is becoming what we were 20 years ago.
3

Stuart W,

Dundee 09/02/2008 04:50:02
I suspect the complainant felt a hard neck rather than a stiff one.
4

donald,

glasgow 09/02/2008 07:48:51
Should be reported to the Electoral Commission for a fairer result.
5

Draco Was a Wimp,

Edinburgh 09/02/2008 08:32:56
Grasping trout. What a surprise to see she's from Liverpool, where I believe ambulance chasing is a local sport. Glad to see that the other driver concerned was a lawyer, however. Would be even better if she was a no-win, no-fee lawyer.
6

Phil C,

09/02/2008 09:22:27
Like a racehorse with a broken leg, I would have her put down!
7

Gothic Rose,

09/02/2008 12:30:25
Well,If nothing else, you have to,admire the,brass-neck
8

Gothic Rose,

09/02/2008 12:32:13
And, though I say it myself, that remark deserves a BOOM,BOOM!:)
9

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 09/02/2008 15:24:30
Gothic Rose

What is a "brass-neck", oh wonderous sage. You sometimes speak in tongues - or Scots or Gaelic or whatever.

That Spencer woman is a gold-digger and her allegations are preposterous. As she enjoys her ill-gotten gains bad karma will get back at her and she MAY be involved in a more serious accident.

This is just laughable if it weren't such a calculated ploy for money by Caroline Spencer.

I wonder if she has a history of frivolous litigation that is entirely without merit. She certainly is "without merit".
10

Gothic Rose,

09/02/2008 16:05:38
Dahling Tim,For Brass-neck think,Cheek,lots of Cheek !!and,not of the "Derriere"sort.Dictionary of Slang may include it.One must broaden ones vocabulory.:)
11

Evia,

09/02/2008 17:24:40
Greedy bitch.
12

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 09/02/2008 19:03:00
I hope there is an appeal and this stupid woman ends up paying costs.

I do not believe that she was injured in a 5mph impact. If she comes to see me, I'll make sure she's actually got the injuries she claims to have, only I won't be using a car travelling at 5mph. I'll be using a cricket bat travelling at about 50mph.

If Sheriff Morrison cares to join her, I'll give him the same treatment. The plus side is that it might knock some sense into the pair of them.

Why should this stupid woman be allowed to do something that might put MY insurance premium up?
13

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 09/02/2008 22:26:33
Did you hear the joke about the Magistrate and the lawyer?
14

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 09/02/2008 22:30:45
Remind me to sue Edinburgh council for whiplash whenever I drive over one of their potholes. Spoiled for choice.
15

Roberta Burns,

09/02/2008 23:29:54
The key words in the case are 'Magistrate' 'Court' 'Sheriff' 'lawyer' 'Compensation'

Looks like there's been a bit in-fighting going on here.
16

deek006,

edinburgh 10/02/2008 06:59:50
scam. they know each other.what about the taxi driver where is his cut,
17

occdoc48,

Chesterfield 10/02/2008 12:56:35
As a medical practitioner who has assessed over three hundred alleged whiplash-type injuries, I am appalled that compensation has been awarded to this woman solely on the basis of what she says. Where is the medical evidence for the damage she is supposed to have suffered? Any one of us can say we have a sore neck and tingling after any sort of incident at all, but it does not mean that it is true. Sounds to me that the decision was based on who this woman was, rather than any objective evidence. What a rort!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.