Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


We need a heavy tax on chocolate to fight obesity, says doctor

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 March 2009
CHOCOLATE should be taxed in the same way as alcohol to tackle the obesity crisis, Scottish doctors will be told next week.

Dr David Walker, a Lanarkshire GP, will warn many people eat their entire daily calorie requirement in chocolate, on top of their normal meals, raising rates of obesity and diabetes.

He said increasing the price of products containing choc
olate would help reduce consumption and bring in more money which could be used by the NHS to deal with the health problems caused by obesity.

The British Medical Association's Scottish local medical committee conference in Clydebank will next week hear appeals for politicians to take a chocolate tax seriously if they want to improve the health of the nation.

Dr Walker said the UK faced a "diabetic time bomb". The past 15 years had seen a doubling in cases of type 2 diabetes, which is linked to being overweight, as well as an increase in illnesses linked to obesity, he said.

"One of the major causes of that has got to be chocolate. The quantities of chocolate being consumed now come into the same realm as alcohol, and all that has been said about the damage that is causing."

Dr Walker, who works in Airdrie, said chocolate was seen as a treat in the past. But now, he said, people were addicted to chocolate and eating it daily.

He said that a 1lb box of chocolates contained 2,500 calories – the recommended daily calorie intake for a man – and could easily be eaten by someone sitting watching TV. Large bars of chocolate, containing around 1,250 calories, are being eaten by people after their lunch, the GP added. Another concern is chocolate being given to babies and children, said Dr Walker.

"With the best intentions, parents and grandparents will pop a chocolate button into a baby's mouth in the first two or three months. The baby smiles and everyone is happy.

"But babies and young children are on their way to being addicted to chocolate before they can even walk."

Dr Walker said the government should look at defining products with certain levels of chocolate in them and tax them extra. For example, this could mean increasing the price by between 10 and 20 per cent, or even higher, he said.

However, Julian Hunt, of the Food and Drink Federation, said: "Introducing regressive taxes on the foods that consumers love would result only in lighter wallets, not smaller waists – particularly as we already have to pay VAT on all our chocolate purchases."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 March 2009 9:39 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Obesity
 
1

Forward not Back,

05/03/2009 00:19:43
Yep, great idea! Then a massive protest not seen the Suffragettes will occur once a month as women demand their period fix!
2

FTH22inarow,

05/03/2009 00:27:29
smoking, drinking and now chocolate, for gods sake Doctors should treat and not be heardv from, have you read the advice they gave out in the middle ages, in 100 years the so called advice they give now could seem just as stupid. again I detect wee free religious freakery behind this.
3

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 05/03/2009 01:23:20

FOR GOD'S SAKE!! INDEED #2,

THE LOONIES ARE ON THE LOOSE!!

'STICK YOUR TAX AND MARS BAR, UP WHERE THE SUN DON'T SHINE!

And that IS putting it politely!

I'll give you friggen "Chocholate Tax" Alright!!


4

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 05/03/2009 01:29:38



NEXT!, THEY WILL BE WANTING TO "TAX" THE AIR WE BREATH!

BUT!!, I Told you all this,...

..."GIVE THEM AN INCH AND THEY WILL WANT A MILE"

The will all get a few Miles, up their rears, if they come out with anymore Stupidities!!


5

Andy Pandy,

Loanhead 05/03/2009 07:05:22
There's a simple solution here.

Tax Fat People.

They'd pay more for their shopping, travel etc. Nobody else would be penalised for their own lack of willpower and when they cant afford chocolate or cakes then they get thin.

What's the bet some politician will pick this up and run with it??
6

Unimpressed one,

05/03/2009 07:56:29
A tax on 'unhealthy' foods, in theory, could be a good thing if the money raised then went straight back out again in the form of direct subsidies to offset the price of fresh fruit and vegetables. But it would never happen.
7

Dave From Barra,

Western Isles 05/03/2009 07:59:33
Lets get everybody fit and healthy so they can be worked longer. Is that it?

Surely it can't be, lets get everybody fit and healthy so they can enjoy a longer, healthier retirement?

Or, lets get everybody fit and healthy to reduce the strain on the NHS? Nah, that would put all these doctors and R&D scientists out of work.

What is the under lying reason to get everybody fit and healthy?
8

Gdgy,

05/03/2009 08:18:59
Who cares if stupid fat people want to make themselves iller?

We should just tell them that if they get above a BMI of (say) 35 then they'll have to get their medical treatment privately - no cost to the taxpayers, let them eat themselves sick...
9

Dave From Barra,

Western Isles 05/03/2009 08:35:31
"Those of us veggies who neither smoke nor drink, but do exercise regularly should not have to pay the sickness bills of others."

Says it all really about this country. A most definate "F_kc you, I'm alright Jack".

Fortunately that always comes back to haunt them, especially when old age related diseases kick in.
10

stephjaybee,

wales 05/03/2009 09:16:56
it's sugar that's the problem. an addictive substance that has slowly found it's way into just about every food product and because of it's addictive nature ensures millions eat c**p. sugar should have a health warning just like fags. all food with added sugar should have a health warning too, a proper health warning with images if necessary. sugar sugar sugar - get rid
11

The Ayrshire Bard,

05/03/2009 09:22:07
I confess to having the deadful Scottish sweet tooth and happily eat a Crunchie, Mars Bar or similar every evening. The wrong side of 70, 6' tall, 12 stone and 34" waist, so far from being obese. Shame about my teeth though!
12

Brodric,

05/03/2009 09:33:11
This is one of the most ridiculous ideas I have ever heard. And its shocking how people are so ready to jump on the bandwagon and attack/condemn/demonise others.

Chocolate is not the real culprit. It might be a symptom of an unhealthy diet in some people, but a bigger fault in diabetes is the highly processed foods that people are eating. Too many fried foods, sausages with high fat and little actual good protein, paninis and bread rolls and pizzas - eaten in front of the TV - and a sedentary lifestyle - in place of veg and fruit and exercise/sport.

Demonising one thing might make us think that we are combatting the problem, but it is not so.

As for Dr David Walker, I reckon he wanted to see his name in the headlines.
13

,

05/03/2009 09:42:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

JG,

Fife 05/03/2009 09:47:39
If men were better at s e x, women wouldn't need chocolate!
15

Horrible Cankers @Cyber Shebeen,

05/03/2009 10:01:02
17..Hi JG...eh sorry doll...cant agree with you on that one...although it would be a good idea for them to polish up their act while we munch on....

I agree with the comments made at 15...people just do not know what they are eating and are happy to live in ignorance...some of the ingredients on processed food packaging reads like a laboratory's shopping list...perhaps if someone took their food from them...broke it down into its basic composition and laid it out on a table they would then understand that what they are eating is not food that the body needs...but chemicals that the producers need you to keep buying in order to line their pockets...aside from that..soft drinks?...the scourge of Scotland...a nation of juice junkies that consume vast quantities of fizzy and sweet liquid chemicals that rot your guts (cause ulcers) and decay your teeth...and we love it...and the diet equivalent?...aspartame?? what the hell is that doing to your body...I'm sure that particular sugar substitute is banned in some countrys..I have seen adults giving wee babies in prams...younger than 2..sips of coca cola...I have seen one mother give it to her baby in a baby bottle!!

SUGAR is the problem..not chocolate!
16

Curious Yellow,

Edinburgh 05/03/2009 10:02:14
I thought that one of the things that set humans apart was the ability to make choices?

So, some things are good for you, some are bad for you, surely it's your choice?

We have far too much of this nannying going on.
17

Highland Mist,

05/03/2009 10:33:35
MOST GPs know little or nothing about nutrition other than the basic facts. To come out an pick on CHOCOLATE is showing absolute ignorance of teh facts and it is as stupid as the Governments recent proposals to try to ban Buckfast to cure our social problems.

Does Dr Walker know what the glycemic index of chocolate is? Does Dr Walker know the difference between different types of chocolate? Does Dr Walker really believe that stopping people eat chocolate will cure social obesity and diabetes II ?

Most obese people have an addiction to carbohydrates and many have addictive personalities. Take away the chocolate and it will be replaced with another drug of choice. Imposing a tax will do nothing.

The NHS places great emphasis on dealing with, trying to understand and curing anorexia and bulimia. Yet the greatest weight problem in this country and the one that is costing the NHS a fortune is the obesity pandemic. Statements like this from GPs merely emphasises their ignorance fo the scale and nature of the problem. And putting up the price of chocolate, or even fast food takeaways loaded with hydrogenated and saturated fat and salt, is not going to solve it.

18

Highland Mist,

05/03/2009 10:44:22
DR WALKER (and I know you will be reading this):

I'm off to have a small bar of organic dark chocolate as my mid morning snack. I suggest that you go and research into the benefits of eating 100g of dark chocolate each day to lower blood pressure and metabolise sugar. The flavanols are also responsible for neutralised potentially cell-damaging substances known as oxygen free radicals. Do you know anything about this? Do you propose to tax this as well? Yet ANOTHER MIDDLE CLASS TAX THAT WILL DO NOTHING TO SOLVE THE PROBLEMS CAUSED BY HIDDEN ADDICTION IN THE COMMUNITY.

GO AND RESEARCH THIS AND SHOW MORE understanding of how food components influence human physiology and help improve the health of the population instead of coming out with sensationalist nonsense.


19

english charlie,

05/03/2009 12:03:15
The displays in shops make them so tempting, so they should be put under the counter, out of view. Same with cigarettes and booze.
20

Tartan Viking,

05/03/2009 12:34:47
#22 english charlie

Actually, when I look through a window of a supermarket everything is tempting. Maybe we should have everything on sale put under the counter, apart from spinach and pot noodles of course. Nobody buys them so they would be safe to show.
21

sam the god,

05/03/2009 13:51:28
I do not have a problem as I shoot most of my food (no sugar content) it is also very healthy.
22

Adso,

05/03/2009 14:01:08
I'm surprised that most seem against this idea. The idea of a fat tax has seemed an obvious one for years. The government clearly needs new and fairer ways of raising taxes. Smokers and drivers are pretty much taxed out - what next?

I don't agree that chocolate alone should be taxed. Tax all of the junk foods out there. Good revenue stream for the government - the only people it will really hurt are those that eat more junk food than they should. For the rest of us it would only be a small tax occasionally.
23

Midnight,

Edinburgh 05/03/2009 14:48:38
I cannot believe how judgemental many of you are about fat people. Derogatory terms, prejudice and finger-pointing won't help folk lose weight. In fact, it might make it worse as depression is a huge cause of weight gain. Plus, you just can't tar all with the same brush. Some larger people have unseen conditions, like hypothyroidism, which cause them to hold weight even if they are in decent shape and eat healthily. So, tell me, how would you judge who is just "fat" and who is large because their body isn't functioning properly? Should those people never be able to buy chocolate (or whatever) so we can feel morally superior to them? Freedom of choice is a great thing. Nobody wants to live in an Orwellian society, but slowly, ideas like this are causing the 1984-ish nightmare to become reality. Scary thought.
24

,

05/03/2009 14:50:16
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
25

,

05/03/2009 14:56:11
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
26

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 05/03/2009 15:00:29
If things keep on going this way, I will expect Scotland in 20 years time to be a nation of enforced non-smoking, non-drinking, vegetarian cyclsts who all live like plebs.

I warned of the dangers of going along with the anti-smoking nazis several years ago. Now look what is happening...

I hope that the lot of you are proud of yourselves.
27

,

05/03/2009 15:16:27
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
28

Calum Crubag,

05/03/2009 15:47:54
I wonder if those against taxes on fags and cac food are also for dole-scroungers? Where's the difference between non-workers living of the backs of taxpayers and fat chainsmoking 4x4 driving jakies living of those of us with a sensible lifestyle that costs the NHS less?

Not saying i agree with more taxes but i don't hear any other solutions. And 'education' aint a magic wand. I knew some 3 or more decades ago that smoking killed. So did my classmates and half of them still chose to take it up. That's their freedom but if it means stealing NHS beds and resources from the rest of us then they can pay for their freedom.
29

Starkravingsane,

Edinburgh 05/03/2009 16:11:34
Shoot me now.
30

Mcsnagpile,

05/03/2009 16:17:42
There should be a butt tax for all transport. Before you pay your fare you put your butt on a sling that sizes and weighs --then pay a proportional extra tax depending on butt to body fat ratio.
31

SandyBottoms,

Edinburgh 05/03/2009 16:32:49
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!! Not my CHOCOLATE!!! You've made sure I can't enjoy a smoke after a nice meal in a restaurant, you've want me to pay through the nose for my pint, DON'T TAKE WHAT LITTLE SENSUAL PLEASURES I HAVE LEFT!!!
32

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 05/03/2009 17:49:34
#30:

Good comments. It's a pity that more people don't realise what is happening all around them and wake up before it's too late.

Things are only going to get much worse until they do.

Several year ago, I used to watch action movies like "Demolition Man" and "Total Recall" and see the environments in which they are set as being contrived. Nowadays, I watch the same movies and see their environments are not too far removed from what we have here and now.

Check out the movies yourself and see what I mean. Look beyond the obvious fictional characters, plot and futuristic technology. Concentrate on the political environment in which they are set. Worrying. Very Worrying.
33

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 05/03/2009 17:52:15
Calum:

"Where's the difference between non-workers living of the backs of taxpayers and fat chainsmoking 4x4 driving jakies..."

Errm... quite a lot actually.

The first group are scroungers, the second are paying more than their fair share of tax. In case you hadn't noticed, tobacco products, petrol and large vehicle road tax are not cheap... More's the pity.
34

Stan Butler,

05/03/2009 18:50:57
#20 Highland Mist

'Most obese people have an addiction to carbohydrates and many have addictive personalities.'


Maybe if they could get themselves addicted to exercise they wouldn't be obese.

35

Itchy,

05/03/2009 18:53:04
This health fascist can sod off.

"11 Rulesbutnotrulers,Federation, not separation 05/03/2009 08:25:05
A high tax on unhealthy foods and drink makes good sense if the monies raised are ploughed back into the NHS to pay the health costs of unhealthy eating and drinking and smoking, etc."

I knew you would support this because you are a loathsome little fascist who hates freedom.

Change your name to Hitler or Mussolini.
36

Horrible Cankers @Cyber Shebeen,

05/03/2009 19:35:13
24...Sam...watch out for slugs in yer lettuce pal...particularly the lead variety...it aint that healthy....
37

radge dug,

05/03/2009 20:25:03
Lets lift all taxes and all laws! Have a free for all. Progress!!
38

Eve,

Scotland 05/03/2009 21:54:53
MMmm Chocolate tastes so good? It also boost my mood when I'm down.

"Dr Walker, who works in Airdrie, said chocolate was seen as a treat in the past. But now, he said, people were addicted to chocolate and eating it daily"

I'm no addicted by the way, I like many people only ate obsen amounts of chocolate when I'm unhappy and when I'm very happy I hardly touch the stuff.

Dr Walker, should leave their crused against the Chocolate thing until the restion is over or nearly over. Unless their willing to prescribe the drugs or do something to raise our hopes instead.

#13 stephjaybee: There is no proff (scientific or other wise)that sugar is adictive. The body naturaly craves sugar, not nessarly confectionary sugar, though. The human body needs a certain amount of glucose to funtion.

Is it Sucrose (in table sugar or invert sugar format)that your suggesting is addicive or Glucose? Cause I'm geussing that you don't think it's Fructose, Galctose, Lactose or Maltose.
39

Tamo,

Montrose 06/03/2009 03:24:53
Doesn't Dr. Walker have anything better to do than make sweeping, anecdotal statements to fan the flames of hysteria? Where is his PROOF that people are actually addicted to chocolate? Where is his proof that obese people are obese because of chocolate? He offers none. He knows he does not have to when there is such virulent hatred of fat people rampant in the world and the government.

You can see some of that hatred in some of the assumptions in these comments. Fat people are not "addicted" to food, anymore than they are "addicted" to air! Thin people also eat chocolate. People of all sizes eat for a variety of reasons and there is no response to food that is unique to fat people. (In other words, for every fat person who's an "emotional eater," there is a thin person who is also an "emotional eater.") Ditto on junk food in general. Not all fat people eat it and not all people who eat it are fat! Ditto, again, on the diseases supposedly "caused" by obesity. Not all people who have those diseases are fat and not all fat people have those diseases!

Here's another thing to blow your minds: Exercise won't necessarily make a person thin. It will improve health - regardless your size - but it might not shrink you. Plenty of fat people actually do exercise, while thin people also contribute to the ranks of couch potatoes. For most people, obesity is not a "lifestyle" or a "choice."

NHS' problems can't be blamed solely on fat people. Further, if a fat person pays the taxes that support NHS, he/she should be as entitled as anyone else to use NHS.

Tell the neo-puritans who want to demonise chocolate to shove it!
40

theteacher112,

Norfolk 11/03/2009 14:40:50
No dancing on Sundays next
41

gerryzm,

devon england 11/03/2009 17:53:58
Chocolate is a good low-calorie food; it's the sugar and fat put into junk "chocolate" that is of low value. In most UK "chocolate" there's so little chocolate that the EU wanted to re-name the bars vegelate. Real chocolate has a minimum of 75% cocoa solids.
42

Antony H,

Blackpool 12/03/2009 20:51:45
Where do I get my cocoa replacement patches? And will they be available on he NHS after visiting a chocolate cessation nurse?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.