Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Was Stonehenge a Neolithic nursing home for Europe's sick and ailing?

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 23 September 2008
DRUIDS, mystics, UFO enthusiasts and even the occasional rock star have converged in awe beneath its arcane structure.
Now, after its eternal mysteries have driven generations of archaeologists round in circles, a lucid new theory has suggested Stonehenge was conceived for a more prosaic purpose – as a Neolithic health centre.

The latest hypothesis surrounding o
ne of the world's best known but least understood landmarks suggests the world heritage site was a precursor to Lourdes.

The claim follows the first dig inside Stonehenge's concentric circles for nearly half a century. The excavation this spring unearthed many fragments of bluestone, accorded healing powers in medieval folklore and literature, and seemingly taken as lucky charms by visitors to Salisbury Plain.

The disclosure justifies the extraordinary feat of Stonehenge's construction, in which bluestone rocks were transported over land and sea from a quarry known as Carn Menyn in Pembrokeshire's Preseli Hills, 150 miles away.

Professor Tim Darvill of Bournemouth University revealed radiocarbon dating suggested the monument was three centuries younger than previous theories suggested, raised in 2300BC.

The date correlates with the grave of the so-called Amesbury Archer, an adult male with a healed head wound and an injured left leg excavated in 2002. With the discovery of an "abnormal number" of other non- native bodies showing signs of serious disease, researchers believe Europe's ill may have came to Stonehenge in search of good health.

"(The stones'] meaning and importance to prehistoric people were sufficiently powerful to warrant the investment of time, effort and resources to move them from the Preseli Hills to the Wessex Downs," Prof Darvill said.

Professor Geoffrey Wainwright, president of the Society of Antiquaries and fellow project leader of the dig alongside Prof Darvill, said a river running through the Preseli Hills had been dammed to create pools for the sick to bathe in. Nearby prehistoric art and burial cairns strengthened the connection between Stonehenge and healing properties.

"The wells of the Preseli Hills were considered to have wonderful healing powers, and that is a good reason why the bluestones were transported," he reasoned.

Few would be so bold as to suggest the latest theory offers a definitive answer to Stonehenge's myriad secrets. Explanations proliferate, not all of them upstanding examples of antiquarian study. They include the creation of the megaliths by giants, and mention of alien spaceship landing pads.

Sagely, Prof Darvill and Prof Wainwright believe the conjecture – the more sensible among it, anyway – can happily co-exist with their own theories.

"Stonehenge probably had more than one purpose, so I have no problem with other people's interpretations," said Prof Wainwright.

English Heritage, the guardian of Stonehenge, agreed to the dig following consent by the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport. Druids also gave their blessings.

A Timewatch documentary on the dig will be screened on BBC2 at 8pm this Saturday.

TIMELINE

3000BC: A large earthwork, or henge, is built

2900BC: Wooden posts erected and later dismantled. Cremation burials placed throughout site

2300BC: Bluestones taken to Stonehenge, followed by Sarsen stones

1901: Landowner Sir Edmond Antrobus fences off the site, charging one shilling admission. Uproar follows

1915: Stonehenge bought by Cecil Chubb at auction for £6,600. He later gives it to the nation

1923: DH Thomas of the Geological Survey discovers the bluestones came from Wales

1978: Skeleton of young male found, with flint arrows wedged in his ribs

1986: Monument becomes World Heritage Site

2002: Discovery of the Amesbury Archer





The full article contains 587 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 22 September 2008 10:04 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Horrible Cankers @Cyber Shebeen,

23/09/2008 00:14:03
Why do so many men kill their children after the marriage or relationship with the mother splits?
2

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta CA: for more WAR VOTE McCain 23/09/2008 04:43:06

Men are weird , they are instinctively a savage beast.
Just look at the WARS they create.

They are also 110% sexually frustrated.

One man one woman is unnatural, for the male of the species.

OK Dude
3

donald,

glasgow 23/09/2008 04:47:21
It was a gathering place for ancient hippies to get stoned.
4

Haggis MacBagpipes,

Central Canada - ex Perth & Glesca 23/09/2008 06:21:51
#3-donald, Glasgow.

What would you consider to be 'ancient'...
"Chuckles" Linskaill, Edinburgh...his age approx.
94-years...would he do that say, 70-years ago?

Or, how about your own age-group, in your 20's during the 1960-70's., would you call that 'Ancient'?
Weed was all the rage back then.
Cheers,
Haggis MacBagpipes™©
5

Cappo Del Monte,

23/09/2008 07:05:53
Who cares its a bunch of rocks
6

Walter Ego,

Durness 23/09/2008 07:17:25
Sick and ailing? Alex Salmond should go there for help.
7

hertscot,

23/09/2008 08:06:53
We are all savage beasts, the very good reason for trying monogamy is the stability of society.
However men and women are genetically programmed to reproduce and as such pass on their genes, this will never change, or if it does tyhe human race will die out.

Monogamy doesn't work for any species.
8

hertscot,

23/09/2008 08:08:18
Re Stonehenge, why did the druids have to give their permission for a dig, they don't own the site and there is no evidence that it was used by them in the past, bloody religion interfering again!
9

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 23/09/2008 08:32:53
Men and women would find Stonehenge useful from a reproduction point of view, getting their rocks off as it were.
10

Lianachan,

HIghlands 23/09/2008 08:37:00
#9 Indeed. The actual, historical druids venerated sacred groves - not stone circles - anyway. The religion of the modern druids is entirely unrelated, and has no historical merit whatsoever.

Anybody who is considering visiting Stonehenge - don't bother. Go to Callanish on the Isle of Lewis instead. Compared to Callanish, Stonehenge has all the artistic merit and ambience of a municipal car park.
11

Lianachan,

Highlands 23/09/2008 08:42:49
#11 & #13 Archeoastronomical theories for standing stones don't generally enjoy much support. The theories of Mike Parker Pearson, which are a bit too complicated to get across here but can be summarised as ritual landscapes, with seperate domains for the living and the dead, are by far the most plausible theories I've read.
12

Boy Wonder,

23/09/2008 08:56:25
New-age archaeology now??? What a load of codswallop!

Considering that the large menhirs are bluestones and were probably shaped to fit in situ after being dragged as huge blocks from the Presceli Hills ... what else would you expect to find but chippings from the work of these early stonemasons?

No mention of several archaeologists disagreeing strongly of this conclusion is there? And there are!

And the Druids had nothing to do with any of the Henges. These monuments were/are preCeltic!
13

Lianachan,

Highlands 23/09/2008 09:32:23
#17 Being used as a calendar is only one theory. One that does not enjoy much support in archaeological (pardon the pun) circles.
14

Tweedmouth,

Coldstream 23/09/2008 09:48:26
"Professor Tim Darvill of Bournemouth University " - says it all really! Bournemouth University??? Glorified town college of education. All this vast balloon of theory has been puffed up based on the findings of some stone chippings from the blue stones - which supposedly were used as 'get well 'Lourdes medals' by sick visitors. Two problems: the stones were 'dressed' on site - so it is entirely consistent that there would be 'stone chips' lying around. Secondly - sick visitors normally take 'good luck' charms home with them - they don't bury them all together at the site of pilgrimage.

This is just some third-rate academic who's wasted a lot of taxpayer's cash on a failed-dig. trying to justify his existence and his research grants - as usual. Get a real job!
15

hertscot,

23/09/2008 09:51:39
Lianachan & Dave from Barra

I recommend a trip to Avebury, a stone circle so large that the village was built inside it, but I would also say a trip to Callanish is more than worthwhile, no matter what their purpose.
16

Lianachan,

Highlands 23/09/2008 10:02:17
#20 Yes, Avebury is pretty impressive - I've been there. I would say that it also lacks the ambience of the Scottish sites, though, due to the landscape and environment it sits in. The inner circles are the same size - pretty much exactly - as the Ring of Brodgar in Orkney.
17

Lianachan,

Highlands 23/09/2008 10:37:08
#22 I'm sure we can agree at least that the stones are amazing. For me, who has visited pretty much every major stone circle and/or arrangement in the UK, they are by far the most impressive. The last time I was there, a few months ago, I went on a Sunday. The vistor centre was closed, and there was absolutely nobody else at the site at all. That, combined with the fact that you're still free to get close to and wander between the stones, meant that I was able to take loads of excellent (and people free) photographs. There aren't many such comparable sites in the UK where you can do that.
18

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 23/09/2008 10:56:55
"Was Stonehenge a Neolithic nursing home for Europe's sick and ailing?"

Very doubtful.
19

Horrible Cankers @Cyber Shebeen,

23/09/2008 11:01:40
2....Thats all very well cannibal but why kill your children after a relationship has ended?...how many times this year so far have we heard of a father killing or attempting to kill his children in this journal alone?

I mean seriously, you would think that they would try to preserve their genes instead of destroy them??...It is not unknown for women to kill their children for a variety of reasons....but normally after a relationship has ended, if the father has custody, they tend to fight for it rather than murder their offspring. Its an interesting issue but I am sure that there is no straightforward answer or is there?
20

Bigwull,

edinburgh 23/09/2008 13:30:18
It was probably built to celebrate Hibernians winning the Scottish Cup
21

jett,

aden 23/09/2008 13:34:49
women are no different from men when it comes to children, this world is made up of many different peoples.
#25 you are an ignorant and sexist and if you don't watch out you could turn funny on it.
22

Horrible Cankers @Cyber Shebeen,

23/09/2008 15:31:02
Whats up mate...dont like people asking why some men kill their children? Lets have your take on it then Freud..come on...Had I asked why some women kill their children would you have come out with the same piffle? Somehow I dont think so...here is a wee article in the times for you to read..

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article1072333.ece
23

Horrible Cankers @Cyber Shebeen,

23/09/2008 15:40:46
This article in the Guardian is interesting too...quite enlightening in fact..

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2006/nov/05/ukcrime.lornamartin
24

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 23/09/2008 16:49:07
28 Horrible Cankers

Women/mothers also kill their children in some kind of gynecological rage but it is not often reported because it is so rare.

But it DOES happen so don't emphasise men killing their children so much, ma chere.
25

Horrible Cankers @Cyber Shebeen,

23/09/2008 17:02:17
Timothy Charles...men kill their children out of sexual jealousy and possession...pre-meditated murder...

I have already stated that some women kill their children at post 25...not for the same reasons that men do...the difference is men carry out the ultimate act in an attempt at ruining the life of their female partner...the majority of these crimes are pre-meditated and are revenge murders....

I am emphasising men killing their children so much, ma chere, because they do...and there are more and more reports of it....I suggest that you read the article in the Guardian..it is food for thought...

Why does it sit uncomfortably with you Timothy Charles...that I am questionning this not so new phenomenon of fathers murdering their offspring?...I find it interesting and would like to understand how a father could murder his child to get at the mother..
26

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 23/09/2008 17:36:54
31 Horrible Cankers

I agree with what you say but just wanted to indicate that mothers kill their own children just as fathers also kill their own children - but apparently for different reasons.

It is still too horrible to contemplate.

I am still wondering how this issue got into this thread since there is no mention of it in the newsitem.
27

Horrible Cankers @Cyber Shebeen,

23/09/2008 17:51:38
32.I brought it into the thread Timothy Charles as commenting on the story re the father who killed his children was not available.
28

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 23/09/2008 19:19:46
Used to look out the window at Stonehenge. Walked round it too. Boring.

Was at the Royal School of Artillery at Larkhill, studying field astronomy at the time.

29

Stonehenge,

Newbury 28/09/2008 23:17:40
Stonehenge theories? .. this is the best and very entertaining!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/may/27/flatpackfurnituresdebt

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.