Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Victim's mother wins first round of Snatch vehicle fight

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 11 July 2009
THE mother of a soldier killed in a roadside attack in Iraq while in a Snatch Land Rover has won the first round of a legal battle for an investigation into the vehicles.
Susan Smith wants to force the government to rethink its decision not to hold a public inquiry into the use of the controversial lightly-armoured vehicles in major conflict situations.

Mrs Smith, of Tamworth, Staffordshire, was given permission to
seek a High Court judicial review relating to past use of the vehicles in Iraq and Afghanistan.

But Mr Justice Mitting refused her leave to challenge a Ministry of Defence decision not to hold an inquiry into present and future deployment of Snatch Land Rovers – a decision he described as "unimpeachable" in the courts.

Mrs Smith's son, Phillip Hewett, 21, a private in the 1st Battalion Staffordshire Regiment, died on 16 July, 2005 in a roadside bomb attack on three armoured Snatch Land Rovers on patrol in the Al Amarah region in south-east Iraq.

Two other soldiers also died in the incident. Pte Hewett, who was driving, died of his wounds at the scene while being given first aid by members of the patrol.

The Snatch Land Rover was originally designed as a cheap and quick way of transporting troops in Northern Ireland. It has been heavily criticised for its inability to protect against roadside bombs following a series of deaths – about 38 in all – in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Mr Justice Mitting said that if a full inquiry was eventually held into past deployment, three issues could be investigated:

• Should different equipment, such as the more heavily armoured Cougar Mastiff, have been procured and deployed in 2005 and 2006?

• If so, could the deaths of some or all of the soldiers have been avoided?

• If so, why was that equipment not procured and deployed?

Mrs Smith, whose case is supported by the families of other soldiers killed in similar incidents, said after the ruling: "I am delighted.

"It is only the first stage, but I am just glad that someone is listening."

It is argued that the MoD knew years before the Iraq war began that the Snatch was out of date and there was a gaping hole in its armoured vehicle capability because of a lack of medium-weight armoured vehicles.





The full article contains 397 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 11 July 2009 12:12 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: British armed forces
 
1

letmein,

paisley 11/07/2009 07:56:37
While our MP's are stealing from us, our army are trying to fight a war with inferior equipment. Their are 9500 troops out their fighting with the same amount of helicopters as they had when there were only 4500 troops. They are not allowed to shoot at the Taliban unless they are shot at, and then they have to ask a non brain for permission to return fire. This is not war it is crazy. There is no enemy as they will not stand up and fight, they are cowards.
2

Dave Case,

12/07/2009 15:07:41
#1 letmein

Agree with you on this one. Many a time, our soldiers are given shoddy equipments in combating terrorists. They should have been provided with the latest version of weaponry and munitions. Ridiculous for the heads of command to demand soldiers to stick to PC. This is war and survival matters.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.