Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Unesco insists Capital must scrap £300m Caltongate scheme

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 06 June 2009
A £300 MILLION development in Edinburgh's historic Old Town has been thrown deeper into chaos after Unesco inspectors demanded council leaders have the whole scheme returned to the drawing board.
Councillors are set to face international condemnation at a world heritage summit in Seville next month after a damning report urged wholescale changes be made to the Caltongate scheme – even though it has received final approval from the Scottish Go
vernment.

The future of the project – which includes a five-star hotel and conference centre on the Royal Mile, more than 200 homes and a cultural quarter – was put in doubt this year when developer Mountgrange went into administration.

Leaked documents obtained by The Scotsman reveal that heritage inspectors are demanding a reprieve for two listed buildings threatened with demolition, the scrapping of a modern building which would have blocked views from Jeffrey Street, and a full review of how the development would impact on views from Calton Hill.

Unesco's report, which the city council received in February, said changes were needed to avoid the development impacting on the "outstanding universal value, authenticity and integrity" of the city's world heritage site.

Although Mountgrange could have resisted any attempt to change the scheme, the fate of the site is now in the hands of the council, as it has retained ownership of land the developer had agreed to buy which is integral to the five-star hotel.

The council is expected to face a major dilemma over the future of the site if Unesco's world heritage committee approves the report's recommendations, as expected. The local authority has had two other major developments called in for public inquiries within the past few months, as well as having to deal with a Unesco investigation triggered last summer.

Referring to Caltongate, Unesco's inspectors recommended the "integration rather than demolition of two listed buildings" and the "total redesign" of a huge part of the development.

Unesco's report will also recommend the creation of a "buffer zone" around the current world heritage site.

The report also states: "There is a need for clear policies in relation to height controls within the world heritage property ... which should be developed on the basis of key views and vistas from within and outside the property."

James Simpson, the Edinburgh-based conservation architect and a leading critic of the Caltongate scheme, said: "It's really up to the council what happens with this development now because of the issues involving site ownership.

"The council could connive with another developer to go ahead with the consented scheme, but I think these recommendations are 100 per cent correct. It would be totally inappropriate for the council to ignore what Unesco has to say about Edinburgh. Now is the time for a bit of reflection and humility."

Sally Richardson, spokeswoman for the Save Our Old Town campaign, which has spent years battling Caltongate, said: "Unesco's report offers a golden opportunity to rethink the whole development."

Jim Lowrie, the city council's planning convener, said: "A decision on the Caltongate scheme has been considered and agreed by the planning committee. We are of course aware of the comments made by Unesco in their draft report and we await the outcome of the World Heritage Committee later this month."





The full article contains 549 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 June 2009 10:18 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Caltongate development
 
1

,

06/06/2009 01:16:34
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

Statsman,

Edinburgh 06/06/2009 01:21:53
Another CEC planning approval found to be inappropriate. Things need to change.
3

Scoop in the City,

06/06/2009 07:27:26
3# Yes that's right, save the WHS - and fill it full of cars.
4

dba,

HAYMARKET 06/06/2009 07:58:31
THREE CHEERS FOR UNESCO - they should REALLY investigate the Architects who seem determined to turn the Athens in the North into physical manifestations of their twoering egoes!

Carltongate was bad enought - now we hold our breath in respect of the SEVENTEEN STOREY development at HAYMARKET.
The views of the locals and the people what actually LIVE in the area ignored by the developers, the architects AND THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT whoare employed to PROTECT gthe fabric of the City.

Everyone seems to forget the scale and value of the fees that these 'demented visionaries'receive - the larger the build - the BIGGER the fees!
5

dba,

HAYMARKET 06/06/2009 08:01:04
The Council have had the report SINCE FEBRUARY... WHAY HAS IT NOT BEEN MADE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC - Come Council YOU ARE SUPPOSEDTO BE (A) ACTING FOR THE CITIZENS AND (B) COMMITTED TO 'OPEN GOIVERNMENT' - When are YOU going to make this report in it's entirety available to thepeople who elected you?
6

Buttress,

06/06/2009 08:24:09
It was not made available to the public as it was not as yet a a public document. It's UNESCO's document, and it is for the Seville meeting this month of the World Heritage Committee.

The 'heritage' tag is only a 'heavy burden' if we sign up to the World Heritage ideal and then ignore our obligations to that.

Also, this scheme should have been referred to UNESCO at an early stage as part of the planning process, and somehow CEC 'forgot' to do that.

Time now for some robust policies to be put in place, both locally and nationally, to protect our World Heritage Sites from rapacious developers, councillors in thrall to them, and planners who seem to be are inept.

And remember all those campaigners who have tirelessly given so much time to trying to save Edinburgh from the rot; possibly a little humility would now be in order, eh, Jim Lowrie? Or even resignation?



7

Buttress,

06/06/2009 08:34:11
33rd session of the Committee
Sevilla, Spain
22 June - 30 June 2009

http://whc.unesco.org/en/sessions/33COM/

Docs are not yet on site, but that'e the committee website.
8

Haymarket,

Edinburgh 06/06/2009 08:34:35
And now we simply have an ugly hole in the ground. The planning decisions made in recent years are dreadful; trams, caltongate and haymarket. Edinburgh is the loser from our weak and poor planning.
9

Buttress,

06/06/2009 08:40:11
There doesn't need to be a hole in the ground; the council is supposed to have a multi thousand pound bond in place from Mountgrange for landscaping the site, in the event of delays. Or has it c*cked that one up as well?
10

GrahamH,

Edinburgh 06/06/2009 08:50:38
This council will risk too much in order to receive 'contributions' to Edinburgh trams. Why should financial demands placed on property developers be allowed to be side tracked into the tram fund?
11

Buttress,

06/06/2009 08:54:33
The trams fund is a different issue; it's also perfectly legal and adopted policy.

12

Buttress,

06/06/2009 09:25:30
However, Coun Lowrie and a few others who were so keen on Caltongate that their behaviour possibly wasn't all that it could be, should read this and reflect:-

http://independentrepublicofthecanongate.blogspot.com/2009/06/london-calling.html

Donald Anderson, where are you now? Ron Hewitt, Chamber of Commerce, who had so much to say in support of Mountgrange's little scheme?




13

Buttress,

06/06/2009 09:41:35
Donald Anderson:-

http://independentrepublicofthecanongate.blogspot.com/2008/02/caltongate-developers-funded-labour.html
14

Buttress,

06/06/2009 09:52:41
And possibly the keenness of Historic Scotland to facilitate Caltongate should not go unrecognised.

There are still unanswered questions about its role in the affair.

"CAN Scottish business learn to love Historic Scotland? Malcolm Cooper, chief inspector of the Scottish Executive's powerful heritage body, might not aspire to love exactly, but he wants developers and wealth creators to know that he is on their side...

...Against this background, Cooper's extending of the hand of co-operation to business has been all the more dramatic. An August meeting, organised by the Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce, at which all of Scotland's housebuilders and property developers were present, the softly-spoken former archeologist raised eyebrows around the table, firstly by the fact that he was prepared to engage in any dialogue with the business community, and then by his assertion that Historic Scotland understood the need to develop the importance of quick decisions and flexible thinking to develop the Edinburgh economy, even to the extent of knocking down old buildings.

Ron Hewitt, chief executive of Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce, said: "Meeting Malcolm and hearing his views has been a breath of fresh air.

"While the business community has been taking forward its plans for the economic development of the city that we believe is necessary for us to compete internationally, he has been helpful in showing us how to ease the planning process in a way that allows that to happen.

"It's hugely encouraging that he is showing an intelligent understanding of how heritage and newbuild can live side by side."

...The most glaring symbol of Cooper's deliberate change of emphasis has been Caltongate, the £200m plan proposed by English developer Mountgrange to convert part of Edinburgh's historic old town. This involves knocking a hole in part of the old tenement streetscape of the Canongate to improve access to a complex containing shops and a five start hotel.

15

Buttress,

06/06/2009 09:53:23
cont.

While the Historic Scotland of popular mythology would have said nyet, nyet, nyet, to what many residents of this neglected quarter of old Edinburgh are bitterly opposed to, Cooper has surprised many by approving the project in principle and making only minor objections to the details..."

http://business.scotsman.com/business/Cooper-has-modern-take-on.2833757.jp


16

noswod,

Honestas 06/06/2009 10:49:23
We must save Carlton Gate from the developers and dumderheeded folk in Edinburghs planning dept. We should see ourselfves as other see us. A lot of uneducated vandals destorying the gates of the Athens of the North. Arise you dour Scots people and save your city.
17

Buttress,

06/06/2009 11:07:35
"even though it has received final approval from the Scottish Government..."

Not really. The government didn't call it in, the final decsion was made by CEC.
18

Seb,

06/06/2009 11:16:12
With planning consent granted and the government declaring no interest, is there any legal way of stopping the development?
19

Seb,

06/06/2009 11:17:07
I'll answer my own question. The CEC can refuse to sell the common good land.
20

Prudence,

06/06/2009 11:32:21
Being born in Exeter, and an archeologist , you would think that Malcolm Cooper ,having spent 10 years with English heritage, would know all about Unesco's world heritage site at Stonehenge and the essential buffer zone around it , unlike Callinish in Lewis where its now impossible to view the stones from a distance without despoilation from fences , telegraph posts and modern bungalows. Whats good for Stonehenge is good for Edinburgh.
21

Buttress,

06/06/2009 11:44:15
The sale of the Common Good Land should indeed not happen for a project such as this.

The CEC can also be persuaded that in order to sell the Canongate Venture, if that is still considered desirable, it should put it on the open market, and not enter into an exclusive and probably unlawful deal with a single developer. There could be a community trust buy out, possibly in conjunction with Building Preservation Trusts already in existence. For a sensible use, grants could be available for repair. The building was sound and viable as it was before the occupants were given notice to quit to facilitate the Caltongate development (or make Mountgrange richer) All very murky.

Also, the Drivers Jonas report should be looked at again, by someone with some knowledge of planning policy and law for the protection of listed buildings.

It falls very short in its conclusions. I suppose it depends on the brief it was set, of course...
22

Buttress,

06/06/2009 11:47:18
Also:-

Swinney admits planning system has failings



Published Date: 04 June 2009
By BRIAN FERGUSON

SCOTTISH finance secretary John Swinney yesterday admitted that having to call in major developments for public inquiries meant the planning system was partly failing.

He said the government wanted to "minimise" the use of inquiries by trying to ensure disputes were resolved early.

Mr Swinney also insisted the government would respect the views of Unesco's world's heritage committee when it rules on major developments in Edinburgh next month – saying the body had a "fundamental" part to play in the planning process.

23

Buttress,

06/06/2009 11:50:14
Also, I believe that CEC still owns some of the tenements. As Mountgrange hasn't paid the promised rent, they should be 'evicted'!

With a huge waiting list for housing, it's a disgrace that these are standing empty.



24

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 06/06/2009 11:50:15
Thank heavens for UNESCO, but why was this catastrophic scheme given planning permission in the first place. The people who make these decisions should not be trusted with our heritage.
25

Buttress,

06/06/2009 12:02:15
The people who pushed this, in the main, have moved on. Trevor Davies, Donald Anderson, (see above), the fomer chief planner Alan Henderson...

Historic Scotland should be 'cosidering its position' and carrying out some investigation into why it went along with this so readily, although had it not no doubt it would have been vilified as 'stifling economic progress'.

Members of the Chamber of Commerce should be baying for the blood of its Chief Executive Ron Hewitt.

...but yes, those councillors who voted for it, especially Lowrie, really do need to consider their postions.
26

Buttress,

06/06/2009 12:04:37
There is more, oh so much more, here:-

www.eh8.org.uk

and maybe the Caltongate campaigners, who have worked tirelessly on this, will now be given the voice which Mountgrange and the council refused them.

27

Buttress,

06/06/2009 12:08:10
Also read:-

http://www.eh8.org.uk/the_canongate_project
28

Buttress,

06/06/2009 12:10:24
And I see that the good folk of the Cnaongate have updayed the blog this morning:-

http://independentrepublicofthecanongate.blogspot.com/2009/06/caltongate-must-be-scapped-insist.html
29

Unimpressed one,

06/06/2009 12:15:46
Ordinary people are sick and tired of the city being designed to put tourists first and council tax payers a poor second.

What is sadly lacking in Edinburgh is an undercover all year market selling everything from fresh produce to bric-a-brac, in addition to weekly car boot sales. Greenside is not suitable for this and should be seen only as a stopgap measure until something permanent can be built. The old bus depot demonstrated the need for a centralised local market. It would attract sorely needed custom 7 days a week and could even double as an exhibition centre of sorts.
30

Buttress,

06/06/2009 12:31:16
And you might find tourists love it too! Not to be knocked, many make a living from tourism, and tourism helps keep many historic buildings going and encourages them to be kept in sound repair.

Look at the popularity of markets in London. Sadly local authorities allowed some of those to be 'redeveloped' (Spitalfield ruined, Greenwich pencilled for redevelopment) but possibly, in the current economic climte, there is regret for that.

Borough food market is wonderful. Many others thriving.
31

Pilrig,

Livingston 06/06/2009 12:46:25
Save Yuppiegate - no to Unesco ! : )
32

Pilrig,

Livingston 06/06/2009 12:47:25
Trevor Davies, who's he givin the finger to nowadays ?
33

Buttress,

06/06/2009 12:52:29
You couldn't make it up:-

http://edinburghnews.scotsman.com/latestnews/Maverick-former-planning-chief-lands.3858435.jp

Oh dear though, all his schmoozing to the UNESCO mission at the cooncil reception about how great Caltongate would be (was he invited? Did he gatecrash??) didn't do a lot of good!

34

Prudence,

06/06/2009 12:52:52
On entering any world heritage site , you step back in time. Its a wonderful feeling, connecting with different layers of history . The four Unesco world heritage sites of Scotland's past are St. Kilda, Old and New Town Edinburgh , neolithic Orkney and New Lanark.Todays architectural variance surrounding Callinish deprives the stones of their resonance in time. This is what will happen if Unesco's report on Edinburgh is ignored. Respecting another's viewpoint , doesn't necessarily mean that you agree with them.
35

Buttress,

06/06/2009 12:54:08
An extract from that article:-

'Maverick' former planning chief lands job as professor



« Previous « PreviousNext » Next »View GalleryPublished Date: 08 March 2008
By Adrian Mather
HE oversaw some of Edinburgh's biggest and most controversial developments during his four-year reign as the city's planning convener.

And now former councillor Trevor Davies is to pass on his knowledge of urban design as an honorary professor at Glasgow University.

Under his new role, Professor Davies will give occasional lectures and seminars, as well as helping supervise postADVERTISEMENT-graduate students at the department of urban studies.

He will also work alongside university colleagues on two special projects designed to educate chief executives and senior council staff in the art of "city-making" and to encourage residents and businesses to improve the areas they live in.

Professor Davies, who was head of the Capital's planning committee before failing to win re-election last year, said he was looking forward to passing on his experience.

"It is a great honour to be asked by Glasgow University to take up this post," he said.

"It will enable me to share with others – and particularly with students who are considering planning as a career – some of the many lessons that I learnt leading the planning and development of the capital city...


36

Buttress,

06/06/2009 12:56:22
Sorry - missed off this part :-)


"Since failing to win re-election to the council, Prof Davies, a former TV producer who helped bring Hamish Macbeth to the small screen, has been involved as a freelance planning consultant and speaker..."

Explains a great deal, eh?
37

Buttress,

06/06/2009 13:02:30
And here's Wee Donald Anderson, still at PPS where his pals at Mountgrange got him a job when the electorate rejected him:-

"PPS hires good people.
They're bright, they're excellent communicators and they care about the quality of the work they do for you. You can expect senior PPS staff to be among the very best in the business. You can also expect them to be actively involved in your account..."

"Director Donald Anderson
Donald is a political animal at heart and was Leader of Edinburgh Council for many years. But he combines political skills- an innate understanding of how an issue will play politically and of what matters to politicians and communities - with an ability to step back from the partisan and to see the big picture. He's a thoughtful and effective communicator."

Smirk.

http://www.ppsgroup.co.uk/#scotland
38

Buttress,

06/06/2009 13:09:03
Prudence, the Antonine Wall is also a WHS, and yes, it is time that ALL were appropriately and properly protected and presented.

39

Willie Mor,

06/06/2009 13:42:14
Very interesting to find out that the developer proposing this controversial development gave a donation of £4,000 to the Labour Party.

Also interesting to learn that the developer also uses the services of a PR company that employs the ex Labour council reader Donald Anderson.

In all of the current circumstances I couldn't possibly think that there is any corruption in any of this.

Labour do not do corruption, they are the honest servants of the people, and we should all get used to that.

Ask Wendy Alexander, Jim Devine, Alisdair Darling, et al. They just don't do corruption! No one gets done, no prosecutions, no guilt, just the odd honest little mistakes.

Moreover, at Westminster, we see a Prime Minister at the top of his game ( so said the NI secretary 5 times in interview on the BBC on Wednesday) and Mr Brown is absolutely correct to refuse to submit to the will of the people and call a general election.

He knows he has a big job to do ending the total and utter financial chaos that the last chancellor of the exchequer delivered when he ended boom and bust.

The little people's problem is that they don't know a good thing when they see it.

Vote Labour, vote for Gordon Brown's prebyterian morals, you know it makes sense!
40

Prudence,

06/06/2009 13:44:29
Buttress, Thank you . Yes. A "mea culpa" ommission. The Antonine Wall WHS status has an fascinating history.
The UK government's nomination of the Antonine Wall for World Heritage status to the international conservation body UNESCO was first officially announced in 2003.It has been backed by the Scottish Government since 2005 and by Scotland's then Culture Minister Patricia Ferguson since 2006.It became the UK's official nomination in late January 2007, and MSPs were called to support the bid anew in May 2007. The Antonine Wall was listed as an extension to the World Heritage Site "Frontiers of the Roman Empire" on 7 July 2008.
Your posting name reminded me the other day of the Hagia Sohia in Istanbul, where the buttresses are so important to its stability , and the thought did pass through my mind that nowadays vertical bracing might be their modern equivalent in tall bildings especially in seismic areas . I expect a 17 story building in Edinburgh is safe enough.
41

dido-bendigo,

Scotland 06/06/2009 14:41:37
Why not ask the bloke who is planning golf courses and a housing estate in Grampian? I'll bet he knows who to talk to when it comes to altering heritage decisions. If 'they' won't sell the land for development, get a compulsory purchase order and throw them off. It's know as modern land clearances. Just take a note of the past history of Scotland!
42

go boil ur heid,

06/06/2009 15:16:47
oh dear i see another round of electical house fires coming up
43

Caora Dubh,

Croit sheasgair 06/06/2009 16:34:17
Developers: Accept that there is no more space for grandiose developments in the heart of the city. New projects there are necessarily going to be small scale.
Use your imagination and site major new hotels elsewhere - e.g. on open land near Queensferry, with spectacular views of the bridges and firth.
Edbgh city council: Recognise that the City is facing a massive problem. Business is being throttled by the need to conserve its architectural heritage. EDINBURGH NOW NEEDS A NEW "NEW TOWN". Edinburgh must have a new city centre, where architects are free to play with ultra-modern designs without impacting on the existing environment. Edinburgh needs a new city centre, where provision has been made for ultramodern services and communications systems even before building starts. I strongly suggest that this new centre is sited somewhere near the Airport in the Sighthill direction, with good connections northwards over the Forth, west to Glasgow, and south to England. It'll also uplift a depressed area. Got it? Good!
44

Prudence,

06/06/2009 17:38:42
#42 Yes , " The Donald " has applied for compulsory purchase orders on land and property at Menie , Aberdeenshire. Its Menie dunes versus Hunter wellies and golf balls. It doesn't come under the same category of world heritage like Iguazu falls in South America , a spectacular semi tropical waterfall area spanning three countries Paraguay , Uruguay and Brazil where logging is not permitted and great pride is taken in its environment and WHS status.
Let us not forget, however, in 1998, senior citizen Vera Coking of Atlantic City in the United States defeated developer Donald Trump, who wanted to buy her house and raze it to make way for a car park to his casino. When she demanded more than $1 million, he took her to court to try to have the house condemned, but the judge ruled that, while compulsorily purchase was permissable in order to provide public services, with the best will in the world, Mr Trump's casino did not fit that particular bill.
45

Rap,

06/06/2009 18:02:53
This "secret" report was somehow made available to the Haymarket inquiry this week and not one of the Council witnesses admitted to having seen it. It was still marked "confidential" the principal planner told the QC.
46

Buttress,

06/06/2009 18:14:27
I gather it was released to only a handful of people, (draft to be responded to by HS on behalf of the government then full report for Seville I think) sworn to silence, but Mr Ferguson had a hotline to UNESCO last November and possibly still has!

http://news.scotsman.com/edinburghplanningissues/Unesco-slams-city-on-Caltongate.4702886.jp

47

Prudence,

06/06/2009 20:47:55
# 45 Its Argentina , Paraguay and Brazil that Igauzu spans. An honest mistake!
48

Buttress,

06/06/2009 21:27:56
'However, planning leader Councillor Jim Lowrie said he was confident ministers would support the council's decision.

"I'm delighted the main elements have been approved, because it sends the message to investors that Edinburgh is not afraid to have modern developments," he said.

When asked how he felt about the level of opposition to the scheme... Cllr Lowrie said: "In five years' time they will have got used to it." '

From:

http://news.scotsman.com/caltongatedevelopment/Caltongate-wins-latest-round-as.3753579.jp
49

Brianwci,

07/06/2009 00:31:26
Caltongate and Haymarket are bold initiatives and if Edinburgh needs anything its bold architectural initiatives after the weak rubbish which has found its way onto Princess Street and of course the mess which is the St James' Centre at the East End.

Third World capitals are full of great new architecture.....does Dubai spring to mind by any chance? And if Edinburgh wants to stay in the tourist race we need more projects like those proposed.

Who knows, even we residents might enjoy them once they are in place......as we will the trams.


50

directaction,

Edinburgh. 07/06/2009 07:34:31
I was at the G20 and the last two climate camps, so were quite a few of my friends. We live in Edinburgh, and we're not at all happy with this or similar plans to demolish areas of Edinburgh's heritage. We live here for a reason: Edinburgh is beautiful.

So far the efforts of s.o.o.t and other campaigners have been fairly effective, and the financial difficulties of the developers themselves will no doubt make it hard for the project to go ahead.

But if it does, and the bulldozers start lining up on the mile, there's going to be protest. And lock-ons, sit ins, etc. Completely non-violent, non destructive, but expensive.

So to the council, and the developers, please. Don't push ahead with these kinds of projects. It really isn't going to be worth the hassle.

We love Edinburgh.
51

Buttress,

07/06/2009 08:21:12
50 For Edinburgh stay in the tourist race it needs to become more like Dubai? What planet is this person on?

The St James' Centre is about to be demolished.

51 - good.
52

Prudence,

07/06/2009 17:35:00
The Edinburgh skyline as viewed from the Botanics is unique , inspirational and to my mind the best .
53

Rap,

08/06/2009 18:37:24
But will have the 17 storey tower as a backdrop I'm afraid. Right behind St Mary's.
54

Buttress,

08/06/2009 21:31:17
No, surely it will not be ever built! :-)
55

Rap,

10/06/2009 16:58:34
I bloody well hope not! Fingers crossed! Now just the nail biting wait. In which time Mr Swinney can ponder the state of the Planning Dept in the city with their recent successes.
56

Buttress,

10/06/2009 18:14:46
If this one gets the go-ahead, then there is no hope.

57

Derek Williams,

Edinburgh 15/06/2009 18:18:14
#50 I agree - up to a point, but I can't see the proposed buildings as being in the class of the best at Dubai. In fact, when I look at old and new side by side, the old built with no-expense-spared love and incredible attenton to detail, the new built solely with the invoice in mind, and beauty irrelevant, I conclude that the great majority new buildings must have been built to be knocked down in about 40 years time, and if they are not knocked down in 40 then they will simply fall over in 50 any way.

I would be a big fan of any new architecture that could equal or exceed the magnificence of Edinburgh's great and historic buildings, but it's just not on the agenda of public funding. The exchequer always assumes the public wants the cheapest, not the most beautiful option and consequently doesn't care about a bequest to posterity of the greatest art of our age.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.