Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


US mortgage market rescue 'no help to UK'

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 September 2008
A MULTI-TRILLION dollar US government move to tackle the cause of the global credit crunch may do little to ease the pressure on British consumers, experts warned yesterday.
The gloomy outlook follows the US Treasury takeover over of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac – the companies that hold nearly half of the country's $12 trillion (£6.8 trillion) mortgages.

The pair are responsible for £2.7 trillion of home loans, but hav
e lost £8 billion in the past year because of the plummeting US housing market, which triggered a downturn in Britain.

Major British banks were forced to write off billions because of their exposure to the struggling US housing market through complex investments since the credit crunch began last year. This forced them to cut mortgage lending.

The US Treasury announcement on Sunday prompted a surge in the financial markets.

The rescue sent some of the UK's biggest banking stocks rocketing to double-digit gains as the move to prop up the pair offered hopes that a further slump in the US housing market might be prevented. HBOS and the Royal Bank of Scotland gained more than 11 per cent.

However, trading on the London Stock Exchange ground to halt for nearly seven hours yesterday after a computer crash, which some linked to the high volume of trading following the move.

There was a widespread welcome for the US action, but economists and analysts doubted when, if at all, it would have an impact in the UK.

Andy Hornby, the chief executive of HBOS, one of Britain's biggest mortgage lenders, said it did not alter his prediction at the weekend that the credit crunch would take 18 months "to play through the system".

Howard Archer, the chief European economist at consultancy Global Insight in London, said it was not the end of the problems plaguing world markets. "Obviously, it brings a bit of confidence and reduces uncertainties, and it's a welcome move. It helps matters, but there are other significant problems.

"European inflation, weak consumer confidence, low investment, falling employment and tight credit were all stoking fears of recession – both on the island and the continent."

David Rosenberg, an economist with Merrill Lynch, said: "We find it difficult to see how it is bullish that the heavy hand of government is needed to such an extent. The takeover of Fannie and Freddie is actually a testament to how broken the financial system is."

Christopher Low, chief economist at FTN Financial, said: "This euphoria might fade, because Fannie and Freddie are not the problem. Their woes are a symptom of a worldwide contraction in credit that may not be cured by the decision."

However, Alistair Darling, the Chancellor, was upbeat. "

I think it will help, for this reason – the American economy is by far the largest in the world and it affects our economy and it affects every other economy. And anything that is done in America that will help build confidence must help."





The full article contains 502 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 09 September 2008 12:43 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Credit Crunch
 
1

Willie Macleod,

Wick 09/09/2008 00:58:12
Fannie and Freddie have been Nationalised

Realism and pragnatisim at work.

Not a command economy or Socialism.

Ford public ownership comes in handy now and again.
2

Willie Macleod,

Wick 09/09/2008 01:00:17
#2 Pragmatism
3

Scullion,

Canada 09/09/2008 01:13:15
These are actually the names of these Federal Mortgage holding companies.
Their existence and their federal bailout plus the sub-prime mortgage puts paid to the idea of unfettered free markets being the answer to all our ills.
Sorry Adam Smith and Milton Friedman.
4

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 09/09/2008 04:13:32
Onwards PRAGNATICS !

I think it's a good name for a new school of economics embracing nationalisation, realism, public ownership and that word, foreign to the Havard Business and Chicago schools ruling Westminster and Whitehall, called ethics.

Part of Caithness was previously nationalised by the UK as it clearly was in our national interest to be capable of dropping a nuclear bomb on Moscow. Useful by-products were Thurso College, houses and a swimming pool. Decommissioning this will cost £billions and take decades. The UK Gov will have to borrow this from private banks and pay the interest so taxes must rise which doesn't seem a happy thing. Unless you're a decommissioning CEO or banker.

Caithnesians owning Caithness? The public would get a dividend on every Kw of wind energy and tidal power to come. Scotland (not being a nation) missed the boat on setting up an oil fund. It's early days in renewables.
A common good fund could finance the College to research new technologies and provide low interest loans for local business startups. As the public now own the land, you could lease a suitable location to build a house (employing local tradesmen) without paying a ridiculous amount to a property developer or landlord. And heat it with your electricity div. and worthwhile things like heat pumps (also made locally).

Another idea is a regional exchange currency. Say from Sutherland to Shetland. Most costs are for skill and labour. Money earned in REC units could be exchanged for locally produced food, drink, clothes, materials and working time which is what you need to live.
5

Itchy,

09/09/2008 06:42:18
#4"Their existence and their federal bailout plus the sub-prime mortgage puts paid to the idea of unfettered free markets being the answer to all our ills.
Sorry Adam Smith and Milton Friedman."

Wrong. It does nothing of the kind.

It proves that politicians think there is such a thing as a free lunch. This measure will not benefit the American economy in any way and the idea that it disproves the free market is just illogical tripe.
6

Fairfax,

09/09/2008 13:20:52
Scullion (3): "Their existence and their federal bailout plus the sub-prime mortgage puts paid to the idea of unfettered free markets being the answer to all our ills."

I'm not a dogmatic free-marketeer, but that certainly is not how I would view this. Freddie and Fannie were government sponsored enterprises, with the result that their bonds have historically traded at very near the Treasury bond rate, despite their being technically private companies. This quasi-public sector status helped to fuel the credit boom in the US, for otherwise their bonds would have been priced at a level consummate with their risk. Thus the conclusion here is that a quasi-public sector involvement in the wholesale credit market can promote further problems. Indeed, one of the US Treasury's stated aims (see their website) is that F and F will be managed differently, an implicit acknowledgment that their low-priced bonds helped drive the credit boom.
7

ebbi,

spain 09/09/2008 15:59:05
the outcome must be fun to watch when the whole thing starts to collapse again. free market is dead and no one can save it.long live socialism.
8

Beachcomber,

Edinburgh 09/09/2008 18:55:04
Fannie & Freddie - US side of the coin

"Modern Debt Peonage"?

Economic Democracy Is Turning Into a Financial Oligarchy

Mike Whitney: An Interview With Michael Hudson

The best that this weekend's bailout can do is to postpone the losses on bad mortgage debts. But this is a far cry from actually restoring the ability of debtors to pay.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20709.htm

====

Why The Fannie-Freddie Bailout Will Fail

By Martin D. Weiss, Ph.D.

With yesterday's announcement of the most massive federal bailout of all time, it's now official: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two largest mortgage lenders on Earth, are bankrupt.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20707.htm

===

US Waves Goodbye to Prosperity and Democracy

By David Hirst

If you were wondering what all the flag-waving at the Republican convention has been about, it is now clear. Americans are waving goodbye to the prosperity the nation has enjoyed since the Great Depression and a final goodbye to democracy. But while preparation for the most important decision made in the nation's post-depression financial history towered above the conventions, I don't think the fate of Freddie and Fannie and the remaining government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) was mentioned during either convention.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20708.htm

9

Fairfax,

09/09/2008 19:20:05
JoeMcT (8): "Fairfax, the lending policies of the banks themselves have created a huge credit/debt bubble which is now deflating rapidly."

That's certainly true. I'm not attributing all blame to Freddie/Fannie at all, merely pointing out that their quasi-public sector status, and their consequent ability to sell bonds at near Treasury rates, helped to fuel the credit bubble.
10

Itchy,

09/09/2008 19:33:29
#9 Long live Socialism?

What kind of Socialism? National or Soviet?

How is the free market involved in this btw?

This is a story of state interventionism and you are illiterate.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.