Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


UK population will be biggest in EU

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 August 2008
BRITAIN'S population is set to become the largest in Europe by 2060 – outstripping Germany, the current leader, according to the latest statistics, released yesterday.
But the study also reveals that the European Union is facing a pensions timebomb, with predictions that there will be only two people of working age paying the pension and healthcare costs for each person aged 65 or over when the population reaches
506 million by 2060.

Britain will overtake Germany by 2060 to become the EU's most populous state with 76.6 million citizens, up from 61 million at present. Germany's population is expected to fall to 70.7 million by 2060 from 82 million in January this year.

The strongest population growth will be in Cyprus, up 66 per cent by 2060; Ireland, up 53 per cent; Luxembourg, up 52 per cent; and Britain, up 25 per cent.

At present there are four people of working age for each person aged 65 or over.

Policymakers are bracing for a big rise in the number of pensioners, putting a strain on public finances as people live longer and there are proportionately fewer people of working age, even with net migration.

Amelia Torres, a European Commission spokeswoman, said: "The ageing of the population is one of the major challenges Europe must face with climate change and globalisation.

"The EU must make sure public finances are sound and people should work longer. We want to carry on with structural reform, in particular reform of pensions systems and for healthcare expenditure with the view to ensuring these systems are sustainable in the long term."

Professor David Bell, of the department of economics at the University of Stirling, said the figures raised serious questions about how EU resources should be distributed.

"There has always been a big debate over how different countries pool their resources. The UK has always resisted this strongly, but might well be expected to contribute more. However, I think the UK government would resist this.

"Economists have been aware of these issues for some time. While the UK and Scotland's birth rates have been going up … there are various reasons why this is not really happening elsewhere.

"Mediterranean countries have been suffering from chronically low birth rates for years. The increasing number of women in the workforce and the falling birth rate has been a factor since the end of the baby boom. It could take decades, if ever, to overturn. And even if it were possible, the loss of women's earnings would have repercussions for these countries' economies."

Prof Bell, who contributed to Lord Sutherland's review of the free personal and nursing care policy in Scotland, said while people should be saving for their old age, the government needed to be more proactive.

"The government needs to reassure people that they and their investments will be protected.

"Until recently people thought they were being sensible by investing their money in the stock market or in housing, but this has been shown to have huge variability.

"The government needs to examine experimental projects overseas, such as those in the US for pensioners where a range of facilities are provided on-site. However, they also need to be asking themselves what can be done for pensioners who can't afford this type of housing."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 August 2008 9:11 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 27/08/2008 00:46:46

What does one expect, when one becomes a, 'Dustbin',?

We don't want or make Babies anymore, how sad!

But our import industry makes up for this.

Being 'selfish' eventually destroys a Nation!

Others will soon take advantage for what we flung away!
2

Edward,

27/08/2008 00:49:43
Will the Scotsman hold this on file until 2060, so we can return to comment on it. Either it will be true, or just a load of Horlicks. Either way many of use born before 1970 will be long dead by then
3

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 27/08/2008 01:04:41

"Long Time Dead", indeed Edward @#2, and we will have left NO Future generations!

But 'Hey' that Plasma TV, and Mercedes Benz, will do us well 6feet under!

While the Polish and others, from lands afar have better values in sight, values that will go on and on!

While our 'Values' are in the breakers yard and recycling bin!
4

somerferg,

perth 27/08/2008 01:41:43
So the upshot of the article is what exactly?? That by the time I and many others retire there will be no money to pay for our 'pensions' well quelle surprise - we already knew this. Funny thing is I can fairly well guarantee that all the fat cat politicians and business leaders will have ample pensions as they have spent the last umpteen years insuring that the rest of us have to work like dogs to have even the possibility of a pittance when we retire while they have lined their pockets very well thank you.

And for your info Charlie regarding the population decline - this has NOTHING to do with women being selfish and not wanting to have children - rather smaller or no family has more to do with economic necessity not plasma TVs just the faint possibility of one day paying of the huge mortgage needed because of the over inflated housing market courtesy of greedy b2stard estate agents. Enough said.
5

Tom in Belmont,

Belmont 27/08/2008 02:09:38
Please take all such forecasts with a grain of salt. I read a graph in the 1965 Atlas of the British Isles that forecast your population at 125 million in 2025. If it's true, however, with a larger population Britain would have enhanced political and economic power. That plus the Industrial REvolution made the British Empire.
6

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 27/08/2008 02:29:30

Yes! we will all being flying the Polish Flag very soon!

NO Excuses somerferg @#4!

I Speak the Truth! you make Excuses!

If the Poles can do it, WHY NOT US!
7

Scythia,

27/08/2008 05:02:24
The article dispels the lie that mass immigration would
solve the "pension timebomb", it will make no difference.
8

The Daleks,

Longmen 27/08/2008 06:11:07
Sorting the problems out isn't rocket science.

1. Stop mass immigration into the EU. This poses the greatest threat to our continued existence.

2. Encourage European parents to produce a sustainable/viable population through a range of measures, such as payments for each child, and free daycare.

3. Allow people to continue working for as long as they wish to. A person of 65 may have seemed ancient by the standards of 1908, but seems relatively young by the standards of 2008.

If we don't address the above, then it won't be too long before we are tacking "stan" onto the end of our various European countries names.

The time really has come to put those fiddles away!
9

Jim A,

27/08/2008 07:10:05
This is assuming there will still be populations in 2060, the way the world is now.
10

eric,

27/08/2008 07:25:04
I go Free bank!
11

Climate change is a fraud,

27/08/2008 07:35:03
"UK population will be biggest in EU"

Thanks to uncontrolled immigration. We won't have these probems once we've left the EU.

VOTE UKIP in the Glenrothes by-election.

Lib-Lab-SNP-Con all support the EU.

VOTE UKIP for a real alternative!
12

Boy Wonder,

27/08/2008 07:57:06
I read #13 and only realised it wasn't Chuckles when I looked at the name-bar twice!

At least Chuckles has an excuse for his brand of lunacy!
13

common sense voice,

27/08/2008 08:53:13
anyone know about the "oldie muslims" habits over collecting pension money etc...

after a lifetime of dodging paying taxes, I bet u they are fast at taking anything they can....

14

JoeMiddleton,

Edinburgh 27/08/2008 10:19:29
#14

If you love Thatcherite policies then you could vote Labour or Conservative because there is no difference. Salmond said accurately that the Scottish people hated Thatcher's social policies even more than her economic policies. He didn't support her economic policies and the SNP have governed to the left while in power.

That's why they have abolished tuition fees. If you want to tell blatant lies that's up to you, but it won't get you any votes.
15

JoeMiddleton,

Edinburgh 27/08/2008 10:22:16
Such predictions are meaningless because nothing stays the same. Scotland and Wales leaving Britain (which could happen within the next few years) would reduce the population by 8 million for a start. Would NI hang on to England or join the rest of Ireland? Who knows but either way that could be a factor as well.
16

Mikey,

27/08/2008 10:55:49
Don'y know if Norn Irn would join England. Just hope they don't join Scotland!
17

Ugly George,

Edinburgh 27/08/2008 11:31:03
18 Joe Middleton
I don't think that Wales is going to leave the UK in the next few years. In fact, unless things have changed recently, I don't even think that is Plaid Cymru policy -their policy is more power. Even if Scotland does leave the UK there will still be considerable movement of population back and forwards so the effect of rising population would be felt all over.
I agree though that predictions can be meaningless because of changes. Much of the recent rise in population has been caused by immigration as a relatively buoyant economy has provided employment for immigrants (especially from Eastern Europe.) However if the economy falters then these opportunities will be less and immigration will decline.
18

Incandescent,

27/08/2008 13:23:17
Right, Charles! Enough! Will you PLEASE, PLEASE give us a break from your constant prattling about babies/children/youth. Also, pull yourself together and drop the contrived, "zany" (but ultimately just annoying) punctuation - it only makes your posts harder to read.
19

Horrible Cankers @Cyber Shebeen,

27/08/2008 13:30:32
1...Charles come on...think of all the people who have had kids and did not really want them...wee "Accidents" that resulted in unloved unwanted children roaming the streets learning how to mug....think of the crime rate in Britain...youth crime...a lot of people out there aint fit to be parents and their selfish acts have led to the unloved becoming the unloveable...

I do not want children, never have done...why should I purpously bring another life into the world when it is not wanted by me?....to do so would be selfish. Children are to be cherished, not seen as another notch on the bedpost of the catholic/muslim/general population......

I have known too many people with children that they dont care for...brought them into the world because it was expected of them, required even. People who are living on state support should be thinking seriously about the number of children they have, why become a parent many times over when you cannot financially support your child? Why bring a child up in poverty? It is harder for children brought up like this to break out of the cycle of poverty that some parents lock them into...they become, in effect, expectant that the state will continue to support them, even should they become parents....

This is not China, fortunately...but children need to be loved....not born to pump up the population.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.