Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


UK deserves more bang for its buck as minister hints at a British Nasa

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 July 2009
THE government is considering setting up a British version of Nasa, the American space agency which is currently celebrating the 40th anniversary of the Moon landing.
After decades in which successive British governments have considered human spaceflight an expensive distraction, the science minister, Lord Drayson yesterday refused to rule out the creation a British Nasa.

The government is now looking at re-or
ganising its space policy, which, according to Lord Drayson, required a "much higher profile". The 40th anniversary of the Moon landing in 1969 has sparked new interest in space travel among a new generation, he said.

Asked to rule out a dedicated space agency in the future, Lord Drayson said: "Well, we are looking at the way in which we are organised in managing space, getting better co-ordination across departments – so watch this space. We are going to look at whether or not we need to change the way we organise our space policy to address the valid criticisms of better co-ordination across departments."

The promise of a new policy comes just months after a British test-pilot in the Army Air Corps was accepted into the European Space Agency's Astronaut Corps.

Timothy Peake, 37, from Chichester, a major in the Army Air Corps, was one of six new names unveiled in May, and among the most surprising as successive British governments have preferred to fund robotic exploration instead of human spaceflight.

Britain, however, took the lead in an attempt to explore Mars when, in 2003, the British landing spacecraft, Beagle 2 formed part of the European Space Agency's Mars Express mission. The craft was expected to touch down on Mars in December 2003 but all contact was lost six days before its scheduled entry into the atmosphere.

Lord Drayson also insisted that Britain get more "bang for the buck" from its £783 million five-year funding for the European Space Agency. The peer claimed space research was going to be "increasingly important" in the future, particularly in the fields of climate change. He said the £6 billion UK space industry was a "hidden gem" responsible for innovations used in everyday life.

His goal was to "make British space policy and the leadership we have in space much higher-profile".

He added: "This is an industry that employs 20,000 people, creates a £6 billion contribution to the UK economy but it is not very well understood. We want to raise the profile because we believe that space research and the technology that supports that is going to be increasingly important in the future."

But Lord Drayson conceded that this would cost money: "It is an industry which requires us to invest for the long term but the benefits are worth it. Understanding from space what's going on on our planet is central to addressing the biggest challenge the whole world is facing, climate change, rising sea levels."

He added: "We are the fourth largest contributor to the European Space Agency – that is right. We are not going to increase our funding... but we have got to get more bang for the buck from the money we are putting in."

He said he wanted to see a "clear sense" of the priorities for the industry and have a "clear plan" for the next 20 years.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 13 July 2009 12:30 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Fifi la Bonbon,

13/07/2009 02:22:02
What is the Nationalist Party position on Space, I wonder? Do they want Scotland to have its own Scottish Space Agency, or do they think Space is a waste of space?

I'm genuinely interested and I can't find their Space policy on the internet.
2

donald,

glasgow 13/07/2009 06:55:34
Just another junket for Labour Cooncillors?

Where are the Labour CND vote crunchers the noo?
3

donald,

glasgow 13/07/2009 06:57:48
Engerland could not afford a big dipper,or to invade the Isle of Wight, without Scottish oil, whisky duties, other resources resources including Scottish cannfodder.
4

Phil C,

13/07/2009 08:21:29
"After decades in which successive British governments have considered human spaceflight an expensive distraction, the science minister, Lord Drayson yesterday refused to rule out the creation a British Nasa."

The government is looking for a cheap distraction, just talk. Of corse they might spend £millions on it before ditching it, as usual. What a lot of hogwash this all is. Get these eejits out!
5

Jardine,

Uckfield 13/07/2009 08:28:01
"What is the Nationalist Party position on Space, I wonder?"

Easy. Its head up its axxx.

Scotland on its own could not afford a meaningful space programme.
6

Unimpressed one,

13/07/2009 08:51:54
The EU will put a stop to this one, probably by invoking the "working at heights" directive or the 40 hour rule.
7

Melly,

Dunblane 13/07/2009 09:01:32
#1 and 5. What stupid remarks. Scotland will have similar space programs to Norway, Denmark and others around Europe. Scotland already contributes as part of the UK, pathetic as it is, and I have no doubt will continue to do so.
8

It's life but not as we know it,

The Oort Clouds 13/07/2009 09:14:10
This would be the same Labour government that recently slashed spending on several key EU space projects like the latest telescopes leaving us out-of-pocket (we'd paid millions already) and our scientists out of the loop? Real joined up thinking.
9

For Scotlands Future,

Vote for the SNP 13/07/2009 10:47:45
With the IMF saying that the UK is heading down the tubes if it doesn't curtail it's spending, this is just crazy. The US is having to review it's space programs. No doubt Russia is doing the same, and I bet China is in the same boat. But what do we get from Westminster - lets have our own space program.

Well, if we need monkeys to send up, no need to look further than the Parliamentary Labour party.
10

Rob Royston,

Bishopbriggs 13/07/2009 11:14:04
Travel to Space? I didn't know the UK was so advanced, then again I do more mundane travelling.

Why not travel the A82 at Loch Lomond, stop at the trafic lights and admire the cars, coaches and trucks coming the other way. Maybe we could use a space rocket to blow a tunnel through the rocks. Maybe another tunnel from Strathspey to the Great Glen, it's amazing the progress this type of spending could lead to.
11

For Scotlands Future,

Vote for the SNP 13/07/2009 11:54:59
The UK under various Westminster governments whose horizon has been, and will only ever be the next election, decided to do the opposite of the US and Kennedy's famous "We choose to go to the Moon" speach in 1962.

"We choose NOT to go to the moon and NOT to do the other things, not because the decision is a hard thing, but because it is easy, because that goal would cost a lot of money and might lose us votes, because that challenge is one we are willing NOT to accept, one we are willing to postpone, and one which we intend to lose"

Afterall, Britain couldn't afford to build Nuclear Submarines AND have a Space Program - just like now.
12

John JP,

13/07/2009 17:59:59
Maybe the Grand Central station the think tank came up with at a price of 25 billion is really the launch pad. So that's why its so expensive lol.
13

letsdoit,

istanbul 13/07/2009 18:15:00
For the 40th anniversary of moonland, there is an interesting video at the site below

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdaBwh20nIk

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.