Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


T in the Park

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Tycoon pledges £50 million to uplifting idea for heart of city



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 November 2008
OVER the past 30 years, Sir Ian Wood has transformed his family's fishing business into a giant of the North Sea oil industry, making him the second-richest man in Scotland in the process.
As his personal fortune has grown to an estimated £890 million, the head of the Aberdeen-based Wood Group has seen Union Street – once the bustling centre of the city – sadly fade from its glory days as one of the busiest shopping centres in the cou
ntry.

But yesterday, in an act of astonishing altruism, and with echoes of the great philanthropists of the Victorian era, Sir Ian pledged £50 million of his fortune to create a new "beating heart" of the Granite City.

His bold vision is to create a new city-centre square above the valley containing Union Terrace Gardens, the Denburn dual carriageway and the main Aberdeen-Inverness rail line.

Sir Ian said his aim was to transform the five-acre site into a square that would be a combination of a grand Italian piazza and a miniature version of New York's Central Park.

He said: "The goal is to give Aberdeen a vibrant new heart to reflect both the success of the region and its position as a leading northern European city.

"This development is of significant regional, national and international importance and will be a clear statement of Scotland's ambition in the energy industry worldwide.

"And it will be very important in ensuring Aberdeen and Scotland secure our place as one of the major energy capitals of the eastern hemisphere, as North Sea activity winds down in ten or 20 years' time."

Sir Ian's plan for a new civic square is the fourth scheme to be suggested for the site.

The tycoon, who was born and bred in the city, said the idea of raising Union Terrace Gardens to become a street-level, city-centre square had first been mooted in the late 1980s.

He said: "From a personal perspective, I consider the failure of Grampian Enterprise to achieve the backing and financial funds to achieve this in the early Nineties to be my biggest failure as its first chairman, and that has always bothered me.

"Added to this is my conviction that the North Sea oil era, certainly the most economically rewarding in our city's history, should make its mark and contribute to some major transformational change in our city's core fabric."

Sir Ian also stressed that he was expecting "significant" contributions to be made by both the public and private sectors, including North Sea oil companies based in the city.

Alex Salmond, the First Minister, said it was a "concept of huge ambition – a plan that would create new heart for this great city".

He went on: "Aberdeen is a world-class energy centre, perhaps second only to Houston as a centre of energy expertise. It is vital the city has a heart and centre of the calibre which fits that international status. I think it is even more necessary than it normally is, in tough economic times, to have visions that transcend the current environment."

He said of Sir Ian's £50 million offer: "It stands in the best possible examples of the tradition of Scottish philanthropy. It is an extraordinary commitment."

But there was a blunt warning that plans already approved to allow the Peacock Visual Arts to build a centre in Union Terrace Garden could be destroyed by Sir Ian's scheme. Sir Ian is insisting that the arts centre should be relocated and incorporated within the civic square and built to a different design.

Lindsay Gordon, the art gallery director, said: "It really puts the whole project in jeopardy."

A feasibility study into the city square is expected to take at least four months, and a final decision on the project will not be made until next December.

How our philanthropists give their cash away

• SIR TOM HUNTER: The property tycoon and richest man in Scotland said last year he would give his £1 billion fortune to charity. Due to the economic downturn, he now has £750 million. He plans on giving it to his charity, the Hunter Foundation, which invests in educational projects in the developing world.

• JK ROWLING: The Harry Potter author founded the Children's High Level Group, giving millions to help children in eastern Europe. She has also donated money to the Volant Charitable Trust, multiple sclerosis charities, Edinburgh University and Médecins Sans Frontières.

• ANN GLOAG: Stagecoach's co-founder supports the health care charity Mercy Ships, and in May she launched the Freedom from Fistula Foundation, aimed at helping pregnant women in Africa.

• CAROL HOGEL: Raised in Chicago, she came to Edinburgh 30 years ago and founded the Dunard Fund, which has donated more than £20 million to Scottish arts projects in the past two decades.

• SIR TOM FARMER: The Kwik-Fit founder has been a major donor to the National Galleries of Scotland.





The full article contains 836 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 November 2008 12:30 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

danielrober,

12/11/2008 00:48:54
Good man.
2

W Smith,

Middle East 12/11/2008 02:13:30
Compared to the Scottish Parliament building that cost ten times as much, this is great news - at no cost to the taxpayer.

Well done Sir Ian!
3

Kate,

Zurich 12/11/2008 07:24:38
Let's hope he does not let the city council faff around with it!

A brilliant gesture by Sir Ian Wood!
4

GraniteCity,

12/11/2008 08:20:42
Whilst I applaud Sir Ian for this ambitious plan I wish he had put the same effort into giving us a radical and striking design for his new HQ which will be built on Riverside Drive one of the main arteries into the city from the south and at a site which is seen from many vantage points. From what I have seen its just another square glass and concrete 'oil company' HQ building that we are all too familiar with in Abz. Here was a chance to build something with an imaginative, radical and striking design. Shame.
5

Richard Taylor,

Aberdeen 12/11/2008 08:38:37
Cannot make up my mind about this. Should we keep the Gdns as a sunken oasis in the city ctre, or raise it, landscape over the Denburn & have car parks etc underneath? And what about the Peacock Arts project?

Not sure. Maybe Sir Ian's money could rather be spent cleaning up the increasingly grimy buildings in the city, which could be done with a clean up (esp Bridge St).
6

57vintage,

Bridge of Don 12/11/2008 08:53:42
I think we should see the plans first. That's a helluva lot of hard core to fill that hole.

BBC Scotland last night highlighted the fact that "A dual carriageway and railway run alongside the park".

Duuuuuuuh - the railway has run along there since the late 19th century which is why generations of Aberdeen children grew upo calling it "the trainie park".

I hate to think of this facility being concreted over.
7

Sandra Paterson,

Aberdeen 12/11/2008 09:13:35
2..At no cost to the taxpayer. hmm. This is a quote from todays P&J.

Plans for the five-acre site – which could spell the end for Peacock Visual Arts’ proposed £13million centre in the gardens – would require “significant” public and private-sector funding, in addition to Sir Ian’s £50million.

His offer is subject to conditions requiring a street-level square that covers the Denburn rail route and nearby roads.

The project must also secure public-sector funding and get general approval from Aberdeen City Council and the people of the north-east.
8

overton,

balmedie 12/11/2008 09:16:41
One thing is guaranteed here and that is as soon as any low quality, low life, local councillors get involved the whole idea and enthusiasm behind it will be destroyed and and the pre-project planning involved will be will be extended to a timescale that will effectively wreck the proposal in its entirety.

Thanks for the idea Mr Wood but I think you will need to take over Aberdeen City Council to make it work.
9

mobocaster,

Aberdeen 12/11/2008 09:49:44
This sounds awfly like an old plan from the 80s come back to haunt us?

The current Peacock proposal goes a very long way to deal with many of the problems surrounding the gardens, without greatly altering the character of the place, which gives Aberdeen one of its best known vistas. eg:

http://www.aspectapartments.com/images/aberdeen_hmt.jpg
http://images.world66.com/un/io/n_/union_terrace_gard_galleryfull

We also have two traditional central spaces - The Castlegate & the Green.

Castlegate:
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/81/245039939_455bf44474_o.jpg

Which despite various initiatives over the years remain underused - Partly because the weather makes them unattractive for large parts of the year. Would "Wood Square" really fare any better?
10

Jo Butler,

Aberdeen 12/11/2008 10:30:01
This sounds like a vanity project at best, and most likely an aggressive move to grab some prime retail space.
If Sir Ian is serious about wanting to reinvigorate Aberdeen, for a fraction of the cost he could save some of the charities and schools affected by the city councils gross financial mismanagement under Kate Dean.
For a further £4 million he could secure the future of the new arts centre project which is certain to revitalize the stunning but underused gardens.
As anyone with an understanding of modern urban planning will tell you, you do not improve a city by creating more dead space, but by employing creative thinking to develop facilities and activities that can exist within them... and that doesn't mean another dozen mobile phone shops.
11

57vintage,

Bridge of Don 12/11/2008 12:18:39
It's a beautiful natural amphitheatre as it is, but many are put off using it because of the number of society's rejects who frequent it. Much better use could be made of the space immediately below street level at Union Terrace - small businesses/retail stalls etc using the generous space there, perhaps.

It seems that Wood was in charge of GEL when the idea was first mooted 20 years ago, so one assumes it must have been a pet project which he's been unable to let go.

Let's consider it by all means, but I'd rather see Castlegate and the space created once St Nicholas House comes down utilised properly.
12

Jock Wilson,

12/11/2008 13:01:27
Union Terrace Gardens as a public space would be different from the Castlegate and the Green, in that it would be a proper green space in the centre of the town.

At the moment, nobody uses the gardens, on account of the number of drop outs who hang out there but more on account of the fact that for most of the year the sunken area receives little sunlight and is perishingly cold.

Sir Ian's plan is audacious and although it would reduce the grandeur of the Union Street Bridge and the sense of plunging crags, it would create an area extending from Union Terrace all the way up to Marischal College, via Schoolhill,comprising several fine looking buildings, that would be the envy of many cities.
13

M L Milne,

Cove Bay, Aberdeen 12/11/2008 13:11:07
20 years too late, Sir Ian! The think-tank Aberdeen Beyond 2000 came up with this idea in the 80's and in the 90's it was put forward as a Millennium project. But we have moved on and the innovative proposal for the Peacock Contemporary Arts Centre is well on the way to becoming a reality. It retains the gardens whilst linking street level to the the open space. It will people into the gardens for a purpose - brilliant!
Let's not go back to a "mock-continental" piazza - we would lose the openness, the sweeping view from Union Bridge to HMT, and have a paved over flat area with overpriced street cafes.
Scottish Enterprise could spend their money on something better than yet another feasibility study - the last one will do. Just bring the figures up to date and we will find that £50M will not go very far. And please do not delay the Peacock proposal it is at a critical stage and this unrealistic red herring might destroy it.
14

Jock Wilson,

12/11/2008 13:27:32
The idea was ahead of its time. That's all.

Nor would it be a 'mock continental piazza' as you put it, but a green space more in line with a mini Central Park with the opportunity for people to disport themselves away from the tyranny of traffic. At the moment they choose not to which speaks volumes for the current use of space.

You obviously carry a torch for the Peacock Centre and certainly Aberdeen is crying out for an arts centre to complement HMT. But this should not detract from the attractiveness of this project which could transform the heart of the city.
15

mobocaster,

Aberdeen 12/11/2008 13:33:22
Yes, this is the old scheme from the mid-80s reborn. Wood was also using the same artist's impression that first saw the light of day in 1986.

No question that the gardens would benifit from some creative thought but it is beginning to look that this scheme could use a bit of modernising input.

Peacock are also very well on the way to realising all the reqired funding. Whilst this is back to square one for feasability etc.
16

mobocaster,

Aberdeen 12/11/2008 13:35:22
Admittedly it has been a long time since I gave it any thought but I don't remember a great deal of green space in the old plans - In fact, the open & (in the Abdn context) blasted nature of the space was a worry even back then.
17

mobocaster,

Aberdeen 12/11/2008 13:41:33
I should also add that Wood was the chairman of Aberdeen Beyond 2000 - Who first mooted this scheme
18

Jock Wilson,

12/11/2008 13:51:29
If Sir Ian himself references Central Park then probably he has in mind greenery, to a greater or lesser degree.

At the moment we have a deep green recess plunged in stygian gloom for most of the year.

Aberdeen has a great history of destroying its architectural heritage and showing no imagination in addressing the pressures of city development. Maybe this time.
19

mobocaster,

Aberdeen 12/11/2008 13:58:03
I think it would probably be lesser - once the weather has taken its toll anyway. Look at the attempt to green-up the beach a few years back, which is looking pretty peely-wally now.

Am I right in remembering that the mature trees currently in UTG are the remainder of the stocket Forest? Mind you, I also remember reading that the slope used to be used as drying/bleaching greens for the old mills in the area.
20

Jock Wilson,

12/11/2008 14:56:08
Mobocastor,

It was a bleaching green. In the 'Granite Mile' (D Morgan) you will find a rare photograph of the Denburn with blankets and the like stretched out in the sun.

Aberdeen's topography is quite remarkable and you begin to understand the vision and 'can do' of the citizens of the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Since 1950 or thereabouts the City has suffered from a succession of pygmies who either subscribe to 'ding it doon' or 'dinna change onything' The city is ripe for regeneration.
21

mobocaster,

Aberdeen 12/11/2008 15:23:40
Yes, that is the image, but not the book I remember - It must be published somewhere else. Fenton Wyness perhaps?

Yes, which raises another point. There is a vast amount of undeveloped space in the structures beneath the city's streets. Only a few hints of the scale of those works are visible today Rather than filling-in the obvious natural gaps that were left open for a purpose, bringing that into meaningful use would maybe be an architectural/planning challenge of a much higher order?

Also remember that that vision was not without cost & the raising of Union st itself was part of the solution when the city found itself bankrupt for the best part of a decade in the wake of the New Streets Act.
22

Jock Wilson,

12/11/2008 15:38:41
If I recall the project went bankrupt because they could fill up Union Street with suitable tenants at the outset. However, a temporary blip did not invalidate the vision that created one of the most dazzling thoroughfares of its time anywhere in Europe.

All of the great cities have a public space. Indeed the cities can be defined and represented in the public imagination by such spaces.

At the moment there is a graveyard and a draughty space at the bottom of Union Street, that could and should be more elegant than it is.

The open spaces once afforded great views to the north and the south of Union Street Bridge. They have long since gone and nothing would be lost by attempting to integrate the current deep and rather unprepossessing gully that serves only to separate parts of the city.
23

mobocaster,

Aberdeen 12/11/2008 15:59:20
Maybe but part of the current problem is that the council rarely stage any events & activities there now.

Till what, the late 90's/early 90s, there was something going on down there nearly every week of the year, except in the depth of winter.

On the rare occasions they stage anything today, people do still turn-out in quantity.

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1209/1055711811_60dde21a80_b.jpg

This is the last one I was at & I'll agree there were a few problems with access but the gardens were pretty full that day.
24

Caora Dubh,

Croit sheasgair 12/11/2008 18:15:03
I have a soft spot for Aberdeen, and I'd like many more people to visit and explore it properly. Of course it's on the wrong side of Scotland but it is still a beautiful city that has an enormous amount to offer. It is that wonderful size that allows a city to be extremely accessible and offer a wide choice of entertainment and shops, without being so big that it has become impersonal. Aberdonians are really warm people; there is great "connectivity". Gigs galore - there is live music to suit every taste.
I'm not sure about Union Terrace Gardens. I think Carmine should have the last say - the Scottish Italian chap who runs that delightful little restaurant on the opposite side of Union Terrace from that awful statue of Price Albert at the corner of the Gardens. Carmine's has been there as long as I've known Aberdeen, and I've come to think of him as the proprietor of the area. (Great food at a good price!)
They could do something spectacular with the square of course, but I'd like to OPEN the heart of Aberdeen, and not turn it into a sterile shopping mall. A piazza would be nice, especially if greenery is included, but a mall or a nondescript steel-framed building would be awful.
25

Jock Wilson,

12/11/2008 20:22:07
24,

You state "I think Carmine should have the last say"

The plan is to build a huge piazza not a huge pizza.
26

Richard Taylor,

Aberdeen 14/11/2008 12:08:10
Mama Mia!

I totally agree with the comments alluding to previous architectural vandalism in the 50/60s. eg. St. Nick Hs, multi storey behind Castlegate, & the line of shops on the corner of Union St/Huntly St, where the closed Sofa Workshop is - which in years gone by, used a splendid granite building. Arguably the worst case of commercial vandalism of all.

So we have to be careful if the design of any new project if it moves forward. But how many projects in Aberdeen have never seen the light of day after being mooted? Lost count of the number of plans that subsequently gather dust.
27

Richard Taylor,

Aberdeen 14/11/2008 12:09:28
Just re-read #26 - not my best grammatically! Hope you understood my sentiments anyway! :-)

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.