Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Friday, 5th December 2008

Haggis Hunt is now on!

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Travellers set to face rail disruption as negotiations break down



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 October 2008
TENS of thousands of Scottish rail commuters face four days of significant disruption starting today after peace talks in the signallers' dispute collapsed.

Nearly 450 staff are due to walk out for 24 hours at noon, bringing much of the network ou
tside the Central Belt to a standstill.

The stoppage – which is due to be repeated at noon on Thursday – comes despite the intervention yesterday of Alex Salmond in an attempt to get Network Rail and the Rail Maritime and Transport union (RMT) back to the talks at Acas.

A Scottish Government spokesman said: "We are extremely disappointed that the RMT and Network Rail management have failed to resolve the issue.

"The First Minister has been in contact with both sides this afternoon to encourage them to get back round the table and continue talks so as to avoid unnecessary disruption to passengers and services."

The dispute, which has been dragging on since last year, centres on working rosters. A previous strike was staged in March last year.

Both sides started separate talks with Acas in Glasgow on Friday, which resumed yesterday in Perth, but they broke down at lunchtime. The two sides had not met face to face.

First ScotRail trains will be severely affected, with no services running north of Perth or in the south west of Scotland during the stoppage.

Routes including the main line between Edinburgh and Glasgow will see the last trains at 6pm. The news sparked a furious response from passenger groups.

Robert Samson, the Scotland manager of Passenger Focus, the official watchdog, said: "This will cause massive inconvenience to passengers which will be very frustrating.

"The two strikes effectively mean four days of disruption. We urge both parties to get back round the table to resolve the dispute."

David McLetchie, the Scottish Conservatives' chief whip, said last night: "The RMT has a history of militancy, which is reflected in today's developments. These strikes are one of the reasons why people are so hesitant about getting out of their cars and using trains – they undermine all our efforts to improve public transport and promote a greener Scotland."

David Simpson, Network Rail route director for Scotland, said he was "bitterly disappointed" that the strike would go ahead.

He said the talks had broken up because the RMT had demanded that attending missed safety assessments should be optional rather than compulsory.

Mr Simpson said that despite repeated requests over the last four months, the union had also failed to provide any valid examples to substantiate its claims that Network Rail had "abused rostering principles".

He said the RMT's other previously stated reason for a strike – that progression should be based on seniority – was a practice phased out some 15 years ago, "and under today's employment law, was most likely illegal". Mr Simpson said: "We have prepared a contingency train service which aims to reduce the impact on passengers as far as possible."

However, the RMT said Network Rail wanted the right to change rosters at short notice without agreement.

Bob Crow, its general secretary, said that because of the firm's refusal to negotiate, the planned strike action would go now ahead today.

He said: "Network Rail is blatantly trying to unilaterally rewrite agreements without consulting the workforce."

Mr Crow said RMT signallers and signals supervisors in Scotland had voted by a margin of more than two-to-one for strike action over the breakdown in industrial relations, which centred on agreements on rostering and transfers.

The union is also due to introduce an overtime ban for signallers from today.

Mary Grant, the managing director of First ScotRail, said: "We are disappointed the dispute has not been resolved and apologise to all who will be affected by a strike outwith our control."

Reduced capacity and frequency on most routes

FIRST ScotRail services will start winding down after this morning's rush hour in preparation for the signallers' 24-hour stoppage from noon.

The train operator said there would be reduced frequency and capacity on those routes where services are being provided.

Contingency plans include replacement bus services on some long-distance routes, such as between Edinburgh and Glasgow and Aberdeen and Inverness.

However, First ScotRail warned passengers that these would be limited by the number of buses available.

The main Edinburgh-Glasgow line will see trains halved in frequency to half-hourly, with the last service leaving each city at 6pm. They will make more stops than normal, so journey times are also likely to be increased.

Many other routes will see fewer trains and services ending by early evening, or mid-evening around Glasgow.

No trains will run on the Glasgow-Oban/Mallaig line, and those north of Perth, during the stoppage.

Sleeper services between Aberdeen, Inverness, Fort William, Edinburgh and London will not run tonight or Thursday night, with the Glasgow-London service the only one operating.

Most National Express East Coast services between London King's Cross and Edinburgh will run, but some will terminate at Berwick-on-Tweed, with a bus connection to and from Edinburgh.

There will also be some changes to Virgin Trains and CrossCountry services.

Bus and coach operators, such as Stagecoach, have said they will have extra vehicles on standby on major routes to cope with additional demand from rail passengers.

Stagecoach said these would include Edinburgh-Glasgow, Fife-Edinburgh, Ayrshire-Glasgow and Stonehaven-Aberdeen, where there had been high demand during previous rail disruption.

Season-ticket holders and those wishing to cancel their travel plans will be offered refunds.



The full article contains 940 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 October 2008 1:06 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: ScotRail , The railways
 
1

youngbuck,

kirkcaldy 07/10/2008 06:38:22
Why intervene, when the dispute will only drive more business the way of Stagecoach? You've got to keep your big donors happy, after all.
2

WKKB,

07/10/2008 09:39:12
Looks like someone will have a valid excuse for being late to or absent from work this week.
3

carrottop,

Dumfries 07/10/2008 09:46:23
Why doesnt anyone comment on the reason for the strike or, like me, cant they understand what its all about.
Reminds me of the arguments we used to have as schoolchildren as to who was running a playground game of football, its my game ... not its not its mine ... is not ... your claimed ... come on then ...
Bring back the belt for these immature adults please.
4

Alan B,

07/10/2008 09:57:04
Given the mess of the economy at the moment this is the last thing we need at the moment. It is a complete shambles.

Also given that this strike has been known for a while why has the scotsman ignored it and why is the reporting with so little depth.

Why when network rail is a uk nationalised company is the strike only effecting Scotland?

Trade unions always seem too willing to turn to strike action without seeing the implications to others.
5

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 07/10/2008 10:15:16
Stand by for a load of crashes on the road for stupid reasons when those who belong on trains try to drive around instead.
6

The_Doctor,

07/10/2008 10:53:39
The militant leadership of the RMT have led their members into this strike over, essentially, nothing. This strike is over "rostering arrangements", is it Mr Crow?

What nonsense. It is the worst kind of macho-sabre rattling from an ultra-militant leadership. While these dinosaurs pat themselves on the back over their macho tactics, their members lose two days pay, millions of people are inconvenienced - can't get to / from work, can't get home in time to collect their children etc - and hard-pressed businesses will lose millions of pounds - possibly to the extend that they have to shed workers.

And for what? So that Bob Crow can get his name in the papers and feel like a big man once again. Pathetic.
7

vimto,

07/10/2008 11:54:05
This is going well,now salmond has brought scotland to a stand still! hey-ho.
8

Calvinist,

07/10/2008 12:13:22
Solidarity with The RMT!!

The people of Scotland should be 100% behind the signalers as should the Scottish government. The attitude of the employers has been appalling. Working people need to stand up for their rights or submit to exploitation by the money men who have destroyed our economy. Carry on brothers and sisters; wed are behind you!
9

Calvinist,

07/10/2008 12:15:45
#5
Hey Alan you are a bit of a pedant. What is wrong with this sentence?

Is the strike only 'effecting' Scotland?
10

The_Doctor,

07/10/2008 12:29:14
#9

Why should the people of Scotland be behind this dispute? It is over nothing, as far as I can see.

I'm not one to side with management as a matter of course, but this dispute is nonsense. To seriously impact on the lives of millions, and risk damaging an already fragile economy, because you are not happy with being told that safety tests (a fairly important thing for a railway worker to be involved in) should be mandatory, is a serious abuse of trade union action.
11

vimto,

07/10/2008 12:30:37
9. IF THEY DON'T LIKE IT THERE ARE PLENTY THAT DO,IN THE PRESENT CLIMATE THEY ARE LUCKY TO HAVE A JOB!
12

Swiffen,

07/10/2008 12:56:13
#9, I would react to your statement but I suspect you are only trying to wind people up.

As for this mess, what a complete shower the RMT are. In this day and age striking over roistering they should be ashamed. People have enough on their plate with the recession and trying to keep a job without the RMT snidely stirring things up to ensure they keep their fat cat salaries and expense accounts. I bet you Bob Crow et al realised people were drifting away from the Union and came up with this to ensure subs get paid.
13

Alan B,

07/10/2008 13:57:26
#Calvinist

From the bbc news this morning it appears this is only effecting Scotland.

14

vimto,

07/10/2008 14:20:09
It is,LOL!
15

danbob,

07/10/2008 17:50:54
9# I will second you on that brother. Most folk are only jealous because they have not got the balls to defend their rights anymore. Let's all roll over and do what the big bosses tell us. lets all accept cr*p rostering so the big bosses can have a big bonus, 2.5% pay rise when inflation is 4.5% no problem I will accept that, we have to think about the bosses only accepting piffling pay in the hundreds of thousands don't we. It is fantastic that at least we have one union who is capable of punching above it's weight and will do. RMT.
16

,

07/10/2008 19:59:30
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
17

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 08/10/2008 00:45:05
16 - Danblob - What utter nonsense - This is not about standing up for your rights 'brother'. This is about greedy unions try to fleece the state, taxpayer and a reliant public over petty issues.

These ultra-left wing, work shy, slobs are the reason that Britain has virtually no manufacturing base. The only place these parasites can run is into public and 'essential' services as they see it as a dripping roast. People are too frightened to take them on because of the 'disruption' it may cause but with that our cowardly politians are not only making a rod for their own backs they are making one for our backs too.

It is time that Unions were held directly accountable for unwarranted action and made to pay any losses to the business and people that suffer even if it includes docking members pay (who voted for the action) in order to finance the compensation package - either that or just pass a bill banning membership of a union.

Unions are the single most corrupt organisations (just) outside the realms of organised crime (perhaps!?) and they no longer serve a purpose to the common folk apart from the upkeep of their status quo.

It is an utter disgrace that Unions are tolerated when all they are really doing is running a protection racket.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.