Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Too toxic to dismantle in India – so 'ghost ship' heads for Britain

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 February 2009
A FORMER French aircraft carrier deemed too unsafe to be scrapped in India is on its way to Britain to join the ranks of so-called "ghost ships" on the banks of the River Tees.
The vessel, formerly known as the Clemenceau, has begun its journey from Brest in France, to be broken up and recycled at Graythorp, Hartlepool.

It will join seven other decommissioned vessels that crossed the Atlantic and are waiting to be taken apart at the Teesside Reclamation and Recycling Centre, owned by the company Able UK.

The Clemenceau was originally set to be dismantled in India, but revelations that it was loaded with asbestos sparked protests by environmental groups.

French authorities cancelled the dismantling, leading to extensive legal wrangling over the ship's fate. The Teesside company won a contract, reported to be worth up to £3.5 million, to scrap the vessel, and said it would bring jobs and prosperity to the area.

The firm had to apply for an exemption from the Health and Safety Executive so the ship can be dismantled and recycled.

The former warship contains about 700 tonnes of contaminated materials, including asbestos, which is illegal to import into the UK.

The fleet of "ghost ships" at Hartlepool has caused controversy among environmentalists, who fear the asbestos on board will harm the environment and damage the health of workers dismantling the vessel.

The 32,780-tonne ship, which is 225m long and 65m high, will become the largest to be recycled in Europe. Able UK said scrapping the carrier in the UK would bring more than 200 jobs to Teesside when work starts shortly after Easter.

The ship will be towed across the North Sea by a giant tug, and is expected to arrive in Hartlepool this week.

But Friends of the Earth said it had no plans to oppose the carrier being taken to north-east England to be scrapped.

Campaigns director Mike Childs said Able UK had "gone through all the right procedures and all the right environmental safeguards have been put in place".

He said: "We recognise that it is not practical for every country to have its own ship-scrapping facilities." Mr Childs said recycling the metal of the Clemenceau was a positive step, and would help to cut down on damaging mining activity.

He also said breaking down the vessel in Europe was a better option than using ports in India or China, where environmental regulations might not be as rigorous.

"It has got to be scrapped somewhere, and it is good that European ships are being scrapped within Europe," he said.

But local groups remain opposed. Iris Ryder, a member of the organisation Friends of Hartlepool and a candidate for the Green Party in Europe, claimed the Clemenceau was a "floating timebomb".

She said: "It has got toxins in it that will be deposited forever.

"A lot of people do not want Hartlepool turned into a toxic dumping ground for the rest of the world."

PROFILE

NAMED after France's First World War prime minister Georges Clemenceau, the aircraft carrier was launched in 1957 and became the mainstay of the French fleet.

She saw action in the Lebanese civil war of the 1980s and the 1991 Gulf war, and sailed more than a million nautical miles before being withdrawn from active service in 1997.

In 2006, she sailed to India to end her life at the giant Alang ship-breaking yard, but was turned away over concerns she would endanger the lives of Indian scrapyard workers.


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 February 2009 2:05 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

David T.,

04/02/2009 01:49:26
A French warship in Hartlepool?

Lets hope there's no simian's on board!
2

drunken proffet,

Tassy 04/02/2009 02:27:00
I would think that if Iris Ryder had a good look around the older buildings in Hartlepool, she would perhaps find a few thousand tons of the stuff in roofs, insulation etc.as yet undiscovered. The dismantling of those ships by skilled workers using the proper equipment is definitely the way to go.
3

Dragonhead,

Dalian,China 04/02/2009 03:58:23
#2 drunken proffet,Tassy. Your points are taken mate.However, in the down to the bone scrimping and saving UK, in an attempt to extract OBSCENE profits, at least expenditure.Then your "Skilled workers using proper equipment"is a pipe dream.
As for bringing prosperity to the area.It will also bring health hazzards to an area quite close by, which is a seaside resort! Still profit eh?
4

why can't I use my own name???,

musselburgh 04/02/2009 05:31:24
Post #1

Excellent observation! Thx for the early morning chuckle!
Wonder if any pranksters could pull off a stunt upon the ship's arrival??
5

Cappo Del Monte,

04/02/2009 07:15:03
#3

Care to enlighten us on the so called seaside resort near to Hartlepool?
Oh and in our country we do have health and safety and it works very well, so they will be using the correct tools for the job etc.
And you cant really comment on health and safety matters after the last few tremendous balls ups your pathetic communist dictatorship has tried to cover up
6

 sm753,

04/02/2009 07:34:32
A rare bit of good economic news - I suppose it's the literal opposite of "manufacturing".

#3 should note that even Friends of the Earth don't oppose this.

And also that the area around Hartlepool can only be considered a "seaside resort" if you're planning to shoot "Blade Runner II".
7

why can't I use my own name???,

musselburgh 04/02/2009 07:37:53
In fact if that ship got anywhere near the Indian shoreline, there's a good chance a monkey or two got on board. All we need now is a short little war with France, a storm and maybe, just maybe, history will repeat itself!!!
8

daveserviceman,

edinburgh 04/02/2009 08:48:15
It is only going there for a complete 6 year refit to take the euro fighter so we only have to build one more aicraft carrier its a cheap way to get one, it is going to be fitted with deisel electric engines and new steam catipults
9

 sm753,

04/02/2009 10:09:35
9 Er, no. I take it that was humour.
10

Dragonhead,

Dalian,China 04/02/2009 10:48:51
#5 Seaside resort in proximity to Hartlepool, Redcar.Hardly a Blackpool,but still well patronised during the summer. I suppose with the amount of pollution and filth Corus Steel spews into the atmosphere already,in the early hours coating the whole area in a choking cloud of noxious brown smoke, when the slag is tipped,then what is a little more pollution?If the French and Indians won't touch it with a barge pole, that in itself should start the alarm bells ringing.
#sm753 Your smart remark about movies,Redcar sea front was turned into the Normandy beaches for the movie "Atonement" in 2006. My wife and I walked through the props on our morning beach walks whilst visiting the area!
As for British 'elf and safety? Snow falls and the schools are closed!!British Health and Safety has become a world wide sick joke.
A complete refit?That is not what the article states.It is to have 700 tonnes of contaminated material removed, and dumped WHERE???
11

Ron S,

Stockbridge 04/02/2009 11:26:45
#9
But the Eurofighter (Typhoon) doesn't have the capacity to land on an aircraft carrier.
12

Number 6,

Germany 04/02/2009 11:27:26
This is how low the british economy has sunk under Labour. Too dangerous for India but fine for the UK ??????.

700 tonnes of contaminated material ?? where will that go. Has this yard and it's workers any experience in scrapping contaminated ships.?

If everything is safe then fine, but we are talking about a Labour goverment here.

I would not be surprised if they also ship over a few thousand indians to do the dismantling . Why give the jobs to Brits? that would be going against everything
"New" Labour stand for.
13

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 04/02/2009 11:41:37
Having built the chat in the first place, you'd think La France could have found the means to dismantle it. By cheap north african labour in Marseille. But perhaps this would impact the Bouillebasse.

France will own most of England's utilities and Spain already has Scotland's. Onward the UK though burying nuclear waste in Hartlepool could be a step to far. Why not Scotland? Brown-Cameron-Mandelson will take us forward?
14

Cappo Del Monte,

04/02/2009 12:05:06
#11
Ok will concede that one to you regarding Redcar ( although have never been there and dont know the proximity to where this ship will be dismantled )
But you do have to remember that the Brits do have one of the best health and Safety records in Europe, if not the world.
The remark about the french is true, hence I would never want them anywhere near building nuclear power plants in this country as an example
15

gordon'sboomhasbust,

glasgow 04/02/2009 12:35:34
#9 dave
It will be in quite good condition aswell. Certainly won't have seen any fighting. Have to make sure the new engines have forward thrust though as the previous ones will have had reverse thrust only.
16

San-3,

Edinburgh 04/02/2009 13:39:48
"..Exemption from the Health and Safety Exec.." ...Mmmmm...could i apply for such a thing so i can be allowed to lay a 3 foot cable from my desk to a wall socket, without a cable conduit thingy...that i am more likey to trip over anyway since it curls up at the edges. The 'Friends-of-the-earth-but-not-hartlepool' crowd seem far less concerned than they used to be 20 years ago, maybe thier edges have curled a bit too.
17

Fairfax,

04/02/2009 14:14:41
Number 6 (13): "700 tonnes of contaminated material ?? where will that go."

If heated to roughly 1200 Centigrade, asbestos forms silicate glass, and can then be used to form ceramic-like tiles. Of course, if it's just going into landfill, then that's not so good.
18

JT,

04/02/2009 16:46:08
Why cant the french dismantle this ship, why are we once again the world's dumping ground?
19

ThePeter,

Glasgae 04/02/2009 19:00:43
Better not tell the "monkey hangers" that a French ship is in the area

They'll be very upset....
20

BillyC,

Paisley 04/02/2009 19:14:12
At least the French still built real aircraft carriers instead of kiddy-on ones that could only fly harriers. Then again we are now going to build two new real carriers when we are having to mothball most of the smaller ships because we can't afford to run them. Only in Britain!
21

Conan,

Moffat 06/02/2009 02:53:16
Why not just sink the thing at sea - of sell it to the Chinese; they seem dead keen on wasting their money on aircraft carriers.
22

,

18/07/2009 08:00:57
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.