Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


T in the Park

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

The 2,000-year-old 'supertanker'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 June 2008
TWO years ago, a Cypriot diver was stunned by a chance find: hundreds of ancient ceramic wine jars, rising from a featureless expanse of flat, desert-like seabed off Cyprus's southern coast.
Together they formed the shape of a ghostly ship, still submerged beneath the sands. It now appears that what the diver discovered was a supertanker of its time, and the biggest and probably oldest wreck ever found in the island's waters.

The merc
hant vessel may also prove to be one of the best preserved wrecks of the Classical period, from the 5th to 4th centuries BC, archaeologists said yesterday.

"There are very few shipwrecks of Classical times left, so it will be very important for the study of ancient shipbuilding techniques and navigation," said Dr Stella Demesticha, a Greek marine archaeologist and visiting lecturer at the University of Cyprus. "It will add a lot to our knowledge."

The ship was carrying high-quality red wine from a Greek island when it sank a mile-and-a-half off the southern coast of Cyprus in about 350BC, around the time Alexander the Great was born. Within days, several of the large wine jars, or amphorae, were brought to the surface.

Why the vessel sank is a mystery – the result of a collision, storm-tossed seas or perhaps structural failure. There is speculation, however, that similar ships were deliberately scuppered to scam the insurers of the day.

The wine was probably destined for one of the island's renowned ports, Kition or Salamina. Alternately, the ship may have been using Cyprus as a handy stopover on the way to Egypt or the Syrian-Palestinian coast. The island was a well-placed trading hub on the commercial sea routes of antiquity.

The vessel has been named the Mazotos shipwreck after the nearest village, but the wreck's precise location is being kept secret to protect it from treasure hunters. It lies at a depth of 45 metres, meaning divers can only work on the site in 20-minute stretches. Some 500 amphorae were found on the seabed's surface and at least 300 more are believed to lie buried in the sand.

That suggests its cargo was twice the size of Cyprus's most celebrated wreck, the Kyrenia, a 50ft merchant vessel found off the northern coast more than 40 years ago. The Mazotos wreck, then, is probably twice as big as the Kyrenia, which was carrying 385 amphorae.

"It is the largest shipwreck we have found in Cyprus, said Dr Pavlos Flourentzos, the director of Cyprus's Department of Antiquities. "It's approximately 50 years older than the Kyrenia."

Experts say the skills of captains who sailed in the 4th century BC without compasses is often underestimated. The ancients invented geometry, were skilled astronomers and understood the importance of getting goods to market quickly, efficiently and in bulk to turn a good profit.

Nautical experts suggest ancient weather patterns, unafflicted by climate change and global warming, were more predictable and regular than today.

"The ancients possessed an ocean of maritime information," said Glafkos Kariolou, an expert in nautical tourism with the Cyprus Tourism Organisation.

The son of a pioneering Cypriot diver who discovered the Kyrenia, he has skippered a replica of the vessel on several long voyages along shipping routes of antiquity.

"We believe that the ancient mariners knew a lot more about the statistics of weather than we do now," Mr Karioulou said. "They knew meteorology like we know the programme of buses in London. They knew exactly when certain winds would blow, they could predict discrepancies in the weather and knew exactly when to sail."

A team has mapped the site of the Mazotos wreck and the finds lying on the sand and seven amphorae have been found. The wreck itself has yet to be excavated.

But as the amphorae were not dispersed and the ship sank in fine sand on Cyprus's leeward side, archaeologists are hopeful there are wooden remains to be uncovered.

"We have serious reason to believe that the hull of the ship is well-preserved in the sand," Dr Demesticha, who is leading the research, told The Scotsman.

The design of the amphorae from the Mazotos wreck indicates they were from the Greek island of Chios. Wine was a leading product of the north Aegean island in antiquity, exported in distinctive, narrow-bottomed jars with long stems.

Dr Demesticha said the amphorae would have lost their wine almost immediately with the stoppers on their spouts dissolving in the salty water. "Now they contain just seawater and sand," she said.

Wreck's importance to early nautical history

THE Mazotos wreck has been dated to about 350BC, and is one of the few finds dating back to the Classical period, from 475-325BC. It is of potentially enormous importance in tracing early economic and nautical history, shedding light on ancient trade routes and the types and sizes of ships.

Cyprus was an important source of raw materials, particularly timber, and for shipping, at a time of great naval battles such as the Battle of Salamis, in 480BC, when the Greeks defeated a much larger Persian fleet in a battle involving hundreds of ships.

In the aftermath of a revolt against the island's Persian rulers, the city states of Cyprus were divided between pro-Greek and pro-Persian cities.

While archeologists cannot be precise about the dates, they have placed the wreck very close to the birth of Alexander the Great in 356BC.



The full article contains 915 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 06 June 2008 11:04 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

MarkR,

USA 07/06/2008 03:11:50
Somehow, they managed to get global warming into a story about 2000+ years ago. The editors must have a daily global warming quota to fill.
2

Lanna,

07/06/2008 06:53:55
#1 MarkR,
funny, I noticed that, too.
3

Nikostratos,

07/06/2008 09:27:19
'high-quality red wine'

How do they know it was high quality??????????
4

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 07/06/2008 10:42:43
#3 Nikostratos

Because of the quality of the amphorae and the fact it was being exported. There is no point in putting poor wine into expensive amphorae and then going to the expense of exporting them.
5

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 07/06/2008 11:46:30
#5 Col. Blimp­IV

Paranoia is a poor substitute for reason.

Human civilisations arose in the 10,000 years since the ice ages. That 10,000 years was a time of unusual climatic stability. Unusual, that is, relative to the convulsions of the ice ages that preceded them and, very likely, to the chaotic climate that will follow if we do not get CO2 emissions under control.

A stable, predictable climate has many benefits, successful navigation being but one of them.
6

57Nomad,

california 07/06/2008 20:08:06
#4 Slioch

Good point. However, if they were insurance scammers it would have been prudent to put low quality wine in the jugs.
7

57Nomad,

california 07/06/2008 20:20:19
#6 Slioch

Human civilization arose 5300 years ago and the climate has never been stable. The first civilization, Sumeria had gods that were capricious at best. One of the reasons was the unpredictability of the weather. In Egypt the gods were constant in keeping with the yearly pulse of the Nile. Not so with the Tigress and Euphrates rivers that would dry up or flood with little or no warning.

The weather today is no different in its variability than it has ever been. The inclusion of "climate change" is nonsense. Perhaps the author has never heard of the Anasazi Indians. They were cultured cliff dwelling people in the American southwest. Here is an excerpt from a publication describing them.

"It is impossible to find a cause as to why they left. But there appear to be several causes that contributed. First, the climate during the Pueblo III period was somewhat unstable with erratic rainfall patterns and periods of drought. This weather problem climaxed with a thirty-year drought starting about 1270 that coincided with a cooling trend that significantly shortened the growing season. Perhaps the expanding population had pressed the limits of the land's capacity to support the people so that they were unable to survive the climatic upheavals of the thirteenth century."
8

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 07/06/2008 22:52:20
#7&8 57Nomad

I'm far too innocent and honest ever to consider the possibility of putting of poor wine into fine amphorae and then shipwrecking the lot as an insurance scam. Shame on you. Us Brits are honest, hard working folk, not like you Californians who lie about in the sun dreaming and smoking pot and having a good time.

Anyway. To answer your #8, and to try to be a little serious: I was careful to use the word "relative" when referring to climatic stability. There has been nothing like the 120m rise in sea level in a few centuries, nor the huge changes in temperature that were experienced during the ice ages prior to 10,000 years ago, since then. Of course, as you rightly point out, there have still been sufficient changes to cause collapses of civilisations: the Anasazi suffered from drought and from having destroyed their nearby forests. The western USA has warmed and dried in recent decades, as I'm sure you are only too aware. Jared Diamond goes into these changes, including the Anasazi, in his book "Collapse", with which I assume you are familiar.
But what is urgently needed to be appreciated is that, in the words of your oceanographer Wally Broecker, the climate is a "wild beast" that we are "poking with sticks". It is beyond question that the Earth's climate for the last 10,000 years has been more stable than for any other similar period for the last million years: look at the ice-core records: you will not find a similar period of relative calm. That you can point to examples of climatic stress in that 10,000 years merely strengthens my point. In other words, the last 10,000 years is as good as it gets, and it had almost unchanging CO2 levels, but it was still tough enough to wipe out several civilisations: can you begin to imagine what will happen when the wild beast wakes again and climate really begins to take off?

Chucking billions of tons a year of CO2 into the atmosphere is putting the atmospheric system completely out of equilibrium - at
9

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 07/06/2008 22:53:16
Contd.

Chucking billions of tons a year of CO2 into the atmosphere is putting the atmospheric system completely out of equilibrium - at present there is 37% more CO2 in the atmosphere than there would be without human actions. There is NO historical analogy to such changes.

Your comment is equivalent to someone going on a long bus trip and noting that the driver during the previous 10,000 miles had frequently run off the road and killed a few folk. But now the driver has got on board a few crates of whisky (CO2 to you and me) and is swigging them as he goes along. But you are not worried because you reckon his driving will be "no different in its variability than it has ever been." and the possibility of change in the driver's behaviour is "nonsense". Aye, well, I just say "Good luck".


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.