Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Standard Grades axed in schools shake-up

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 April 2008
Overhaul of Scottish education promises exams tailored to pupils' needs by 2012
STANDARD grades are to be axed in an overhaul of Scotland's exam system.

Children now in primary six will be the last to sit the exams, which are taken by every state school pupil in Scotland.

Intermediate exams will also be scrapped in the shake-up.

They will be replaced by new qualifications called "General" grades which will be introduced in 2012 in addition to literacy and numeracy exams for all school leavers.

Fiona Hyslop, the education secretary, said the move was needed to meet the needs of the 21st century, even though the format for the General qualification has not yet been finalised.

She said: "Pupils across Scotland are about to start Standard grades in the next few weeks.

"We have a strong qualifications system, but we need a next generation. The problem is that it is seen as a very complex system and we are trying to simplify it."

At present, pupils study all subjects in the first two years of secondary school, and then specialise in up to nine subject areas.

From 2012 pupils will sit the new "General grade" at the end of fourth year but more able children will be able to go straight on to Highers or a mix of the two.

The idea is to enable teachers to "tailor" an exam diet appropriate to each child's ability.

In addition, fourth year pupils will have to take exams for a compulsory Scottish Certificate of Literacy and Numeracy in December.

Highers will remain as the "gold standard" of Scottish school education, but will be reviewed along with Advanced Highers.

New baccalaureates in science and languages, which will be made up of Highers, Advanced Highers plus a project, will run in S6.

Business leaders welcomed the new emphasis on basic skills, but teachers were cautious.

Ronnie Smith, the general secretary of Scotland's biggest teaching union, said: "The EIS remains to be convinced of the value of potentially removing the Standard grade and Intermediate 1 and 2 to replace them with another general level qualification. Standard grade is a well recognised qualification, which is valued by employers, teachers and parents and which provides a valuable exit qualification for those pupils who elect to leave school following fourth year.

"We need to be careful not to lose the many positive benefits that Standard grade currently offers to pupils."

Judith Gillespie, development manager of the Scottish Parent Teacher Council, said parents would be happy as long as any new exams reflected ability and were respected by employers, universities and colleges.

However, political opponents demanded more detail.

Rhona Brankin, Labour's education spokeswoman, said: "There is widespread recognition that change is necessary for our national qualifications."

But she added: "These new awards do not in themselves ensure that young people become literate and numerate, or that Scotland eradicates illiteracy."

Consultation with parents, schools, universities and employers will take place from June to October.

That should inform decisions on whether the new General exams will run for one or two years, begin in S3 or S4, and whether content will be externally examined or internally assessed by teachers.

The changes have been spurred by the new Curriculum for Excellence due to land on teachers' desks in August.

Criticisms have abounded in recent years that the Standard grade, introduced 24 years ago, was no longer effective preparation for Higher exams.

Standard grades allow every child, whatever their ability, to gain awards. But that led to criticism that the lowest grades were meaningless, and some schools dropped them altogether.

Welcome for advent of 'simpler system' for business
BUSINESS leaders have long been critical of school-leavers' ability to read, write and count.

Employers yesterday welcomed new compulsory literacy and numeracy exams all pupils will have to take before leaving school.

Iain Ferguson, policy executive at CBI Scotland, said: "For business, literacy and numeracy are the bedrock of any employee's education.

"We said before the election that business really begrudges training employees up to the basic standard. No matter what the sector, literacy and numeracy are critical."

Mr Ferguson backed moves to simplify the qualifications system.

He said: "The decision to drop the two national qualifications of Standard and Intermediate grade will, in the long run, make the system simpler for business to understand.

"There have been too many qualifications business has had to understand."

The full article contains 739 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 April 2008 11:21 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Carnbee,

25/04/2008 06:52:20
Nonsense. Best thing to happen. S Grades have long run their course. As a teacher believe me when I say this. How can future generations be demoralised when they haven't been near an eaxm ? Pupils work for what is in front of them. The here and now is what is important to them.
2

Gilmartin,

Philippines 25/04/2008 07:52:59
Yep, lets dumbdown the education system even more so as anybody can go to a "university" to study hairdressing ;)
3

Selgovae,

Scottish Borders 25/04/2008 08:03:33
I'm confused.

'The idea is to enable teachers to "tailor" an exam diet appropriate to each child's ability. '

How will fewer types of exam enable a more tailored exam diet?

The CBI comments are a little strange too. I get the impression that "business" sees education as a production line of ready-packaged labour units.

At the end of the day, even the best exam can only tell you that you are as good as you are. More focus on learning and less on testing would be nice.
4

JayJay,

Right here 25/04/2008 08:15:55
Do politicians feel it necessary to change the education system every three or four years for a laugh?
This smacks to me as another effort to pander to the lower percentiles in the classroom. Education works, or seems to work, perfectly well for those kids who turn up, get parental support, try hard, respect their teachers. Unfortunately, such children (and I know this from umpteen teacher friends) have to largely fend for themselves while the "needs" of those who have no interest whatsoever in education are managed.
I see a major issue in the suggestion that it is the teacher who will be "tailoring" an individual progress plan for each pupil. That sounds awfully like streaming to me and I had thought the mighty minds that dictate education policy had set their faces against anything other that the educational equivalent of communism...one size fits all. It also seems to me to place a fairly onerous burden on the teacher, and might very well be open to dispute from parents. And it sounds awfully time consuming.
Changing exams is hardly the pressing issue. The behaviour of pupils in the classroom (have the forgotten the recent statistics on teacher attacks?) seems to me to be a very effective barrier to learning - I know this from the feedback I get from my two kids teachers. When will government do something about that?
5

Stu_R_20,

Edinburgh, deep in the library 25/04/2008 09:00:03
Useless qualifications: In many cases what you are taught is actually wrong for example, in Chemistry there are only three types of reaction and one form of bonding between elements....
Well done Fiona, now just highers need to be scrapped!
6

paulr,

edinburgh 25/04/2008 09:01:49
"literacy and numeracy exams for all school leavers"
Why bother?
literacy and numeracy should be checked all through a pupils school life, not just when they are about to leave school, its too late by then.
7

Border spy,

Melrose 25/04/2008 09:05:11
There is some concern about abolishing the one bit of the current system which is settled and working at a time when the whole review of the curriculum is looking more and more like a dog's breakfast.
The timing of the announcement is insensitive - telling pupils that the exams they have been working towards for the last two years are to be abolished is not a very clever idea.
Nevertheless the current arrangements are cumbersome and over-complicated. Let's hope that we can produce something which is helpful for children and employers. Which adequately assesses what children know and can do and works as a good predictor for success in employment or further and higher education.
8

Crank Parent,

Livingston 25/04/2008 09:48:27
"Judith Gillespie, development manager of the Scottish Parent Teacher Council, said parents would be happy as long as any new exams reflected ability and were respected by employers, universities and colleges."

You don't need exams to demonstrate your ability to a college, university or employer.
9

Robert12,

Edinburgh 25/04/2008 10:11:07
Maybe not in Livingston but I know I certainly had to display my qualifications when going for my post!
10

Red Tower,

Dunoon 25/04/2008 10:13:51
I deplore the fact that there have to be yet more ill-thought out tinkering changes to the education system. What we need to do is scrap everything that has gone before, Standard Grade et al, and get back to square one.

The first question that should realistically be asked is, what percentage of the population should be able to benefit from a quality-based university education? The present goal of sending 50% of the population to university can only be achieved by lowering entrance standards and by dumbing down courses.

Entrance to university should be achieved by the satisfying stringent criteria. A maximum figure of 30% of the population being eligible would be a realistic goal.

Secondly, far greater emphasis should be placed on the importance of good trade-based courses which would be run in conjuction with quality-based apprenticeships.
Personally if I were a parent nowadays I would be advising my offspring to consider the latter. The market is currently cluttered with holders of worthless degrees and cowboy tradesmen.

With these objectives in mind I would then design exams to achieve them.

Now before anyone jumps in and tells me that educaion is about more than satisfying the basics let me say I agree. The Arts and sport are important and should be covered in schools but neither needs to be examinable.

11

conservative,

Fife 25/04/2008 10:23:37
Change the examinations so that more pass. Change the university entrance qualifications so that more can enter. Change the university courses so that more can study meaningless subjects and then fail anyway. End up with a population and workforce useless for any practical application. India and China must be laughing all the way to our bank.
12

Chris1,

Glasgow 25/04/2008 10:24:29
The Scotsman writes "STANDARD grades are to be axed in an overhaul of Scotland's exam system.

Children now in primary six will be the last to sit the exams, which are taken by every state school pupil in Scotland."

If you read Fiona Hyslop's full statement at http://www.scotland.gov.uk/News/This-Week/Speeches/smarter/natqual you will read the following "Children currently in P6 are likely to be the first to fully experience the new secondary curriculum. As such, they will be the first to require access to the next generation of qualifications. We will therefore plan to have revised qualifications in place from 2012/13 onwards."

So that means that children currently in P7 will be the last to sit the current standard grades. Not helpful to read wrong information in the newspaper.

Timing of the consultation is all wrong - it should be from August to December when schools are not on holiday. I don't know why they need to scrap the current system anyway - they've been around long enough for people to get their heads around.

13

Crank Parent,

Livingston 25/04/2008 10:29:08
# 12

You've missed my point entirely. Obviously going to school has restricted your view of education and life in general.

Children are not required to attend school or sit exams. Exams are not the only way to go to university or get a job and be successful in life. Home educated children go straight to college/university/work without having sat any exams. The worlds richest and most successful people are far more likely to have dropped out of school or been home educated.
14

Last furlong,

25/04/2008 10:36:24
What was wrong with O grades, highers and 6 year studies. Everyone understood them. Wish the MPs would stop playing with the education system.
15

conservative,

Fife 25/04/2008 10:42:58
#17 Last Furlong
Not enough people passed them. Don't you know that dumbing down the examinations automatically makes all school pupils cleverer and pushes Scotland even higher up the economic scale? Silly fellow!
16

Red Ken,

South East Asia 25/04/2008 10:49:01
What they need to do is to get the kids to do the 3 Rs and get them up to a decent standard. I live and work in South East Asia and the standard of education in countries like Singapore put the Scottish Education system to shame. Other countries in the area do their best but the vast majority of students leave school with a decent grasp of the 3 Rs unlike in Scotland where they are lucky to string a simple sentence together.

Too many goody two shoes namby pamby PC liberals have interferred too long in the education system and its about time they were kick out.
17

Boab,

Glasgow 25/04/2008 10:59:58
#6 Jay Jay: Isn't streaming the opposite of communism? You're concentrating all the bright weans in one class so that you get good behaviour, hard work and high ability. Better buy some cattle prods for the remedial classes though!

This could be a good developement. The fact is, there's a huge gulf between children who read from a young age and those who don't; an able 12 year old could probably scrape a Higher pass; while others never will. Why hold the bright ones back? 'Tailoring the curriculum' sounds OK to me.

Agree that weans have to go through too many tests. They start at seven or eight years old these days!
18

izzie,

Dundee 25/04/2008 11:04:53
I would like to get rid of the coursework element in Standard Grade. I mark Standard Grade folios for the SQA and am presented with beautifully word processed essays which I know have been worked and re worked over weeks. They gain good grades but are a reflection of the teacher's, tutors, and parents abilities as much as the pupils. This added to the (talk element assessed in class)represents one third of the final award resulting in illiterate pupils gaining Grade 3 and above. No wonmder employers question the system.
19

Guthrie,

Edinburgh 25/04/2008 11:28:52
Crank Parent #16- good luck on earning enough to be able to stay at home educating your children, and then getting them into Uni without exams for the university to be able to judge their knowledge level by....

Carnbee #2- as a teacher, you'll have to tell the rest of us what is wrong with standard grades. I don't recall any problems with them when I was at school.

20

A Scot in America,

25/04/2008 11:32:30
Jay Jay #6
You are 100% spot on with your analysis. The first time a teacher starts developing seperate individual tests for each student, tests which will be different from each other is the point at which parents will cry foul. Your going to see a mass exodus of teachers as individulizing exams and thus instruction to this degree will be much to time consuming for public education. It might work fine for a small select student body in a near laboratory setting but it won't work for public ed.
21

fluffmeister,

As far away from TWG as possible 25/04/2008 11:53:21
Guthrie #22

You seem particularly ill informed

Home education can and is done by parents on all budgets

Universities despite government intervention are still independent and smart enough to spot talent without having to rely on exams. The many HE'd students in highest education being clear proof.
22

should have gone to specsavers,

Thurso 25/04/2008 15:38:11
> what is wrong with standard grades. I don't recall
> any problems with them when I was at school.

When I did my standard grades I did credit papers and general papers for standard grades: 2 exams for the same qualification, at the same level, in the same year, for *each* subject. An incredible waste of paper, and it must have doubled the amount of money spent on marking exams.

Besides, streamlining the exam system is a good idea, the current mess makes it difficult to determine the value of one qualification over another.
23

Robert12,

25/04/2008 16:30:41
#16 - Sorry, how exactly can someone enter a University degree programme without any qualifications?! I don't know what happens at West Lothian College, but everywhere else they set exam grade requirements.

I think you've been watching too much of the Apprentice. Most successful people do have qualifications and will have most definitely sat exams.

#25 the reason you did Credit and General was so that if you failed the Credit exam you'd (hopefully) still get a 3 or a 4 from your General exam rather than nothing at all.
24

The Federalist (the poster formerly know as NAUON),

25/04/2008 16:45:19
I can understand why they want to get rid of Standard Grades but the solution seems to me completely unworkable.

If they are to keep Highers but scrap Intermediates and Standard Grade then how on earth are pupils going to cover the content that is pre-requisite for many Higher courses?

What will hapen to subjects such as Business Education that do not fit neatly into one of the "Curriculum for Excellence" headings? There are serious teaching and resource implications that need addressed before any new system can be implemented.

A general across the board qualification ignores the fact that some pupils perform better in practical as opposed to academic subject areas (and vice versa) - will pupils fail the general qualification if they can't achieve across the board skills?

And how on earth can you specialise in NINE ares? That's stretching the word specialise to the extreme. Moreover, is there time to actual cover 9 subjects as well as the compulsory elements?

Personally I would have scrapped Standard Grades and replaced them with Intermediates - and that may yet be the outcome if the EIS has its way.
25

The Federalist (the poster formerly know as NAUON),

25/04/2008 16:46:36
#27 PS Tailoring exams to pupils may be fine in theory but what about schools with small rolls that can't offer the broad spectrum of "specialist areas"?
26

The Federalist (the poster formerly know as NAUON),

25/04/2008 16:48:18
#4 I find the CBI response to be bizarre as well - how this will simplify qualifications is beyond me. the truth is most employers have just about got their heads around the current qualifications - another change will confuse matters further.
27

The Federalist (the poster formerly know as NAUON),

25/04/2008 16:51:38
#16 "The worlds richest and most successful people are far more likely to have dropped out of school or been home educated."

You home educators make me laugh sometimes - what a crock of crap.
28

The Federalist (the poster formerly know as NAUON),

25/04/2008 16:53:45
#24 "Home education can and is done by parents on all budgets"

But mainly done by middle-class liberals who think they know better.
29

A Scot in America,

25/04/2008 17:08:22
#31
On this side of the pond its more apt to be fundamentalist Christian nutters who believe that the other "religion"??? "secular humanism" will turn their children into Satan's children.
30

Crank Parent,

Livingston 25/04/2008 18:25:07
#22
"Crank Parent #16- good luck on earning enough to be able to stay at home educating your children, and then getting them into Uni without exams for the university to be able to judge their knowledge level by...."

I'm not sure why you think luck has anything to do with it. My children are extremely intelligent and perfectly capable of gaining entry to a college and/or university of their choice in the same way that thousands of other home ed children in the UK do.

#26
"#16 - Sorry, how exactly can someone enter a University degree programme without any qualifications?! I don't know what happens at West Lothian College, but everywhere else they set exam grade requirements."

What makes you think my children will be going to WLC?

For your information, exams are not a requirement for entry to UK universities. Cambridge, Oxford and all the other top UK universities take home ed children on an interview and portfolio. Many have said they actually prefer home ed children as they are more motivated to learn and come ready equipped with the skills required to be successful students.

There are 55,000+ home ed children in the UK. Being home educated does not prevent them from being where they want to be in life. All the evidence shows that schools are failing children and that small groups of mixed age children are more sociable and more effective learners.


31

Nosetam,

25/04/2008 19:12:29
Fiona MacLeod wrongly says, "Standard Grades ... are taken by every state school pupil in Scotland." East Renfrewshire schools have already dumped them and many others are in the process of doing so also.

Standard Grade is no loss in terms of a school leaving qualification and, within the curriculum, it is a very poor preparation for Highers.

Hyslop has only announced what is happening by natural erosion anyway.

The surprising announcement is the scrapping of Intermediates 1 and 2, which some schools have just gone to enormous lengths to replace Standard Grade with. But even there, people were beginning to ask, "If Int 2 only serves as a preparation for Higher, why not just skip the Int 2 exams and devote an extra half term to Higher preparation?"
32

,

25/04/2008 21:54:06
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
33

Gordon lying traitor scum,

26/04/2008 08:50:26
Outspoken Arizona Senator Questions 9/11 Official Version Of Events

State Sen. Karen Johnson, R-Mesa, has come under fierce criticism for going on record with her doubts over the government's version of events surrounding the 9/11 attacks. Following a vote in the Senate Appropriations Committee on Arizona's 9/11 Memorial, Johnson told Capitol reporters "There are many of us that believe there's been a cover-up."
34

The Answer,

Glasgow 26/04/2008 11:40:24
Maybe it's time at last to sort out Scotlands education system,

Less than 10,000 scots males managed to graduate on a First degree award for the 2006-2007 academic year.

Dont shoot the mesenger take a look at the facts!

Then maybe the nats will force the SNP government to take urgent action now, tomorrow will be to late.

HESA (Higher Education Statistical Agency)

tinyurl.com/58ou3a

35

Mop,

*********** 26/04/2008 13:56:17
I do wish they would stop mucking about with the exam system,find something and stick to it.
I know a family who have about 3 different types of exam passes between them,how employers are meant to sort all this out I dont know.I dont even understand the present system!How can you grasp it when it keeps changing all this time?
36

musicmadmama1,

26/04/2008 15:20:08
#16 - "Sorry, how exactly can someone enter a University degree programme without any qualifications?! I don't know what happens at West Lothian College, but everywhere else they set exam grade requirements."

Sorry you are totally wrong - most FE colleges in Scotland will accept students, eg home educated young people and mature students without school qualifications. I have 2 at Uni and a 15yo full time at FE college having gained entry a year earlier than his peers. All have been home educated and haven't sat any exams. The oldest was offered direct entry into 3rd year at Uni at 17, middle son went straight into 2nd year at Uni.
The feedback I have had from different colleges and Unis when discussing home ed are pretty much as crank parent says in post *33.
Colleges are full of bright people of all ages who have been let down badly by a failing school system.
37

Eve,

Scotland 26/04/2008 18:16:27
"Children now in primary six will be the last to sit the exams, which are taken by every state school pupil in Scotland."

The above paragraph wording is wired (NOT very dyslexic friendly) I thought 10year old where going to be made to sit exams this year and was confused until I realised that, it must be when they are in 4th year.
38

Eve,

Scotland 26/04/2008 18:42:10
I read about this in Hearld yeasterday. I'm NOT to sure if this is a good idea.

As someone who went up to high School barely being able to read. I do feel for young dyslexic and others who strugle with reading, writing or/and arithmitic.

When I hear stories like these I like to think back to what I was like and the way I felt back then and how I would have coped/felt if things where like that when I was that age.

I'm afaied to say that I think I would have been worse off if things had been like this when I was at school.

For the ovbuse reason:

My reading only hit aged 14 (which is what all adult should red to an age of) after I left school. It was only when I found my self haveing to read more technical/spealist books that my reading really came on. (The kind of books that schools don't have in their libarrys as they are more advance. Ironicaly I think I would still struggle the School text books cause I've alway found them restrictive in reading style so therefore lack sence, BUT thats one of the way dyslexia can effect an indavidal.

This means that at aged 16 I would NOT have passed my reading exam at the very least and would have to sit it numerous ocassions and would have still faild. Which makes me ask the question:

How many times would a school have you sitting an exam before they let you leave with no/ short on quailifcations.

39

Eve,

Scotland 26/04/2008 19:02:48
#39 musicmadmama1: "Colleges are full of bright people of all ages who have been let down badly by a failing school system." Aye BUT NO just colleges, cause they are the lucky ones who are getting a chance. To many don't get the chance and work in crummy low paid jobs all their life.

Scotland is a nation of smart people, it's a shame that most don't know it.

I'm one of the lucky ones, I went to college then Universty (Though I must say I took a very long road in doing so)and got my degree last year, ironicaly it was a signifcant anversary of when I was told at school that I couldn't do higher because I was dyslexic.

The most significant thing school teaches you that life is unfare and that people discriminate intenaly and unintencanaly. I'm still trying to work out which hurts the most.

I think it's important that everyone remebers this one thing: School is the beging of education and should never be the end. A persons learning experence should never truely end.

P.S. I'm going to do my masters this year or next BUT NOT to prove I'm smart this time BUT because I feel like I could do some good with it.
40

fluffmeister,

As far away from TWG as possible 26/04/2008 19:53:12
Federalist

#30 Oh dear, when the facts dont back up your bigotry, turn to insults - you aren't Judith Gillespie is disguise are you ?

#31 Wrong again - you *must* be Judith Gillespie in disguise.

41

a.student,

Edinburgh 26/04/2008 21:19:34
a totally disagree with this scheme. firstly i fail to understand where the huge problem lies in our current system of national qualifications. standard grade (or intermediate 1/2) maths and english are compulsory for the majority of school pupils in scotland. the overwhelming majoirty of school leavers are perfectly literate and capable of carrying out basic numercy.

however what i take issue with most is that we have been told that this new qualification will be easier than the current standard grades. yet it is common knowledge among educators and pupils that there is a huge gulf between standard grades and highers as it is - agulf which many student are actually unable to across. so if anything, i feel we are detrimenting our students' chances of success by making it even more difficult for them to progress through the school system.

next thing fiona hyslop will be telling us that we're just going to abolish all qualifications to make the system "more simple".
42

Eve,

Scotland 27/04/2008 13:34:42
#44 a.student: 1stly, What on earth are you studing?

2ndly, Why do you think everyone has the same school experences as you?

3rdly it's a well knowen fact that every year theres at least one person who has troubles with litercy or numerusy leaves school. It can't be arrdicated cause everyones experences are diffrent and everyone also has diffrent ways of learning more effective.

4thly standard grades have their falts to, Some pupils were and are written of as fondy student (i.e.anit capable than anything more than a grade 5 or 6 or what ever it is these days). I was unforchently one of them BUT was fortunent enough to prove them wroung.

Oh I have no idea what what the gap is between highers and Standard grades. Cause I wasnae allowed to do higers BUT hay I manged to jump from college NC to uni BSc (hons)and sucseed.


NB: I don't like the idea for the reasons I said above BUT I do realise the falts in the Standard grades.

43

Eve,

Scotland 27/04/2008 13:34:45
#44 a.student: 1stly, What on earth are you studing?

2ndly, Why do you think everyone has the same school experences as you?

3rdly it's a well knowen fact that every year theres at least one person who has troubles with litercy or numerusy leaves school. It can't be arrdicated cause everyones experences are diffrent and everyone also has diffrent ways of learning more effective.

4thly standard grades have their falts to, Some pupils were and are written of as fondy student (i.e.anit capable than anything more than a grade 5 or 6 or what ever it is these days). I was unforchently one of them BUT was fortunent enough to prove them wroung.

Oh I have no idea what what the gap is between highers and Standard grades. Cause I wasnae allowed to do higers BUT hay I manged to jump from college NC to uni BSc (hons)and sucseed.


NB: I don't like the idea for the reasons I said above BUT I do realise the falts in the Standard grades.

44

Eve,

Scotland 27/04/2008 13:35:25
opps What happen there, sorry about the double posting!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.