Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Staff to sue over night-shift cancer

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 17 March 2009
THE UK government could face a flood of compensation claims from women who develop breast cancer after working night shift, lawyers warned yesterday.
It follows a landmark ruling involving the Danish government, which has started paying damages to women suffering from cancer after long spells working nights.

The Danish authorities acted after a finding by the International Agency for Research
on Cancer (IARC), an arm of the UN's World Health Organisation, which found that night shifts probably increase the risk of developing cancer.

For years, there has been growing evidence that night shifts are bad for workers' health, with symptoms including disturbed sleep, fatigue, digestive problems and a greater risk of accidents at work.

But these are the first government payments to women who have developed cancer after long periods of antisocial hours.

Bruce Caldow, a partner in employment law with Harper Macleod solicitors, said the case opened up the issues of whether working nights caused lasting damage and if staff were aware of the risks.

"I'm certain that lawyers in Scotland and the rest of the UK will carefully scrutinise these written judgments to see whether legal action could be taken," he said.

Rory McPherson, an employment lawyer with Thompsons solicitors, said employers could fall foul of the law.

"The UK government and the Health and Safety Executive should urgently look at the medical evidence to see what guidance can be given to employers and employees," he added.

Almost 40 Danish women have won compensation, including Ulla Mahnkopf, who spent 30 years as a flight attendant for the Scandinavian airline SAS.

She said "I had no idea. But when you think back now, I can see that when I stopped flying, it was like coming out of a shell – I had been living in there because of jet lag and I can see now I had a totally different life."

Dr Vincent Cogliano, of the IARC, said the agency reached its conclusion about night shifts after looking at studies of both humans and animals.

One of the reports, published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, showed a 36 per cent greater risk of breast cancer for women who had worked night shifts for more than 30 years, compared with women who had not.

Dr Cogliano said there was evidence to support the hypothesis that alterations in sleep patterns could suppress the production of melatonin, a hormone secreted by the brain.

"Melatonin has some beneficial effects in preventing some of the steps leading to cancer," he said. "The level of evidence is really no different than it might be for an industrial chemical."

In the UK, it is estimated about 20 per cent of the workforce work night shifts.

The recent research was based on the incidence of breast cancer among nurses and flight attendants, backed by animal studies which showed that constant light, dim light at night or simulated jet lag substantially boosted tumour development.





The full article contains 495 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 March 2009 9:40 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Bemused and above it all,

17/03/2009 01:41:05
And what about men who develop prostate cancer after years of nightshift?
2

FTH22inarow,

17/03/2009 06:57:55
You choose to work nightshift for extra money don't you?
3

Phil C,

17/03/2009 09:11:43
Mental nonsense! Are we all mad, even entertaining such bufoonery?
4

danbob,

17/03/2009 09:36:59
But there is no conclusive proof.

(Quote)The Danish authorities acted after a finding by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), an arm of the UN's World Health Organisation, which found that night shifts PROBABLY increase the risk of developing cancer.(unquote)

If we are going to use this type of junk research as a benchmark for shelling out taxpayers millions where will we end up? It has to stop.
I worked seven years on night shift. Of course I was tired during the day. I knew I would be. That's why my employer paid me a third more than everyone working days, and when I had enough I left for another day job, not a lawyers office to winge I had been hard done by.
5

Proximaking,

Aberdeen 17/03/2009 09:55:26
Everyone knows, and have known for decades, that air staff are more prone to all forms of cancer due to cosmic radiation so air staff are the last people who should be compensated for slightly increased cancer risks. And no doubt as with everything else some cancers may be reduced by night working. Are those people going to work for less money because they have a lower cancer risk? ....... I thought not.

Thank heavens that with the way the economy of the world is going none of these nonsense payouts whether for cancer, or unfair pension rights for government workers, or for supporting feckless people who have no intention of ever working, will have a snowflake's chance in hell of being paid out in the longer term.
6

The real dracula,

17/03/2009 10:09:36
#3 not everyone chooses to do nightshift , it is in your contract , what do you want , nightworkers to stop totally ,,,,,,,,would leave the hospitals , policing and fire services in a bit of a mess would it not.
7

DeeFlymaster,

17/03/2009 11:26:02
The one basic reason why night workers get more cancers is that they are deprived of sunshine and their vitamin D levels, which protect against cancer, are chronically low. If they had eaten a diet high in fats, dairy and fish and taken D3 supplements when they couldn't get outside they would probably have been fine. They don't need compensation, they need education.
8

im brian and so is my wife,

edinburgh 17/03/2009 12:01:48
having cancer is no joke i can tell you,but i see the points made,yes night shift paid more and some of us love it
whatever next ,D.L.A for hurting yer oiles because you had boiled cabbage,sprouts and curry for lunch and your loud reports,caused extreme pain and discomfort to your farmer giles(piles)
mind yopu they pay mandelson for being a walking phalic item so nothings new
9

im brian and so is my wife,

edinburgh 17/03/2009 12:03:33
arrgghhh bloody typo piles not oiles,sounds like popeye
10

fife runner,

17/03/2009 13:14:22
must be the nighshift naver mind that many will develope cancer because they smoke, ar overweight or consume excess alcohol.

watched on the telly last night how one woman who worked nightshift was thinking it must be the work. it was obvious she was a smoker by listening to her voice and the fact her face looked like a dried out chamois.
11

,

17/03/2009 13:45:18
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

Joe Macdelta.,

17/03/2009 18:31:40
I find this hard to believe, how can working at night as opposed to working during the day, cause a particular type of cancer, it couldnt be that these people are the ones who will get this cancer anyway.
13

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 17/03/2009 18:47:27
Lawyers feeling a bit poor ??

This litigious culture has gone way too far - there MUST be a some sort of constitution with a clause that prevents lawyers and their 'victims' taking the country to the cleaners over piffle and very questionable cases of which this is one.

There is no conclusive proof that night shift workers get cancer as result of night work. Me thinks this has to do more with the lifestyle choices of the workers than the hours they work !

12:- I think you are spot on along with 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,11 and 13 !!!

I wonder if the government ever looks at what the majority of folk think these days ??!
14

SOFBTRC,

Far, far from Glasgow 17/03/2009 19:49:28
Can't you people read? Disruptions in melatonin regulation are thought to be responsible. But whether melatonin is responsible or not is somewhat irrelevant, since the point is that data clearly show increased levels of various cancers in night shift workers. Don't know what melatonin is, or what it does? Go and find out, before spouting your uninformed rubbish about "junk research" and "no conclusive proof". Try "PubMed" where you can view abstracts of real, peer-reviewed scientific articles rather than believe a newspaper columnist, if that makes you happier. Some people really have no idea whatsoever about research and the null hypothesis in statistics.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.