Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Security fears follow Stansted Airport breach

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 December 2008
SECURITY at one of Britain's busiest airports is under urgent review tonight after environmental campaigners broke in, forcing the runway to be closed.
More than 50 flights were cancelled and many others were delayed after dozens of activists from protest group Plane Stupid cut through Stansted Airport's security fence at around 3am.

Police arrested 57 people and the runway reopened just after 8am but disruption to flights continued throughout the day.

Ryanair, the only airline to cancel flights, called for an investigation into why airport operator BAA had failed to keep the Essex airport "secure and open", saying the disruption to passengers was "unacceptable".

Spokesman Stephen McNamara said: "The security at BAA Stansted airport has once again failed.

"We need to know what measures the BAA is putting in place to prevent these repeated security failures."

Long queues formed at Ryanair check-in desks today and armed police officers helped to keep order as a small number of passengers became irate.

Some of those queuing said they were alarmed protestors had got in so easily.

Terry Purton, 61, of Edenbridge, Kent, said: "If they can do it, I'm sure there would be nothing to stop terrorists."

Lainey Mace, of Fakenham, Norfolk, added: "One would have thought security at an airport would be much tighter than that."

Stansted Airport and Essex Police said they will investigate the security breach.

"If there are lessons to be learnt, that is what we need to take on board. We need to discover if there's anything we can do better," a BAA spokesman said.

"This is a site of about 2,000 acres bordered by a security fence. It is not operated as a fortress."

He said the protestors were quickly intercepted and a second group was prevented from going through the fence.

Nick Barton, the airport's commercial and development director, added: "At no time were any passengers or planes in danger."

Today's protest was sparked by the Government's decision to allow the expansion of the airport with a second runway.

Activist Lily Kember, 21, a third-year anthropology student at Edinburgh University, said the group used bolt-cutters to get into a secure area around 50 metres from the runway.

Ms Kember, from London, said the threat of climate change was more "terrifying" than the fear of arrest.

A spokesman for Plane Stupid said tonight: "We have to take these necessary actions. It was a big action, it's a big problem and a strong message."

Today's breach follows a similar climate change protest at Heathrow Airport, west London, in February when Greenpeace protestors climbed on top of a British Airways plane and unfurled a banner protesting against a third runway.

Greenpeace today supported Plane Stupid, saying: "The climate change secretary Ed Miliband called for a Suffragette-style movement to pressure governments to act. Well, he got his wish.

"The Suffragettes were disruptive and lambasted by the establishment of the day, but have been utterly vindicated by history, and no doubt it will be the same with Plane Stupid."

Mick Rix of the GMB union, which represents Stansted Airport staff including baggage handlers and check-in workers, said: "The GMB has been raising the state of the fencing around Stansted Airport for a number of months because we have not been satisfied that it is in a good enough state.

"It was obvious to GMB that protesters would seek to breach it.

"We believe the perimeter of the airport should be secured by a quasi-official airport security force rather than by a conglomerate of security contractors. Since it is a criminal offence to breach this fence, those guarding it should have powers of arrest."
Essex Police said 50 of those arrested were held on suspicion of aggravated trespass, three on suspicion of attempting to gain access to a restricted area and four of conspiracy to commit a public nuisance.

They remain in custody tonight.

Climate change was cited as one of the reasons for refusal when the local planning authority Uttlesford District Council turned down BAA's application to expand Stansted in November 2006.

Environmental campaigners hailed the decision as a benchmark saying it was the first time climate change had been listed as a reason for refusing a planning application.

The Government overruled Uttlesford District Council in October this year following an appeal by BAA.

Transport Secretary Geoff Hoon granted permission for the airport to increase the number of flights from 241,000 to 264,000 and raise the number of passengers from 25 million to 35 million.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 December 2008 4:56 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Mad Jock,

East Lothian 08/12/2008 17:56:08
If my flight had been cancelled or disrupted by this action, I would have seriously considered taking legal action against this group, and sue them all as an organisation and as individuals. A class action would do the job nicely. Plane Stupid just about sums them up. There is a judicial review on this matter anyway, and they have plainly broken the law. There must be a huge number of passengers who will now be out of pocket due to these morons, so perhaps hitting them all where it hurts might make them think again. Simply fining them some paltry amount won't act as any kind of deterrent.
Protests are our democratic right, and woe betide any government that tries to stop that, but the public has a greater right to be protected from these sort of disruptive actions, especially when the law has clearly been broken, and the public has suffered financially as a result.
2

St Andrew 01,

Johannesburg 08/12/2008 18:09:34
If these protesters had jobs it would be better for all of us.
A wasted life with no substance will lead to anti social behaviour such as this - these thugs are dangerous and the law must deal with them accordingly
3

Scimitar1,

08/12/2008 18:17:02
Throw them all in jail. The taxpayer would benefit too considering the relative cost of prison vs the assortment of benefits these workless parasites receive coutesy the hard pressed taxpayer.
4

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 08/12/2008 18:51:34
It is just 57 pampered, privileged, over-indulged layabouts with nothing better to do playing at being part of the political protest.

They will return to their million pound or more flats in Notting Hill or Daddy's country seat as they sip champagne and indulge in all forms of sexual excess and perversion as they look down on the rest of British society.

What a bunch of useless tw*ts!

Down with the aristocracy and its parasitic members. They are RIDICULOUS.
5

Goat Boy,

08/12/2008 19:22:33
I agree with the message, but not the method. Upsetting the general public is NOT the way to gain support, and they will need plenty of public support if they want to win their case.

6

Ewan Oosami,

08/12/2008 19:22:38
Use the firetrucks to spray them with diarroeah (?) laced with purple dye.....(er would that make it Dyerroeah ?) so these parasites could be identified for weeks. What right have they got to spoil innocent peoples holidays or trips to see relatives - who the hell do they think they are? I hope they get sued for every penny they have.
Find where they live and do the same to them!
7

nolimits,

BC, Canada 08/12/2008 19:34:40
Heh heh! What a bunch of fuddie duddies.... I'l just bet you all have never protested anything in your lives. Being told where to S..t, what colour it should be, and how high the pile, is probably your greatest joy in conforming to the social norms. Jesus H. Christ, get a grip..
8

Schot,

Plainly sensible 08/12/2008 20:41:31
This was a safe action by all accounts as the runway was closed at the time. It was also accountable which means they were proud to have done it and didn't try to escape as part of the act is to ensure their arguments are heard in court. Looks like some posh activists and some poor ones so class stereotyping isn't helpful although they were noticably young people. Probably best to lock up any person who looks too young as they are the ones who take most offence at the destruction of their future for our silly consumerist short-termism.

Upsetting people taking wasteful flights for no good reason will not be counter-productive to their campaign, even any sort of sit-down protest in a town inconveniences someone, even a simple march blocks a road. Are you for banning all protest?

Terrorists know that is impossible to secure a runway, as witnessed by the IRA mortar campaign against Heathrow. A far more reprehensible and dangerous action took place in Prestwick two years ago, and to Plane Stupids shame they have refused to rule out similar dangerous tactics. Saying that, no Plane Stupid action so far has carried any safety risk to the travelling public and they seem unlikely to do so.
9

Richard Lionheart,

08/12/2008 23:51:58
#8 The runway was closed because of the security threat this action, by criminals, caused.

Stopping people from flying or traveling by car will not do anything to stop climate change. Get used to it!
10

Fifi la Bonbon,

Ay-kay, yah!!! 09/12/2008 00:14:17
I think we ordinary folk need to get used to being told by our social betters how we might travel.

"Activist Lily Kember, 21, a third-year anthropology student at Edinburgh University..." - says it all.

She is a genuine toff, from a family with absolutely oodles of money and connections,and she and her posh mates have decided that going on holiday inexpensively to foreign parts is not for us. "Travelling" must be reserved for nice people, like them, and this is how they're going to sort it out.

And it's all for the sake of the planet so just shut up about it, yah!

Won't stop them travelling wherever they damn well like, but then they have the money and networks, and if it's just them, then it's nicer. Then they can write books about these places so they get even richer. And we go to Clacton, or Saltcoats, and we have to damn well lump it.

11

Schot,

09/12/2008 03:07:09
-Stopping people from flying or traveling by car will not do anything to stop climate change. Get used to it!

It plays a small but important part in saving our climate. Eating meat is far more destructive than flying but these particular activists tend to eat more meat than they fly.

-Won't stop them travelling wherever they damn well like, but then they have the money and networks, and if it's just them, then it's nicer

Unfortunately you are correct. Even their spokesperson today didn't deny flying themselves and refused to rule out flying in future. Just because the activists are often hypocritical doesn't mean the platitudes they express are factually wrong. I am glad to see no arguments here against man-made climate-change. You presumably have younger kin who you wouldn't deny an atmosphere to.
12

eyeswide,

10/12/2008 09:25:06
"fears"

About sums it up.

These wilfully stupid ignoramuses are too afraid to do some real research and too afraid of what they may discover... and it ain't what this paper's hacks keep saying is happening either.

Colder soon. CO2 is innocent.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.