Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


T in the Park

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Security fear as thousands of Iraqi prisoners set to go free



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 November 2008
IRAQ'S parliament is due to pass a long-negotiated security pact with the United States tomorrow, creating a new problem for the American military – how to deal with 5,000 dangerous detainees it will now have to charge or release.
The deal is primarily intended to set a timetable for US troops to leave Iraq by the end of 2011. But it also calls for control of security matters to shift to the Iraqi authorities. If passed, it will mean US troops could no longer hold people without charge, as they have since the 2003 invasion.

All detentions would have to be based on evidence, and the US would have to prosecute prisoners in Iraqi courts, or let them go. "At the end of the day, if there's not enough facts to justify a court case, then we'll have to release," Brigadier-General David Quantock, commander of the US detention system in Iraq, said.

The Americans have evidence against only "a few hundred" of the most dangerous detainees, he said, leaving open the possibility thousands may soon find themselves back on Iraq's streets.

Part of the challenge stems from differences between the American and Iraqi legal systems. In the US, forensic evidence is widely used in the courts. Not so in Iraq.

"We've got a number of guys that are covered in TNT (explosive residue). However, that's not admissible in Iraqi court," Brigadier-Gen Quantock said. "What wins the day in Iraqi courts today is two eyewitness statements or a confession."

The US is training Iraqi forensic specialists and pushing to make such evidence more acceptable in court. Iraqi judges are slowly bending, but it is expected to take time before forensic evidence is widely approved.

There has been a marked improvement in security, and that has boosted the confidence of Iraq's government and allowed security-based detention to give way to a civilian justice system. If the pact with the US is agreed, it will also mark a major step towards shutting down a detention system that was tainted by the scandal at Abu Ghraib prison, outside Baghdad, where US guards abused detainees.

The vast majority of those in US custody are not considered dangerous, so the military is focusing its legal efforts on the 5,000 it deems a threat.

Iraq's government will receive the names and other details of those in US custody so it can issue arrest warrants for some of them. Brigadier-Gen Quantock said he was confident that either the US or Iraqi government will muster enough evidence to keep many of the most dangerous individuals behind bars.

But releasing the other 11,000, who are not considered a serious threat, also poses a challenge.

The security agreement stipulates that detainees be let go "in a safe and orderly manner".

US and Iraqi officials are mindful of the dangers posed by dumping thousands of suspected insurgents into communities already grappling with high unemployment.

"The fact that they are going back to their cities and homes might complicate the security situation," said Haider al-Ibadi, a Shiite MP with close ties to the prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki. "But we can do nothing to stop this, because the authorities cannot arrest or keep any person in custody without evidence."

The US set up the detention system after toppling Saddam Hussein as a way to hold suspected insurgents. Those considered a security risk could be held without charge as long as the US deemed necessary. Since the war began, some 100,000 have passed through the system, with the prisoner population peaking at 26,000 in mid-2007.


BACKGROUND

UNITED States' forces in Iraq are holding some 16,500 detainees in all.

The largest jail, with 12,900 prisoners, is at Camp Bucca, near Basra, 340 miles south-east of Baghdad.

Camp Cropper, on the sprawling US base near Baghdad international airport, is the logistical headquarters and houses 2,000 prisoners. All detainees entering and leaving US custody pass through it.

The US has already released about 16,000 detainees over the past year and plans to continue freeing prisoners at an average rate of 50 a day.

"We think the communities can absorb it at about that rate – any faster would put us at risk," Brigadier-General David Quantock said.

The full article contains 726 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 November 2008 10:05 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Iraq
 
1

Postmark-55,

China, 25/11/2008 00:23:02
The US has no business there and needs to leave at once, and pick up their murdering buddies in Afghanistan on the way so that they can all go 'home' together.
2

,

25/11/2008 01:34:25
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Lynne,

25/11/2008 03:09:09
What a joke.. a toll with multiple IDs is out "exposing" us!!! Ya hafta laugh!!! This guy/girl is a joke.
4

Lynne,

25/11/2008 03:10:20
Sorry, the word is troll.

LE your an idiot.
5

Finlang,

France 25/11/2008 03:49:42
#4
And the grammatical form is "you're" (i.e. the contraction of "you are"). Have a nice right-wingish day.
6

,

25/11/2008 03:55:29
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

,

25/11/2008 04:09:33
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

,

25/11/2008 04:54:15
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
9

Cappo Del Monte,

25/11/2008 06:54:28
#1 skidmark

Hasnt your communist brothers not restricted your internet access yet, only asking as the verbal pollution coming from your pathetic fingers is bunging up the internet again.
I see your little one brain cell cannot deal with the fact that the bullies of the fine porcelain china invaded Tibet in the 50's, have tortured and killed to keep the people oppressed, sorry those little things like freedom to speak vote etc are alien to you.
Now away back to your wee red flag waving
10

,

25/11/2008 07:32:38
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

drunken proffet,

Tassy 25/11/2008 07:33:16
Throughout life, people consistently ignore "timing" as a relevant part of the formula to buy a house, close a deal, propose marriage. Is Time the fourth dimension that controls our deals and efforts. I could not tell you, but I tell you one thing, coming from an OAP no doubt on the verge of senility. The Americans should clear out first and release the prisoners second.
12

invictager,

Kent 25/11/2008 08:24:10
No forensic evidence, only two eyewitnesses or a confession.
Wow, why haven't we adpoted such a classy system. Think of all the jail space it would save.
13

Cappo Del Monte,

25/11/2008 08:28:54
#10 you dont half haver some pi*h
Hopefully school will begin soon for you
14

,

25/11/2008 08:52:41
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

,

25/11/2008 09:28:12
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
16

,

25/11/2008 10:08:41
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
17

Fidelio,

Edinburgh 25/11/2008 12:24:34
Half of these toe-rags should be 6 foot under anyway.
Let them out I say, theres plenty of ammunition left for the lot of them.
18

Rowdy Roy,

25/11/2008 12:39:15
#17 Fidelio
Planing on committing war crimes?
Kill em all then ask question later eh
19

Bele's bane,

Scotland 25/11/2008 13:40:32
America will have the perfect solution.

Soon they will begin work on regaining control over and restoring Abu Ghraib as the premier indudtrial production level torture centre of the world.

These "suspect detainees" have had a taste of American justice and no doubt will be keen to join the resistance in an effort to expell the occupier and restore soverignty to Iraq.

They might even have the desire to remove the American compliant puppet government and replace it with a government elected via the democratic process when the country is no longer under occupation!

No thinking person can give any credibility to a government that was "elected" while a country was under occupation.

I notice that the concept of free expression is under serious threat by the Scotsman's censor!

Perhaps he or she should research the concept of freedom of expression and afford readers the courteous opportunity to read what other posters have written before the post is removed!
20

Number 6,

Germany 25/11/2008 13:57:12
At last we are see-ing some movement on this issue. Lets free these men and let them return to their families. You can't be allowed to torture indefinetley, and abominations like Abu-Grab must be closed ASP in the name of human decencey.

I see Guantanimo is also about to be emptied, can I suggest that these cages are now turned over to the thousands of Americans now living under bridges in the land of the free.

The days of crude uneducated Presidents are over. Get used to it neo-cons, America will now be approaching problems from a more intelligent and less barbaric angle. No more massacre first make excuses later .

Welcome back to the world community.
21

invictager,

Kent 25/11/2008 14:09:09
If you actually believe Obama will do anything but more of the same you must be even more stupid than your post makes you appear.
22

Number 6,

Germany 25/11/2008 14:36:03
#21 So mr wise guy,what's your post based on? Dismissing Obama, before he has even took office,
is right up there with Lynne for rank stupidity and ignorance. Try not to tar all Americans with the same brush, it just makes you look dumb.
23

invictager,

Kent 25/11/2008 19:24:34
My post is based on the fact that the USA does not give a monkeys about anybody but themselves and the fact that Obama has actually said he will continue the fight against extremists.

The fact that he move some troops from Iraq to concentrate on Afghanistan does not change the fact he will not follow any policy he sees fit to stop another 9/11
24

Dragonhead,

Dalian,China 26/11/2008 01:45:51
#9 Cappo del Monte.How can you invade what is already yours Oh! enlightened one.Your inane comments on Tibet are garbage, as are your purile comments on Internet access in China.You have not the faintest idea what you are talking about.On a scale of 1:10, you don't even reach ONE!
25

P. Lee,

26/11/2008 12:51:04
#9 Cappo del Monto you talk absolute nonsense and know nothing. I dont think you are real person
26

Finnking,

Lempäälä 28/11/2008 05:10:29
A million dead. Millions displaced. Cities destroyed. Illegal/immoral phosphor weapons used. outrageous abuse and torture of prisoners. According to this (well written) article, 100 000 detainees have passed through the US "justice" system without charge with a further 12000 being held in spite of no evidence against them.

Invasion, mass killing, illegal weapons use, mass detentions and torture.

Surely these are grounds for the international community to place the controlling regime under sanctions and, possibly, military action?

Not going to happen. Such action is reserved for non USA controlled states.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.