Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Scotland's top policeman demands special courts for domestic violence

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 January 2008
SCOTLAND'S most senior police officer has called for specialist courts to be created across the country to deal with the soaring number of domestic abuse cases.
Stephen House, chief constable of Strathclyde Police, said a pilot scheme – which every year sees a dedicated sheriff deal swiftly with more than 700 violent partners who are "fast-tracked" through the system by prosecutors in Glasgow – was proving "hugely successful".

He said the pilot, set up in October 2004, should be replicated in other cities and towns across the country, describing the absence of public money for the move as a "frustration".

Mr House's call puts him at odds with the Scottish Government, which has ruled out a national roll-out of domestic- violence courts, agreeing only to fund an expansion of the Glasgow service.

The SNP-led administration has also halted a planned national roll-out of youth courts.

Latest figures show violence against women in the home is at an all-time high. A 7 per cent rise in recorded incidents of abuse took the number of cases to more than 48,000 in Scotland last year, but a victim survey has revealed that many incidents go unreported, and the true number could be as high as 250,000.

The figures led Morag Alexander, head of the Commission for Equality and Human Rights in Scotland, to describe domestic violence as "a hidden epidemic of unimaginable proportions".

Mr House said the pilot court had been "very successful".

He added: "We've had experience of this elsewhere in the country and the world. The great thing is the judge becomes an expert on the issue and immune to the excuses from offenders. The court becomes less tolerant of domestic violence and more understanding to the victim's situation. That helps them come up with a more appropriate sentence.

"If those appearing before the court are repeat offenders, then clearly they need a custodial sentence. That is especially true as, for it even to get to court, it means it's a serious report.

"I would like to see the pilot spread across Strathclyde. In fact, we need to spread it out across the whole of Scotland.

"The frustration is the lack of public finances. If you could take the money police and health services spend on dealing with violence, particularly drink-related, and spend it on something else, such as these courts, it would make a real difference. The problem is we have to keep spending it on dealing with the consequences of domestic violence."

Under the pilot scheme, victims are also given specialist support to help them overcome their fear of going to court.

Last night, Kenny MacAskill, the justice secretary, insisted domestic abuse was "right up there" in the Scottish Government's priorities, but said the pressure on court buildings made it impractical to extend the scheme across Scotland.

Edinburgh's courtrooms, for example, face a massive increase in workload when relatively minor district court cases are moved to the sheriff court in Chambers Street next year.

Jacq Kelly, a spokeswoman for Scottish Women's Aid, said the lessons from the pilot scheme must be applied across the country, so victims of domestic abuse could benefit from quicker and more rigorous prosecutions.

She added: "We are keen to see the lessons learned during the pilot applied elsewhere."

'HE WOULD LOCK ME IN'IF THERE could be any consolation for Catherine, it was that her husband never actually hit her.

But the scars inflicted by more than four years of psychological torture were every bit as damaging as any physical attack.

Verbal abuse, including physical threats, spiralled into even more terrifying episodes involving attempts to snatch her daughter, setting fire to the family home and serial stalking.

"For five years, everything was fine. But he became really nasty when I told him I wanted to go to university and get a degree," says the 26-year-old, who is from the south side of Glasgow.

"He wanted me to work, saying we didn't have enough money. He wanted me to have (another] baby, but I wasn't ready for that.

"It went downhill from there. He would lock me in the house and lock my shoes in a cupboard so I couldn't go out. I had to sneak out and go round to my neighbour's so I could borrow a pair of shoes that were too small so I could go to university. It was unbelievable. I'd miss the last lecture so I could get back home before he returned from work."

One violent outburst in the middle of the night, however, when her husband smashed up the living room, left her with no option but to leave home.

Catherine's husband was arrested and, within six weeks, appeared at Glasgow's domestic-abuse court. Under the normal court system, she would have had to wait for closer to six months before the case would be dealt with.

He pleaded guilty to three charges, including two breaches of the peace, and was sentenced to 240 hours of community service.

• The name of the victim in this case has been changed.

The full article contains 858 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 January 2008 12:02 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

,

21/01/2008 01:08:26
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

Teofilio Cubillas,

21/01/2008 01:42:45
In what respect is he 'Scotland's most senior police officer?' He's less senior than the other seven who by dint of time in that rank have seniority. He's the Chief Constable of Scotland's largest force.
3

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta, CA..captured from Mexico 1845 21/01/2008 06:11:12
Latest figures show violence against women in the home is at an all-time high. A 7 per cent rise in recorded incidents of abuse took the number of cases to more than 48,000 in Scotland last year, but a victim survey has revealed that many incidents go unreported, and the true number could be as high as 250,000.

------------------------------------------------

Every body knows what a violent country the US (my country) is.

But it looks like Scotland is no better, when it comes to beating up and killing its women.

A BIG BLACK EYE for the Scots.

How disgusting and evil cruelty to women is.

GC

4

calum,

21/01/2008 06:27:47
So, it hasn't taken the Met-trained new boy to start telling everyone in Scotland what to do. I wonder how long it will take for the Justice Minister and the Lord Advocate to slap him back into line, foolish boy!
5

beeree,

local 21/01/2008 08:46:11
I see from reports elsewhere that there is a terrorist supporting march in Glasgow this weekend.

It's a good tactic to try and divert attention elsewhere rather than apply it to people who blatantly advocate law-breaking.
6

Jeeemy,

21/01/2008 09:11:03
This mans “doup” is not long in the seat, but he is certainly making sure the media are falling on his every word.
Pontificating on Firearms and him from the “Met” curious that; then we have “domestics” when his force’s policy is to ignore and be selective.
Now had he been getting more than 7% out and being seen, and even enforcing the current laws of this land (I do trust he has had a full briefing on the differences) I may consider his sound bites further, but until he has satisfied me that he and the force he commands has got it’s act together, I shall reserve judgement.

7

alsirat,

Scotland 21/01/2008 09:28:56
A difficult one. As a kid I lived next door to a family where the husband used to beat the wife up. If police were called, she would physically atack them and give them abuse for picking on her husband. What can you do?
8

Queen D,

Glasgow 21/01/2008 09:43:18
Did he 'demand' as it says in the headline or did he 'call' for these courts to be set up??
I agrree,it is a difficult situation for the police and has ever been so!
9

Isonomia,

Lenzie 21/01/2008 09:43:42
Strathclyde police have a terrible record for abuse, perhaps before pointing to the splinter in someone else's eye he should ....
10

Horrible Cankers..dans le Cyber Shebeen,

21/01/2008 10:46:31
These courts are for male and female victims of domestic abuse...the problem lies in our culture...the shame attached to being a victim of domestic abuse..the not involving the 'polis'...what happens to the children?

Things are different for women now..they can flee the home WITH their kids as opposed to becoming homeless and abandoning their children to a drunk father...

Of course both male and female partners are violent...but have a look at the stats..go on, google it...I dare you.....shocking...male violence in the home is still an awful part of our heritage...a legacy that violent fathers left to their male children...who will continue to leave it to their children....

You can 'but but but' all you want...zero tolerance is only a phrase...and the sad thing is the children are raised in this environment.
11

sam the god,

21/01/2008 11:24:39
#11 Horrible Cankers

Is it any better in France?
12

Horrible Cankers..dans le Cyber Shebeen,

21/01/2008 11:33:22
12...I have no idea.
13

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 21/01/2008 11:43:07
The police are there to enforce the law, not to get involved in suggesting new laws. If we gave the police their way we would now have 90 day internment.
14

ex-labour,

21/01/2008 12:25:05
12 sam the god,'Is it any better in France?'

It happens wherever men are!
15

Legacy,

N.E. 21/01/2008 12:35:10
#14 Spot on!
Flexing his/their muscle with the SNP Government, he should stick to what he's paid for, preferably Policing our Streets, let's see them!
16

the_figures_are _fudged,

Galashiels 21/01/2008 12:39:17
Police must stop trying to meddle in politics.

Do we now pay police to have political views ?

17

Tom R,

21/01/2008 12:57:41
The prevalence of female violence against men is much higher than people realise. This is evidenced by surveys of people who are asked whether or not they have ever struck their partner/husband/wife and the answers show little difference between males and females. So what is going on? I suggest the following:

*there is a clear advantage for women seeking a divorce to accuse their husbands of domestic violence. It helps with regard to child custody issues among other things.

*many men do not wish to admit to being attacked by their wives

*even if the woman strikes the first blow she may be the one who is meaningfully injured due to retaliation. The mindset that a woman can safely hit a man because he is stronger is a dangerous but common view

* while I fully accept that it can be very unpleasant to be shouted and sworn at in an argument, I do think a clear distinction should be drawn between domestic violence and domestic abuse. In all other aspects of the law, swearing at someone is NOT treated as seriously as a physical attack.

We are running well behind the times in this country if we cannot grasp that this should be a gender neutral issue



18

Horrible Cankers..dans le Cyber Shebeen,

21/01/2008 13:21:36
We are running behind the times in Scotland...one because violence in any situation is not being addressed..two..because male violence in our culture is nothing to be proud of...Scotland has a reputation for violence, particularly Glasgow..some men wear their 'hardman' reputation as a badge of masculinity...for far too long now domestic violence has been hushed up and something seen to be left for couples or husband and wife to deal with..

You are wrong in your statement that a clear distinction shoulod be drawn between domestic violence and domestic abuse..for either sex...some of the most violent acts can be in the form of threats...fear is a powerful weapon in the hands of the abuser and many a woman and child have been cowed into submission by a bullying domineering husband/father..if you tell someone often enough that they are worthless useless trash they will believe you...physical violence leaves physical scars...mental violence has left people dysfunctional in relationships and probably in danger of becoming either victim or abuser..

The law will not treat verbal assault as seriously as physical assault but we, as human beings, have to recognise the damage that continued verbal violence can do to people, particularly over a long period of time...it aint Freudian analysis...its logic.

As I said before...google the stats...particularly those of women who have been murdered by their partners...its ugly...its unacceptable and we should be doing something about it....

There is a clear advantage to men to deny domestic violence, particularly in divorce cases...or possible imprisonment...

Violence should be tackled in schools...dialogue between boys and girls..but particularly tackling our burden of 'the hardman'..which begins in secondary school...your brother a hardman?...why then you must join a gang too...
19

sam the god,

21/01/2008 13:36:07
#15 ex-labour

Yes I know that but I was wanting to know if the numbers per head of population is different in the two countries (cultural differences).
20

Tom R,

21/01/2008 13:41:56
#21

I will say it again. This must be treated as a gender neutral issue. It is people as individuals who are violent, not men or women. Trying to blame one gender or the other will not help to solve the problem.

I am not belittling the effects of verbal abuse, but I am saying this:

Domestic abuse is NOT domestic violence. In the past domestic violence was just that-physical violence. In recent years the definition of domestic "violence" has come to include verbal abuse-no wonder the statistics are soaring.
21

Horrible Cankers..dans le Cyber Shebeen,

21/01/2008 14:43:27
23....Look through past articles on this newspaper with regard to violence..whether domestic or not...there is hardly a day goes by without several reports of male violence and sexual assaults...

You are turning a blind eye to the problem..the culture of male violence in our society..particularly within the working classes...this is a gender issue...because the male gender is expected to come up to a certain standard of masculinity, and for some that includes being an aggressive individual..or violent...a 'hardman'...this falsehood still exists within our society and it creates violence..

It is not about blaming one gender or the other but recognising the FACTS and the STATS that speak volumes...any violence is unacceptable, but male violence reports swamp newspapers and television news..it is about RE-EDUCATION for children..despite what our culture, tv or heros will tell us..

In Scotland Assault is a crime of common law...if you even threaten someone with assault ie "If you do not do this I will kill you"..you can be charged with assault as this is a threat of violence, it also includes..extortion and cruel and unnatural treatment of children..

This definition applies to anyone whether in a domestic or non domestic situation, so why should it be any different for people in a domestic situation if they are guilty of this behaviour?

Perhaps the stats are not a true reflection of the problem...perhaps it is ACTUALLY worse?
22

A Copper,

Glasgow 21/01/2008 16:19:31
Regarding No1 comments

Strathclyde Police does get involved in Domestics, the time taken to deal with these incidents has increased 4 fold in the last few years as the recording procedure is extensive, a basic verbal argument between two adults will result in a Domestic incident report being raised this is a long procedure, its not so long ago this would have be resulted as "advice given".

These increased reporting methods have raised the number of domestic incidents. There has been no increase in domestic incidents only the way that they all get recorded.

When it comes to making laws everyone is allowed an opinion that includes the police as the people who have do deal with it.

Mr House is a change at the helm of Strathclyde Police and from what i hear his changes are being well received from the rank and file officers.

Remember the next time you and your partner argue, that's a domestic incident. If your neighbour phones the police you will become part of the increasing figures.
23

Gordiedoonsooth,

Engerland 21/01/2008 16:25:53
Been in SIX forces then=another butterfly!


Stephen House QPM

Chief Constable Stephen House
As the most senior police officer within Strathclyde Police, Chief Constable Stephen House has overall responsibility for operational policy, internal administration and Force efficiency.

Mr House was born in Glasgow, where he lived until his family moved south in 1968. He returned to Scotland to study at Aberdeen University before joining Sussex Police in 1981.

He was a constable in Brighton for most of his early service and policed the Brighton Grand Hotel bombing and the miners' strike. He was promoted to sergeant on transfer to Northamptonshire Police in 1988. On promotion to the rank of inspector, he worked as staff officer to the chief constable. He was later a chief inspector at the force headquarters and at division in Kettering and Wellingborough.

In 1994, he transferred to West Yorkshire Police where he worked firstly as a superintendent in the performance unit and then as divisional commander in Central Bradford for three years.

He attended the Senior Command Course at Bramshill in 1997, and in the following year was appointed assistant chief constable in Staffordshire. While there he was responsible for territorial policing and latterly specialist services.

Mr House joined the Metropolitan Police Service in December 2001 as deputy assistant commissioner. Initially he worked in Policy Reviews and Standards and moved to Territorial Policing in early 2003. He was appointed assistant commissioner Central Operations in January 2005 setting up the new business group from scratch.

In 2006, he was asked to take command of the Specialist Crime Directorate with responsibility for:



*
Homicide and other serious crime
*
Organised crime
*
Criminal networks
*
Intelligence and covert policing
*
Child protection
*
Economic crime
*
Drugs
*
Gun crim
24

Anthony,

Glasgow 21/01/2008 17:01:21
The key words are "deal swiftly". How can you "deal swiftly" with matters which might come down to questions of disputed evidence? It appears this is yet more summary justice, by which is meant, make sure the accused has no chance of receiving a fair trial. It's quick and efficient. It's also utterly perverse. Mr House should give up the job (supposedly a politically neutral one), and stand for elected office if he wants to campaign. He could then test the sort of true support his ideas have. Yet again, the police interfering in politics. This has to stop.
25

Helmut Smegma,

Edinburgh 21/01/2008 17:09:51
Let`s have meaningful custodial sentences to refelect the severity of the crimes.Special courts won`t solve the problem.
26

Mike96,

Devon 21/01/2008 17:38:23
If you wish to learn the truth behind the feminist movement and just how anti-male and divisive they are read Erin Pizzey's own words which can be found here at www.nscfc.com/pressrelease.htm for if anyone knows she most surely does being the first person to open a woman's refuge. Men are most definatly victims also, so why in the whole of the UK are there but only 2 male refuges in comparison to the 500 plus for woman?

27

henrymanchester,

UK 21/01/2008 18:02:47
Steven House reminds me of a slimmed down uncle fester...
28

ex-labour,

21/01/2008 18:51:37
29 Mike96,Devon Correction - the feminist movement was about anti- male dominance of society and culture, language, thought and imagery. To a great extent they still are.
At the same time, I totally agree that female on male violence is a serious problem that is not addressed. However, males are still unable to deal with the ridicule from other males when they are victims of domestic violence. So, they suffer in silence. There should, indeed, be more refuges for victims of female violence.
29

Nellie,

Liverpool 21/01/2008 19:13:13
#14. Wrong. The Met did not support the 90 day internment idea. Nor did MI5. It would seem our rights are safer in their hands than it is with the Government!
30

Rob me blind,

Peterhead 21/01/2008 19:30:58
I am all for these courts the sooner theses women are brought to justice the better they have been getting away with abuse for years and the normal court system either cant or wont deal with them
31

MichScot,

USA 21/01/2008 20:05:33
Abuse is WRONG and it is against God's commands. I have read that Britain has just been offered sharia law... Make sure you don't accept the offer and try also to protect their women, as well. If it is illegal for one group, it should be illegal for all the other groups.
32

open,

west coast 21/01/2008 20:28:20
The above commenters should be aware that specialist courts he is suggesting are courts without JURIES.

The criminal laws in this country require a JURY which is being blatantly undermined by the judicial system and police tinkering in our laws.

Any man or woman who has a partner alleging an attack of any kind has the criminal laws to deal with assault .What is happening is that those controlling our laws are needing more excuses to steal a mans assets,home and children,empowering women like Heather Mills along the way that makes the same allegations against one of music's rock legends to up the anti on her massive multi million pound divorce settlement.

The police are, as someone suggested above ,SELECTIVE about who is taken seriously when it comes to one partner alleging abuse by another .THAT DEPENDS ON WHETHER the man in question is in the same MASONIC club as the local police.The whole sinister aspect of domestics when PROPERTY is owned by the man paying the mortgage is that closed secretive courts require a reason to transfer vast sums from one party to another .That is usually the state who use legal aid to fund long term divorce cases and then STEAL the family home.

This is completely opposite from the domestics that happen on many housing schemes were property is not an issue but the fights and squabbles that go on are used as an excuse for the legal system to make assumptions that all men are objects of ridicule and open to theft of their hard earned assets.

The divorce industry is a massive racket for the purveyors of lies and deceit and the legal parasites and police rely on radical feminist whining to abuse their power and take over the running of the family but especially the homes.

The police should account for the vast amount of time they spend getting involved in the house and child theft that is rife in Strathclyde under the previous chief constable Rae who resigned before the new police commissioner caught up with his part in t
33

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 21/01/2008 21:06:25
#32 I never mentioned the Met, but as you have then read this:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,22989-1862592,00.html

It appears that Sir Ian Blair has driven a coach and horses through your statement, Nellie.
34

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 21/01/2008 21:09:15
Nellie

The source is the Times and here is the reference to Sir Ian:

"Sir Ian Blair, the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, also held a previously-scheduled briefing for journalists in Westminster this afternoon, in which he offered his unqualified support for the 90-day limit"

Note the words "unqualified support........"
35

open,

west coast 21/01/2008 21:11:44
POLICE including Strathclyde police are involved in aiding and abetting sheriff officer to enter premises and steal land,property and assets.Excuses required are domestic and divorce.

UK BAILIFFS UNLAWFULLY ENTERING HOMES

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7197493.stm

Bailiffs are illegally entering homes to confiscate people's possessions, the National Debtline has warned. It also says police do not stop such practices because many officers do not fully understand the law themselves.
---------------
The POLICE DO fully understand the law but we ask how many of the repossessed homes they assist in STEALING get offered back to those same police at knock down prices?

LJPR LEGAL JUDICIAL POLITICAL REFORMERS

Masonic judges OUT Juries IN
36

Mike96,

Devon 21/01/2008 23:51:20
You are spot on number 35. www.nscfc.com
37

,

22/01/2008 00:22:14
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
38

,

22/01/2008 00:24:36
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
39

Colin Midlem,

USA 22/01/2008 00:48:31
My childhood included physical violence from my father who was an intelligent and successful technocrat but learnt his parenting from his father and had no thought to change such behaviour.

My first wife [who had suffered psychological abuse in childhood] and I decided that our children would be free from such problems. Although our relationship was not great we stuck together for the care of the children who have turned into exceptional young people. My wife struggled with terrible PMS which was taken out on me physically and mentally. I was unable to retaliate due to a pacifist attitude. The last time I threw a punch was on the rugby field at age ten.

The next 47 years have seen me avoid violence using a fast brain and agile tongue.

When I reached sufficient status I could arrange my work plan to be away from home during the period knowing that the children would be safe if subject to some ill temper.

Doesn't always work with my second wife who has a volatile temper which includes threats and violence which I tackle with a wicket keeper's talents for catching objects and the ability to walk away. This last has usually been assisted by a kick in the back to accelerate my departure down the stair. To date my injuries have been simple fractures.

I hold deep feelings about violence directed at women and extend those to domestic violence to men which I think is under-recognised. Maybe we are just wimps or perhaps love overcomes the temporary insanity of our female partners.

The answer to the wife-beaters is complex but probably rests with an upbringing free of violence and education in relationship building. How do you create such?
40

Doreen,

The çyber Shebeen 22/01/2008 11:16:31
42...Colin..I realise that you do love your wife but you are doing her no favours by accepting her behaviour, in fact you are probably exacerbating any feelings of self hatred that she has.

"Simple fractures?"...you sound like a classic victim of domestic violence..

Do yourself, your wife, your children and all victims of domestic violence a favour...she has to realise that she is abusive, is abusing you and abusing herself in the process...she needs help, she is a criminal also and one day you may not have the option of reporting her to the authorities...

Why wait?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.