Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 10th May 2008

Evening News / Sony Centre Reverse Auction

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Schwarzenegger comes under fire as California slashes green car target



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 29 March 2008
ARNOLD Schwarzenegger, the governor of California, was accused of betraying his green credentials yesterday after the state slashed its targets for zero-emission vehicles.
Friends of the Earth complained that the state has bowed to car manufacturers by weakening a mandate, set five years ago, for at least 25,000 electric and hydrogen-powered vehicles to be on California's roads by 2014.

The California Air Resource
s Board (CARB) yesterday revised the target to just 7,500, a 70 per cent reduction.

It is the latest in a series of drastic erosions of the zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) programme, which decreed that 10 per cent of cars made by the country's main manufacturers should be emission-free by 2003.

"This is another step backwards," said Danielle Fugere, FoE's West Coast director, yesterday. She said the gradual watering down of targets had saved car makers more than $6 billion.

CARB, a state agency, is independent of Schwarzenegger, whose Hummers run on hydrogen and bio-fuels. But campaigners have been disappointed by his failure to take a public stand on the ZEV issue before the board's decision, given his otherwise noisy advocacy of the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.

"The move by CARB is political, it's because of pressure from auto-makers," Ms Fugere claimed. "We didn't see him pushing CARB to do the right thing."

The decision is expected to affect 12 other states that had adopted California's ZEV target.

Car manufactures – which had lobbied aggressively and even threatened to go to court to fight the old mandate – said they were pleased with the revised measure. They said that the previous target was too rushed and they needed more time to develop affordable hydrogen and battery-powered vehicles.

The rules apply to Ford, General Motors, Toyota, Honda and Nissan.

To help compensate for downgrading its ZEV mandate, the CARB has set new rules requiring them to build nearly 60,000 plug-in hybrid vehicles in California while the technology that will allow mass production of pure zero-emission vehicles is developed.

Hybrids run on a combination of electricity and petrol. The plug-in variety envisioned by the CARB have yet to come into production. General Motors, for example, is developing a rechargeable vehicle it hopes to have on the market in 2010.

Plug In America, which campaigns for electric vehicles, expressed disappointment at CARB's "shameful weakening" of the ZEV programme.

And doubts remained over the board's pledge to overhaul its ZEV programme to bring it into line with emission standards enacted in California in 2006, which aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 80 per cent by 2050. The overhaul will not take place until at least the end of next year.

"It's a huge blow," Chelsea Sexton, executive director of Plug In America, complained.

But Mary Nichols, chair of CARB, hit back. "We're introducing a whole new category of vehicles to the public," she said. "I don't think it's a step backwards in the real world."





The full article contains 505 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 March 2008 10:25 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Reckless,

Corrupt EU 29/03/2008 12:08:45
Arnold is the son of an SS officer.

http://www.arnoldexposed.com/
2

Stuart 2,

Pennsylvaia 29/03/2008 12:35:42
#1 Reckless, that is old hat besides how many living today are the children of SS offficer?

California wants zero pollution and are willing to have plug in cars while the technology is being developed. Of course, when you recharge you use electricity which is generated. The generating stations cause pollution. One doesnot build generators in California they buy, beg, steal from plants in other states.
3

Reckless,

Corrupt EU 29/03/2008 14:36:01
"The son of an SS nazi officer,
Schwarzenegger has publicly stated that
he has dreamed of being a dictator and that he
admires Hitler. He campaigned for war criminal
Kurt Waldhiem after it had been made public that he
was a top nazi."

He also dislikes blacks.
4

Bill Offshore,

Banchory 29/03/2008 16:27:13
Why is it that the people that want to run a car on electricity conveniantly forget where that electricity comes from? A coal or oil powered generator most likely.
5

Big Willie Winkie (Wee was already taken),

29/03/2008 16:29:21
#3.
Bravo, Arnie (idiot)could not pour p*sh out of a welly boot if the instructions were printed on the sole.
6

Randy C,

Seattle WA 01/04/2008 07:24:46
Regarding #4. Would you please check your facts before you completely dismiss electric cars. In California most of the electricity comes from hydro electric, solar, wind and nuclear sources. All way cleaner than coal. Even if 100% of your electricity comes from coal, on a per mile basis there is still less than half of the emissions than a gas powered car. Coal powered plants get cleaner every year with improving technology, while a gas car only can get dirtier due to simple wear and tear.
7

Randy C,

Seattle WA 01/04/2008 07:55:56
Regarding #6. Oops I forgot to include my final point. It is estimated that electrical power grid can support about 180 million electric cars without building 1 single new power plant.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.