Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Russian bombs fell 50m from oil pipeline

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 August 2008
RUSSIAN planes dropped bombs this month within 50 metres of a pipeline that British oil company BP was in the process of reopening through Georgia, according to witnesses.
Residents yesterday showed deep craters alongside the pipeline, which runs between Azerbaijan's capital Baku, on the Caspian Sea, and Georgia's Black Sea port of Supsa.

It was reported on 12 August that Georgia had accused Russia of bombing the p
ipeline, without causing serious damage. Russia denied any such attacks.

"They started dropping the bombs at seven o'clock in the evening of the 11th," said Adam Zaridze, 26, a herdsman. "In one day they dropped 42 bombs," he said. "They were black planes … The cattle ran all over the place. Some of the cattle were killed." A woman suffered a fatal heart attack from fear, he said.

Next to a marker post above the underground pipeline, 15 miles from the border with Azerbaijan, three craters were visible within 50m of it. The largest was about 3m deep and 8m in diameter.

A line of craters could be seen running perpendicular to the pipeline for more than a mile. Cattle were grazing beside a churned-up area larger than a football pitch with two large craters in the middle.

Pipelines through Georgia, bringing oil and gas westwards from the Caspian Sea, are strategically important as they bypass Russia and help reduce western energy dependence on Moscow. The European Union relies on Russia for about a quarter of its gas and much of its oil.

This month's Russian- Georgian conflict rattled energy markets and western governments, which saw it as an attempt by Russia to reassert control over a former Soviet republic seeking to move closer to the West.

Matt Taylor, a BP spokesman, said it was aware of the bombing, but did not wish to comment. When fighting began, BP was reopening the pipeline, which was pumping 150,000 barrels per day until it was closed for maintenance in 2006.

He said the idea was reopen it at 90,000bpd to "provide some flexibility" and back-up for the main oil pipeline across Georgia, which runs from Baku via Tbilisi to Ceyhan in Turkey.

That pipeline carries between 700,000 and 800,000bpd, but was closed for two weeks this month after an explosion in its Turkish stretch. It runs close to the Baku-Supsa pipe, as does an important gas pipeline from the Caspian to Turkey, but neither were damaged in the conflict.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 August 2008 10:28 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Georgia
 
1

Andrew BOD,

Aberdeenshire 30/08/2008 00:06:49
Why were Russian bombs dropped this close to a vital energy supply for Europe?

Does anybody know? Vasya?
2

Andrew BOD,

Aberdeenshire 30/08/2008 00:44:59
Abkhazia. Not much has been said of this autonomous state.

Well here's some facts...

Population in 2003 was 216,000
21% Georgian, 44% Abkhazian, 11% Russian, 21% Armenian, 3% others

Population in 1989 was 525,000
46% Georgian, 18% Abkhaz, 14% Russian, 15% Armenian, 7% others

WHY THE DIFFERENCE YOU MAY ASK?

Attributed directly to the genocide of approx 20,000 Georgians and subsequent ethnic cleansing of over 200,000 Georgians from Abkhazia. This was the work of the Confederation of Mountain Peoples of the Caucasus (including Abkhazia), aided by Russian equipment and funds, a Black Sea naval blockade by Russia, and possible involvement of Russian Generals in strategic maneouvers against Georgian forces. A central part of this was the Sukhumi Massacre and the Battle of Gagra where Georgian POWs were executed. These war crimes and ethnic cleansing are being investigated by the International Criminal Court in The Hague.

And just recently, on May 15, 2008, the UN General Assembly adopted a non-binding resolution recognising the right of all refugees (including victims of reported “ethnic cleansing”) to return to Abkhazia and their property rights.

Not much chance of that now.

SO TELL ME, HOW IS ABKHAZIA WORTHY OF INDEPENDENCE FROM GEORGIA?



3

Mashimaro,

China 30/08/2008 03:21:45
Wow, I recall the americans dropping a bomb DIRECTLY on the Chinese embassy in Kosovo. Oops
4

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 30/08/2008 04:58:16
Andrew BOD in #1: I would assume that if they wanted to disrupt the pipeline, then it'd be disrupted. I also assume if a bomb dropped within 50M of the pipeline, then it was probably unintentional. The Russians are not nearly so accurate with a lot of their weaponry as the US is.

Mashimaro in 3: yes, its true. But in 1999 when the US dropped sent that bomb to the Chinese embassy in Serbia it was done on purpose. That was one of those precision bombs that follows the little red light targets of a laser device. They had a man on the ground pointing the laser at the embassy to bring it in. and then the US said that the reason they hit the embassy is because the maps they had were out-dated and they didn't know the newly constructed embassy was at that location. All this info I just gave you came out in obscure parts of our media. The other info that came out is that the Chinese flew in a husband-wife team of technicians to operate special equipment in that part of the embassy. The equipment was identifying the locations of US jets in the air. They were feeding this info to the serbians.

The other new news on this conflict in Georgia is that the Russians found a US passport in the building used by some Georgian soldiers they captured. It is assumed to be a passport of one of the US soldiers embedded into the Georgian military.
5

Postmark-55,

China, 30/08/2008 05:07:38
Hey Wally, I look at it this way, if Russia had wanted to hit the pipeline, they surely would have.
I am sure that when they dropped 42 bombs over the course of more than a mile, they missed the line purposely, more or less sending a message.

As far as The US bombing the Chinese Embassy, you can bet that was no accident.
After all, The Chinese are the sworn enemy solely because we fly the Communist flag.
6

Jim A,

30/08/2008 06:31:25
#5 Postmark-55, Now how do you know it wasn't an accident? Could be if there was someone holding a laser at a target said person may have had a skinfull of drink the night before and a bad case of the shakes the following morning. One must explore all possible avenues here. And besides it's one thing to say it was no accident but it's another proving it. Also I don't think it was because of the communist flag, it's a very nice flag :-)
7

Postmark-55,

China, 30/08/2008 06:56:54
#Jim A, Hey you old dog, how ya doing?I don't know if I buy Wally's version about the guy standing on the ground pointing a laser at the embassy, it would have to be quite the nutcase willing to take that risk and the bomb not straying to take him out.
Then again, like you said, he might have been p!ssed to the eyeballs and really didn't give a rat's @ss.
And as far as our flag goes, hmmmmmm, not bad, but I still think the Maple Leaf has more character.
And yes Jim, I know what you're going to say next, so let's have it.
8

Jim A,

30/08/2008 07:03:06
#7 Postmark, "And yes Jim, I know what you're going to say next, so let's have it."

As if I would mate ;-)
9

Jim A,

30/08/2008 07:04:06
Oh yea of little faith.
10

Postmark-55,

China, 30/08/2008 07:13:17
What Jim,
Nothing about taking the boy out of Canada?
You got the shakes today Jim,
Whooping it up last night weren't you?
Yeah 6 months in Alberta will have changed you, whether for better or worse only your wife will know, but I have a good hunch.;);)
11

Jim A,

30/08/2008 07:26:48
#10, Nothing about taking the boy out of Canada?

No sir, I try never to repeat myself, once is enough and judging by your last post I'm glad to see it stuck and you took it on board ;->
12

Neil,

Glasgow 30/08/2008 11:50:06
There is nothing that is a longer target or easier to blow up than an oil pipeline. The fact that the Russians didn't do so shows they didn't intend to.

They deliberately did their best to minimise this conflict. Would that we had not done the opposite.
13

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 30/08/2008 14:43:25
there are people who believe the pipelines are a major cause of the conflict. here is a Canadian intellectual speaking of this.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9907
14

Vasya,

30/08/2008 15:18:55
Totally agree with #4. Andrew, I have explained it several times. This 50 meters crater is bullexcrement. If Russia wanted to destroy the pipeline it would be destroyed. Do you have any doubts about it??? So the balst was clear well-played scene for western reproters such as "russian rockets from plains" in previous year)))
15

Mashimaro,

China 30/08/2008 15:27:51
Wally, once again you confirm your handle... chinese spying for Serbians... yeahhhhh right.
16

Gere,

Scotland 30/08/2008 20:40:12
Post #12 Neil, Glasgow

Note also, unlike American precision bombing in Afganistan and Iraq there were no broken bodies as a result of co-lateral damage!!!

Those Russians could teach the Americans a thing or two about accuracy!

Makes you think!!
17

Eboneesha,

30/08/2008 23:08:58
#13 Wally,By The Rivers Of Babylon

Canadian intellectual = Oxymoron

Just look at Scullions posts.
18

Andrew BOD,

Aberdeen/shire 31/08/2008 00:28:31
Vasya

I agree. If they wanted to destroy the pipeline they could have easily. But it does smell of provocation.
19

Neil,

Glasgow 31/08/2008 13:13:08
Provocation by the Russians or by our media? Whwen you have a war & several hundred miles of pipeline the odds of some sort of shrapnel getting within 50m somewhere along its length is strong (you are talking about an area equivalent to about 50 sq miles). Is this not just our media playing it up?
20

Mashimaro,

China 31/08/2008 14:28:22
But of course. THat is what they do.
21

mike - across the pond,

wally 31/08/2008 23:45:14
you "assume" that the russians have the technology to hope for the accuracy of the AMERICAN military....

not a valid assumption...

and wally.... you fit "canadian" and "intellectual" into the same sentence.... lol without laughing... ROFLMMFUSAAO.....

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.