Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Russia threatens nuclear strikes

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 January 2008
RUSSIA'S military chief of staff said yesterday that Moscow could use nuclear weapons in preventive strikes in case of a major threat.
These were the latest aggressive remarks from increasingly assertive authorities in Moscow.

General Yuri Baluyevsky said: "We have no plans to attack anyone, but we consider it necessary for all our partners in the world community to clearly under
stand… that to defend the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Russia and its allies, military forces will be used, including preventively, including the use of nuclear weapons."

The comments from the hawkish Baluyevsky did not appear to mark a policy shift for Russia, whose leaders have stressed the need to maintain a powerful nuclear deterrent and reserved the right to carry out preventive strikes to counter threats.

But in most of their public remarks about preventive strikes, President Vladimir Putin and other officials have not specifically mentioned the use of nuclear weapons.

Baluyevsky's remarks, which were made at a press conference, came at a time of increasingly strained relations between Moscow and the West.

The two sides are at odds over a range of issues and are embroiled in persistent disputes over US plans for missile defence facilities in former Soviet satellite states that have joined Nato, as well as alliance members' refusal to ratify an updated European conventional arms treaty.

The latest remarks appeared aimed at least in part at the United States, which Moscow accuses of endangering global security through aggressive actions such as the invasion of Iraq.

Putin, who has sought to boost his popularity at home and win support abroad with his vocal criticism of US foreign policy, has said that Russia opposes the use of preventive military attacks but reserves the right to carry them out because other countries do so.

Baluyevsky identified no specific nations or forces that threaten Russia.

But, according to the ITAR-Tass news agency, he said threats to global security include "the striving by a number of countries for hegemony on a regional and global level" – a clear reference to the United States – and terrorism.

Baluyevsky's remarks, made ahead of the March 2 presidential election, may also have been aimed in part at a domestic audience.

Putin is barred from seeking a third term but has clearly endorsed protege Dmitry Medvedev as his favoured successor.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 January 2008 8:29 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

Unimpressed one,

20/01/2008 10:02:29
That's all we need now, a resurrection of the cold war to go with the war on terror. Oh, and I forgot the war on poverty, battle against obesity, fighting climate chaos....
2

OscarMacApfel,

Dumfries 20/01/2008 11:49:00
Shittting crikey, 20 years ago this would have been the top story and we'd all be busy out the back digging bunkers.
3

Caora Dubh,

Croit sheasgair 20/01/2008 13:01:37
Grow up Putin and General Baluyevsky. We're sick of infantile Cold War posturing. We're all adults now, so throw away the baby's rattle and learn to talk like a grown-up.
4

Neil,

Glasgow 20/01/2008 17:04:38
Coara you should remeber that the NATO countries have always maintained their right to launch nuclear first strikes against anybody & indeed have a long record of breaking international law to engage in military adveturism & indeed genocide.

I agree that we desperately need a world where narions can co-exist under the rule of international law. However surely your criticism should be first directed against the main genocidal monsters running the NATO countries rather than those trying to defend themselves.

The mention of "allies" seems to be aimed at protecting Serbia from NATO's apparent desire to, once again ride roughshod over the rule of law & their most solemn & repeated promises so that they can keep Kosovo. Nobody can honestly complain if the Russians choose to put more faith in their own strength than in lying racist war criminals like Brown, Bush, Cameron & Clinton.
5

Guga II,

Rockall 20/01/2008 17:27:16
They're as bad as some of the septics, they want to nuke everything and everyone.
6

henrymanchester,

UK 20/01/2008 23:22:26
Perhaps we could spread a rumor France is planning an attack on Russia and let nature take its course...

:)
7

Patrick Sullivan,

Des Moines 20/01/2008 23:30:05
An all out nuclear holocaust was and continues to be the plan for all of us.
This is why the Extraterrestrials have intervened into our world.
The nuclear "Trigger' has been pulled on us already; many times over the decades.
We are the "Living Dead."
8

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 20/01/2008 23:35:59
#7

"We are the "Living Dead."

....That's a good name for a movie.
9

Conan the Librarian™,

20/01/2008 23:40:26
7
Er...Thats good Patrick.

Can I borrow one of your tinfoil helmets?
Mine's got a gremlin living in it.
10

weeshooie1,

Australia 21/01/2008 01:44:27
And so, once again, the paranoia sets in :o(
11

Gaius,

Renfrew 21/01/2008 02:43:12
I cannot believe the warmongering polemics coming out of The Kremlin. Is Putin mad? I suspect this by any standards. We know they are possess nukes and are ruthless. They are guilty of Crimes against Humanity by unleashing an indiscriminate dirty bomb on London.

Now they are threatening us with nukes openly!

Putin will NEVER intimidate the British people. Many have tried and failed. We don't fear Russia. They should understand this.

In the very meantime: remove all so-called "diplomats" from London: our security services have enough to do without shadowing potential radio-active polonium spreaders. We cannot take risks now.

Visas for Russians should be as rare as like rocking-horse teeth. We must stand up to this vicious bullying tactics. Russia is using a 'divide and rule' strategy. That is why we must make sure the UK remains united and strong.

The EU should denounce Russian aggression vociferously. They are not doing enough. Is the EU afraid of the oil and gas weapon? If so, remember Hitler and the failed policy of Appeasement. You can never placate a bully!

If you want peace, prepare for war!

12

Batu,

Mongolia 21/01/2008 13:33:05
I think when someone surrounds you with all there WMD, I believe the logical thing to do is be ready to throw all you got at them. If a bully did this to me, Id wack him on the face with an aluminum bat and watch his lights go out. The law of the jungle.
13

P Rayner.,

London 21/01/2008 17:55:21
Just a little reminder from our Russian friends as to the level of danger were we stupid enough to walk naked in this world . Lets remain vigilant and suitably armed .
14

CelticMo,

Falls Church 22/01/2008 16:41:15
Sorry for the late post. Just had to ask #7 a quick question and post a small observation.

Patrick, you don't by any chance hang out with Tom Cruise and his cult buddies, do you?

Let's not start the nuke paranoia BS again. Let's clear this up once and for all. It's my belief that Saudi funds terrorism (remember 9/11). How many Saudis piloted the planes? Iran is not a threat (at this time), and Russia's just rattling their self-made cage to get attention. Putin should be grounded until he learns to play well with others and communicate effectively without waving a large (or possibly very small) stick. Probably tiny.
15

Neil,

Glasgow 22/01/2008 18:12:43
Regretably I can believe the warmongering polemics coming from Gaius. They very much reflect the sort of paranoia pushed by the BBC as well.

The fact is that Russia has not invaded other countries, as we have & has not repeatedly briken its word, treaty obligations & international law as our war criminal leaders undeniably have.

That being the case would it be sensible of the Russians not to "remain vigilant and suitably armed"? I wish we lived in a world where it was not neccessary for other nations to rely on their own defences but for that they would have to be able to rely on us not to elect genocidal war criminals in the first place.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.