Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Friday, 5th December 2008

Haggis Hunt is now on!

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Rooms with a stunning view … first new Princes Street hotel for over 50 years



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 September 2008
THE first major development in more than five years on Edinburgh's main thoroughfare was unveiled yesterday.
A 100-bedroom "boutique" hotel and a new department store are planned for a glass-fronted development at 121-123 Princes Street.

The Hugh Martin Partnership, architects for Glasgow's award-winning Princes Mall shopping centre, have been drafted in to design the building.

The hotel – which would be the first to open on Princes Street for more than 50 years – will have a bar and restaurant overlooking West Princes Street Gardens and a large rooftop garden.

New Look has already agreed to open a three-storey department store on the site, subject to planning permission.

The new scheme is the first to emerge on Princes Street since the city council stepped up efforts to encourage development through its controversial "string of pearls" initiative. The last hotel to be built on Princes Street was the Mount Royal in 1955.

The last major development to get the go-ahead on Princes Street, in 2002, saw the former Burberry and C&A department stores knocked down and replaced by a building, unveiled in 2005, which is now home to shops and offices.

Belfast-based developer, the Deramore Property Group, yesterday lodged a planning application for the scheme after months of talks with council officials and heritage groups.

Deramore's £40 million scheme is being created on the site of two B-listed buildings, one of which is to be demolished while the other will have all but its Georgian facade removed.

They have lain all but empty for more than five years other than to house temporary "tartan tat" shops.

Darren Lonega, spokesman for Deramore, said: "We've sought inspiration from other world class cities and consulted widely within Edinburgh during the development of our proposals.

"We believe this scheme will deliver a sensitive and sustainable solution for these historic buildings to contribute far more positively to the vibrancy of Scotland's premier street."

Jonathan Guthrie, director of the council's city centre partnership, said: "We're working closely with Deramore on 121-123 Princes Street, and exploring other opportunities with investors, to ensure that we take positive steps toward enhancing the retail sector in Princes Street with better public spaces and access to the buildings."

It is understood Deramore hopes to start work on site within the next 18 months, although much will depend on the response to the company's plans by the capital's heritage groups.

Plans for the development which led to the demolition of the Burberry and C&A stores were first unveiled in 2000. But the scheme was dogged by delays and protests from heritage groups and was only given the go-ahead in the summer of 2002 after Historic withdrew a formal objection.

Graham Birse, deputy chief executive of Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce, said: "It is crucial that investor confidence is maintained and that Princes Street is rejuvenated as quickly as possible to secure Edinburgh's future as an attractive and accessible retail and leisure destination."

The full article contains 512 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 05/09/2008 01:40:09

The Question must be!,..

Can one afford £500 per night, for 'Bed and Breakfast'?

I think NOT!

Mind you the MSPs will be able to put it on expense's.
2

Douglas,

Bathgate 05/09/2008 07:44:22
Pearly stringy world class hotel in traditional museum quality glass for the world heritage site that needs special bins for litter.
This glass fronted jewel will, I suppose, be in keeping with the city and it's history because it's going to keep the riff-raff away with exorbitant prices.
I note in the passing that the main criterion for a boutique hotel is that it has less than 100 rooms. I wonder what else it isn't going to be.
3

Duncan in Edinburgh,

05/09/2008 08:23:35
Brian, the Glasgow shopping centre is called Princes Square. Princes Mall is in Edinburgh. On Princes Street. You know, the street you wrote the story about? Yep, that's the one.

Jeez. I suppose we should be glad he didn't call it Princess Street...
4

eric,

Lothian 05/09/2008 08:46:03
Isnt that a pretty sight!It just gets worse every passing week.Shiny new trams posh hotel and nowhere to shop.Oh well ill stick with Glasgow like i have done over the last 30yrs.
5

FC Barcelona,

05/09/2008 09:29:29
#4 so you'll stick with glasgow, is that as eric from lothians or as your other personality jim fae glasgow?
6

Alasdair,

05/09/2008 09:44:53
#5, FC Barcelona - eric is so mental, I've actually started worrying that he might be one of our lot, masquerading as a Glasgow-fixated idiot, for the purposes of besmirching their city in our eyes.

It's the sort of nonsense Joe in Livingston might come up with.

Annoyingly, on this occasion he has got one thing right. That design is awful.
7

Southsider71,

Newton Mearns, Glasgow 05/09/2008 10:10:28
#6 I often wondered if FC Barcelona was also known as Capital Boy...Joe in Livingston goes by Foxy, Brigadoon in the Evening Times...
8

Grumpy,

05/09/2008 10:14:48
Mind you, the hotel clients'll get a great view of the fireworks and the drunks at the Hogmanay party
9

Mr H 2u,

Embra 05/09/2008 10:20:36
Is this an early April fool? It has to be. Haven't we just had UNESCO calling out the cooncil for shi&e developments.
10

Buttress,

05/09/2008 10:29:42
Glass fronted. Yeah right. Fits in like the proverbial sore thumb. Looks sh*te anywhere.


11

Duncan in Edinburgh,

05/09/2008 10:36:40
#10 Oh come on Buttress, you know the score - this isn't the actual design, this is the sacrificial design, so that they can make a whole raft of "compromises" and then end up building what they always wanted to.

Give it three or four months and we'll see a "council insists on redesign to Princes St hotel" story.
12

Gina Gibson,

Wales 05/09/2008 10:39:48
#10 As princes street is a big toliet then it is the perfect location for sh*te.
13

Old Cartha Boy,

05/09/2008 11:28:33
Just surprised that TIE haven't issued a press release claiming that the hotel is being built due to the popularity of the tram scheme.
14

ThePeter,

Glasgae 05/09/2008 11:32:12
Edinburgh city councillors should be shot

At one stage Princes St was a beautiful looking street that worked and was a pride to both Edinburgh and Scotland

Now it's an embarresing eyesore
15

Starkravingsane,

Edinburgh 05/09/2008 11:35:13
Speaking as one of the riff raff, I couldn't pay £500 a night. Not even if you threw in George Clooney as well. And New Look? New Look? It's not exactly a classy shop, is it?
16

Seb,

05/09/2008 11:36:15
Looks like Hugh Martin/Turley took on all the consultation advice. Not.
17

Duncan in Edinburgh,

05/09/2008 11:59:24
#14 Much as I am not a fan of the current crop of councillors ruining our city, I think it would be rather unfair to blame them for the current state of Princes Street. You have to go back a good 50 years to understand what happened, and it's worth bearing in mind that there have been great acts of conservation as well as those of wrecking.
18

ThePeter,

Glasgae 05/09/2008 12:02:41
#17 - my apologies for not clarifying

ALL Edinburgh councillors for the past 50 years should be shot..

Also, I have a good friend in the Cockburn society who feels that any conservation that the council has done has purely been coincidental / in-spite of the Edinburgh council.
19

Duncan in Edinburgh,

05/09/2008 12:22:32
#18 Right. Well, some of them are already dead, so you've got a head start there.

Incidentally, your good friend in the Cockburn Society - is s/he also a member of the Cockburn Association, the well-known heritage watchdog? ;-)
20

WKKB,

05/09/2008 12:44:08
NO MORE GLASS! This city used to be a beautiful reflection of all that is good with old architecture. I'm not sure what happened when all the concrete, steele and glass started being approved. Look at the concrete structures now that were built even just a few years back and they look completely outdated and just plain old and ugly. We're NOT a modern city and that's why people come here. If 'they' want to rejuvinate Princes St they should focus on making it look as it did in ancient times, a street befitting this city. The businesses can be modern inside if needs be but sticking up a glass building now with what's become a hodge podge of other structures is not going to help the situation. I personally wish all the businesses on Princes St could look more like Jenners, a building that really reflects Edinburgh's history.

I keep thinking if something isn't done soon the whole of Princes St will soon look like another ghastly mistake... The new Scottish Parliment building!
21

Seb,

05/09/2008 12:56:31
#20 "ancient times"? That'll mean you want no buildings there then. And we are a modern city. I'm modern, and I live here ina throughly modern manner. The fact that we have historic fabric doesn't mean we must reject all modern intervention.

Princes St has long been a hodge podge and I would detest any attempt to recreate some continuous Georgian facade that was never actually there.

Having said that, these proposals look distinctly inferior.
22

Duncan in Edinburgh,

05/09/2008 13:27:34
#20 As has been mentioned before, you should read about some of the protests that were mounted over the building of the North Bridge, or George IV Bridge. All the historic closes that were being destroyed in this rush to modernity. It is far too simplistic to simply yearn for "olden days".
23

lulach mac gille coemgain,

05/09/2008 14:22:52
Aye ! and there’s a housing shortage - an unhappiest city in the UK and a soul-less city centre - Wunder why ?

Glad a stye in West Lothian where people smile, talk and live in social cohesion ! Great !
24

Duncan in Edinburgh,

05/09/2008 15:00:09
#23 Is that the same West Lothian that includes Livingston? Or is there another, smiley, chatty, cohesive West Lothian somewhere?
25

Brian M,

Edinburghg 05/09/2008 15:48:35
Surely the Cockburn Crew should be demanding that Princes street properties be returned to their original heritage purpose as houses for locals and not the uninspiring motley retail crew of tat, mobile phone shops, lingerie shops, mediocre stores, burger/pizza outlets, etc
26

Seb,

05/09/2008 16:28:22
Interesting to note the comments of Mr Guthrie of the council's city centre partnership. They want to get rid of the Old Waverley Hotel to redevelop that site too.

#24 that would be houses for local toffs.
27

Erica from East Kilbride,

05/09/2008 19:01:24
#4 - Eric, you must really be the king of short-sightedness if you can rate the vista in Glasgow City Centre above one of Europe's most dramatic and beautiful thoroughfares. Sour grapes much?
28

Kitti Kat,

05/09/2008 20:54:41
what an ugly building!! Why is Edinburgh losing her wonderful charm with such awful buildings? I will continue to stay at the good old Caledonian or Carlton rather than an ugly glass "cage". Yuk!!! Princes St. is getting more and more tacky as years go by. Instead of conserving the facades, they are torn down and replaced with stuff that belongs in (ugh) New York or LA. Yes some of the older buidlings need to be updated--air conditioning, window screens, etc. but to lose the wonderful old buildings is sad.
29

World class concrete,

09/09/2008 10:25:24
Please will someone explain why it has to be glass fronted. Why can't it be a stone fronted building? Or are we just supposed to be grateful it doesn't feature a tower or some other "landmark feature"?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.