Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 30th August 2008

RBS Ambassador, Luke Donald

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Planners over-ruled as bid for student flats thrown out



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 March 2008
CONTROVERSIAL plans for a £22 million student flats development which attracted scores of objections have been thrown out by councillors.
Developers had wanted to build four new buildings with 295 student bedrooms on the site of a former furniture showroom on McDonald Road.

Council planning officers had recommended approval for the project, but more than 120 residents complained amid concerns that an influx of students would lead to an increase in late-night noise.

Despite the recommendations that the scheme be approved, the council's planning committee voted against the proposals during a meeting on Wednesday.

Residents who were attending the meeting applauded from the public gallery when the decision was made.

Councillor Angela Blacklock, who represents Leith Walk, said a surge in the number of students coming into the area could upset the "delicate balance" of community relations.

She said: "It's not that we're against student accommodation, but we really think it's difficult for this area to accommodate more students.

"There's a delicate balance. Crime figures are not that high but that could change. Many local residents have come to me who are really concerned about this development."

During the meeting, councillors gave the go-ahead for another student halls complex on Leith Walk.

The £11m development will be built on the site of the council's former social work headquarters at Shrubhill House.

The meeting heard from council planning officers that if all the current proposed developments had gone ahead, students would make up more than 11 per cent of the population of Leith – higher than the average figure for elsewhere in the Capital.

Councillor Lesley Hinds said planners should try and spread student housing out across the city.

She said: "We've got so many objections to this. There have been over 100 objections – it's not about being against students, it's about getting the right balance in the community.

"The development is not wanted in the area. We should be trying to balance up student accommodation in areas of the city that don't have it."

The Unite Group, which is the UK's biggest student landlord, is the developer behind the McDonald Road project.

Jim Pike, acquisition and development director, said it was waiting to hear the committee's reasons for turning down the application before deciding on the best way forward.

He added: "We will continue to work closely with Edinburgh City Council and the local community to ensure any decision made by Unite is in the best interests of the local area."

The proposals for the site of the former Martin & Frost showroom had included 65 student flats in a mix of four and five-bed clusters.

Planning officers said the accommodation would relieve pressure on the general housing stock in Edinburgh.

But Edinburgh North and Leith MP Mark Lazarowicz was among those who objected to the scheme.

He had urged the city council to listen to the views of local residents.

www.unite-group.co.uk

The full article contains 498 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 March 2008 12:32 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Students in Edinburgh
 
1

NorT,

Edinburgh 21/03/2008 13:03:47
It ios about time that the Planning officials were more in tune with the thoughts of the residents rather than trying to promote their own hair-brained schemes. Thank goodness the Planning Committee saw sense.
2

Arrow,

edinburgh 21/03/2008 14:00:19
is the development plan. is it not about time that the committee members took a look at their own policies that they endorsed? the officials only make recommendations. and when it comes to appeals the members have to stand up (not the planners) at an inquiry and get their bums felt. and if the Councilm\cannot prove their case and the appellants are awarded expenses then all of the council tax payers stump up not the Councillors who made the decision. perhaps if that were to be the practice we might have a propoer planning policy led system.
3

,

21/03/2008 17:21:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.