Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Paxman to talk pants with M&S chief after complaining about state of nation's undies

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 January 2008
JEREMY Paxman is hoping for the support of Britain's men as he prepares for his toughest interview yet – tackling the boss of Marks & Spencer over the quality of its underpants.
The Newsnight presenter is to meet Sir Stuart Rose, the chief executive, after writing to complain about his experiences. Sir Stuart reportedly offered to bring samples of M&S products to the meeting, but Mr Paxman declined.

The ferocious inter
rogator and University Challenge host has set himself up as the representative of "widespread gusset anxiety" over the quality of M&S socks and pants. The retail giant said complaints about its underwear were at their lowest level in five years, but said it welcomed the presenter's comments.

Mr Paxman said: "Like very large numbers of men in this country, I have always bought my socks and pants at Marks & Sparks.

"I've noticed that something very troubling has happened. There's no other way to put this. Their pants no longer provide adequate support.

"When I've discussed this with friends and acquaintances, it has revealed widespread gusset anxiety.

"The other thing is socks. Even among those of us who clip our toenails very rigorously, they appear to be wearing out much more quickly on the big toe.

"Also, they're no longer ribbed around the top, which means they do not stay up in the way that they used to."

He added: "These are matters of great concern to the men of Britain. I just felt it was time that somebody raised this with the only man who can sort it out, Stuart Rose."

M&S pants are big business. One in four British men buys their undergarments from the firm, it said last night. In total, clothing sold at more than 300 M&S stories pulls in £4 billion in revenue.

The high street retailer is trying to capture the discount market with deals of five pairs of pants for £3, and copies of top brands, including new seamless pants made from material developed for women's lingerie.

A spokeswoman for M&S said: "Jeremy Paxman wrote a very light-hearted letter to Sir Stuart last week and they will be meeting up shortly to discuss pants and other things.

"One in four men wears our pants and we are the largest lingerie and underwear retailer in the UK by a long shot – we sell four times as much as our nearest competitor.

"Customer complaints about our underwear are at their lowest level in five years, but we're happy to hear Mr Paxman's views."

The spokeswoman could not confirm whether boxers or briefs were more popular. Mr Paxman later said: "I don't know how this leaked out, but it wasn't supposed to. Anyway, Stuart Rose took this very good- humouredly and very kindly replied. We are going to discuss pants and elastic, among other things, and I will have an opportunity to ventilate this issue.

"If I don't get any satisfaction from the pants-bearing meeting, we'1ll have to think again."

In 2006, the BBC series Who do you think you are? followed Mr Paxman as he traced his origins to Glasgow's east end, where his great-grandmother and her nine children lived in poverty.

Pants-to-share ratio wide open to market fluctuation
PAXO'S problems are by no means confined to gentlemen of the south-east of England. In response to the declining durability of M&S underpants, I switched last year to slightly longer briefs, made of coarser materials.

The colour range – from mellow amber to autumnal glow – did not compensate for the curious front "envelope" design, preventing, so to speak, speedy aperture, which can be a cause for consternation.

However, M&S pants have been most keenly priced – and this may well be the "aperture" to the company's deeper problem.

Debate about the fortunes of M&S has recently focused on Pant-Share-Ratio, known inside M&S as the Stuart Pant Index. It was launched in January 2006, when the company was selling men's underpants at four pairs for £5, the same price as a single M&S share. Thus the original PSR was 4:1, that is, four pairs of pants were worth one share.

The index climbed over the next 18 months as the price of pants fell and the shares rose. This, said Sir Stuart, was due to "deflation for men's boxers, about 45 per cent, quality maintained … and our boxers do not lose 11 per cent in length when washed … which is important for men who do not like tight-fitting pants".

But to fight off the likes of Tesco, M&S then offered "five-packs" at £3, ie 60p a pair, giving an astonishing PSR of 8. This was clearly a margin-shredding peak and a loud "sell" signal to the stock market. M&S shares have duly plunged to take the ratio back to 6.9. You can learn a lot in the M&S underwear department.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 January 2008 9:51 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Willie Macleod,

Wick 21/01/2008 02:42:33
An Interviewer with balls but I never thought Literally
2

Keith Swinburne,

Cambridge 21/01/2008 07:55:58
Here here Mr Paxman.

The daft thing is that until a couple of years ago M&S had just the answer for Mr Paxman (and me).

I emailed M&S Customer Service back September as follows: You seem to have discontinued my favourite pants!?

Mens trunks with supportive pouch and no fly (ref no 2474 748).

Are these still available? Are there any like them? Please bring them back :-)


I got the dismissive reply: I'm really sorry as the hipsters are now unavailable to purchase and we will receive no further stock. I understand that this is disappointing.


Perhaps Mr Rose should be briefed on this so he can go to the meeting with news that Mr Paxman will be better supported in future!
3

Duncan in Edinburgh,

21/01/2008 08:07:38
#1 You never thought that Paxman had testicles? Curious.

#2 Where where? Oh, hear hear?
4

Graeme,

Guangzhou 21/01/2008 09:10:03
Hahaha… “mellow amber to autumnal glow”…assume Paxman was talking about the map of Ireland he left on the front.

No wonder Sir Stuart Rose was reluctant to study them.
5

hertscot,

21/01/2008 09:40:28
What a load of B******S!!!!
6

yolanda,

21/01/2008 10:21:37
I'm not really interested in Jeremy Paxman's pants per se, but he has a very valid point. The decline of standards at M&S has been ongoing for several years. Their garments used to be known for their quality, but those days are long gone. I have returned four items to them in the last few months because they have literally fallen apart. The seams in the clothing come away if you so much as look at them. The company has dumbed down in all sorts of ways. Poor service, surly shop assistants, and all round tat. I doubt if their claim that one in four wears their underwear still stands true. I don't know anyone who buys their rubbish any more. There is competition where there didn't used to be. They can keep their substandard sweatshop goods as far as I'm concerned........ I still like their food though, even though I know it's a rip off!
7

Loki - The Scourge of the Schemies,

EH1, looking down at M&S 21/01/2008 10:29:29
I had a great deal of respect for Paxman until discovering that he shopped at the citadel of over-priced tat, M&S! Has the man no taste?!
8

the_figures_are _fudged,

Galashiels 21/01/2008 12:26:11
Sounds like someone needs to call customer support.

Why is this in the politics section ?

Could we please hear if Wendy is still AWOL and when the commission is due to report ?
9

marrianna,

K. 21/01/2008 17:17:02
Personally, I think M.& S. underwear is as good as its ever been. However I have been toying with the idea of revealing the fact that they put 'pork fat' in their icing, so will take this opportunity.
Vegetarians beware!
10

Willie Macleod,

Wick 21/01/2008 18:31:42
#3 Thats not what I meant sorry had a bit of an off night last night, nothing went right.
11

Lady inwaiting,

Glenrothes 21/01/2008 20:29:02
I agree with Jeremy Pax that M & S clothes!!!! also men's sock getting very thin cotton and very diasppoiment for the women's height who has not fit the length especial height 5 feet and the dress and skirts keep length too long. Where the short lenght are now??????
12

ex-labour,

21/01/2008 22:29:17
Jeremy dear, has no-one told you that pants and socks do become loose over time. You really should change them now and again.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.