Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Friday, 5th December 2008

Haggis Hunt is now on!

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Move for power shift to 'restore democracy' for parks



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 16 May 2008
THE Scottish Government is to be urged to remove council powers from Scotland's two national park boards to return "local democracy" to communities within the parks.
A campaign by Angus Macmillan, of Meikle Boturich, near Balloch in Dunbartonshire, has led to a petition being put on the Scottish Parliament website.

Mr Macmillan claims residents within the boundaries of the Cairngorms and Loch Lomond and the Tr
ossachs national parks are discriminated against as they do not have the same level of democracy as elsewhere.

He wants a forthcoming review of parks to alter legislation. Mr Macmillan claims the National Parks Act 2000 removed a substantial part of local democracy "and placed it in the hands of National Park Authority quangos dominated by placemen appointees".

The park boards are currently made up of 25 members. Five are directly elected by voters in the park, ten are nominated by local authorities and ten are appointed by Scottish ministers.

Mr Macmillan said a hypothetical planning application in the Argyll and Bute area of the Loch Lomond park could be decided by two government appointees, one West Dunbartonshire councillor appointee, two Stirling councillor appointees, four members from outwith Argyll and Bute and just one from Argyll and Bute.

To date, 29 people have signed the petition, which is due to go to the petitions committee on 13 June.





The full article contains 232 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 15 May 2008 9:28 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

druidh,

edinburgh 16/05/2008 00:19:42
29 people have signed the petition.

Mass support then Angus?
2

Upbeat,

16/05/2008 10:07:01
Angus was warned in these comment boards that his was a minority opinion. He was advised that if he held such strong views about the nature of National Park management he should put himself up for election /selection to the National park board.
3

Angus,

Alexandria 27/05/2008 23:48:26
I think one has to realise that this is not a numbers game, although there are now 65 signatures. It is a question of getting the issue before the petitions committee to test the argument.

In my view every citizen in the UK is entitled to the same level of local democracy irrespective of colour or creed, or where they reside, and the National Parks 2000 Act is discriminatory in that it deprives park residents of a substantial amount of their local democracy.

If I have not said so already I would never consider putting myself up for election to a quango. The quango bonfire is well overdue.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.