Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 30th August 2008

RBS Ambassador, Luke Donald

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Kitchen cuts serving up future problems for nation's health



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Latest council cash savings let down our children, says George Foulkes.
I NEVER cease to be amazed by the shameful and irresponsible actions of the administration in Edinburgh in a bid to tackle its self-induced financial crisis. It was bad enough when we discovered that budget cuts, sorry, "Proposals for Disinvestment",
were directly hitting older people and key voluntary sector services but the relentless pursuit to deprive our children of an education system free from the threat of cuts and closures goes against everything I stand for.

Since the Lib Dem/SNP coalition took over the council last May, the children and families of Edinburgh have had to fight tooth and nail to keep their local schools and nurseries from closure, have had to accept crèche facilities closing and endure increased fees for the ones they managed to save. The Go 4 It programme, a holiday activities club that this year involved almost 1000 secondary school children, is being cut. Physical education allocation is no longer guaranteed, school meals are being increased by 10p and now parents have to fight to keep school kitchens open.

This is not what the Scottish Government promised in its manifesto, it is certainly not a record to be proud of and the parents in Edinburgh and beyond have now had enough with the unkindest cut of all.

Fourteen out of the eighteen state nursery schools across Edinburgh are to stop serving hot meals, along with six schools out of eight no longer cooking meals for children, but bringing in ready-made meals and cold sandwiches.

This has provoked fury among kitchen staff and parents, many of whom have contacted me.

Ruth McKay, practice manager at the Children's Weight Clinic in Edinburgh, said: "Sandwiches are no substitute for a proper meal. Surely, the council can find something else to cut, instead of the possible one hot meal a day these children will have?"

A recent HMIE report stated that "sometimes the quality of food served was adversely affected by transportation" and highlighted complaints by pupils about the quality of transported food.

Not only has the council ignored this by forcing children to eat transported school meals, it is contradicting every policy or funding commitment the SNP Government has made in tackling childhood obesity and promoting healthy eating.

The council is selling out on our children's health and education.

Investing in our children is investing in Scotland's future. It should be the single most important thing we do as a nation, not only to ensure we prosper long term but also to fulfil a duty of care to all our children. The councillors who share responsibility for running the city are showing a complete disregard for this view and a total contempt for children, parents and the health of our nation.

George Foulkes is a Lothians MSP





The full article contains 483 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 May 2008 9:59 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

toby,

Edinburgh 26/05/2008 11:12:07
Opening up the new regime in 'Services for Communities' meant diversion of funding to cover the massive salaries of non productive quangoes within Waverley Court and other recently established groups scattered about offices in Edinburgh. Funding for this is done by cutting productive staff. reducing the salaries of the genuine workers and services to the elderly. The answer lies in YOU, the public to demand
accountability by puting pressure on your MSP and MP.
2

Chris.J,

Edinburgh 26/05/2008 11:33:09
The "self-induced financial crisis" was caused by the previous LABOUR administration. Not that Foulkesake likes to stop the truth getting in the way of a good story....

3

Conway,

26/05/2008 12:16:28
So Mr Foulkes would rather continue to put our council tax up without any type of assesment into whether money can be saved . Its the same old Labour story lets splash the cash to keep the votes ,then try and balance the books by sly increases of taxes on fuel,vat,national insurance etc . Scotland can afford free meals care of the elderly etc however to do it requires us to be thrifty not mean just thrifty.
4

NorT,

Edinburgh 26/05/2008 13:08:28
fatty Foulkes should remember that iut was his Labour administration in the Council that has caused all these problems. He shgould rmeember he only became an MSP (a regional one) by the skin of his teeth. It is about time that be "shut pu". We are getting tired of all his moaning, remember you are in possition. The sooner we are independent the better.
5

Duncan in Edinburgh,

26/05/2008 13:16:30
#2 and #4 yet again this damn lie is propagated. The Labour administration did NOT cause these problems. The Lib Dem / SNP coalition and their utter inability to manage their officials caused these problems, and continues to do so.

The problems created by the administration's inability to hold down the budget demands of their departments have been compounded by the SNP government's Council Tax freeze and together are the root cause of the problems Edinburgh is facing.

When will the Lib Dems and SNP take responsibility for their disastrous actions?
6

Tynietiger,

26/05/2008 13:28:22
# 5
Afraid you are wrong Duncan, the previous Labour administration left a budget deficit of almost £20 million for year 2007/08 most of which is down to the mismanagement over several years of the childrens and families department which covers education.

Tax freeze has nothing to do with these cuts as Edinburgh received an increase in funding from Scottish government of over twice the rate of inflation at 5.25% despite Westminster reducing Scotland's money to 0.5% over inflation at a time North Sea Oil is giving Chancellor Darling an extra £4.5 billion he didn't budget for.

How does Lord Foulkes of two jobs intend to solve the budget shortfall.. what alternatives does he suggest. Labour can only criticise but not come up with constructive suggestions. That is why they are getting hammered in the polls.
7

Duncan in Edinburgh,

26/05/2008 13:37:08
#6 No they didn't! It doesn't matter how many times this lie is repeated, it won't become the truth!

It was the new administration which set the budget for 2007/8, not the Labour one. As for mismanagement of the C&F department, the changes which were brought in following the Caleb Ness tragedy found broad support across all parties, and the expense was deemed worth it at the time. What has changed?

As for your astonishingly misleading claims about what the CT freeze did for Edinburgh - I note you quote the increase to Edinburgh including inflation, but the increase the Holyrood excluding it, thus making them utterly incomparable - you ought to be ashamed to indulge in such misinformation.

The SNP's sleight of hand over schools funding, not least their manifesto commitment to match the existing building plans "brick for brick" which has turned out to be a complete falsehood, is shameful. They fritter money away on populist measures over road tolls, and meanwhile condemn our children to study is crumbling schools. And the worst is that people like you continue to defend them.

For shame, SNP, for shame.
8

Stan Dup,

26/05/2008 13:52:42
#7 so Duncan,
It was the new administration which set the budget for 2007/8, not the Labour one.
When was the budget for 07/08 set and when was "the new" administration elected. Budgets are usually set before the start of a financial year.
9

Duncan in Edinburgh,

26/05/2008 13:59:11
#8 Except when an election is coming up! For pity's sake, do you think every new administration is unable to make any decisions for the first year? Budgets were approved after the election, as has always been the case. Departmental officials tried to boost their budgets because there were new bodies in the chamber, as is always the case. The Lib Dem and SNP numpties were so ill-prepared for government that they blindly accepted every increased request.

Anyone honest in the council will confirm that that is exactly what happened.
10

beckypumps1,

Fife 26/05/2008 15:00:36
I see The baron is still on the sauce.
11

Kirkliston Steve,

Kirkliston 26/05/2008 15:43:36
Putting the petty bickering to one side for a minute, this is an important issue.

For some kids school dinners provide them with their only decent meal of the day. Penny pinching will only come back to bite us in the long term. A decent diet helps to maintain energy levels, attention span and good behaviour. Before you know it the Council will be dealing with poorer school results and increased levels of truanting, and will wonder what caused it.
12

Stan Dup,

26/05/2008 15:51:51
#9, but Duncan, the council tax was approved in February by the labour administration and that surely is the basis of the budget for the next year. Also it was the previous administrations stewardship of the spending that led to the starting position for the budget. To say the new administration set the 2007/08 budget is just not on, or are you an ex labour administration councillor
13

neds-r-us,

26/05/2008 16:03:02
It is enough to make me weep.

Working class bairns and families being attacked by the SNP/Lib-Dem council.

If the SNP keep attacking and cutting services then they will NOT be re-elected at the next election.
14

S'me,

Edinburgh 26/05/2008 16:09:38
All coming home to roost now the populist policies that will soon be forgotten like the forth crossing toll cut, causing cut after cut in important areas like schools and nutrition.
15

neds-r-us,

26/05/2008 16:10:40
I forgot to mention that the SNP councillors voted to end the subsidy for the number 18 bus service.

There is now no number 18 bus service on a Sunday from the Gyle to the new Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh.

The SNP promised more buses, but when in power they cut public transport.

16

S'me,

Edinburgh 26/05/2008 16:11:42
Oh and by the way, the longer the SNP are in power, the less right they have to blame everyone and anyone else for economic problem... time to take some responsibility for your actions...
17

Duncan in Edinburgh,

26/05/2008 16:51:06
#12 Ach, away and bile yer heid. No, I've never been on the council, and I've never been in the Labour party, I just know when our city is being run by numpties, and it is right now. And I am sick to death of hearing that it was the last lot's fault, when the last lot never ended up supping with the devil on council tax freezes, cutting creche facilities, stopping schools building programmes or the rest.

The 2007/8 budget was decided by the new administration. It was the SNP and Lib Dems who decided that a £200,000 giant telly was a good and affordable idea - remember? Or was that the Labour party too? It was the Lib Dems and SNP who decided to renovate Glenogle baths, but can't find the money to meet their commitments to renovate the city's flagship Commonwealth Pool.

Remember, this is the administration who, in their first week, wanted to reintroduce robes for councillors to separate them from "the hoi polloi".

Or was that Labour's fault too?

Jings.
18

Juan hand,

26/05/2008 19:57:17
Self induced? All the debt labour left behind and a 100 million gyle fund totaly raided ! LOL

I think he should donate part of his glenfiddich bill.
19

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 26/05/2008 21:08:20
Lord George Foulkes said:

"buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrp!!"
20

Duncan in Edinburgh,

27/05/2008 10:15:25
#18 More disinformation from the SNP camp there.

The decision to deplete the council reserves in order to pay the one-off historical cost of the equal pay settlement, which started to accrue long before Labour were in power, was a decision agreed to by ALL parties, including the two currently mismanaging the council. It is pure hypocrisy to bring it up as a reason to criticise Labour. Typical thoughtless oppositionism from the SNP.
21

ptdoug,

27/05/2008 10:45:31
Just a thought... but how much is Edinburgh spending on the next to useless Tram line?

Nearly three quarters of a BILLION pounds?

Typical Labour... "All fur coat and no knickers" policy.

The SNP wanted to scrap the Edinburgh Tram scheme on the grounds the vast sum of money would be better spent on more urgent priority areas... such as schools, perhaps?

A Labour,Tory, LibDem alliance at Holyrood ganged up on the SNP forcing them to cancel thier plans to scrap the tram scheme....

Never mind... as I said at the time... the good citizens of Edinburgh will be able to sit in the shiny new Trams as they trundle around Edinburgh, and through the nice shiny windows they will be able to see dilapidated schools, boarded up schools, etc, etc...

Thanks to Labour, their chums the Tories, and their lapdogs the LibDems.
22

Duncan in Edinburgh,

27/05/2008 11:07:43
#21 Not that I suspect it will matter to you but your argument is nonsense.

Firstly, the Edinburgh trams scheme is the first major investment of central funds into Edinburgh's transport infrastructure for a generation. Edinburgh's economy now generates more money than Glasgow, and yet while Glasgow has received billions of pounds in central funding for transport schemes over the past two decades, Edinburgh has received nothing.

The SNP's first act as a government was to try to cut both EARL and the trams scheme, but they never intended to spend the money on non-transport projects - they explicitly stated that their intention was to fund transport projects elsewhere in the country.

So no, the trams money is not being taken away from schools buildings programmes. Having had more than £1.5 billion of business rates extracted from Edinburgh to be spent on the rest of the country, we are in fact being short-changed.

Instead of a grudgingly granted single tram line, we need and deserve tram lines 2 and 3 as well, to give us a truly integrated system which can meet the needs of Scotland's major economic powerhouse.
23

ptdoug,

27/05/2008 19:40:00
22 Duncan...

Not the point mate. It's not a competition to see who gets most... Glasgow or Edinburgh.

As the Capitol City, Edinburgh most certainly does need and deserve extra funding in certain areas. But in view of the current economic climate and very tight financial constraints, we have to cut our cloth according to our needs, not our fine wishes.

The money going to trams could be spent on schools.

Trams are a luxury... schools are not.

Trams or schools... what is your priority Duncan?
24

ptdoug,

27/05/2008 19:45:40
Oh... and Edinburgh's schools most certainly did not deteriorate to their current state over the last year since the SNP/LibDems took control of the council.

The state of our Capitols schools is a direct result of year after year of lunacy and mismanagement by Labour at national and local level.
25

The Matt and Stooley Experience,

Edinburgh 28/05/2008 11:35:28
CHRIS J,

Don't be ridiculous- Labour left £52 million in the bank when the SNP took over the council.

This is what happens when councillors are elected who are completely out of their depth.
26

The Matt and Stooley Experience,

Edinburgh 28/05/2008 11:36:21
CHRIS J,

Don't be ridiculous- Labour left £52 million in the bank when the SNP took over the council.

This is what happens when councillors are elected who are completely out of their depth.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.