Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


JK Rowling to speak at Harvard, but students say she's 'a flash in the pan'

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 May 2008
SHE has sold nearly 400 million books, is worth £500 million and has inspired millions to get back to reading. But for some students at one of the world's most prestigious universities JK Rowling is just a "flash in the pan".
A row has erupted over whether Ms Rowling is the right person to give the most important speech of the year at Harvard University as thousands of students graduate on 5 June. She was asked in January to give the commencement address at the Ivy League
institution, but some students have complained that they deserve better.

Last year's words of wisdom to graduates, from Microsoft boss Bill Gates, reportedly inspired a large number of students to opt for charitable work rather than Wall Street firms. Previous speakers include kings, presidents and towering literary figures, so some students awaiting the ceremony have complained that 42-year-old Ms Rowling, the 144th richest Briton, won't be impressive enough.

Adam Goldenberg, a Canadian student who writes for the Harvard Crimson, the daily newspaper at the university, said: "Our commencement speaker tricked parents into letting their kids read books filled with sex, murder, and homosexual role models.

"Harvard seniors have every right to demand a Harvard-calibre speaker. Harry Potter – and JK Rowling – is just a flash in the pan. Writing bedtime stories is lame – just ask Tolkien and CS Lewis. The class of 2008 has been royally screwed by Harvard. A petty pop culture personality of questionable permanence will send us on our merry way, while figures of real substance wait in the wings."

But Harvard is hardly an anti-Harry Potter zone. Last July, on the eve of the publication of her seventh and final novel, dozens of restaurants and stores on campus opened late and offered Harry Potter-themed specials. There was a three-hour performance by Harry and the Potters, and hundreds of fans queued to buy the book at midnight. Marc Lambert, chief executive of the Scottish Book Trust, said Ms Rowling should inspire graduates as the embodiment of the American dream – a self-made billionaire, in dollar terms. He said: "She is obviously an interesting and intellectual person who gives money to a lot of different causes. I can't think of anyone better to inspire people to go out in the world and make a name for themselves."

Ms Rowling is just the fifth woman since 1950 to speak at Commencement, although not the first female British novelist. Lady Barbara Ward Jackson was first in 1957. The other women were Benazir Bhutto, former Irish president Mary Robinson, former US secretary of state Madeleine Albright, and US congresswoman Barbara Jordan.

Other speakers have included John F Kennedy, before he became US president, Nobel Prize-winning author Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, and the King of Spain, Juan Carlos I. Writers Ralph Ellison and Lionel Trilling have also spoken at the event.

The speaker for Class Day, chosen by students, is chairman of the US Federal Reserve, Ben Bernanke. Class Marshall Alexander J Tennant said: "When we found out JK Rowling was going to be speaking, we wanted to find someone that would kind of balance our graduation ceremonies."

HIGH PRAISE AND DEATH THREATS

HARRY Potter and his creator, JK Rowling, have evoked strong emotions from fans and critics alike over the years.

Ms Rowling herself said this year that she had received death threats from Christians opposed to her novels. Father Gabriele Amorth, the Vatican's chief exorcist, has previously attacked the books, saying: "Behind Harry Potter hides the signature of the king of the darkness, the Devil."

Stephen King, the horror writer, praised Ms Rowling for "having fun" in the last Harry Potter novel, adding that she had "set the standard – it's a high one".

For all she has her critics, JK Rowling has even more defenders. One reviewer at the San Francisco Chronicle received threats over an unkind reading of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince.

He defended his comments, but added: "Every book critic ought to get down on his or her knees to Rowling because, thanks appreciably to her, most of a whole generation may just grow up reading after all."



The full article contains 709 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Tom in Belmont,

Belmont 05/05/2008 00:15:56
I guess the spoiled brats at Harvard would rather have some government official than a lady who made with her own talent and labor - might give them a bad example, what?
By the way: Fr. Amroth is an exorcist for the Diocese of Rome, which is different from the Vatican.
2

Black Beard,

05/05/2008 00:47:02
Maybe they're afraid she'll sue them too.
3

Douglas,

Bathgate 05/05/2008 01:13:09
You didn't study grammur or speling their did yu?
4

indune1,

Canada 05/05/2008 01:28:14
4 - Wee Dougie - lay off my mate Spook, you pedant.
5

sigh,

usa 05/05/2008 01:40:41
crack reporters you've got there. goldenberg's article was obviously satire.
6

indune1,

Canada 05/05/2008 01:43:07

7 - Sigh - for years, many of us readers of the Hootsman have suspected that its reporters are on crack.
7

Fanling,

Switzerland 05/05/2008 02:10:05
"Harvard seniors have every right to demand a Harvard-calibre speaker. Harry Potter – and JK Rowling – is just a flash in the pan ..."

Some flash in the pan, junior. She has outsold, and will continue to outsell, her contemporaries worldwide because her literature is in demand. It works. It has been made into Hollywood-type films (care to answer why?) and will continue to introduce and entrance literate children worldwide to something they would otherwise have bypassed. I personally know of children from all points of Europe all the way to to China who have discovered the Harry Potter mystery thrill. Some flash in the pan. Grow up Rich Mommy's Boy. Your pomposity is flattened by a perfectly wonderful modern literary phenomenon.
8

,

05/05/2008 02:11:48
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
9

,

05/05/2008 02:11:49
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

doublescotch,

U.S.A. 05/05/2008 02:11:57
Even Jerry Hall refused to vote for J.K. for the Whitbread Award. If anyone has read the Tove Jansson books you will know where J.K got the idea about the hat. By the way Seamus Heaney won the Whitbread that year. Maybe those "spoilt-brats" feel short-changed
11

doublescotch,

U.S.A. 05/05/2008 02:12:10
Even Jerry Hall refused to vote for J.K. for the Whitbread Award. If anyone has read the Tove Jansson books you will know where J.K got the idea about the hat. By the way Seamus Heaney won the Whitbread that year. Maybe those "spoilt-brats" feel short-changed
12

,

05/05/2008 02:12:18
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

Fanling,

Switzerland 05/05/2008 02:19:35
#10 doublescotch,U.S.A.
Five times posted? I think we got it the first time.
14

doublescotch,

U.S.A. 05/05/2008 02:34:43
I either have a really bad stutter:0 or there is an echo somewhere:)
15

potterfreak,

05/05/2008 02:37:23
Adam Goldenberg, a Canadian student who writes for the Harvard Crimson, the daily newspaper at the university, said: "Our commencement speaker tricked parents into letting their kids read books filled with sex, murder, and homosexual role models.

are you serious? firstly, there is NO sex in Harry Potter. secondly, yes there may be murder, but it states again and again that IT IS WRONG!!!!!!!! and finally, what the hell is wrong with being homosexual!!!!!!!!!!
16

indune1,

Canada 05/05/2008 03:26:09

Doublescotch - always nice to hear from you, regardless how many times over. Late spring in the Rideau Lakes.

Fanling - don't be the pedant (Yes, I know you can't help it). Please have something more to state than the obvious.

17 - Well, many in our society do have a problem with homosexuality. Not me, but many others - many of them Potter aficionados.
17

doublescotch,

u.S.A 05/05/2008 03:45:43
318 Dunnie. Hello Love:) I see you survied the walk in the snowshooes:)
18

doublescotch,

U.S.A. 05/05/2008 03:50:23
#18 dunnie i meant shoes:)
19

Erick,

Los Angeles 05/05/2008 05:13:49
You folks need to lighten up. We have this odd characteristic here in the States. It's called a sense of humor.

Someone at Harvard said "Writing bedtime stories is lame – just ask Tolkien and CS Lewis." and "Our commencement speaker tricked parents into letting their kids read books filled with sex, murder, and homosexual role models."

Pretty funny I thought, especially for Harvard.
20

wnaegele,

Albuquerque NM USA 05/05/2008 05:22:14
Obviously being moronic is no obstacle in gaining a Harvard degree...
21

sharon g,

wishaw 05/05/2008 06:00:07
#21..of course we don't have your great sense of humor!Then...we don't have George'Chuckles' Bush as our leader.
#22...just need lots of money from mummy and daddy.
22

Stu_R_20,

Edinburgh 05/05/2008 06:04:41
When you compare her to the previous speakers she's not all that much.
23

Beth Boyle,

New York, USA 05/05/2008 08:11:44
It's great stuff. I enjoy the Harry Potter books. Most Americans love them. Is it great literature, who cares it's great fun! Lighten up, its fantasy and its childrens literature after all!
24

Truely English,

05/05/2008 08:27:51
We should all read the Harry Potter books as they have made such an enormous impact on the learning of the English language throughout the World.

A big thank you to J. K. Rowling from everyone, who promotes the English language and culture as you made our work so much easier.
25

Boy Wonder,

05/05/2008 09:06:22
I get fed up with certain people looking down their noses at other people because of what they read, watch ot participate in. It's sheer effen snobbery. That's what it is!

Academia does not sell as well as JK because of the limited market. So-called "literature" does not sell as well, because the target audience is smaller than the popular market.

Last point ... it's just sheer, bloody-minded jealousy that they didn't think of it first!

Ms Rowling's books may not be Dostoevsky or Dickens ... but she wasn't trying to be! All she wanted to do was tell a story ... and she did that. Then sold the rights for merchandising and movies like George Lucas did with Star Wars. She's done her bit.

Who was the last author to have done as well as she??
26

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 05/05/2008 09:25:30
#21

"We have this odd characteristic here in the States. It's called a sense of humor".

...but you have to admit it's quite basic. It would have to develop further to appreciate the more sophisticated variety.
27

SRU,

05/05/2008 09:44:54
One student syas "A petty pop culture personality of questionable permanence will send us on our merry way, while figures of real substance wait in the wings."

What about a couple of years ago when the creator of Family Guy did a major talk to students at Harvard... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJSmANHxY0Q .

Would that not be classed as pop culture... Ivy league has such a short memories...

PS. I love both Harr Potter and family Guy, pop culture or not.
28

Lillig,

05/05/2008 10:22:34
JK wouldn't have done so well had the first book not been picked up by Hollywood.

I HATE Harry Potter books. And also the films. This is so typical of the can't-stay- quiet-for-a-second and I-am-bored-if-there-is-not-endless-activity childrens' society of this era.

No 28 Boy Wonder - you said "Academia does not sell as well as JK because of the limited market. So-called "literature" does not sell as well, because the target audience is smaller than the popular market".

Good literature does not sell well because children are not encouraged to engage with good literature. They want something all-laughing, all-dancing, easy to read, that doesn't involve them in any serious effort. Compare this with the 60s when classical literature was read at primary school and was given as presents for birthdays.

And who said it promotes the English language and culture? (27 - Truely English? The book is translated into many languages - and what aspect of English culture does the storyline represent?

This rubbish is toytown, cartoonish, faux myth. Harvard would do well to make the point and reject the overly worshipped JK and her boring protegy, Harry.
29

Venachar,

05/05/2008 10:52:07
It's all just snob value!

I mean the English Patient as an example must be one of the most boring books ever to read, Atonement another, anyone that swallows a thesaurus and then regurgitates it in a book does not live in the real world. How long and why does McEwan need to describe a room in such detail.

I am neutral Jack Vettriano's art, others love it others hate it. Same with writing, you either like it or you don't. However if you appear to be popular it seems you are automatically categorised as substandard.

Well ladies and gents I would rather be in Tom Clancy's or J.K's shoes than Salman Rushdie's.

If you wish to be amused read any of Carl Hiassen's novels, hilarious! My own favourite is Lucky You.

30

Horrible Cankers at the Cyber Shebeen,

05/05/2008 10:53:55
31....Now that is effete snobbery...

I have not read, nor will, any of the Harry Potter novels...aint interested, but in my youth I read a lot of fiction...this fed my imagination and kept me interested in English classes at school... the kids that struggled with literacy were also encouraged to read because of fiction that they enjoyed...

The 60's was almost 5 decades ago!....what did they say about childrens reading matter in the sixties when comparing it to the Edwardian era?

This is children and young adults fiction...times move on...but not you.
31

Lillig,

05/05/2008 11:01:55
33 - there are many wonderful contemporary authors out there writing wonderful fiction for adults and children.

The information society hasn't increased our knowledge, it has limited it.

The narrow vision of many adults - and the dependence on only the fast-moving - has led to a lack of reading opportunities for children.

Harry Potter is part of this and I don't see why JK deserves to speak at Harvard. There are many more deserving authors.
32

AB_R,

05/05/2008 11:13:27
I think the first movie was out at about the same time as the 3rd book was published, so the Holywood hype had nothing to do with the success of the Harry Potter books.

The last book had over 600 pages. I suspect that the majority of comments above are from people who have never read the books and are quite frankly speaking from an ignorant position.

Any author who can get children to read more will always get my support time and time again.

ABR (age 40 and rising)
33

Venachar,

05/05/2008 11:19:35
#34 Lillig

Utter tosh! Grow up will you.

Sit by your childrens bed at night and read them a story, any story.
As they get older and start reading, buy them comics to keep them interested.
As they develop introduce them to slightly more interesting authors.
If and when you reach this stage your children will pick up a book, any book read it and make their own mind up about what they like.

Shakespear, Dickens et al have no immediate bearing on young peoples outlook on life today. They may be appreciated when a bit older, but children have to be interested in reading first.

Just what is "good literature"?









34

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 05/05/2008 11:47:39
#34

"I don't see why JK deserves to speak at Harvard".

....I don't see why Harvard deserves the honour of having her speak there.
35

Truely English,

05/05/2008 13:13:55
J. K. Rowling has done great work by promoting a marvellous set of stories in English and she lives in Scotland.

What more could Scottish people want?

This all helps to bond the Scottish and English people together as one nation. Go for it.
36

Reading Public 1,

Wisc 05/05/2008 13:39:47
Much to do about nothing. Harvard brats do not deserve her brains. Harvard is about making money and she knows how. Academic snobs are ridiculous, leftist, liberals at Harvard and when they leave the become neocon conservatives.
37

Silence of the Yams,

05/05/2008 13:40:21
I think she's a one trick pony.
38

Crewedaddy,

Cheshire 05/05/2008 14:11:55
34. You haven't a clue. I wonder what on earth children in your charge read. Tolstoy or Tolkein? Dostoevsky or Dahl? Laugh a minute at Lillig Towers. Getting children to pick up a book and stay reading it for hours is hardly promoting a short attention span society. I would rather my children read JK Rowling and develop literary appreciation at their own pace than be forced to bog themselves down in Shakespeare or Dickens at an age when the language means nothing to them. I went to primary school in the 60s and can remember one thing about "classic" literature - my teacher, for whom I had the greatest respect, telling us not to bother with Dickens until we were older because we would appreciate it more. He was right, Pickwick is one of the greatest comedy creations ever, something I wouldn't have understood at all when I was 10.

You're either a flamer or a snob. Either way, you know nothing about children. As for the American who thinks Family Guy is the zenith of humour...
39

John Blackley,

Florida 05/05/2008 14:24:15
Whoa there!

Now I know there are some here who will jump on any opportunity to sneer at anything American but you may want to hold your fire on this one.

The Scotsman - with its usual lazy reporting - starts out the story by saying, "some students have complained that they deserve better" - but goes on to quote just one Canadian who "writes for the Harvard Crimson". Doesn't say this moose-jockey is the editor of the Crimson. Doesn't say he's representing any kind of student body.

Those of you who've been to a university that boasted a student-body newspaper will know how hard it is to get enough copy to fill the paper and so these rags tend to take on anything to fill their pages.

I would've thought that contributors to this website would recognise a troll. Apparently not.
40

Douglas,

Bathgate 05/05/2008 14:27:10
#8 indune1: This post in your capacity as spotter of humour (retired)?
Are you Spook's ghost writer? I'll be sure to put a smiley face when I'm kidding around in future to save you furrowing your brow in wonder.
41

Fairfax,

05/05/2008 15:49:25
It's remarkable, if not heartwarming, that so many Scots support an English author so fervently.
42

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 05/05/2008 16:27:24
It is truly unfortunate that they quoted some dumb-ass Canadian student who made that stupid comment. We have wiser scholars at Harvard than that blowhard.

I think the Rideau Lakes, although beautiful, are sometimes over-rated.
43

Black Beard,

05/05/2008 17:20:13
The students have a perfect right to expect better than JK Rowling. Maybe a Nobel laureate or Pulitzer Prize winner? Instead they're offered a hack writer with a chip on her shoulder the size of Scotland.

Good marketing and better press are responsible for the books' popularity, not the caliber of writing. Harry Potter is a media sensation; not a literary mile stone.


Oh, by the way, has she sued any more of her fans lately? I hope she's keeping her eyes open for any possible festivals in India. Some people just aren't satisfied with £500 million ;)
44

dumbledork,

hoggywarts 05/05/2008 18:19:08
While Jo is busy suing her die-hard fan, Stephanie Meyer is on the rise and has joined Time's 2008 list of most influential people, a list where Jo herself is missing. Her other fans have been converted into Twilight fans, Miley Cyrus/Hanna Montana fans, while the others have gone back to their manga and anime, to patiently awaiting sequels of Spider-Man, Iron Man and other superhero movies, the latest release of final fantasy and other video games, etc.

The rest of the world has moved on but someone cannot accept that her era has ended and is so desperately trying to keep a firm grip on an empire, like a green ten-armed monster, with a lawsuit that does nothing but reveal a poor rich woman's nightmares that by the time the theme park and the scottish book is out, the Lexicon sales would have saturated her market which, by then, would be more keen on buying Miley Cyrus' autobiographical book or Stephanie Meyer's "fan-written" companion books.

Harvard deserves someone who sleeps well at night to speak at their commencement ceremony :)
45

Lillig,

05/05/2008 18:22:00
Who mentioned dickens? I certainly didn't and I don't think that it is appropriate for this generation of children.

Black Beard (47) says it all - "Good marketing and better press are responsible for the books' popularity, not the caliber of writing. Harry Potter is a media sensation; not a literary milestone".

It is so frightening that so many people are taken in by this. Yes, enjoy the book as a book, but lets not make it out to be something it is not. And there are many other books out there that could get kids reading.

The real issue is that children are hooked on sensation, not on reflection or thinking. They want action. No wonder there is a lack of parental control. No wonder there is lack of discipline. I could so more, but given the lack of ability (in many of the writers) to understand basic stuff, I won't waste my precious breath.

46

OMGosh,

Canada 05/05/2008 18:55:55
Can't you see this is satire???
Goldenberg's column is entitled "Sardonic Verses" for heaven's sake!
Your journalist clearly has not done his due diligence.
And what a shame that his error has brought out such ugliness and bias in the comments from readers who didn't know any better.
47

sigh,

05/05/2008 19:49:59
seriously, wtf guys. it's humour. satire. you know, not serious. i suggest all of you seething with outrage redirect it at, hmm, i don't know, incompetent reporters?
48

Caora Dubh,

Croit sheasgair 05/05/2008 21:19:29
A few weeks ago I heard a discussion on the radio about publishing. Some fascinating points were raised:
(1) Publishers only hit paydirt through a handful of books, and are lucky if others sell enough to cover the cost of publishing them. Many books are bad losers.
(2) Everyone thinks they have one or two books in them, and 000's of people submit unsolicited manuscripts to each major publisher each year.
(3) Publishers' reviewers have a good idea of what sells, although they do reject the odd book that later turns out to be a best-seller. Books about hobbies, professional and vocational skills can be guaranteed to sell a certain number, as can well-written biographies of famous people and "celebs".
(4) Authors who are not writing for a specific market segment in which their chosen publisher specialises, are wasting time.
(5) Each publisher only puts aside a little money each year to advertise a handful of "great new authors" (it's a cynical game); hundreds of truly first class manuscripts are rejected. The "Chosen Few" are then pushed through the media, billboards etc. Even if the books are subsequently bestsellers, the cost of the publicity means that many debut novels are loss-leaders.
(6) The important thing is that the advertising creates a "brand", e.g. Rankin, Cornwell, Welsh, or Rowling, and hopefully a craze through brainwashing. Children are vulnerable as they are so susceptible to peer pressure. The publisher then pumps the "brand" for every last penny that can be drained out of it before the bubble bursts; the author is commissioned to write many successive books of the same type.
49

Caora Dubh,

Croit sheasgair 05/05/2008 21:36:51
There are some great authors and many popular authors, but very few great popular authors. It is impossible to be objective about who is a great author, but a great writer makes a familiar language fresh and lively, captures something of what it is to be human - emotionally and intellectually, and gives the reader significant insights, allowing them to see "how and why things tick" in this wacky world. In this context the "Harry Potter" books are merely entertaining, not great - but they are children's books, written for a definite market segment. The marriage of a school setting, magic and witchcraft is highly retrogressive - Victorian, in fact. J.K. Rowling may be a great writer, and now Harry Potter is dead and buried (we hope), she has a chance to show us what she is really made of.
50

cmwarren,

05/05/2008 23:04:59
What is with people attacking jk rowling for sueing a fan.

she is sueing a fan because that fan wrote a book which is simply 91% of it copied word for word from her books and alphabiatised. she is sueing to protect her rights, which give her the right to stop a book that rips off her work without providing any real transformative value. on top of the 91% ripped from her copyrighted worked, he also ripped more on top of that from other copyrighted sources with no real citation, and dose not provide any new insight. that isent allowable under fair use, and currently, the judge is deliberating on which way the ruling with go. he can either limit copyright, or protect it. its not a black and white issue, but he is having to set presedence.

how dare a author sue to protect her rights as they stand from books that are as substandered as it is possible to be when she has let many books be written about her works because they add more then they take?

why the hell are students only complaining now about jo speaking? we have known about her giving the speech for months.

also... please SHUT UP about the classics. the reasons kids dont devour the classics is because none of them have enough relevance to modern times for a kid to see that and enjoy it. Kids want to be entertained, and they want books to have thought provoking. jk rowling achived that by creating a story that entertains, but also deals with issues such as bigotry, slavery, murder, and the value of human life and the power of love and self sacrafice.

her books have more to teach then most classics combined, because they are relevant to modern times because we still see gynocide happening in the world. bigotry and racisem still is a dominate issue throughout the globe. what happens in harry potter is happening in the real world, just without wands and potions and horcruxes.

jk rowling has written something more relevant then dickens and balsac. infact, she is a modern day dickens. dickens was a ph
51

cmwarren,

05/05/2008 23:07:34
sorry, my comment got cut off. let me finish with my apolagize for that.

Dickens was a phenomen in his own time. people belittled him because he was so popular, like they do now. he got people interested and sold alot of books because of it. harverd would have under the current standing, complained about dickens apperently becuase he was a pop culture icon in his own right in his own time.
52

Lillig,

05/05/2008 23:07:54
cmwarren - get a life!
53

Virginian,

USA 06/05/2008 02:10:46
Adam Goldenberg is a very astute young man.

It's good to know that Harvard still has at least one sensible student.

J K Rowling does not have anything to offer the graduates of a university...perhaps a kindergarten graduation would be better.
54

Annelynn,

London, Ontario, Canada 06/05/2008 02:42:52
I am a Canadian female, 60 years old, with a post-graduate education and 55 years of reading experience. I have read the classics, many contemporary authors, as well as works in French and Latin (this last one I do not recommend)! I have also read all seven HP books several times and thoroughly enjoyed them each time. I have begun to introduce HP to my grandchildren, and on to the next generation!

Like it or not, JK Rowling is a gifted author (note that I did not specify her degree of English proficiency or compare her with any other author - it isn't necessary). She managed to write seven highly successful books and is now enjoying (I hope) the fruit of her labours.

I picked up the first book on a recommendation from my cousin who lives in England, and we are now both dedicated fans. There was virtually no advertising or hype in Canada about the books at this point and I read Philosophers Stone because my cousin asked me to. She didn't need to ask me to read the subsequent books: I was at the bookstore at midnight with everyone else!

Rowling is speaking at Harvard because she is a singular example of what one human being can accomplish with determination, focus and stick-with-it-ness. I'm sure that Harvard tries to imbue all of its students with these traits, along with the broadmindedness required to embrace new ideas, new people and new "outside-the-box" stuff.

JK Rowling can be their first reality check!!!!!

P.S. I hope Mr. Goldenberg was being satirical - if not, his parents have wasted a lot of money!
55

ken lee,

bulgaria 06/05/2008 06:19:12
Whatever JK Rowling accomplished, she has undone when she allowed herself to become the puppet of a monopolistic conglomerate. Harvard deserves better, someone who has a mind of their own, exemplary, inspirational, and is not corrupted by/intoxicated with their own fame and fortune.
56

Virginian,

USA 06/05/2008 19:03:31
#59 Annlynne, London, Ontario, Canado
Quote:
"I'm sure that Harvard tries to imbue all of its students with these traits [determination, focus and stick-with-it-ness (sic)], along with the broadmindedness required to embrace new ideas, new people and new 'outside-the-box' (sic) stuff."

Answer:

Annlynne, you have been reading too much JK Rowling material with all of its "stick-with-it-ness" and "outside-the-box stuff."

You've been infected seemingly with Rowling's known lack of proficiency in writing the English language. Why pass this virus on to your grandchildren and the next generation?

Rest assured that the founders of Harvard never intended that the institution be used to promote anything but the education of Puritan ministers and godly male civic leaders. (Several of my colonial Puritan ancestors were Harvard's founders.)

Harvard's original insignia and motto were an open book, the Bible, with the Latin word, "VERITAS," or "TRUTH," on it.

It is unlikely that the Puritan founders would have approved of either Rowling or her books since she writes shallow, superstitious fiction rather than erudite, expository truth.

Why not expose yourself and your grandchildren to the King James version of the Bible, the true source of the written English language?

We have Protestant Reformers such as Tyndale, Wycliffe and Coverdale to thank for the Bible's translation from Greek and Latin into the vernacular of English.

With the Bible you not only have the highest level of content but also perfect grammar and syntax. It's the first and best classic that can be used to form a true scholar.




57

Ben More,

Edinburgh 06/05/2008 23:53:47
Firstly--JK Rowling, whatever her literary merit, is scheduled to speak and that's a fact. I bet her experience of persevering through personal adversity and rising to huge international success, in addition to her reasonable English skills, will combine for a good and entertaining address with a strong message. I know some believe that the speakers must invariably be international statesmen/women and policy setters, but it's not as if a Harvard degree will be worth any less in the long run because a mainstream writer was chosen to speak one year. It's only a speech.

Secondly--to all the reverse snobs who refer to Harvard students as spoiled, elite brats with limitless funding from their parents: while there will be a contingent among this (and any other University) student body who fit this description, it should be noted that Harvard has a need-blind admissions system that, in conjunction with a massive endowment for funding scholarships, allows ANY student deemed academically suited to attend and funds his/her education.

There are good and bad things about this system, but my main point here is that the student body, by virtue of being selected without financial consideration, is more diverse--economically and culturally--than these posters allow and it doesn't deserve to be painted with a broad, classist brush.
58

Annelynn,

London 07/05/2008 01:40:57
To the Virginian #61 - At times, I do like a little fun and frivolity in the English language. It's my wicked English/Canadian humour coming out!!!

As for my grandchildren, they were introduced to the Bible by their parents before they could walk. It is my privilege as a grandparent, to introduce less discipline and more fantasy into my grandchildren's lives - and we all enjoy it to the full!

I also have ancestors and current relatives who graduated from Harvard, Oxford and Cambridge. Puritanical these schools may have been, but they have largely moved with the times. It would appear, however, that some of the students have been influenced by the aged, ivy-covered stone walls, rather than the learning inside them. That Virginia, is the VERITAS!!
59

Virginian,

USA 07/05/2008 02:53:17
#63 Annelynn,London

Quote: "Puritanical these schools may have been, but they have largely moved with the times."

Answer: Unfortunately the movement with the times of Harvard, Oxford and Cambridge has been in a downward direction.

Dumbing down of scholarship, lowering of admission standards and degrading of moral teaching has been the result.

Quote: "...some of the students have been influenced by the aged, ivy-covered stone walls, rather than the learning inside them. That Virginia (sic) is the VERITAS!!"

Answer: Could you possibly mean that some of the students have been influenced by Harvard's early reputation for scholarship rather than by what they are taught today?

Since your statement is an enigma, it is impossible to know if it is the VERITAS or not.

Annelynn, a further puzzle is what these comments have to do with whether or not JK Rowling, a mediocre writer of children's fiction, is a fitting speaker at Harvard's commencement.

Perhaps Harvard is simply moving with the times by picking an inferior writer with a reputation for greedily pursuing wealth instead of an inspiring scholar with sage advice for the graduates.

60

Edward M Kennedy,

20/12/2008 01:44:56
Don't know about that Virginian

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.