Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


T in the Park

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Is writing on the wall at last in graffiti capital of Europe?



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 29 July 2008
"THAT'S me," the graffiti artist Anek says, pointing to one of the dozen hooded and masked figures swarming across an underground train platform in Berlin.
He is playing a film of his graffiti crew "bombing" the outside of a train, which they paralysed by pulling the emergency brake. Passengers can be seen through the windows, frozen in their seats, until they vanish behind the wall of paint the crew is
applying with military co-ordination. Nobody tries to stop them.

They can expect three to four minutes before the transport police show up. In two and a half, they've covered the whole side of one carriage with "1Up" – the name of their crew – in huge red, black and silver letters. And then, they escape into the night on foot or bicycles.

1Up is one of dozens of crews that have made Berlin the graffiti capital of Europe. Graffiti is everywhere. There were 20,000 reported cases last year, police say, causing property damage of up to 50 million (£40 million).

Berliners are proud of their city's liberal, artistic personality – "poor but sexy" as Klaus Wowereit, the openly gay mayor, dubbed it – and graffiti has always been accepted as part of the package. But public opinion is turning. Last year, a policeman was killed when he stepped into the path of a train at West Berlin's Halensee station while photographing graffiti for evidence. The writers were never caught and the case sparked outrage among Berliners clamouring for greater law and order.

"We need a Giuliani," says Gunnar Schupelius, a columnist at the top-selling BZ tabloid paper, referring to Rudy, the former mayor of New York, whose controversial zero-tolerance approach to petty crimes such as vandalism were credited with cleaning up that city.

In the past few years, Angela Merkel's government has increased the maximum sentence for vandalism from one to two years in prison and made it easier for prosecutors to push for the maximum. There has also been a generational change among judges, reflecting a less forgiving philosophy, according to Peter Brasche, a lawyer who defends graffiti artists and takes canvasses from his young clients as part of his fee. "The older judges are members of the '68 generation," he says. "They want to educate. The younger ones want to sentence. Even ordinary younger people are turning against graffiti. Twenty-year-olds are calling the police when they see someone doing it. That didn't used to happen."

Typically, a first offence might earn a writer a spell of community service or, if they are 21 or over, a fine. By the third offence, they face a suspended jail sentence and, for the fourth, a jail term of two years.

Opponents such as Gunnar Schupelius link graffiti crews to more serious crimes. And while this is true in a few cases, people such as Anek resent the perception that all writers are gangsters, drug users and criminals.

A gentle and slightly hippyish 27-year-old, Anek is studying to be a teacher. He says he loves the silence at 3am when he goes out tagging on his own. "It's like you own the street," he says.

At the other extreme, adrenaline-fuelled raids such as the train "bombing" are all about the kick, the feeling of camaraderie and the sense of belonging he gets by putting himself in danger with his friends. His girlfriend is part of the 1up crew, which happily accepts women.

Anek worries about getting caught and what this might do to his teaching career prospects.

"People can't imagine that someone who is studying or has a job and is respectable also does graffiti," he says.

The police response is gathering pace. A special squad set up in the 1990s has grown to about 20 investigators, who use helicopters and night-vision to catch writers in the dark and have a huge database matching tag names and crews to individuals.





The full article contains 666 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 July 2008 10:40 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 29/07/2008 08:17:15
Shooting is too good for these scum. The guilty should be hanged and quartered, but not drawn (unless on the walls they have defaced). At the very least they should be taught to spell correctly.
2

Yane,

29/07/2008 10:53:12
foo was hear
3

FLUB,

a rocky outcrop in eastern central Scotland 29/07/2008 12:23:54
Anyone who damages or defaces publicly owned property (such as trains) should automatically face a term of imprisonment.

Graffiti could be tackled by withdrawing from sale single cans of spray paint. Why does anybody need them?

The subject of this story 'Anek' is 27 years old and a trainee teacher; this must be one of the worst cases of arrested development I've ever come across. Was fur ein arschloch!

4

we the people,

29/07/2008 13:34:21
#3 i hope somebody tags your rocky outcrop
5

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 29/07/2008 15:12:54
In Ottawa we have the absurd situation where a private houseowner or business has to clean up the graffiti at his or her own expense or be billed by the city or be billed by the city.

This can happen time after time and this absurd bylaw is being reconsidered by the city council.

One can only hope they make a wise decision - faint hope, indeed.
6

El_Kabooko,

Sacramento 29/07/2008 17:46:49
There is a proper time and place for everything; unfortunately graffiti artists fail to recognize this common courtesy.

I understand that youth needs an avenue for exploration and expression, graffiti does provide an outlet. But if that outlet is not tempered by prudence and respect, then it steps over the line and deprives the rest of us of our rights and property. That being said, I think zero tolerance is the correct response to these hooligans.

In addition, I think society should proceed to enter their homes, sell their possessions as reparations for the property they damage, deface and destroy what remains, and broadcast the whole process on a cable channel as reality TV. I wonder how many of these individuals, after being placed in the public stocks, would retain a blasé attitude towards their actions?

Unfortunately, there are too many liberals support graffiti artists "freedom of expression" even though it costs the rest of us in terms of resources and forces us to view their exhibitionist behavior.
7

2dogs in D.C.,

29/07/2008 19:38:17
Wow, Tim, that's a rough law. Graffiti generally sucks, but sometimes, just sometimes...For instance, for many years, there was a message painted on the side of a major overpass on the capitol beltway, just as the enormous vista of the Morman Temple came into view, if you've never seen it, it looks like the Emerald City in Wizard of Oz. It said "Surrender Dorothy". And then, forever, was "Cool Disco Dan" and his "art", seen from the Metro system.
8

Kelvino,

New York 29/07/2008 21:20:50
I had a friend from art school some 30 years ago who started this nonsense in the Bronx / Brooklyn / NYC area. His picked-up, street-gang crew of apprentices sprayed their adolescent drivel over anything that stayed still long enough. They considered themselves to be "art terrorists," but most of us saw them as simply disenfranchised, powerless jackoffs. Is there an art "statement" in all of this ? Of course there is, but the over-all impression is that of feces thrown by infants on bathroom walls. . . .
9

Black Beard,

30/07/2008 21:08:11
Tim, it's your property so you are responsible for upkeep. If the people painting your property are caught then they are responsible for paying for the cleanup.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.