Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 9th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Hezbollah tightens its grip on Beirut amid fresh bloodshed



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 11 May 2008
AFTER heavily armed Hezbollah fighters seized control of much of western Beirut on Friday they withdrew overnight, leaving their allies, the Amal Shi'ite militias, to consolidate their gains after some of the worst fighting in Beirut since the civil war.
The state of lawlessness in the city's Muslim areas was underlined by an attack on a funeral procession yesterday in Tarik Jadideh, a Sunni neighbourhood of Beirut earlier seized by Shiite gunmen, that left two dead and two wounded. While the violence tapered off in Beirut, however, it erupted in the mountain town of Aley east of Beirut. Four people were killed there late on Friday night, while another civilian died in the clashes in the southern city of Sidon.

As the dust settles, it is clear that Hezbollah has increased its influence significantly. Its allies also forced a government-allied satellite television station off the air and burned the offices of its newspaper affiliate as Sunni fighters loyal to the government largely melted away after three days of sectarian clashes.

Those humiliating blows made clearer than ever the power and determination of Hezbollah, a Shi'ite group backed by Iran and Syria, and its allies.

By Friday afternoon, armed Shi'ite fighters were riding joyfully through west Beirut in a long column of trucks, cars and scooters, shouting and firing their weapons into the air in a victory celebration.

The government issued an urgent appeal for help from other nations, calling Hezbollah's actions an "armed coup" against Lebanon and its democratic system using "weapons sent by Tehran."

Some government lawmakers, including the Druse leader, Walid Jumblatt, and Saad Hariri, the son of the assassinated former prime minister Rafiq Hariri, spent the day holed up in their compounds, protected by Lebanese Army contingents and the police.

In Washington, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said the United States was "deeply concerned" about the continuing violence and condemned Hezbollah as "undermining the legitimate authority of the Lebanese government."

Israeli officials said they were closely tracking events across their northern border.

It was not yet clear what Friday's events would mean for Lebanon's political future, or how Hezbollah's show of force might translate into a corresponding political advantage. For now, they seemed only to deepen the political stalemate here. For 17 months, Lebanon has been divided between the Hezbollah-led opposition and the government of Prime Minister Fouad Siniora, which is supported by the West and Saudi Arabia. The stand-off has left the country without a president since late November.

Lebanon's army – the one institution viewed as neutral in the country's bitter political struggle – has stood by during the clashes, unwilling to take sides.

Three days of street battles here have left at least 11 people dead and 20 wounded. Most of the fighting has been in Beirut, but there have been sporadic gun battles between pro-government and opposition forces in other areas, including the Bekaa Valley, northern Lebanon and the Chouf mountains.

The violence seemed to be tapering off on Friday, though some major roads remained blocked, including the one linking Beirut and its airport.

The recent battles started after the government on Tuesday took steps against Hezbollah's private telecommunications network, calling it a violation of Lebanon's sovereignty.

Hezbollah loyalists responded, quickly blocking roads in the capital with burning tyres, including the crucial road to the airport.

On Thursday, Hezbollah's leader, Sheik Hassan Nasrallah, said the government had declared war by threatening to shut down the group's private telephone network. "We have said before that we will cut the hand that targets the weapons of the resistance," he said. "Today is the day to fulfil this promise."

The group will call off its fighters only after the government backs down completely from its challenge to the telephone network, Sheik Nasrallah said.

But Hezbollah's goals are likely to extend beyond that, said Amal Saad-Ghorayeb, a Hezbollah expert.

"I can't envision Hezbollah joining this government, so the demands will go beyond their previous demands," she said. "They want the government to resign. This is effectively a coup."

The government has been urging the election of the army commander, General Michel Suleiman, as president, and on Thursday, Saad Hariri, a leader of the government political alliance, repeated that proposal. But Hezbollah and its Christian allies have rejected proposals for electing a president until there is a much broader agreement, including a new cabinet and a new election law.

In Friday's clashes, Hezbollah and its allies appear to have singled out Hariri, the leader of the pro-government March 14 political alliance. Militia fighters fired rocket-propelled grenades at the office of his Future newspaper in west Beirut early on Friday morning, badly burning several floors of the building. The Future Movement's television station was forced off the air, and the Lebanese Army took over another Future office after Hezbollah allies made threats against it.

One casualty of the recent confrontations has been the widespread notion that Sunni militias capable of countering Hezbollah were being trained in Lebanon, said Sarkis Naoum, a senior columnist for Al Nahar newspaper.

As it turned out, the young Sunni fighters loyal to Hariri's Future Movement – part of the government majority – were no match for their better-armed Shi'ite rivals. Hariri apparently recognised this, and ordered a withdrawal rather than face a massacre.

So far, the young men – some in their teens – who make up most of the militia fighters have obeyed commands from their leaders to stop fighting. Whether they will continue to do so is a much-discussed question here.

The full article contains 931 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 May 2008 9:41 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

W Smith,

Middle East 11/05/2008 03:59:40
"Hezbollah are not a terrorist organisation" says George Galloway(protest friend of Alex Salmond).

So the Hezbollah muslim gunmen are 'freedom fighters' trying to liberate the Lebanese Christians (mainly catholic) form the tyranny of the Zionists and the American Imperialists?

AYE RIGHT.

Hopefully the anti-Iraq war SNP bloggers will be along shortly telling us that Hezbollah's actions are 'illegal'.

Or will they start another rant about Bush, Blair, Israel, the Butchers Apron, etc, just to divert attention?

Funny how Salmond hates NATO but can't bring himself to say anything negative about muslim terrorists groups.
2

Silence of the Yams,

11/05/2008 10:32:04
Beruit is THEE tale of two cities. One half peaceful and civilised, the other backwards, warlike and tyranical. That is the reality of Islam: constant bloodshed!
3

Silence of the Yams,

11/05/2008 10:32:16
Beruit is THEE tale of two cities. One half peaceful and civilised, the other backwards, warlike and tyranical. That is the reality of Islam: constant bloodshed!
4

Chris N.,

Canada 11/05/2008 19:12:12
I'm surprised by the blatantly racist comments left by readers on this site. Does the UK not have laws against hate speech?
5

Black Beard,

11/05/2008 21:14:08
Islam is a religion not a race.
6

Carolyn 1,

11/05/2008 21:59:10
1st eliminate any free speech that you don't agree with
2nd, eliminate ANY opposition.
Lebanon doesn't need a news organization, radio, or tv to tell the citizens and the world what the world already knows:
Hezbollah is a military fueled pawn manipulated by Syria and Iran in their quest for world power. Nothing, not words, not diplomacy, not economic opportunities or sanctions will abate or deter the Iranian and Syrian proxy to power down Israel and the US, (elimination is preferred): there will be no diplomatic solution until Islam is a World Theocracy or Radical Islam is facing the final elimination itself.
That's how it works- the lead up to war, the war and after the war: Fight to the end.
That's the truth and the tragedy of Hezbollah
7

Michaela,

Canada 12/05/2008 00:29:39
Well, there goes Iran's proxy army, Hezbollah, accomplishing another part of Iran's plan for the Middle East.
8

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 12/05/2008 08:32:57
Olmert is almost gone and he shall be replaced by Benjamin Netanyahu; Bebe will do Hezbollah the biggest ugly they've ever suffered!!!

He'll also launch the necessary attacks on Iran, to stop them from producing nukes.

The only question is whether he'll use commercial munitions or resort to nukes.

At the end of the day, Bebe will NOT give back the Golan (nor should he or any other Israeli PM interested in keeping the country safe from another genocide), but he will put paid to as many Hamas and Hezbollah terrorists as humanly possible, before the mindless twits talk enough people into opting into giving up Land for 'Peace'.

Some people will never learn.

Personally, I hope the USA will sell a few hundred MOABs to Bebe, so that he can sucker punch Hezbollah and their Iranian Revolutionary Guard minders into utter oblivion.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving bunch of swine.

Cheers from the Rockies
9

Carolyn 1,

12/05/2008 20:34:50
We shouldn't forget democracy is possible- Lebanon in the pre-1970s was a functioning democracy with a rule of(secular)law in the Arab world...then the Palestinians moved in...
- then the price of oil dropped,
- then Libya bombed the Olympics....
- then they bombed Berlin
- then they bombed Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie

as for bombing Iran, Israel and the USA has to walk tough, talk tough and carry a damn big stick: when the talking doesn't work it makes sense to bomb the Hezbollah targets; keep talking and keep bombing until we hear the answer we want to hear.
Sooner or later the bad guys will be dead or not thrilled at being shot.
Sooner is better than later.

Neanderthal @ 8
I agree.
I think looking at the limited and rapidly shrinking horizons left for Israel and hoping for a long future Netanyahu would drop the proper sized Mother down a number of chimneys, simultaneously, at least I hope so.

10

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 12/05/2008 22:39:12
Carolyn,

It wasn't Libya which bombed the Olympics, it was the Black September group, which was a select wing of Al Fatah: these were Yasser Arafat's groups, and he was behind the murder of the Israeli atheletes.

I watched the whole thing ensue through ABC's coverage of the Olympics: when that chopper exploded, I knew that war was inevitable. A year later, the '73 Arab-Israeli war began, and were it not for the massive arms Airlift by Nixon to Golda Meir, Israel may well not have survived.

The Israelis make few mistakes (they cannot afford to) and learn from the few they make.

Europe had better wake up and realize that the Jews will not go 'quietly into the night': if it looks like they're going, they'll take as many Arabs as possible with them.

Paraphrasing Old Philby from The Time Machine, "...soon the Mushrooms will be spouting..."

Aye, and they'll not be stingy with them.

Cheers from the Rockies
11

57Nomad,

california 13/05/2008 07:37:08
#4 Chris

Chris, are you saying that there are laws in Canada that limit freedom of speech?
12

Carolyn 1,

13/05/2008 14:22:30
Nomad @ 11
Canadian Free Speech?
That's one more element of democracy on shaky ground across the border.
One notable case that springs to my mind is The Islamic Congress and the Canadian Government suing McCleans and Ezra Levant in civil and criminal trials (I think), because he published an excerpt from Mark Steyn's best seller- so the answer is obvious- Canada has limited free speech and its citizens risk lawsuits if they speak out against Islam, sharia etc...
13

Carolyn 1,

13/05/2008 14:37:56
Neanderthal @10

I was thinking of Gaddafi, the mad dog, when I wrote the short list,- Gaddafi funded a lot of terror, including Black September. I could be wrong?
14

Chris N.,

Canada 14/05/2008 03:32:08
To #11:

Yes 57Nomad, in Canada if speech is used to willfully incite hatred against a group of people, then it is against the law and one can be prosecuted for it. Google 'David Ahenakew' if you are interested in learning more.

15

P.K,

14/05/2008 17:18:07
#14

So, your Muslim brothers are lucky to have sought sanctuary in UK rather than Canada or else they will be the first ones to be thrown into prison!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1567819/%27Hate-literature-easily-found-at-UK-mosques%27.html



 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.