Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 17th May 2008

Evening News / Sony Centre Reverse Auction

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Healthy people 'more of a drain on NHS because they live longer'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 February 2008
PREVENTING obesity and smoking costs healthcare services more because patients live years longer, a study has revealed.
Dutch researchers found the health costs of thin and healthy people in adulthood are more expensive than those of either fat people or smokers.

The scientists created a model to simulate lifetime health costs for three groups of 1,000 people. Thes
e were the "healthy-living" group (thin and non-smoking), obese people, and smokers.

On average, healthy people lived 84 years. Smokers lived about 77 years, and obese people lived about 80 years. The researchers found that from the age of 20 to 56, obese people racked up the most expensive health costs. But because both the smokers and the obese people died sooner than the healthy group, it cost less to treat them in the long run.

Ultimately, the thin and healthy group cost the most, about £211,000, from age 20 on. The cost of care for obese people was £188,000, and for smokers, about £165,000.

The results, published in the Public Library of Science Medicine counter the common perception that preventing obesity will save healthcare services worldwide billions.

Pieter van Baal, an economist at the Netherlands' National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, who led the study, said: "It was a small surprise. But it also makes sense. If you live longer, then you cost the health system more."

Patrick Basham, a professor of health politics at Johns Hopkins University in the United States , said: "This throws a bucket of cold water on to the idea that obesity is going to cost trillions of dollars.

"If we're going to worry about the future of obesity, we should stop worrying about its financial impact."

But obesity experts said that fighting the epidemic was about more than just saving healthcare providers money.



The full article contains 316 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 February 2008 9:45 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Chairman Gordon,

Bannockburn 05/02/2008 01:14:50
Tell that to all the testosterone-soaked idiot mountaineers in the mountain rescue thread on Saturday, since they were all convinced that they're personally saving the NHS a fortune.
2

Charles Linskaill,

.Edinburgh 05/02/2008 01:46:44
Soo the normally "Healthy people" are to be victimized.?
Is this the real answer, to the health debate, that our GP's only 'want to know' the people that can make it to see them, between 9am-5pm, Monday to Friday,?

Even the,.."Healthy people"..get ill at times and need a little help,, maybe this understanding, has NO Place in our society anymore.
3

fife runner,

05/02/2008 06:52:19
£3Bn a year to treat obese problems alone and it costs more to keep a healthy person!!??. Save us from academics. Now we will have real problems. Where's that burger and fries, I want to save the country money (ha!)

Wait for the comments coming in from the fatties. Lets not forget that NHS waiting lists are on the whole caused by unhealthy people ie obese, smokers and excessive drnkiers
4

fife runner,

05/02/2008 06:54:49
Charles i went to GP with injury caused by running. He told me of a clinic for sports injuries. It cost money. I then said to him if I came to you and smoked 40 fags a day and was grossly overweight you would send me to any number of specialists. He looked a bit shocked and referred me to physio and podiatry
5

HarderTruth,

05/02/2008 10:38:48
There is little new here. A German economic study in the 70's showed the same, but limited to smokers: they die earlier, but statistically manage to complete their working lives in the low paid factory type jobs which many have. This combined with the tax these foolish people willingly pay makes them extremely cost efficient societally. Obesity may be quite different, and the simplest way to stop fat folk from using up the planets resources is to tax them. Clealry more research is needed to demonstrate whether in full live cycle terms they die early enough to offset their huge carbon and methane footprints. If they do then perhaps a rebate on early death might be given to their estate. And there should, of course, be presumed donation of their entire estate to Greenpeace, unless they opt out.
6

Sioux Man Chu,

05/02/2008 13:49:14
#5 Alternatively we could just render them down and use them as fuel.
7

HarderTruth,

05/02/2008 16:58:01
#6 Intriguing thought. However detailed research would be required to demonstarte that the CO2 released would energy efficient. It may well be that inhumation of fat folk is a sustainable means of carbon sequestration. This would additionally allow a secondary market to be opened. Personally, I'd go long on say 2500 Scottish units. This way your portfolio is guaranteed to grow enormously.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.