Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Gordon Brown to repay over £12,000 in expenses

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 October 2009
PRIME Minister Gordon Brown is to repay more than £12,000 in expenses for cleaning, gardening and maintenance at his second home, his office announced today.
The repayment came after auditor Sir Thomas Legg wrote to all MPs to highlight concerns which have arisen during his inquiry into expenses paid out over the past five years.

Sir Thomas said that any claim over £2,000 a year for cleaning or £1,000 for gardening is excessive and should be repaid.

So Mr Brown is to return £10,716.60 in relation to cleaning and £302.50 in the period 2004/05 to 2008/09.

The Prime Minister will also repay a £1,396 bill for painting and decorating from April 2006 that was inadvertently submitted twice, bringing the total to £12,415.10.

Mr Brown's adviser on the Ministerial Code, Sir Philip Mawer, has ruled that Mr Legg's findings do not amount to a breach, said the Prime Minister's office.

Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg was asked to pay back £910 in parliamentary expenses for gardening costs at his second home. His spokeswoman said that he will comply with the request

Earlier, former home secretary Jacqui Smith apologised for wrongly designating her family house as a second home for expenses purposes.

She also apologised "unreservedly" to Parliament for claiming the cost of adult movies on expenses.

Ms Smith was ordered to make the public apology in the House of Commons following an investigation by the Commons Standards and Privileges Committee.

In a statement, Mr Brown's office said: "Mr Brown received a letter from Sir Thomas Legg this afternoon.

"Sir Thomas Legg has issued his provisional conclusions to MPs, asking for further information where necessary before concluding in December.

"Mr Brown has always supported this process and will co-operate fully and make the necessary repayment.

"Mr Brown's expenses have always been cleared by the House authorities as entirely consistent with the rules."

The statement added: "Mr Brown has written to all ministers urging them, where they are asked, to respond promptly and in full to any requests for further information and when the process is completed to make appropriate repayments.

"Mr Brown has always supported clearing up the problems associated with the failed system of the past.

"Sir Christopher Kelly will shortly recommend a completely new system and the establishment of the independent Parliamentary Standards Authority takes the setting and adjudication of allowances out of the hands of MPs so the problems of the past cannot happen again.

"Mr Brown looks forward to condemning the discredited old system to the history books."

And the statement said: "Sir Thomas Legg has deemed that, for cleaning, any claim in excess of £2,000 in any one year warrants repayment. He has included domestic cleaning, window cleaning, dry-cleaning and laundry in this category and has assessed over the five-year period this amounts to £10,716.60.

"Sir Thomas Legg has deemed that any claim in excess of £1,000 in any one year for gardening warrants repayment. He has assessed that over the five-year period this amounts to £302.50.

"The review also alerted Mr Brown to a bill for painting and decorating of £1,396 from April 2006 that was inadvertently assigned by error to two quarters. This was not spotted or adjusted by the House authorities at the time. Mr Brown has apologised for this inadvertent error."

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 October 2009 5:01 PM
  • Source: scotsman.com
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Politicians' expenses
 
1

Nevsky;,

St Petersburg 12/10/2009 17:10:51
Dear oh dear!

2

Nevsky;,

St Petersburg 12/10/2009 17:13:22
"Mr Brown looks forward to condemning the discredited old system to the history books."

While at the same time paying back money from a system he took full advantage of!

Brown's logic....whatever happened when i had anything to do with it i didn't have anything to do with it....where's me tablets?
3

New Town Resident,

12/10/2009 17:21:09
Saw it said that Legg is going for partial repayment of the cable subs.

The MPs justify cable TV subs on the grounds they need to watch News and Current Affairs.

Not true - Sky TV, BBC Parliament,BBC Alba, Bloomberg etc., are all available on Freeview. Why should any cable subs be allowed at all for these freeloaders?

Nevsky. O/T

Pleased to see UNESCO is telling Petersburg that they will lose world heritage status if that RMJM tower block monstosity is built. See the local Petersburg populace are holding mass demonstrations against RMJM as well now, and the Russian minstrey of culture is supporting them. Why on earth would any city with half decent architecture want to employ RMJM?

4

effdot,

Elgin 12/10/2009 17:25:28
You may remember that a couple of months ago a businessman paid his VAT twice but they put it into the wrong account.

So while he was on holiday they bankrupted him and forcibly sold his family business.

The politico's rally don't get it, do they?

A lot of other countries would have dragged them outside by now and strung them up.......
5

Tris,

12/10/2009 17:25:53
"a £1,396 bill for painting and decorating from April 2006 that was inadvertently submitted twice"
*******************

I have no real doubt that Mr Brown inadvertently submitted his bill twice. He's many things but an out and out thief, I doubt. And certainly not for such a small sum (to him).

What worries me is that his word is immediatly taken for this. Would that be so for a bone fide small businessman, or someone on the dole? From stories I've read in the Times today, I doubt it. Some poor man wrongly submitted an invoice for tax relief on £17 and his life was made hell by the IR.

I dislike one law for us and one for them. It's really just not fair.

6

Steve McGregor,

Dundee 12/10/2009 17:57:58
one word to describe prime minister

"crook"
7

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 12/10/2009 18:39:16

For Gordon Brown £12,000.00, is only a little pocket money, I am sure he has no problem paying it back, unfortunately for some £12,000.00, is a years wages, what an unjust world we live in.



8

the_figures_are _fudged,

Galashiels 12/10/2009 18:53:36
This is what I find so disgusting about modern politics.

It took the prime minister 4 or 5 years to scam his way through what to many of us is an entire years worth of income BEFORE tax, in incidental expenses.

There is not a party in Westminster that does not have the stench of sleaze and corruption.

The rot goes all the way to the top.

Will any of them accept responsibility ?
9

,

12/10/2009 18:57:40
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

jockstrap,

Cyprus 12/10/2009 19:02:47
Be nice to have a spare £12,000 lying about
11

The Col. of Monte Cristo,

12/10/2009 19:46:27
Does anyone know if this is supposed to be the end of the mater?

Or will we be treated to an update...telling us who paid back what, who came up with plausible reasons/excuses, who told Dr Legg to Naarff Offf and how Jaqui Smith gets to pcket more that a hundred grand...In exchange for an apology?
12

morris,

edinburgh 12/10/2009 20:32:15
The rules before were do what you like ,claim what you like, and sod the taxpayer,WE are above the law WE MAKE THE LAW.

The rules are now changed,and these sums to which you have no entitlement are no longer acceptable, so hand some money back chaps but only if you feel like it. They are objecting to returning money to which they would have had no right to in the first place,if there had been any meaningful rules.
The request to hand back certain sums is OUT OF ORDER.They must be forced to hand back any claims declared which are judged to be outwith the accpeted rules,and if they dont then it goes to court.They argubly should be in court anyway ,irrespective of whether they hand anything back or not.

The electorate and the PRESS have a duty here to advise who did what and more to the point WHO DID NOT,and standing down does not mean you are immune or exempt.
The bank robber does not hand back a few quid say Sorry Guv and we reply Well done sir! BRavo!Now off you go and have a nice retirement.







We nail his sorry hide to HM detention centre!

This lot are even worse than your average criminal who seeks wealth .
This lot already have wealth and think they are above the law and take even more, and when caught,think it an afront to hand any back!
Anyone who suports this filth is even worse!
13

Observer,,

Glasgow 12/10/2009 20:48:55
Looking at it objectively, it would be unfair to apply different rules retrospectively. In any other context that would be seen as a breach of natural justice.

But it is extremely hard to look at this objectively, expecially as these are the same collective group of people who pass laws meaning that you can be imprisoned for housing benefit fraud, or not paying your Council Tax, or Television License.

They should be begging the electorate for mercy, they should be walking through the streets with their heads shaved holding tapers in a sign of penance for their sins.

But of course they are not. They are actually talking about taking legal action to protect their ill gotten gains.

In any other country that would be a cue for a revolution, or an unprising at least. But not here.
14

Brianwci,

12/10/2009 21:41:46
No doubt this Brit Nat fiasco will shut them up once and for all about Salmond's couple of Club Sandwiches and a half shandy (comparatively speaking) he claimed for during the hols.

Certainly this will put a major dent in the already collapsing Brit Nat vote.
15

,

12/10/2009 22:04:02
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
16

eamon,

12/10/2009 22:07:41
For Brown to have been found dipping into the public purse for personal gain is a disgrace, but I wonder how much was plundered by Blair. It turns out all his expenses claims have been shredded though.
17

Tris,

12/10/2009 22:13:10
#14 Observer. The rules were rather nebulous, but everything was supposed to be necessary to doing their jobs as MPs. Legg, it appears, has set some limits on stuff like gardening and decorating which the MPs should have done themselves, or the Fees Office should have done if they hadn't been scared stiff of the Speaker who oversaw their work. I mean how hanging baskets and tree surgery, not to mention duck houses and moats could possibly be necessary to the job are completely beyond this guy.

When will we see police prosecutions for the shelves that never were and the rewiring that never was? Or is that legal cheating and theft?
18

Tris,

12/10/2009 22:15:45
#17 eamon. Yes mr Blair's wife is a QC. She would have the wit to shred evidence. That, of course, in itself is illegal. But they don't call him Teflon Tony for nothing.
19

eamon,

12/10/2009 22:26:39
#19
I agree, Teflon Tony sounds about right, but maybe we should be thinking of something more slimy. while Mr Browns actions are certainly not acceptable, I fear they are small fry compared to Blair. I wonder how the European parliament expenses sheets work. I am sure Cherie has it figured out.
20

Sgian Achlais,

12/10/2009 22:30:16
Well i am looking forward to seeing what the papers make of this over the next few days.

I imagine Eck will be getting it in the neck from BBC Scotland tomorrow for a couple of pound while El Gordo will be justified in a 12K fiddle of his expenses.

I hope this list will be published.

I am punching the air in splendid delight for the first time I can recall at an announcement from Wasteminster.

LMFAO.

Gordon Brown - Boom and Busted!
21

Alan B,

12/10/2009 23:26:24
Surely brown should have to repay the rent he claimed for a flat only a few miles away from his grace and favour home we the tax payer supplied him.

After this brown really needs to resign. No wonder he did not sack the likes of smith and mcnulty when he is up to his neck in it himself.
22

Master of conspiracies,

12/10/2009 23:30:20
I wonder what Blagger Brown's unofficial spokesman Doofus is saying on this thread. Oh wait, even he's too embarrased to show his mug here. As for the thieving MPs who refuse to pay back their ill gotten gains, put them in the stocks in the middle of their constituencies and allow the public to throw rotten fruit at them,in fact whay not do that for all MPs. You could even charge the public per piece of fruit as this would raise so much money it could go a long way to wiping out the national debt.
23

Jo'Burg Jock,

South Africa 12/10/2009 23:50:13
Those with morals and ideals find it difficult to comprehend Brown thieving twelve thousand pounds from the "common purse".

Brown's moral compass becomes very suspicious when one speculates on what is going on behind Brown's conversion to his new found "virtues' of nuclear power.

Then one reads about his younger brother Andrew as head of media relations at nuclear company EDF Energy.

The rat that one smells at this point is positively rancid, until one considers that this same creature (BROWN) sends young men to fight and die in illegal wars.

To make matters worse he sends them off without the proper equipment.

Those of you concerned with a MEASLY TWELVE THOUSAND POUNDS may be appeased when this Prime Minister of the UK pays it back.

Don't forget he's only paying it back 'cos he was caught.

What about his family connection with nuclear company EDF Energy?

Consider this "son of the manse" and the thousands of innocent civilians - men women and children who are now dead in Iraq. What happened to their families, their futures, their hopes, their dreams.

What happened to their existence on this Earth.

What happened to the futures, hopes and dreams of those young soldiers sent to die in a foreign land fighting Blair and Brown's illegal wars.

What happened to their existence on this Earth.


WILL THIS CREATURE BROWN LOSE ANY SLEEP TONIGHT OVER THE THEFT OF A FEW THOUSAND QUID OF TAXPAYERS MONEY?

I leave that answer to your own judgement.

24

Kenny A,

13/10/2009 08:04:20
Where is Timberlake and the rest.

Sadly missed by your absense

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.