Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Gordon Brown apologises to bereaved mother over letter mistake

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 November 2009
Gordon Brown said today that he had apologised to the grieving mother of a soldier killed in Afghanistan for "any unintended mistake" in a hand-written letter of condolence.
The Prime Minister spoke by telephone with Jacqui Janes yesterday after learning of her distress over the message, sent after her son Jamie, 20, of the 1st Battalion The Grenadier Guards, was killed by an explosion on October 5, which began "Dear Mrs
James".

In a statement, Mr Brown said: "I take very seriously my responsibility to the bereaved.

"Every time I write a letter to mothers and fathers and partners who have suffered bereavement to express my sincere condolences, it is a moment of personal sadness to me.

"And I am in awe of the bravery and sacrifice of the men and women of our armed forces.

"I send a hand-written letter to every family and I often write to more than one member of the family. I have telephoned Jacqui Janes to apologise for any unintended mistake in the letter."

He went on: "To all other families whom I have written to, I can only apologise if my handwriting is difficult to read.

"I have at all times acted in good faith seeking to do the right thing. I do not think anyone will believe that I write letters with any intent to cause offence."

Mrs Janes, 47, had complained that she found Mr Brown's letter "disrespectful" because of the spelling mistake.

She told The Sun: "He couldn't even be bothered to get our family name right. That made me so angry.

"Then I saw he had scribbled out a mistake in Jamie's name.

"The very least I would expect from Gordon Brown is to get his name right.

"The letter was scrawled so quickly I could hardly even read it and some of the words were half-finished. It's just disrespectful."

Mr Brown arranged to speak to Mrs Janes personally last night after being alerted to her upset by the newspaper.

The Prime Minister's statement was issued after Downing Street came under pressure to make clear whether he accepted a mistake had been made.

"He has unwillingly, in writing a letter, caused this offence. Of course he is sorry for that.

"The hand-written letter clearly contains mistakes on the basis that the person who received it has misread those words," his spokesman told reporters.

He said he expected the Prime Minister to continue writing the letters by hand but refused to discuss the detailed process for the writing and checking of the messages.

"The suggestion that he would have or does write these letters in a way that is anything other than with the dignity of the office he holds is completely inappropriate," he said.

The PM was aware he had "somewhat unique" handwriting.

"If some of his handwriting is less legible than others and can be capable of being misinterpreted, then that is clearly something that the Prime Minister is aware of," he said.

"Some people's handwriting is easier to read than others. Everyone acknowledges that the Prime Minister's handwriting is of a particular style. That is not a criticism of the Prime Minister."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 09 November 2009 2:36 PM
  • Source: scotsman.com
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Afghanistan
 
1

tommy M,

Scotland 09/11/2009 13:58:08
The Scotsman fails to mention that the letter "continued with a series of further spelling errors and a scribble through the final letter of the name Jamie.
From the guardian

Apparently some of the words were half finished -his incompetence stretches beyond mere financial incompetence.

If Broon really took his "responsibility to the bereaved seriously " maybe he would have a rethink on sending ill equipped soldiers into illegal wars in the first place.
2

Alec M,

Falkirk 09/11/2009 14:04:35
No cumfort (sic) to el Gordo, but is he dyslexic as well????
3

Starkravingsane,

Edinburgh 09/11/2009 15:11:06
What a cretinous ass. How dispicable he is. Just another tedious part of the job, eh Gordon?
4

Jimbo2,

09/11/2009 15:11:43
Broon's not interested in the names of his victims.

If some of his words were half finished then it seems he's not really interested in putting pen to paper either.
5

JulesF,

Kirkliston 09/11/2009 15:39:36
I'm sorry but I can't stand the man or the party he leads but on this occasion I fail to see why he should be castigated for this.

He at least has the decency to hand write the letter to each family, perhaps he can't psell, perhaps he can, but at least he actually takes a moment to write.
6

Corky,

09/11/2009 16:05:02
#5 and 6,

That's my take on it too. It's good to see folk with a balanced sense like yourselves. I think it's politicking of the worst kind for the media to portray issues like this.

It's a private handwritten letter from a busy PM to a bereaved mother. If she had a problem, then it was between her and him.
7

blackley,

Edinburgh 09/11/2009 16:20:30
Did this lady not think to contact the PM's office to seek an apology? Did she have to go to the Sun first? That's not very dignified, I'm afraid.

I can guarantee that Brown cares more about her boy than the editor of the Sun.
8

danbob,

09/11/2009 16:24:48
8# My thoughts too. Showing a personal letter to the editor of the current bun so his brain dead readers can tut tut at it, is scraping the barrel of publicity.
9

Tarchin,

Lothian 09/11/2009 16:36:57
I feel very sorry for Mrs Janes losing her son in such circumstances. The British Army is a volunteer army, no one is forced to join the armed sevices unlike National Servce conscripts who served in Korea and Cyprus. Anyone joining the armed forces should realise that by so doing they are putting their life at risk.
The letter was written by a visually impared man and it would be easy to misread n for m.

Why did Mrs Janes not contact Mr Brown directly, by letter, email or telephone? Why take to the Murdoch press and why did they feel the need to publish it?

#3 I think the word your looking for is despicable
10

lilywhite,

Borders 09/11/2009 16:45:09
Agree with many of the comments above,I am not and never will be a fan of Browns, but he goes up a notch in my book for the fact that he takes the time to send a hand written letter, I am sure in future more care will be taken.
11

Colkitto,

River Clyde 09/11/2009 16:51:56
It's an absolute appalling gaffe by Brown. He couldn't even get the soldiers name right when he read out the list of names in the Commons either!
That's just unforgivable...
12

as13,

Sunderland 09/11/2009 16:52:18
indeed....one wonders about the motives involved in going to The Sun with this story, rather than pointing out the error to the PM directly.

as a Scot living in Engerland I am often annoyed by the mispronunciation and spelling of my surname, but a quick 'ahem' and correction generally suffices!
13

r1niceboy,

Nebraska, via Polwarth 09/11/2009 16:59:58
Dear Mrs., Mr., Miss, or Mr. And Mrs. Janes: Words cannot express the deep personal grief I experienced when your husband, son, father, or brother was killed, wounded, or reported missing in action.
14

Handsome Scotsman,

09/11/2009 17:03:57
Of the ‘thousands of mistakes ’Gordon has made since inheriting the job, this ‘one mistake’ is the most trivial and not least newsworthy.
15

Handsome Scotsman,

09/11/2009 17:04:59
^see typo mistakes above for how easy it is done
16

Western Gael,

09/11/2009 17:07:31
#13
If you think correspondence of any kind that takes the PM to task over being both cack handed and illiterate would be conveyed to the man, you are simply daft. If the bloke cannot pen a literate, sincere letter of condolence, he should have his staff do it for him and simply sign it. Pretense of literacy is no less wrong than pretense of sincerity.
17

fife runner,

09/11/2009 17:10:40
agree #8 totally undignified. Like people suing NHS over death of loved one. Only interested in money
18

fife runner,

09/11/2009 17:13:31
just listened to Sun editor and Labour MP. Sun even got handwriting expert to analyse the writing. Probably needed another half page to try and fill the comic.
19

Jo'Burg Jock,

South Africa 09/11/2009 17:23:27

A handwritten letter does indeed display a personal touch that could never be intimated in a typed "standard" letter of condolence.

The writer might be commended for sacrificing his valuable time in order to portray that he is emotionally affected by the sad loss.


However the young soldier sacrificed more than a few seconds of time. He sacrificed his life and Brown does not deserve one inch of lee way.

Brown can end the needless deaths of soldiers now, but he does not.

He continues to put these young men in harms way and his relentless refusal to end it now will result in many more parents reading his letters.

Brown has proven to be incompetent in just about everything he does and it is sad that so many lives have been destroyed and many more will be destroyed.

20

DougMack,

America 09/11/2009 17:39:08
It appears that Mr. Brown was applying something similar to his famous "ligh touch," a phrase he coined pre-financial crisis to say how the banks should be regulated. Just a "light touch" of the pen here and there on quick condolence note and off in the post it goes, mistakes and all. Just like with the banks! Way to go, Gordo!!!
21

Observer,,

Glasgow 09/11/2009 17:49:10
Agree with the majority of posters who think this is rather pathetic, and that the mother should not have gone directly to the Sun.
22

uno.who,

Livingston 09/11/2009 18:49:09
I have little time for Broon the Buffoon .... but what truly grieving parent would ever consider running to The Sun editor with a letter of condolence, merely because it contains spelling mistakes?


23

vitesse_skye,

Antwerp Belgium 09/11/2009 19:37:27
As someone who was educated at Kirkcaldy High School I have sympathy for Gordon Brown for the first time in my life. Not only can he not write well but he cannot count very well either. Fortunately the graduates of Kirkcaldy High are all more at home watching the X Factor although unfortunately few have it. Thank God I only had one term of it before being rescued.
24

Nevsky;,

St Petersburg 09/11/2009 20:05:50
Personally, regardless of what the soldier's mother has done, i think that scrawl is an absolute disgrace.

The fact that Brown could not even be bothered to get a clean sheet of paper when he got the lad's name wrong and decided instead to scrub over it tells you all you need to know....who here would ever think of sending a card like that?
25

Observer,,

Glasgow 09/11/2009 20:14:01
24 A fair point, I didn't actually realise that, I thought he had just made a spelling error, we can all do that.

Perhaps he should get his staff to write the letters and he just signs them. He should certainly get someone to proof read them before they go out, let's hope he realises that now.

26

fife runner,

09/11/2009 20:26:51
saw the mum on the news tonight with the copyright Sun Logo . why copyright if it to be shared or is mum getting paid.
27

fife runner,

09/11/2009 20:27:16
own goal to mum
28

fife runner,

09/11/2009 20:28:06
she must be naive
29

Observer,,

Glasgow 09/11/2009 20:36:10
31 Or being exploited. We don't know do we, all in all a very unhappy tale all round.
30

JulesF,

Kirkliston 09/11/2009 20:36:56
#31

Or the kind of Moron that lives and breathes' what she reads in here daily comic, I mean the Sun ! Quick quick call the Sun let's make a fast buck !'
31

JulesF,

Kirkliston 09/11/2009 20:37:58
speeling mishtakes are aesy when ur preshed fur time :)
32

JulesF,

Kirkliston 09/11/2009 20:38:50
but a leest yoo took the time to sit down and rite the leetr in the fist plaice !
33

JulesF,

Kirkliston 09/11/2009 20:39:36
I can't believe I'm defending him, but I AM !
34

Thomas79,

Ayrshire 09/11/2009 20:50:04
It was a mistake and the PM has apologised for it.

I don't think we should politicize the issue.

I think that should be the end of the matter
35

JulesF,

Kirkliston 09/11/2009 20:58:25
#37 Agreed, but anyone tell me, did Tony write personal letters to the families of the innocent soldiers he sent to their deaths ?
36

Campaign Lawer,

Elgin 09/11/2009 20:59:00
Brown is ignorant.

He uses a permanent marker to write condolence letters, an item more suited to writing Graffiti on bus shelters.
He can’t spell.
He can’t read names.
He doesn’t listen to his people.
He is plain ignorant.
He can’t even get his wife to wear her Poppy on her left side over her heart on Remembrance Sunday (unlike Mrs Cameron)

I wouldn’t be surprised if he phoned JJ Sports first before he finally got through to Jacqui Janes to apologise.

He is a heartless bumbling idiot of the first order.

Only 208 days left and counting until Thursday 6 May 2010 Browns last possible day as leader of UK PLC.
37

Brianwci,

09/11/2009 20:59:45
I'm with you JulesF, this is a ridiculous point to pick holes in.

As you say he was decent enough to send a hand written letter via his one failing eye.

There is plenty to attack London Labour about, but this certainly isn't one of them.

For what it's worth I apologise to the PM and his party for any misguided nationalist attacks.

This whole episode is completely over the top and the sooner it's dropped the better.
38

JulesF,

Kirkliston 09/11/2009 21:03:09
#40 But unfortunately that's the 'Scum' for you. We might attack this paper from time to time but thank God we actually have it !
39

JulesF,

Kirkliston 09/11/2009 21:19:04
And another thing, my sister in law is dyslexic, yet is a superb Nursery supervisor. Do the parents complain about her occasional misshaps in her writings in their childs diary, no they don't ! I'm actually really p1ssed off about this whole thing now !
40

JulesF,

Kirkliston 09/11/2009 21:27:14
#39 What's a lawer ?

Muppet !
41

Iain Mac,

09/11/2009 22:21:27
I'm no Gordo fan but why didn't this lady complain direct instead of going to the Sun???

The Sun will always be Skum.
42

Colkitto,

River Clyde 09/11/2009 22:47:52
Looks like Gordon is telling lies over the apology going by the quotes in this story.
The Sun taped the telephone conversation by him to the grieving mother. It lasted 13 minutes and he doesn't apologies at all during the conversation !
43

blackley,

Edinburgh 09/11/2009 23:21:34
Mrs Janes and indeed her son must have had their name misspelt countless times before. No one is perfect, sadly, not even the PM!
44

uno.who,

Livingston 10/11/2009 11:18:00
#25 "How much thought, respect and care does that evoke?"

..... a lot more than a typewritten, mass-produced Govt letter would ever evoke, I should imagine.

Let's hope you never have any difficulties with your sight, and remain perfect (PS your own post contains spelling errors!)

Follow up .... this "mother" is obviously in the pay of the redtop rag, else why would she allow them to secretly TAPE RECORD a direct telephone call from the Prime Minister ? That wasn't done by accident .... if the state did it, it would be called "wire-tapping".
45

uno.who,

Livingston 10/11/2009 11:38:20
Does anyone really think that Gordy thought to himself, "Right, let's try and upset/insult the mum of a dead soldier, so that everyone can see what a moron I am?"

Get real. And, yes, "Jamie Janes" IS a tongue twister.
46

uno.who,

Livingston 10/11/2009 11:51:06
#48 "Looks like Gordon is telling lies over the apology going by the quotes in this story. The Sun taped the telephone conversation by him to the grieving mother. It lasted 13 minutes and he doesn't apologies at all during the conversation!"

Maybe you should try reading the transcript, instead of trying to defend your favourite ragtop. Brown clearly uses the word "sorry" SIXTEEN times.

This grieving mother is being used and abused by this appalling tabloid.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.