Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


G20 analysis: A new world order – built on shaky foundations

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 April 2009
THERE was hype and hyperbole surrounding the "historic" agreement reached at yesterday's G20 Summit in London.
But it is only when the fireworks fizzle out that the scorched earth beneath them can truly be assessed.

Talk of "green shoots" was already sweeping through the venue in east London.

However, early foliage has a habit of being wiped out by late frosts. World markets rallied amid the largely positive coverage of the summit. But this was before the ink had dried, let alone before the appendices to the communiqué had been released.

Yesterday's deal did have some substance – but not enough on the key issues that threaten to continue to undermine world markets.

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev was right when he declared that Prime Minister Gordon Brown "dedicated all his heart" to the declaration.

But it was always going to be impossible to get 20 world leaders to agree all their cash for the deal really to make an immediate impact.

Overall, it was a public relations triumph for Mr Brown. He was praised by world leaders, including man-of-the-moment Barack Obama, and none of the threatened strops by the French came to fruition.

There was also hope offered for struggling eastern and central European economies. The complicated-sounding "Special Drawing Rights" for the International Monetary Fund will inject desperately needed funds into fledging countries.

More importantly, it will also mean that the burden does not immediately fall on the "big" economies, such as America and the UK. Stabilising smaller countries now will save more money in the long run.

China will be a much more significant contributor to the IMF, but for this Beijing will expect to flex more muscle in the organisation.

This perhaps underscores the changing nature of the "new world order", with America and the West losing influence to their eastern counterparts.

There was also progress on getting international agreement about tax havens, with the list of "rogue" states refusing to cough up their details halved from six to three in just one day. But a much larger "grey" list of tax havens still exists, with countries such as Switzerland continuing to employ stalling tactics.

Nations that refuse to exchange tax information could in the future supposedly face "tough" sanctions, including the withdrawal of financing by the World Bank or International Monetary Fund.

But there was not a penny of fresh fiscal stimulus pledged, despite this initially being top of the priority list for the US and Britain. The term is mentioned only once in the final communiqué.

There was also little substance on world trade and reducing protectionism. Progress on this will be impossible without America's consent.

The $250 billion announced for world trade is not actual money being pumped in by governments. It is a finance package, with just 40 per cent directly from governments and the rest being raised from the private sector – although who the investors will be has yet to be clarified. It is also split over two years. But the former chancellor turned prime minister is famed for double-counting money.

There was some modest progress on regulation, such as finally looking at reining in hedge funds.

But the missing ingredient for a healthy economy was a plan for how to clear up banks' dodgy toxic assets. And no economic powerhouse can be rebuilt without first underpinning its shaky foundations: its banks.



The six key accords in summit's communiqué – and how they scored


FINANCIAL RESOLUTION

THERE were many soothing words about regulation, but few details.

The crunch issue of persuading banks to lend again will remain unresolved if financial institutions do not have rules on how to ditch toxic assets – and how to avoid another banking crisis.

For the first time, some hedge fund activities will be regulated. There was support for more candid surveillance of economies and financial sectors and credit agencies.

And there was a pledge to crack down on bankers' pay.

Effectiveness: 2/5



TAX HAVENS

GORDON Brown, the Prime Minister, has predicted the end of tax havens.

He had reason for confidence, as leaders pledged that countries that would not co-operate with signing up to agreements on information-sharing would be named and shamed.

By yesterday evening, the OECD had published a "blacklist" of countries that were unwilling to sign up to the transparency code.

Initially, there were six countries on the list, but by last night just three were left as Brunei, Guatemala and Malaysia hastily agreed to fall into line. That left Costa Rica, the Philippines and Uruguay as "rogue" tax states.

Effectiveness: 4/5



INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND

RESOURCES to the International Monetary Fund have been trebled to allow emerging economies to draw on its cash to inject liquidity into their own economies. Its funds have soared from $250 billion to $750 billion thanks to the agreement at the summit.

An injection of $500 billion has been given to the fund to help developing countries.

Meanwhile, an additional $250 billion will be made available in "Special Drawing Rights", which is effectively an overdraft facility.

Officials privately say they are not expecting the IMF to need all the resources, but the plan is designed to reassure struggling nations it will be able to bail out any country in fear of going bust.

If smaller eastern and central European economies can be saved, it will save bigger countries such as the UK and the US from having to bail them out.

The IMF will also sell some of its gold reserves, and give the money to the poorest companies. The sale of gold will be done gradually rather than all at once, to avoid depressing the boom in gold markets. In uncertain times, the price of gold rockets as investors take their money out of "riskier" vehicles.

Effectiveness: 3/5

Verdict: 3/5



FINANCIAL STIMULUS

FISCAL stimulus was what could perhaps be described as the "elephant in the room".

This was what Britain and America had been pushing for, despite the best efforts of their leaders to play down expectations on this front.

The communiqué promised that there would be an "unprecedented" global fiscal expansion of $5 trillion, which it said would save or create millions of jobs that would otherwise have been destroyed. Crucially, it is not new money – but an aggregation of the additional spending programmes and tax cuts already announced around the world for this year and next.

France and Germany had argued that the fiscal programmes already announced should be given time to work before pumping more large sums into the world economy.

However, Gordon Brown is trying to dress up the $1.1 trillion as evidence of fiscal stimulus.

In fact, these are funds being made available to the International Monetary Fund, rather than being injected immediately into world economies. China will be a bigger contributor and will want greater voting rights for the privilege.

Effectiveness: 2/5

Rating: 2/5



WORLD TRADE

A PACKAGE worth $250 billion was agreed to boost world trade.

The communiqué pledges that world leaders "will ensure availability" of this amount for the next two years, so the money will not all be available immediately. There was also a commitment to working towards the completion of the Doha trade round, which seeks to reach a deal on protectionism, but crucially no timetable for this.

Countries also pledged not to devalue their own currencies to give themselves an unfair advantage, while anti-protectionist measures were also condemned.

Effectiveness: 2/5

Rating: 2/5



ENVIRONMENT

THERE was disappointment last night about the lack of progress on the environment. The communiqué agreed by world leaders tacked this on to the end of their statement, and environmental campaigners said it smacked of an afterthought.

No money was pledged for "green" initiatives, although this was one of the areas of economic growth potential trumpeted by Barack Obama and Gordon Brown. There are vague promises to "transition" more quickly to a green economy and to "build a resilient, sustainable, and green recovery", but no detail on how this would be done.

Effectiveness: 1/5



THE G20: MORE COVERAGE

G20 leaders agree to trillion-dollar rescue

Activists invited north to target Royal Bank AGM in Edinburgh today

Long day in the yellow zone behind a very thick blue line

Number of people charged over disorder rises to 122

First Lady makes an impact with royal embrace and fashion sense

Rowling is a hit with Obamas

Berlusconi's too loud for the Queen

Loo-break leader misses photo

Biker Cameron beats the traffic

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 April 2009 1:05 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: G20 Summit , Recession
 
1

The Brain,

03/04/2009 00:08:22
Alex Salmond made a fine contribution. He's a real global player!
2

,

03/04/2009 00:10:02
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Forward not Back,

03/04/2009 00:10:59
#1 - What has Alex Salmond got to do with any of this?

The scoring given above seems fair, basically showing that it has achieved little, this pantomime. China are the real winners as they will have more influence on the IMF, while they continue to make bilateral deals of their own with African nations.
4

Observer,,

Glasgow 03/04/2009 00:17:15
Gordon Brown is the loser. The message coming from this is to delete - permenently - risk based regulation.

Bye Bye Gordon.
5

The Brain,

03/04/2009 00:35:42
3 You ask "What has Alex Salmond got to do with any of this?"

He had some ground breaking ideas for a £25 Million loan to the Dunfermline. All the global leaders of the G20 needed to take advice from such a heavyweight.

Salmond is always at the thick of it. Whether it's corresponding with Robert Mugabe on Nuclear power or organising laminated certificates that you visited Scotland for the Homecoming to wasting tens of thousands on doing duets with his favourite singer.

Yes sirree, Alex Salmond is right up there on the world stage. He's a real walt, I mean player.
6

Peter Curran,

Kirkliston 03/04/2009 00:37:18
On the 1st of April, I was between a rock and a hard place. I wanted Gordon to fail miserably, to be utterly discredited, to come home to a vote of no confidence, followed by a speedy election. But I wanted the G20 to succeed spectacularly, to rescue us from depression, to point the way to a new era of world cooperation. I can't have both, and, retaining a sense of proportion with great difficulty, I was forced to wish Brown well.

So what was the G20? One giant superpower, America, with its compliant sidekick, Britain, jointly responsible (jointly irresponsible) for the global financial meltdown that threatens the life of billions across the planet, trying persuade the other nations to swallow their contempt and revulsion at the architects of the shambles, and find a way forward.

At least there has been a deal, and since ambiguity and motherhood statements are often necessary components of getting a deal between autonomous and belligerent parties, perhaps this deal was a good as, or perhaps better than we had a right to expect.

I can never forgive you for Iraq, Gordon, nor for your betrayal of the land of your birth, but I wish you well in your new incarnation as world statesman. You must succeed. Just get out of British politics.

As the Bishop said to the Actress - this thing is bigger than both of us.

http://moridura.blogspot.com
7

Dark Lochnagar,

http://darklochnagar.blogspot.com 03/04/2009 01:38:28
Absolutely no new fiscal stimulus money announced as promised by the great white elephant. A complete and expensive waste of money which could have been done by teleconferencing. We are blamed jointly with the USA for the mess in the world. I don't mind Broon trying to remedy his mistake, but a real leader would admit he had made one in the first place.
8

Edward,

03/04/2009 01:43:20
The fact is Brown is still dead man walking
9

woodchopper,

Leeper, USA 03/04/2009 02:59:58
Yep, the new world order is in. Notice how congress is rubber stamping Obama's massive and expensive bills to march us towards fascism. USSR assemble did it for 70yrs and Italy and Germanys' assemblies did it in the '30's. History is repeating.
10

Jimmy Le Pie,

03/04/2009 04:39:37
So let me get this right,

Our Dear Leader, Comrade Broon, is going to borrow billions to put into the IMF, so he can borrow billions from the IMF to fiscally stimulate himself??

Sounds a bit dodgy - is Mr Jacqui Smith involved??
11

Billiam Wallace,

03/04/2009 06:25:59
#5 Danieldobber wrote:"We still like you Brown." Nearly threw up. Pass me a sick-bag. We still like the idea of you Broon, the idea of you crushed under a bus!

#9 Dark Lochnagar wrote: "A complete and expensive waste of money which could have been done by teleconferencing."

Yes it could have been done by video link but that wouldn't have given the establishment the chance to show how bad the protesters are and how scary the police and legislation have to be. Just think, if they hadn't hemmed in those protesters, (the peaceful ones) and trampled their civil rights, the proles might get it into their heads to ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING about the NWO and their destruction of our society. (In the case of the Dunfermline, our Building Society).

Saor Alba
12

Billiam Wallace,

03/04/2009 06:28:31
P.S. Jimmy le Pie, I believe her man is going to provide the stimulus package in a plain brown wrapper, together with a bottle of baby lotion and a box of Scotties, (no, on second thoughts, Broon won't use those, best make them Kleenex).
13

yockel,

03/04/2009 06:49:43
Historic! What, where? Did I miss something?
14

steve 1511,

aberdeen 03/04/2009 07:00:13
more grand standing from the gibbbering eejit broon ,as the country goes down the tubes,this eejit has roamed the world in his deluded state of mind achieving nothing that will be of benefit to the people of britian,


WE ARE DOOMED WITH BROON,DOOOMED
15

Faux Cul,

03/04/2009 07:07:37
1 The half Brain


Yes and he was almost as good at contributing to understanding and resolving the financial debacle as you are,

Superb post truly incisive and revealing.

Stick to your knotting CJD.
16

Dave From Barra,

Western Isles 03/04/2009 07:52:02
It seems The Bairn, Rufus, Grahamski and Smee were also not invited to the G20 or asked to put forward proposals.

that means that they are not important.

Remember people, the aforementioned people ARE NOT IMPORTANT.

RBNR @20

Well put.
17

paulr,

edinburgh 03/04/2009 07:58:58
What were their names again????????
Curly, Moe and Little Joe?
the three stooges.
18

,

03/04/2009 08:13:24
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
19

TWC,

Ex Labour 03/04/2009 08:16:58
People should look at the regional news wee companies are losing jobs all over Britain but only the big losses are important to newspapers.
The media will once again build Brown up to the detriment of the Country and the Labour party.
20

Nikostratos,,

03/04/2009 08:29:02
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article2358332.ece




The PM won a standing ovation from world leaders after securing the deal yesterday.

He promised the G20 action plan will ensure all countries are well on the road to recovery by the end of next year.
21

Dave From Barra,

Western Isles 03/04/2009 08:33:57
Jebus, there are Sun readers in now. This paper really has gone to the dogs.
22

TWC,

Ex labour 03/04/2009 08:36:50
25 Nikostratos,,
People always give a standing ovation to the host all else would be crass.
It is a like when two teams get a draw when they both almost lost they are just relieved they didn't have a disaster.
A meeting in the Autumn will be required ti have another go at this, in an attempt to fix things and the host their will get a standing ovation too because things will be so bad.


This agreement has all the fingerprints of Wordsmiths all over it.
23

Los Angeles,

03/04/2009 08:39:46
THERE was hype and hyperbole surrounding the "historic" agreement reached at yesterday's G20 Summit in London. (Peev -Scotsman)

Almost all of it provided by the press and media.

24

Marian,

03/04/2009 08:40:16
Gordon Brown is using the G20 as a smokescreen to try and conceal his own personal responsibility for introducing a system of dysfunctional bank regulation that has led the UK into the dire economic mess we are in now.

This catastrophe happened on his watch, no matter how much he now opportunistically beats up on bankers. He turned on the fountain of cheap money and encouraged the country to swim in it. House prices rose, debt went through the roof and the illusion won elections
.
Throughout, Brown boasted of the beauty of his regulatory structure, when those he put in in charge of it were failing to ask the most basic questions of financial institutions. The same bankers Brown now claims to be angry with, he once wooed, travelling to the City to give speeches praising their "financial innovation".

Instead of leading some sort of vendetta against nakers in order to conceal his own failings, Gordon Brown should resign immediately so a UK general election can be held to elect a new government to sort out the mess he created and get the UK out of the depression he created.
25

Dave From Barra,

Western Isles 03/04/2009 08:42:41
That's what new leaders do.

The break what is not broken then fix it to prove themselves.

26

infowarrior,

03/04/2009 08:44:23
They can shove their New World Order up their globalist backsides.
27

Los Angeles,

03/04/2009 08:44:28
Salmond is always at the thick of it. (Brainless)

You're a nonentity - the only outlet for your narcissism is posting garbage on this website and repeating it a few dozen times each thread. In all the occasions I've scrolled down Scotsman thread's I don't recall a single intelligent thought from you. In fact, I don't recall anything you said. Not even the next day. It's all dross.

If this website wasn't here who would you talk at?


28

Dave From Barra,

Western Isles 03/04/2009 08:45:14
LA

A mirror.
29

Los Angeles,

03/04/2009 08:47:07
They can shove their New World Order up (Infowarrior)

It arrived the minute Bin Laden planned the destruction of the Twin Towers - the worst thing he could have done to further his cause - and when Bush decided he needed to prove to his dad he wasn't a weakling and an alcoholic.

The new world order started that day.

30

Dave From Barra,

Western Isles 03/04/2009 08:48:49
Here is a wheel. How can we improve it?

Let's re-invent it.
31

yockel,

03/04/2009 09:06:09
Brown engineers a meaningless propaganda stunt.
Am I meant to change my mind about something?
32

Sedov,

03/04/2009 09:06:43
I agree with the Scotsmans analysis that the G20 agreement is built on shaky foundations -the foundations of capitalism which are made of sand.

But the Scotsman newspapers and its owners are part of those shaky foundations - but will it continue on its merry way as part of the establishment that controls our lives? YES!

Will the Scotsman and its owners seriously challenge the system that has brought about misery for millions of ordinary working people - NO!

Its business as usual for the lackeys of a failed system and we will pay the cost.
33

yockel,

03/04/2009 09:07:29
The FTSE closed up.
Nobody is impressed by the G20 but City traders are prepared to bet your shirt that somebody might be.
34

For Scotlands Future,

Vote For The SNP 03/04/2009 09:17:22
Told you. Today's papers are full of how Maggie Brown's summit saved the world. I'm surprised that some Labour electioneering didn't call it "Gordon's 20".

"crack down on Bankers pay"

So, is the whole world going to nationalise all the banks in the world? Why don't they cut down the amount Banks can steal from customers - that's what the voter wants to see.

Tax Havens: But of course they will be allowed to operate and still hide the tax haven funds of the rich elite. It's just the information on suckers who incur the wrath of who ever happens to be in power at the time that will be made available.

Nice to pledge money, but not pay up when asked. Countries won't even pay for the UN let alone the IMF.

5 Trillion: As the article points out, Maggie Brown in his unique accounting style is double counting the IMF money, and the remainder is the money countries have already said they are spending - NET RESULT: Apart from the IMF money, no extra money on the table from the G20 - Europe wins over US and UK.

"250 billion for World Trade" Smoke and mirrors again. Who's going to provide it, when and to whom??

No, Europe and the UK can't afford to go green, so the US will stride even further ahead with their "smart grids", "internet for everyone" and "stimulus spending on children's education".
35

lulach mac gille coemgain,

03/04/2009 09:23:05
Well! Writing the worlds debt off is still on the cards eh? ha ha ha!

And they looked upon the face of capitalism and noticed that when one person has all the money - they’ve got to give some away and print more for the game to continue.

The communists are now gien the world money - Ho ho ho - ye canny make it up can ye?
36

For Scotlands Future,

Vote For The SNP 03/04/2009 09:30:12
New World Order: Yes that's right.

The UK disappears from the maps. The separate countries become members of the EU in their own right. England is relegated to a minor EU country.

London is wiped off the map as a financial powerhouse as a result of its principle part in the collapse of world markets.

The Queen puts all her money into tax havens to protect it from being taxed by the English Government in Westminster who are desperate for revenues. The Queen is invited to become a Scottish Citizen.
37

The Strategist,

03/04/2009 09:35:03
One of the biggest advantages that Scotland could gain from independence is the adoption of the European social economic market model as against the so called Anglo Saxon economic model.

The European model provides for more manufacturing and and a generally much more balanced economy.
38

Marian,

03/04/2009 09:37:00
For an excellent analysis of Brown's illusory G20 deal read Fraser Nelson in the Spectator today http://www.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/3509801/browns-illusory-g20-deal.thtml

So its yet another of Gordon Brown's cunning budgets that falls apart once the small print is examined.

Brown's downfall will be all the more spectacular for his hubris.
39

Alasdair mac Alasdair Mór Mac an Righ,,

03/04/2009 09:44:06
Well should I feel much better today. After the UK government spend millions bringing world leaders to a summit for a bit of posturing and photos when all details were arranged before hand. A simple press release would have been fine.

For the big announcement.

"After the failure of the worlds largest financial institutions due to management incompetence and greed we are going to take what little financial eggs we have left and at great expense stick them all in the same financial basket under the management of bankers"

"We feel that by keeping all our eggs in the same basket we can ensure they are kept safer than if we kept them in our countries where the risks were spread out and reduced."

"One advantage in handing over financial control of the global economy to unelected financiers who will have all the power and none of the democratic accountability that currently interferes with domestic decisions is we the elite will do as we please"

"No Country will argue as they will all be owing so much to the new super organisation that will control the money. As everyone knows if you control the money you control everything"

"Gordon Brown and his mates have personally set up the regulatory regime for the new super IMF so we can all relax safe in the hands of the man who saved the world, again from himself"
40

For Scotlands Future,

Vote For The SNP 03/04/2009 09:45:17
#38
Looks like everyone considers it a success because the stock exchanges had a good day. But when have stock prices been an indicator of the well being of a country.

A company sacks 5000 staff - it's stock goes up.
The stock market is happiest when Oil Prices and commodity prices are RISING.
The stock market wants, in fact it NEEDS inflation to survive.

The world leaders only want to fix the world markets so that the rich elite can start screwing everyone again.
41

Jimmy Le Pie,

03/04/2009 10:20:04
25 Nikostratos,,

You said,

"The PM won a standing ovation from world leaders after securing the deal yesterday.

He promised the G20 action plan will ensure all countries are well on the road to recovery by the end of next year."

Were the 4000 - 5000 who were made redundant yesterday joining in the standing ovation???

42

Rasco,

03/04/2009 10:24:19
#1 Moron. I Wonder if Foulkes could find out how much all this cost and what expenses was paid to Kate Moss and the other celebs.
43

TWC,

03/04/2009 10:28:03
The Stock prices will always rise and the real speculators will buy before the rise then sell when they are sure they've got all the mugs. giv it a week.
This problem is so big all parties shoukld come to an agreement and change the PM under some pretext. It's no good attacking each other that only forces the labour party to continue supporting this crazy Fiscal STimulus in the UK
We need Europe to spend and if they won't we should batten down the hatches..
44

,

03/04/2009 10:29:40
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
45

Abnorman,

On a nice chair 03/04/2009 10:33:54
"There was hype and hyperbole......."

Moot point but isn't hype an abreviation for hyperbole and shouldn't journalists working for a national newspaper know that?

Or am I missing something?
46

bluehead,

edinburgh 03/04/2009 10:52:44
I wouldn't trust that lot as far as I could throw them
I've never seen a creepier lot,
every time I look at the face of Gordon brown I could puke
if that pile listened to brown then they will all be in trouble
I can hardly believe they did not know he was as thick as sauce in the neck of a bottle
the world is about ready to collapse
47

ecosseman,

FACTS NOT PROPAGANDA 03/04/2009 11:49:47
1*
YOU ARE A COMPLETE A*** HOLE
KEEP IT UP.

ROLL ON THE ELECTION!
48

TWC,

03/04/2009 12:17:39
There won't be a new world order till all the Leaders who contributed to the disaster are gone especially Gordon.
He isn't the first and he won't be the last to take on a job he isn't capable of doing but he is bringing the Country and the Party to it's knees. The failure to get the European Stmulus commitment was the end of the game
49

Los Angeles,

03/04/2009 12:42:52
RUFUS - YOU ARE A COMPLETE A*** HOLE (Ecosseman)

Complete? You pay him too much of a compliment.

50

Tim C,

Southern England 03/04/2009 13:37:35
Orwellian. Broon was grinning because his ambition is to transform the planet into a nastier version of East Germany, (GDR). The message was that the politicians want more power and more taxation. The G20 summit was a fraud.

51

JCA REID,

Annan 03/04/2009 13:44:37
The ratings only give this 14 out of 30! So it gets a "D" Grade.
52

TWC,

03/04/2009 14:17:14
I see the stock prices dropping as people realise it there's nothing really new behind the G20. The speculators have raised the value then sold
53

,

03/04/2009 16:05:41
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
54

,

03/04/2009 16:09:31
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
55

Florence,

Edinburgh 03/04/2009 17:04:25
As I said on another thread, the G20 was a vehicle hatched by Brown to save his political neck. Let's take stock in two months from now and see how successful this venture has been. I'm not as optimistic (read compliant?) as the BBC about the success of this conference but, whatever the outcome, our children and their children have been left with a staggering debt that will plague them for decades to come.
56

TWC,

03/04/2009 17:13:31
Brown will be planning another escape from Britain as we speak before going to the G20 in September to plan the Global recovery.... sorry the next Global recovery.
I'll be skint by September.
57

Steve A.,

03/04/2009 17:59:36
Well well if anybody was ever in doubt about broons relationship with the fat cat bankers ...now they know the new world order is nothing more than an international banking cartel setting up world government.

Broon says screw Britain and her people ...you and your children's children will be the cash cows that keeps the global elite in the manner they are accustomed to.

Screw you broon you elitist scumbag !!!
58

ebbi,

spain 03/04/2009 18:56:42
the huge borrowing from the bank of england will drive us bankrupt!!! recovery ?? what recovery?? the economy needs injection of money by people who have the disposable income to spend it.are we in this position?? of course not.just don´t have the cash to spend and boost the economy!! long way to recovery if any!!! these are just hypes to milk dumb investors one more time.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.