Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Farmer reveals the bloody face of Zimbabwe terror

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 September 2009
WHEN the youths saw Murray Pott's sister filming them as they hit the Zimbabwean farmer with sticks, they smashed the kitchen window to try to get to her too.
Mr Pott, who is of Scottish descent, was left with broken ribs and head injuries after a mob attacked him on his farm in Chinhoyi, central Zimbabwe last week.

The incident shows how terrifying life has become for the country's last white farmers seven months into the power-sharing agreement between president Robert Mugabe and former opposition leader Morgan Tsvangirai that was widely expected to end land invasions.

"I was attacked in my mother's yard by 13 people," Mr Pott told The Scotsman. "I was hit 28 times with sticks."

Blood streaming down his face, the father of two was rushed to a government hospital. Mr Pott, who grew tobacco, soyabeans, potatoes and desperately-needed maize on his Hilltop Farm, has kidney problems because of his injuries.

Farmers' groups say that Mr Mugabe is using youths to stir up violence in a throwback to the early days of Zimbabwe's white farm seizures. Mr Tsvangirai, who is now prime minister, appears powerless to stop him.

Thirteen white farmers were murdered after Mr Mugabe ordered (now late) war veterans' leader 'Hitler' Hunzvi to lead farm invasions in 2001: since then, more than 3,000 people have lost homes and livelihoods.

Police have been given orders not to arrest perpetrators of the latest violence: when Mr Pott gave a video of Tuesday's attack to the police, they responded by charging him with public violence.

"They are saying I was the one doing the violence. But I was only one person against 13," said Mr Pott. One of the youths was knocked to the ground during the attack. "I have the paperwork to be allowed to carry on farming," the farmer said.

Mr Mugabe is defiant. "If they (white farmers] thought they would be saved by the inclusive government, that is a lie," he told Zanu-PF youths this month.

"I will just send police to drive them away."

A day after the attack on Mr Pott, the 85-year-old president told around 850 potential investors attending a mining conference in Harare that his government was not "rough and racist as some people regard us."

With what critics describe as unbelievable cynicism, Mr Mugabe said: "The sanctity of property rights and the rule of law in all its dimensions are fully respected."

Deon Theron, the president of the Commercial Farmers' Union, said: "He's lying through his teeth." The union is compiling a list of 'incidents' on white farms: last month there were 172.

Less than 500 farmers are still on the land: "Nobody's stable," said Mr Theron. "Since he made that horrible statement to the youths, things have hotted up.

"It's the youths that have always been used. They've been used right through the elections. They are just Mugabe's brownshirts," he added.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 September 2009 1:42 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Zimbabwe , Video Archive
 
1

stephen mccall,

Lomita,Ca 26/09/2009 03:11:27
Well this Mugabe character is a piece of work!Courageous man Mr.Pott though i fear for his safety,the pendulum has swung here,where are the U.N. ?
2

Plucky,

On the move, 26/09/2009 06:25:25
As disgusting as this is, I can't help but wonder how the British treated the Rhodesian people when they colonized their land as well as other African countries and how many Africans had much worse done to them.
I know what the British did when they invaded North America, everyday I look around and see the evidence of that and can't help but wonder what our people did to deserve how the British treated us and in fact still treat us.
As #1 pointed out, the pendulum has swung in Zimbabwe and payback isn't always pretty.
The UN like always does nothing because there's nothing of value in Zimbabwe, a blatant lack of oil guarantees the UN looking the other way.
3

Geoff,

sa 26/09/2009 07:09:25
2 Plucky-fascinating comment!

You wonder how the British treated the RHODESIAN people? The Rhodesian people???
Also what the British did when they invaded North America?? The British were but one of many invaders,their descendents being very much a minority there now.
Mugabe is an insane savage who has inflicted death,torture,pain and suffering on Zimbabweans of all colours. Yes atrocities were comitted under the rule of Ian Smith but compared to Mugabe he was an angel who bequeathed this maniac one of the best run,wealthiest countries in Africa!
4

Geoff,

sa 26/09/2009 07:10:22
2 Plucky-also"How the British still treat us"????? Where may I ask,do you live??
5

oder,

Scotland 26/09/2009 07:11:39
2 Plucky,On the move,

actually not as bad as you seem to think postie! many more under Mugabe rule have been killed and displaced that under white colonial rule, the Matabele rebellion at the turn of the century was settled peacefully by Cecil Rhodes with very little loss of life, if you study the history of Rhodesia/Zimbabwe from 1891 (first white settlers arrived) you will find very little wars between the white settlers and the African population, what is happening to today is just the continuation of Mugabe tactics from his terror war against his imaginary enemies the whites bearing in mind many many more Africans have died and were killed by Mugabe than whites, the atrocities committed today are carried out by people who where not around either in colonial times or in the terror war of 70s and 80s so your argument that its "payback" holds no water
interesting point you make about the UN if there was nothing in Zimbabwe today then its also true there was nothing there when it was Rhodesia yet sanctions, boycotts, arms embargoes etc were applied then does show that the UN were "anti white" when it was Rhodesia but turns a blind eye now its Zimbabwe?
6

oder,

Scotland 26/09/2009 07:20:13
2 Plucky,On the move,

it should be apparent to you that Mugabe is,has, and always will be a man of violence, he knows nothing else, his entire reign is nothing but violence.
7

Jim A,

26/09/2009 07:50:48
#2 Plucky, as pointed out, a fascinating comment,

"I know what the British did when they invaded North America, everyday I look around and see the evidence of that and can't help but wonder what our people did to deserve how the British treated us and in fact still treat us."

Probably no more than what the Native Americans did to deserve what they got from the Americans.

Pot, kettle, black.




8

Ben Thehoose,

26/09/2009 07:58:48
The Rhodesian police (The BSAP) did not fire even ONE shot in anger for the many years they kept law and order.

Majority rule had to come about, but there are many older and wiser Africans still alive who will tell you privately that life under white rule was far better than life under Mugabe.
9

,

26/09/2009 08:42:59
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

Plumber John,

Pittsburgh 26/09/2009 09:24:38
Sounds like they are reverting back to the trees again in africa. The people of africa would still be scratching out a living in the dirt if it wasn't for the Bristish ruling them for years. The British advanced the entire continent from living in the bush to actual civilization. Now this ruler wants to revert back to the bushes. It's time for a well needed elimination of a savage. These farmers feed the country and once they are gone it will lead to starvation again. And then we will have these people pleading for food and have to watch sally struthers begging for food to feed the children.
Where is the UN? Oh i see they are too busy worried about lining their own pockets with money. Where is Al Gore? Oh too busy prmoting the false and proven false claims of climate change (global warming. WHere is Jesse Jackson? Oh too busy covering up another illegitimate child. I say all the white move out of africa and let it turn back into the savage place it used to be. LEt nature take its course with these people and please do not feed them since it will only cause more to be produced.
11

,

26/09/2009 10:06:34
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

huggs,

26/09/2009 10:27:39
#10 You are spot on.If it wasnt for the white farmers we would have been dishing out aid a long time ago.
They will just keep on having babies dancing on crops and spreading aids close the door on the country and let them get on with it.
Wont be too long untill there would be no one left there
13

Pilrig.,

Livingston 26/09/2009 10:30:44
10 - 'The British advanced the entire continent from living in the bush to civilization'

Like Egypt, Carthage, Timbuktu, Morocco, Ethiopia I suppose ?

(sigh)...such is the state of American education.....

And of course who put e-ba-gum in power over the likes of N'Komo ? The Thatcher Government !!
14

danbob,

26/09/2009 11:44:25
2# Did you ever hear the one about the North American slave trade? Imbacile. No matter what the British did in the past, and there is no denying much was bad, the Americans have done the same in a shorter space of time, and are still at it. Interesting to see the great bastion of self interest the EU is lending money to Mugabe again. Must be something he has that they want to import.
15

Geoff,

sa 26/09/2009 11:54:45
11 Liberty valance-a bit one sided. The British Empire was founded by those seeking adventure,those wanting to spread the christian Gospel,those who valued 'British Civilisation' and who thought in the words of Rhodes that 'the more of the world ruled by us,the better it will be for the human race', for political reasons and yes , by those who sought to make money-a reason that motivates virtually all of mankind for better or worse!
Included many Scotsmen from all walks of life.
16

Alba Abú,

26/09/2009 11:57:03
#14 America was under British rule when the slave trade began. The British organised ships to go to the Ivory coast and snatch the natives from their homes. It was the British who started the slave trade in America.
Only one of the many appalling acts of savagery carried out by a people who called themselves civilised.
17

Alba Abú,

26/09/2009 12:00:46
#15 What a load of nonsense.
I dont think that the tens of thousands of natives from the countries which were originally invaded and pilaged by the British terrorists,would agree with you.

Aye! spread the Christian gospel at the point of a sword or at the end of a rope.
18

danbob,

26/09/2009 12:19:05
16# The slave trade continued for a hundred years beyond British rule. Like I said we did a lot of bad things. Can we be blamed for other people who knew no better carrying it on.
19

Silence of the Yamzz,

26/09/2009 12:21:22
Once a good country until the do-gooders handed it over to the native savages.
20

Allan100,

Glasgow 26/09/2009 12:47:44
I left Salisbury (now Harare) with my parents in 1983 - Mugabe's intentions were by that point very clear.

Although I was only 11 when we left, i remember a beautiful, clean and well ordered place. Now it is a cesspit. Mugabe is a racist of the highest order and has subjected his people to abject poverty and despair. Salisbury went from being a modern capital into a litter strewn pit with raw sewage on the streets. Can anyone seriously say that Zimbabwe is a better place under this racist despot than it was under white rule? I absolutely agree that black majority rule was necessary but the circumstance we find oursleves in now is just heartbreaking. Comment 8 is correct - if you ask older Africans many will tell you that life was much better under white rule - despite what you have heard, Ian Smith's and previous Governments had invested in black education and were committed to progressively including blacks in Government to faciltate a structured transition not the chaos we have now.

21

Plucky,

On the move, 26/09/2009 12:53:27
Here is just a very small example of British atrocities committed worldwide, and you wonder why nations are fighting back and why terrorism has come to Brtish shores.
We, the Americans, are descendents of the British and are carrying out these atrocities in the name of the British Empire to this day and have therefore suffered terrorism coming to our shores as well.
Like I mentioned in my earlier post, payback isn't always pretty.
It's a good thing that India and China are peaceful nations for they have the technology to seriously hurt Britain and America but they are gentle nations who will have no part of the dirty wars.
My ancestors suffered heavily
22

Plucky,

On the move, 26/09/2009 12:56:22
Here is just a very small example of British atrocities committed worldwide, and you wonder why nations are fighting back and why terrorism has come to Brtish shores.
We, the Americans, are descendents of the British and are carrying out these atrocities in the name of the British Empire to this day and have therefore suffered terrorism coming to our shores as well.
Like I mentioned in my earlier post, payback isn't always pretty.
It's a good thing that India and China are peaceful nations for they have the technology to seriously hurt Britain and America but they are gentle nations who will have no part of the dirty wars.
My ancestors suffered heavily because of small pox infected blankets given by the 'white' people who had no qualms about decimating my forefathers to get our land.
23

Geoff,

sa 26/09/2009 12:57:54
17 Alba Abu-it could be argued that Africa was better off before the white men arrived-with a population a fraction of what it is now,a life expectancy in the 30's-40's,witchcraft,rulers like Shaka who simply slaughtered and burnt out his enemies(could have taught the brits a thing or two by your reckoning?) disease and ignorance.
But on the other hand-modern technology,modern medicine etc.?
As to spreading the Gospel at the point of a sword-you insult many good and well meaning (mainly Scots) missionaries with your blanket condemnation.
24

Plucky,

On the move 26/09/2009 12:58:06
http://www.geocities.com/british_atrocities/?20088?200926
25

Geoff,

sa 26/09/2009 13:04:19
22 Plucky-your comments really confuse me.You say"We Americans are descendents of the British"??
Carrying out atrocities in the name of the British Empire????????
China and India gentle nations??? A million butchered in the Indian partition,Pakistan-Indian wars,untouchables?? China-Mao's bloody purges,the crushing of Tibet???

Also as stated earlier,the descendents of the British are a minority in North America-what of the Spanish and french and Dutch?
26

Geoff,

sa 26/09/2009 13:06:05
And of course the black americans,Germans,east Asians,Poles,Mexicans etc etc etc
27

Caora Dubh,

Croit sheasgair 26/09/2009 13:30:48
Zimbabwe is a tragedy. It was occupied by whites because Cecil Rhodes and others fondly imagined that it had vast mineral wealth like that of the Transvaal. The Rudd Concession that started white occupation was illegal in essence, and even then was immediately and brazenly violated to steal rich, well-watered farm land on the central plateau from Africans and hand it to white settlers. Laws were rapidly introduced to segregate the country and force blacks into a wholly subordinate position - they became outcasts in their own country, not being allowed to aspire to anything more than semi-skilled jobs. The UK backed the settlers 100% through the Privy Council and NEVER interfered with racist laws, NOT ONCE. British Prime Ministers had the bloody nerve to castigate the South African apartheid regime, while they had allowed and even encourgaed such legislation to be promulgated in Southern Rhodesia - the country was a good place to find homes for poor British whites, such as ex-servicemen - who received extraordinarily good deals on land there - land that was once the blacks. Yes, by 1970 the whites had succeeded in building a modern country, and they had also succeeded in creating a bloody civil war, and an almost wholly uneducated black underclass that was in no position whatsoever to handle the economy. There were very few black doctors, no black veterinarians, black mining engineers, black electrical and telecommunications engineers etc. Now it is true that Mugabe had a small chance to put things right - a narrow window to train black technical professionals before the size of the population swamped the country's resources. And yes - he made terrible mistakes, and yes, he is an appalling racist. But the basic problems would have been there regardless of the country's leadership - and starving people will do anything to stay alive.
28

Plucky,

On the move, 26/09/2009 13:40:12
26 Geoff,
Germans, British, is there a difference?
The British are of Germanic people bloodlines, therefore no difference.
It was the British Pilgrims that betrayed my people and it was them who started the decimation of my people all in thanks for being helped out to see them through our brutal winters.
My people were naive and unaware of how evil the British were and were blindsided by a people they helped out.
Many thanks.
Black Americans you say.
Why are there black Americans? 100% due to the thriving slave trade, again initiated by the British.
India suffered under colonial rule.
China suffered horrendously because of the opium wars, and Africa, well, Africa speaks for itself everyday thanks to what the British put them through.
The British Isles must be a tremendously horrible place to live considering how they infested every corner of the globe to get away from there.
29

Caora Dubh,

Croit sheasgair 26/09/2009 13:44:14
South Africans would do very well to note that my e-mail above applies equally well to their own country. South Africans - all the signs are there that you are on the slippery slope, too. You cannot all be company directors, lawyers, political scientists, sociologists, and counsellors. You cannot spend your lives in workshops learning about "empowerment" and human rights. You can't all make a living from heritage and selling "The Struggle" to black American-wannabe-Africans. South Africa - much more than Zimbabwe - is industrialised and needs TECHNICAL skills and experience. Technically qualified and experienced white South Africans are emigrating in droves. Britain, Canada, Australia and N.Z. are full of young white South Africans who have left a country that enforces affirmative action, and many of these are technically/scientifically qualified - as software engineers, paramedics, electrical, electronic and mechanical engineers and so on. If black South Africans do not tackle science and maths, and the country has nothing to offer whites who are so qualified - YOU ARE DOOMED. And your fall will be even more painful and tragic than that of Zimbabwe.
30

2dogs in D.C.,

26/09/2009 14:41:45
the native americans had not even discovered the wheel when what we now call the U.S. was "discovered". Horses were unknown before the Spaniards,,and various tribes had a habit of fighting upon contact.Necessary because the tribes had a way of hunting out an area and so were always on the move.The noble Indian was, indeed,in touch with his environment.And his environment was very much in touch with him.For instance,go into his tent alone,come out with flees.Now,how this devolved away from Zimbob,I really don't know.But I do know my history as pertains to here.
31

2dogs in D.C.,

26/09/2009 14:42:37
fleas,that is.
32

Unimpressed one,

26/09/2009 14:59:25
Zimbabwe - the result of meddling by Harold Wilson's government. Ian smith was right all along and should have been allowed to run the country.
33

Plucky,

On the move, 26/09/2009 15:07:36
#30 2dogs,
The "noble Indian" showed superior horseman skills due to his Mongolian heritage, it has nothing to do with the Spanish introducing horses to the Americas, it was already inherant to him.
The whiteman hunted out our buffalo, not the "noble Indian" himself.
Our land was stolen from us and I can't see it being returned to us anytime soon, considering how were were left with just a mere fraction of our people.
As far as the Zimbabwe comparison goes, it just shows the British haven't done anyone a favor where ever they colonized, they were uninvited and wreaked havoc on native populations and continue to do so directly or indirectly due to their American cousins.
34

Geoff,

sa 26/09/2009 15:08:22
27 and 29 Caora Dubh-agree with much of your assesment.Clearly, notwithstanding the drawbacks of life in pre-colonial Africa most of the continent is now populated by people who have abandoned the structure of one culture and are not properly trained to run nations structured around modern western technoculture. We are caught in this terrible population trap-for every classroom and hospital we build we need two more to cope with growth out of control. I remain cautiously optimistic that we may muddle through but it is difficult to be optimistic in Africa nowadays.
35

2dogs in D.C.,

26/09/2009 15:59:06
33-Plucky-When you say our land,what exactly do you mean?I would assume you are speaking as a Native American.What people? I've quite a bit of Choctaw mixed in my blood,but do not consider myself Native.(Randy Irish immigrants,you know). Yes the "Whites"(but there were quite a few "Black" buff. hunters as well),pretty much tagged out the Buffs. Partially as a war tactic,you know.Horses? Yes the Natives became quite adept,but it took a while after the Spaniard re-intro.Eastern woodland tribes had a way of hunting out an area,which is why they learned early to farm and fish.Western tribes tended to a much more nomadic way of life.All fought with surrounding peoples over land.Both had their reasons for what they did,and I'm not qualified to say why.But, this is ancient history and has not much to do w/Zim.
36

2dogs in D.C.,

26/09/2009 16:01:26
By the way,for what it's worth,the clearances of the Cherokee,Chocktaw and all others was a crime.Gold was the ancient oil.
37

Phil the Flooter,

26/09/2009 21:07:59
#14 'America was under British rule when the slave trade began. The British organised ships to go to the Ivory coast and snatch the natives from their homes. It was the British who started the slave trade in America.
Only one of the many appalling acts of savagery carried out by a people who called themselves civilised.'

IDIOT The British were pivotal in stopping the slave trade in the 19th Century , also The slave trade was assisted by Black Folk and Arabs who transported and sold the slaves to the White traders.. they made money out of it. Then again it is estimated that the Arab slave traders took thousands of white slaves from the south coast of England from the 14th century onwards. It is not only the British who were involved in slavery. Go read a proper book instead of spouting your bitter and twisted rubbish.
38

Davemmmm,

26/09/2009 21:11:06
Man - these exchanges are incredible... sure, there have awful things done by whites to blacks, whites to native americans, whites to oooh whites - but also blacks to blacks, arabs to blacks, native americans to native americans and pretty much all possible permutations given the various geographical constraints. You cannot justify present atrocities by events of generations past. Especially when your actions result in the breadbasket of africa beoming the basket case of africa within the space of 10 years. Well done Robert it's an achievement few could perform - but the people of Zim will dance on your grave one day.
39

2dogs in D.C.,

27/09/2009 03:17:19
Damn skippy.This one's all over the place.Zimbab,Indians,hell,where's the Martian?
40

,

27/09/2009 10:08:02
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
41

Lys Alf,

Scotland 27/09/2009 13:13:33
Post #2 Plucky

Are you aware that before the arrival of the whites in what is referred to Geographicaly as Southern Africa the indigenous people had no concept of schools, governance, hospitals, a monetary economy. Even though they had been in existance for as long as the whites they had failed to evolve even the basic requirement for social development, an alphabet! Remember these residents of the southerly part of the African continent were untoutched by the slave trade! I believe that the first time a book appeared in the Xhosa language was circa 1850. A naughty white missionary had spent years reducing the native language to phonetically be adapted to the naughty white man's alphabet!
42

Taz,

The Land of the Free. 27/09/2009 13:57:37
Re: "I know what the British did when they invaded North America, everyday I look around and see the evidence of that and can't help but wonder what our people did to deserve how the British treated us and in fact still treat us."

Probably no more than what the Native Americans did to deserve what they got from the Americans.

Pot, kettle, black.
...........................................

I imagine you figure the natives gave you Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, South Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and Virginia, because they liked you. You people looted Rhodesia for decades. Your presence is as welcome there as most other places you occupied and stole from. They want their country back and are prepared to fight for it. Get out!! And start paying the poor of the world that you enslaved, murdered, and stole from in the name of Empire.
43

,

28/09/2009 12:32:41
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
44

,

28/09/2009 15:25:45
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
45

,

30/09/2009 14:39:17
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.