Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


End of a load of government bull

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 06 January 2009
IN THESE days of economic turmoil, everybody, it seems, is looking for a bull market – even the Scottish Government.
For more than 100 years, the state has maintained a mighty herd of top-quality bulls in the Highlands. But that tradition, and the service the bulls provide to crofting communities, will come to an end in the next few months.

Richard Lochhead, the rural affairs secretary, has decided it is not the Scottish Government's job to run a "bulls-for-hire" scheme, and these public-sector bulls will be sold off, presumably to raise much-needed cash for extra police officers, new school books or hospital equipment.

There are 119 bulls still there now, on two farms in Inverness-shire. They are hired out to crofters, who use them to service cows in the summer, returning to their farms for the winter.

Without the government bulls, the crofters would have to buy their own animals, which, they say, would be of inferior quality, and this would also reduce the variation in the gene pool.

Crofters usually form small groups to hire bulls. It costs £500, plus travel expenses, for each bull hire, which works out at an average of £1,100 per hire. Each bull serves an average of 27 cows.

Some 430 crofters made 120 hires of bulls last year, too few, ministers claim, to continue the scheme because of the cost of maintaining, housing, feeding and looking after the bull herd.

According to the Scottish Government, it costs £3,000 per hire to maintain the bulls – a loss of between £1,900 and £2,500 per bull hire. No-one was willing to say exactly what the government's losses are on the scheme, but, with just 120 bull hires last year, the subsidy to the crofters was about £250,000: more than the Scottish Government says it can afford.

There is a suspicion among crofters that what the Scottish Government really wants to do is sell off the two Inverness-shire farms, Knocknagael and Balrobert, and raise even more money, possibly as much as £1 million.

Ministers have not confirmed their intentions for the farms, but a spokeswoman did admit the issue was partly about cost and also partly because of European state aid rules.

She said: "The government proposes to close the central, state-owned stud facility in Inverness by summer 2009.

"Crofting groups who have taken advantage of the bull-hire scheme in the last three years will be offered the opportunity to buy a bull in the spring of 2009."

Jamie McGrigor, a Conservative MSP for the Highlands and Islands, has tabled a parliamentary motion condemning the move. He said: "The government says it is committed to crofting and keeping crofting going. They know the bull-hire scheme is one of the only ways that crofters have of keeping high-quality stock. This is just selling off the crofting family silver."

Norman Leask, of the Scottish Crofting Foundation, said the problem for crofters was not just the expense of buying their own bulls, but in having the facilities to winter the animals.

Mr Leask added that the health standards of the animals were always high from the Scottish Government bull stud, which ensured high quality and healthy calves.


BACKGROUND

THE first scheme to help crofters improve their stock started in the late 19th century.

Records from that time are hazy but some sort of centralised bull hire scheme operated from at least 1897.

The Crofters Commission, a government-run body, took over the official bull hire scheme in 1996. There was also a ram hire scheme, but that was stopped in 2004.

Crofters can choose from a range of bull breeds, including Aberdeen Angus; Charolais; Highland; Limousin; Luing; Saler; Shorthorn and Simmental.

The full article contains 634 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 January 2009 11:52 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Jimmy Le Pie,

06/01/2009 00:06:19
Imagine a Tory complaining about the selling of public assets.

Whatever next????????????
2

Warden An' All, Reborn,

06/01/2009 00:11:04
Nice photo of alex salmond, he has never looked so good.

Here is a wee bit of advice for my pet dog:

What accomplishes respect does only good.

What invokes life lives.

Cheat and lament longingly.

Manage empathy.

Talk righteously and find friendship in contentment.

When all rhetoric dances end negativity.

Be yourself.

Make indivisible division, negativity inanimate, good health tangible.
3

Lurking from home,

06/01/2009 00:17:30
Eck is history.
4

,

06/01/2009 01:05:13
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

Forward not Back,

06/01/2009 01:22:00
Another bull***t story from Hamish.
6

Warden An' All, Reborn,

06/01/2009 01:22:49
Was that eck is tory?
7

Warden An' All, Reborn,

06/01/2009 01:26:17
I have always seen eck as being a little heffer.
8

,

06/01/2009 01:27:56
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
9

Conan the Librarian™,

06/01/2009 01:58:40
Public sector bulls have been sacked.

Do they still get their final salary pension?

Or end up in MacDonald's, and not even working there.
10

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 06/01/2009 02:19:15
Maybe the crofters could form a co-operative to purchase all the Bulls and the farms they live on.

They could probably run it much more cost effectively than Government.

Transporting the whole animal when all you actually need is a syringe of semen seems a ridicules method for breeding.

Perhaps they could find employment for the soon to be unemployed Scotsman journalists "milking" the Bulls.

After all thats a service they currently perform for the Labour Party.
11

A True Scot.,

06/01/2009 06:44:09
Yes Hamish another wonderful insight into your talent as a journalist. Best to retire on a low and maintain your website "scottish unionist" full time.
This waste of space posing as a newsman actually gets paid for writing this drivel with everything else thats going on.
What next medals for Tory Bliar?
12

Grahamski,

Falkirk 06/01/2009 07:27:34
Aren't the psycho nats a hoot? Here's one displaying his thoughtful views on his political opponents, 'the anti-Scottish, trough swilling, money grabbing, lying traitor scum at wasteminster.'
Now, why do you think Mr Salmond and his chums are so keen to keep your typical nationalist nutter away from their sanitised version of civic nationalism?
How representative is this kind of extremist nonsense in the SNP do you think?
13

Warden An' All, Reborn,

06/01/2009 07:28:41
8-Quisling Gogs-I never considered eck to have any.
14

Florence,

Edinburgh 06/01/2009 08:28:02
11, A TRUE SCOT: Got it in one, sir/madam. Heard on the news Bush is to present Blair with the highest honour before he (Bush) leaves office. You couldn't make it up!
15

TWC,

06/01/2009 08:28:19
2 Warden An' All, Reborn
You are obsessed with Wee Eck I think you need help.
You are actually flattering him in some ways.
You don't come out with policies to beat his you just rant about the guy.
This is a non story too I'm disappointed in the Tories
16

Miles,

Better away from Glasgow 06/01/2009 08:53:02
Have they already shot the large number of quality Rams that crofters used to have delivered for free servicing of their ewes? If not, they won't be able to get rid of the farms. Next weeks story perhaps.

The former AFD also had a neat little cartoon booklet to explain to crofters how to check that a Ram had enough kit and how to ensure that the ewes were divided into serviceable bundles so that the studs would not be over worked.

They also used to offer an artificial insemination service to crofters in the Western Isles.

Its a crofters life - subsidies for everything, plus your dole money.
17

Donnie Murdo,

Western Isles 06/01/2009 08:55:49
They will still be able to buy straws of semen from top bulls and there are AI people in most areas of the highlands and islands (the SAC offer advice with regards this).

It may be slightly more exspensive per cow but AI has a high % of suceess and the crofters won't have to look after a rather expensive publically owned asset anymore.

This could work to thier favour if they decide to embrace not so new technology and think a wee bitty out the box.
18

Edward,

06/01/2009 09:08:02
Another Labour inspired anti SNP story fed through their Scotsman mouthpiece
Sorry Hamish but this is so last years news!
19

Morry,

Scotland 06/01/2009 11:33:27
Yet another blow / kick in the teeth to the farmer / crofter,
I very much doubt that those who participated in the Bull hire scheme will now buy their own bulls, what crofter do you know who can lay his hands on a pedigree bull costing thousands of pounds, very few I would think.

Well that puts paid to cattle and sheep on the hills!
20

,

06/01/2009 11:49:57
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
21

,

06/01/2009 11:51:29
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
22

Tris,

06/01/2009 11:59:43
Jamie McGrigor... will you listen to yourself?

Selling off the family silver is what Tories have been doing since 1979, Thatcher, Major, Blair and Brown.... You make a bit of an ass of yourself complaining that the SNP is going it too.
23

LAWSY2,

lanark 06/01/2009 12:04:38
Aye > Hamish you will never be able to hide a Unionist.
24

Americanbob,

06/01/2009 12:11:48
119 bulls and 120 hires, this must be the most uneconomic system in existence. Each bull hired out only once in a year, or is one bull doing all the work (having all the fun) and the rest do nothing? (hell, sounds like parliament!)
25

Ewan M,

06/01/2009 12:44:09
Scotsman how dare you write a story that tarnishes the SNP. Why don't you just blame Westminster like they do.

#24 Tris - just because the Tories done it before them still doesn't make it right.
26

buller,

Macduff 06/01/2009 13:02:54
Plenty TAX PAYERS MONEY to bail out the Banks and the INDIAN Motor Company !! Ta Ta to that money ? But when it comes to the crofters, none, surely they could downsize it or will they sell it all off to a French or Spanish Company ?. Yes I think its a load of Bull too !! Obviously nothing in it for the Ministers like local property sales , travelling expenses and second homes no point in helping out time wasting Crofters when the money could be used for a GREATER GOOD !! Like the next SELF APPOINTED PAY RISES FOR MP'S or larger free meals at Hollyrood, or LARGER GOLDEN HANDSHAKES AND PENSIONS for incompetent Local Councillors in Aberdeen the list of greater goods is endless !!!! Yours without prejudice Buller
27

Daibhidh,

Edinburgh 06/01/2009 13:28:29
Interesting how this unionist, central belt rag and it's Labour/Tory mount-pieces only focus on issues outwith central Scotland when it gives them a chance to hit-out at the SNP...Labour and this rag have no interest in the Highlands and this story just goes to show how they use and abuse issues for their own political gain.

In this day and age, we cannot sustain a services like the bull for hire scheme and it must come to an end. Crofting is not an easy life, granted, but then again, nor are many walks of life found in cities. The difference being that crofters get grants and subsidies from every direction. They get £20,000 to build a house, they even get planning consent for a house when we mere mortals would be told to sling out hooks...

I hasve nothing against crofting at all, in fact I'm supporting of the culture and industry, but I also know that when economics start to bite and priorities lie elsewhere, the bull scheme has to go...sorry chaps...
28

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 06/01/2009 13:46:41
"Ross Finnie (no relation) robustly defended the Scottish Executive's decision to axe a 100-year-old bull hire scheme, saying it was not providing value for money nor the genetic and quality improvements that it should."

(P & J archive)

Scottish Labour know their own and are now dead against what was once their particular stupidity.

Views from Argyll to Caithness go like:

“Is this yet another attempt to make it impossible for rural communities to flourish? Profit margins are wafer thin or do not even exist. Making Crofters buy a bull to grow calves will see the end of beef production on crofts, and the end of some of the best beef on this planet. Keep the bull scheme, keep crofting alive, keep the Highlands and Islands populated by working people not just seasonal visitors.”

“This has been one of the most successful government schemes for farmers. It delivers real benefits to those who need it and only those that need it. It delivers sound environmental benefits in keeping cattle in the areas where they are most needed.”

“Give the crofters a break!”
29

Donnie Murdo,

Western Isles 06/01/2009 13:47:07
29

You are right, of course, with regards the harsh realities of economy and subsidy.

With that, it is only right that the electronic (and other) factories close down taking thier millions in public subsidies with them and make the workers redundant.

It is also right that all the 000's of bank workers now working under public funding have a reduction in pay and no financial incentive and those that are deemed not needed are shown the door.

I've got nothing against electronic factory or bank workers but when the harsh realities of economics start to bite, the jobs have to go....sorry chaps..
30

Daibhidh,

Edinburgh 06/01/2009 13:54:42
Absolutely, that state cannot and should not fund everything...however, don't forget that it's not just city business that get vast government subsidies...on top of crofting grants, many rural communities benefit from suns from HIE, local Council's and other funding streams...you must also understand, Donnie, that keeping our banks afloat has wider economic benefits which affect us all in Scotland, keeping the crofters' bull sheme afloat will benefit far fewer people and will not have nearly as far-reaching results...
31

Donnie Murdo,

Western Isles 06/01/2009 14:03:45
32

Depends what bank you choose to bank with. Admit it, we are all subsidised to the hilt in some fashion.

However, having never made use of the bull scheme myself (I choose AI as my prefered method of reproduction for my cattle for reasons mentioned at 19) it won't be such a big impact as could be made out.

BTW, we don't recieve any "suns" from HIE here but what we can get is "sums" from the WIE but not for crofting. As it happens though, the WIE have poured in 3 lots of £3 million into Arnish yard which went into administration 3 times, taking that money with it.

Funding streams for crofters come primarily from the Crofters Commission and SGRIPID (the latter available to all farmers and crofters). The funding streams from local councils and W/HIE's is not available for croftiing activities as such but more diversified projects (including town orientated people). All funding projects are based on thier own merits and rate of return.
32

Morry,

Scotland 06/01/2009 14:16:24
30, I am with Yok Finney on this one, crofters in general and mainly to do with remote location do benefit from the many schemes available, however, in saying that, the fear expressed by NFUS, STFAG, etc, whereby there is real fear regarding falling sheep numbers in recent years one has to wonder will the cattle be next?
The Bull hire scheme was a vital part of the crofters ability to make his croft viable,
whilst the government spout non stop about strong, sustainable communities, these cannot be achieved without such schemes as this,
the majority of modern crofters have to introduce other incomes, many work full time away from their crofts, the bull hire scheme allowed at least some agricultural activity on the croft, thereby, contributing to the sustainability of the crofting industry.
It will be a sad day indeed, as someone mentioned earlier when there are no highland cattle left and no sheep on the hills and in ther glens.
33

Daibhidh,

Edinburgh 06/01/2009 14:56:11
#33...spelling aside, HIE (or WIE in your case) do grant monies to rural communities, I'mn ot focusing simply on crofting. The point I'm making, which ultimately what you said in your last post, is that we're all subsidised, but we have to prioritise subsidies given the current climate and spent public money where it's most needed...the bull scheme, in my opinion, does not warrant continued funding (as stated by the last Lib/Lab Executive as well as the SNP)...however, this is only my opinion. If crofters can make a case, then feel freeto make it...
34

Donnie Murdo,

Western Isles 06/01/2009 15:13:57
36

Sure but it also depends on what a "rural community is"? Is it a "rural community" because it isn't within commuting distance of the central belt or other major population centre?

Scotland is a big place but as it happens, most of it lies outwith the central belt. Given the resources per head in these outlying areas, it's within our best interests to keep them lubricated, just as the central belt is too.

It's not always a good thing for a nation to become dependant soley on the centre of things, the peripherals of the country is just as important for many a varied asset and attribute.
35

Lesley McDade,

Edinburgh 06/01/2009 15:32:03
The issue does not appear to me to be relative to the crofters per se and their use of stud bulls paid for by the Government. It appears to me to be that the Government needs to strategically think their bull stud policy - which essentially is a good one - and "improve" on it. For example, these bulls are housed on two farms in Inverness - do they need to be located their - could they be spread out - "Rurely". I am thinking that Highland Bulls also assist our "picture postcard of Scotland - tourism": could they usefully be housed around Scotland and tap into tourism - such that the £1,500 + shortfall the Government say they are making could be captured elsewhere and possibly "add value" to some other kind of facility - I am thinking Gorgie Farm, Edinburgh, there is a small play park scheme in the Borders which I know of but cannot remember the name, there is that park near Stirling can't remember the name. If each bull has a price tag "X" cost to the Government - placing the bull in a tourist hotspot and recovering a percentage of its upkeep plus adding to tourism might be away forward. Look for a way to "maximise" benefit to keeping an elite service in Scotland for the crofters benefit et al and for everyone else's benefit too: and at the same time make it cost effective - a little bit of thought is necessary. Minus-a-brain cell politics needs to go in the bin: its not about "change", its about "improvement" which facilitates progress. The Government needs to see "sense" and "Get Real". Regards, Lesley
36

Daibhidh,

Edinburgh 06/01/2009 16:39:01
#37...

Indeed, you are correct, and for the record, despite what my screen name suggests, I live nearer to you than Edinburgh. I am only too aware of the need to spread investment throughout Scotland and no, I would not class a small communter communitiy located within a stones throw of Edinburgh or Glasgow as being particularly rural. I'm talking about Initiative on the Edge settlements, areas where the nearest town, let alone city, is two hours drive (or a ferry journey) to reach...I just feel that money spent in boosting banking and big business, so long as it's properly controlled, is more likely to help the whole of Scotland, whereas as keeping an ailing Bull Stud running is more about preserving something which is not economocally viable and does not benefit the majority of tax payers...these are difficult time, money is tight...to play devil's advocate, it would not be the first time people had to move to the cities to find work...perhaps its just cyclical and a pattern of migration? It's happened the world over in all directions...and for info also, I had to move OUT of the city to find work, not the other way round!
37

SEUMAS,

fearn 06/01/2009 16:45:44
Time macdonnell was joining crow and co.
38

Finnking,

Lempäälä 06/01/2009 17:28:02
Letter from Gaza:

http://tinyurl.com/73fbby
39

Allan(handofgod137),

06/01/2009 17:30:41
If they get rid of the bulls, then they should make sure there is plenty of high quality spemin available for AI. In fact I'm sure many gnats would be available to help harvest it, as the majority will have had plenty experiance of this (admittedly on a far smaller scale). :)
40

Masterpiece,

06/01/2009 17:35:26
39
Considering the fact that very little if any of the Oil and Gas found in Scottish Waters is anywhere near the Central Belt of Scotland. Is it not the case that the Highlands and Islands subsidise the rest of Scotland and the rest of the UK.
41

Morry,

Scotland 06/01/2009 18:16:12
43, you are right there,
42

,

06/01/2009 18:53:03
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
43

,

06/01/2009 20:00:19
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.