Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Doctors demand freeze on use of diabetes drug for heart patients

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 April 2008
SCOTTISH doctors have said there is "no defence" for the use of a widely prescribed diabetes drug after warnings that it should not be used in patients with heart problems, The Scotsman can reveal.
The consultants, who work in the NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde area, recommend no new patients are given Avandia – also known as rosiglitazone.

They said GPs should look carefully at those already taking the drug, used to treat type 2 diabetes, and stop the treatment if any risk factors are found.

One senior source said consultants "felt very uncomfortable with its ongoing usage" and it was likely that GPs would be prevented from prescribing the drug.

In patients with type 2 diabetes, the pancreas does not make enough insulin to control sugar levels in the blood, or the body is unable to use insulin effectively. The illness can often be controlled through lifestyle changes such as diet, weight control and physical activity. Drugs are prescribed if symptoms persist.

Avandia, made by GlaxoSmithKline is used by 150,000 patients in the UK and it is estimated that 15,000 take it in Scotland, more than 3,000 of them in the Greater Glasgow and Clyde area.

There are signs of other health boards introducing measures. Research published in the New England Journal of Medicine in May suggested Avandia may raise the risk of heart attacks by 43 per cent, and the risk of cardiovascular deaths by 64 per cent.

In January, the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) said the drug should carry extra warnings, including the fact that it must not be used in patients with acute coronary syndromes such as angina.

However, a review of the whole class of drugs – glitazones – by the agency has concluded that the benefits of Avandia still outweighed the risks.

The methodology of the research that has raised concerns about the drug has been criticised, and other studies have suggested the risks are uncertain.

Despite this, the Glasgow doctors are making recommendations to the area drug and therapeutics committee (ADTC) that could lead to many patients being taken off the medicine.

The ADTC will consider the recommendations at a meeting this month before producing guidance for all doctors in NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Scotland's largest health board.

The consultants' concerns are revealed in the minutes of a meeting of the Managed Clinical Network for Diabetes in February, where they discussed the new guidance from the EMEA.

"The consensus was that there was no defence for its use unless the goalposts changed in times to come," the minutes read.

A senior source present at the meeting told The Scotsman that while some consultants thought Avandia should be withdrawn completely, the majority view was that doctors needed to look very closely at patients on the drug and decide whether they should continue with it.

"It is a case of looking carefully at the patients who are on rosiglitazone, making sure that it's safe to use it. And if it is not safe at all, then stop it completely."

The expert thought it was likely the drug would be placed on a restricted formulary, meaning only specialist consultants could prescribe it. GPs would no longer be able to issue Avandia.

A spokeswoman for the health board said: "

We are aware of the safety issues surrounding the drug including the recent correspondence from the EMEA, and prescribers have been kept fully up to date with the safety information."

NHS Forth Valley said that since the initial study was published last May, it had told doctors that another drug, Actos, "should be used as the glitazone of choice for new patients".

Paul Beardon, head of prescribing management at NHS Dumfries and Galloway, said it was likely that Avandia would be withdrawn from its formulary in the next month.

A spokeswoman for GlaxoSmithKline said: "After an extensive review of the data, the European medicines regulatory agency concluded in October last year that the benefits of rosiglitazone in type 2 diabetes continue to outweigh its risks – in other words, that rosiglitazone is still of value in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes.

"A revision to the labelling for rosiglitazone – the information that serves as a guide for doctors about the appropriate use of this medication – was announced by the European medicines regulatory agency in January. The regulators did not make any recommendations to doctors about switching treatment."

The company added: "GlaxoSmithKline believes that rosiglitazone remains a valuable medicine for many patients with type 2 diabetes and an important treatment option for doctors, when used appropriately, and that the decision about a patient's treatment should be made by the doctor, in consultation with the patient and in line with the prescribing information."

• Additional reporting by Marisa de Andrade

Making cells more insulin friendly

ROSIGLITAZONE – better known as Avandia – is part of a class of drugs known as thiazolidinediones, commonly referred to as glitazones.

The glitazones are used to treat adult patients with type 2 diabetes, particularly people who are overweight.

In patients with type 2 diabetes, the pancreas does not make enough insulin to be able to control sugar levels in the blood, or the body is unable to use the insulin effectively.

The illness is normally first treated by lifestyle changes, such as alterations in diet and increased exercise. Where that has no effect, drugs are then prescribed.

The glitazones work by making cells in the fat, muscle and liver more sensitive to insulin, which means the body can make better use of what insulin it produces.

This leads to reduced blood sugar levels.

'FEELING WAS DREADFUL'

VENETIA Murray was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in May 2002.

"I had lots of symptoms for about three years before I was diagnosed. I was really thirsty, I was very tired and had other unpleasant symptoms too," she said.

In October 2003, Ms Murray was put on the drug Avandia to help to control her condition.

"In the following years I started to feel extremely tired, with a gripping feeling in my chest, but no pain really.

"By 2006 it was dreadful, and by 2007 it was unspeakable. But I did not feel any pain, just this tight, gripping feeling."

In 2007, the 72-year-old was diagnosed with a heart problem which would mean she needed surgery.

"I had to have a quadruple bypass last September and a valve replacement. The surgery lasted 7 hours, and I was in intensive care for four weeks. I also developed MRSA."

Ms Murray, of Haddington, East Lothian, is still recovering from the major surgery. She is unsure whether or not her problems could be linked to the drugs she was taking for her diabetes.

"The trouble is that there are a lot of things that if you have diabetes you can get heart problems anyway," she said.

Ms Murray came off Avandia last summer after hearing concerns raised about the drug in news reports.


The full article contains 1166 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 April 2008 2:18 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 07/04/2008 01:44:56
OH! , What can we do,?..(the powers at be)

Take what you get!, ...and,..'Hope for the Best'!
2

,

07/04/2008 04:14:24
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Trotter,

Stonehouse 07/04/2008 07:02:18
How many angry (concerned) patients will the average pharmacy see today, I wonder?!
4

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta; . CA.....a place in the Sun 07/04/2008 07:20:48
1
Charles Linskaill,
Edinburgh
--------------------------------

Hey dude when Ur blood pump 9Heart) slows down, drink two Swedish glasses (22oz each) of Arrogant Bas*tard Ale (7.3% /vol. alcohol),

And if that don't work, drink the same amount of Double Arrogant Bas*tard Ale. @ 10% / Vol. Alcohol.

But stand close to a support, like a wall, or a lamp post.

Do this before breakfast.

happy haggis Day

GC
5

Dr Katharine Morrison,

Mauchline 07/04/2008 09:24:24
Sulphonylureas are not heart healthy either. The best things type two diabetics can do to improve their health is to restrict carbohydrates in their diet and start exercising particularly resistance work. See how at www.dsolve.com
6

Robert,

Kirriemuir 07/04/2008 09:37:52
With the statistics described in this article it sure does represent strong evidence that the drug mentioned causes cardiac problems but the makers are not likely to admit this nor to accept blame for exacerbating Venetia's problems. If I were a gambler I would welcome odds like this but for medicine, no way! It is reassuring to note that the Consultants are taking a stance against the pharmaceutical companies.
7

fife runner,

07/04/2008 10:36:07
type 2 caused by lifestyle anyway. so if they ahd not made themselves ill it would not be needed. their heart problems also probably caused by lifestyle. One thing leads to another.
8

Privateman,

Anywhere but here 07/04/2008 11:14:18
#7 fife runner: "type 2 caused by lifestyle anyway". That's a bit simplistic, if not plain wrong.

"It tends to run in families. It is more common in people who are overweight. It is also more common in African, Afro-Caribbean and Asian people."
(http://www.patient.co.uk/showdoc/27000151/)

Type 2 diabetes MAY be caused by lifestyle, but it can equally be genetic or has causes which we do not quite understand. So it's a long way from recognising just one of the causes to blaming all sufferers from type 2 for bringing it on themselves as you do. My father in law has it, had been a keen walker and golfer all his life until he damaged his knee, still goes swimming regularly, etc. You sound a bit like the Glen Hoddle type who say it's all their own fault without looking at the whole spectrum of causes. I suppose Indian sufferers should blame themselves for being Indian first.
9

Balliol II,

Dunbar 07/04/2008 11:16:56
#7 'fife runner' What makes you so sure? I have type 2 diabetes and so had my father. There is a strong genetic component as well as risks associated with over-weight, diet and exercise.
As for the glitazones apart from the exaggeration of risk I can say that Actos works as it immediately reduced and controlled my blood glucose level when I started taking it in January. There have been no observable side effects.
I do wish that people who post on this site would not be so all-knowing about things they know little or nothing about.
10

Shetland Dave,

edinburgh 07/04/2008 13:38:08
#7 If only you knew what you were talking about before you post . I am insulin dependent type 2 I hill walk do all sorts of things so caused by lifestyle I dont think so .yes one thing leads to another so try not to think to much you might get a brain cell.
11

Stuart W,

07/04/2008 14:25:08
#7

I've recently been diagnosed type 2, but have never smoked, never done drugs, haven't touched alcohol in ten years and while I'm not running marathons I think nothing of walking several miles.

I admit that my diet has been far from perfect, and I've been a couple of stone overweight, but I suspect anyone looking at me would consider me almost perfect weight.

To that extent you might as well dismiss anyone with any health problems at all because surely very few of us (or none) have perfect lifestyles.
12

Stuart W,

07/04/2008 14:30:45
By the way, since I suspect that if anything it's probably been my diet that's caused the diabetes I'm a bit more amenable to what some call the "nanny state" in relation to governent advice over diet etc - I only wish my own had been a bit better.

I saw a piece on BBC News 24 about obesity in America recently and one doctor claimed that obesity/diabetes etc would bankrupt the US healthcare system within ten years.

Slight exaggeration perhaps, but food for thought (excuse pun!) for those who condemn the "nanny state".
13

Gavin MacColl,

Edinburgh 07/04/2008 15:47:05
One thing worth noting in the original meta analysis of rosiglitazone clinical trials data in NEJM, is the author's affiliations with companies other than GSK. Also, the FDA are much more forthright in how the risk affects patients compared to the European regulators.

It is unlikely (and not clinically proven) that a low carb/high activity diet will cure type II diabetes - although lower carbohydrate intake over time does reduce the risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Once the pancreas stops making enough insulin to overcome insulin resistance, then some drug intervention has to be taken to manage glucose levels and to slow the inevitable tissue damage caused by insulin resistance. Exercise has some benefits - e.g. increased blood flow in peripheral tissues.

An attraction of Avandia for type 2 diabetes is its pill form, and an alternative to regular insulin injections for bringing down circulating glucose levels but, as with any drug therapy, this comes at a cost.
14

Cadiz Runner,

Cadiz 07/04/2008 16:25:02
Fife runner should take care not to over-generalise and cast opinions on matters that he is not fully aware off. I can confirm, knowing the patient in the case study, that Ms Murray´s condition is not due to her lifestyle. A long distance sea swimmer in her younger years she continued to swim, take exercise and eat healthily until her late 60´s when her health problems forced her to become less active. Since then she continues to eat healthily, is fully aware of what a "healthy lifestyle" is and hopes to resume her life-long exercise regime as soon as she is able to. A well written article.
15

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 08/04/2008 00:10:44
Has anyone asked? --- Why these 'doctors" ave carte blanche over the drugs we need and want ? They are nothing but educated monkeys who are somehow put in control of life quality. Why is it immoral for us to decide what cholesterol drug or diabetes drug we want without interference from the drug fueled gp profit culture? They are true quacks trading their souls for money ....

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.