Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 11th May 2008

Evening News / Sony Centre Reverse Auction

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Discovery with deep impact on Scots coast



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 March 2008
IT IS a mystery which has puzzled generations of geologists – the origins of a layer of stratified rock trapped in the sediments which now form part of the coastline of north-west Scotland.
Scientists suspected for years that the curious seam could have been formed by volcanic activity millions of years ago.

But it was revealed yesterday that the 40-mile long rock layer was formed when the biggest meteorite ever to strike what is now the British Isles hit the Earth close to present-day Ullapool with the force of a 145,000 megaton bomb.

Geologists at Aberdeen and Oxford universities, who made the discovery, believe that the rock was formed by ejecta – material which was forced out of the Earth – by the meteorite, it hit 1.2 billion years ago.

The meteorite, which is thought to have measured up to 1km across, would have formed an impact crater up to 10km in diameter, but the material ejected by the impact spread out for at least 50km.

The rock layer, which stretches from Gairloch in the south to the Sutherland village of Stoer to the north, is sandwiched between sedimentary rocks which form part of the Torridonian sandstones of Sutherland.

Ken Amor, one of the leaders of the team of geologists involved in the discovery, said: "This is the most spectacular evidence for a meteorite impact within the British Isles to date, and what we have discovered about this meteorite strike could help us understand the ancient impacts that shaped the surface of other planets, such as Mars."

Mr Amor, a geologist at Oxford University's department of earth sciences, added:

"The massive impact would have melted rocks and thrown up an enormous cloud of vapour that scattered material over a large part of the region around Ullapool. The crater was rapidly buried by sandstone, which helped to preserve the evidence."

Scott Thackrey, a PhD student in geology and petroleum geology at Aberdeen University and an expert on impact craters, said:

"Ejecta deposits like this are extremely rare. These layers usually get eroded away very quickly, but this layer has been pretty well perfectly preserved.

"This deposit had originally been thought to be volcanic. But the problem was it is the only instance of this deposit in about a couple of kilometres of sediment. And, if it had been created by volcanic activity, we would have expected to see quite a few of these layers occurring, but this was the only one.

"We found indicators which prove that the layer was formed by a meteorite rather than a volcanic event."

The layer of rock varies in thickness from six to 22 metres and is composed of both melted rock fragments caused when the meteorite struck the Earth and by "shock mineral" debris formed by the ground surge as the force of the crater's impact spread across the landscape.

Mr Thackrey added: "The meteorite would have struck with the force of 145,000 megatons.

"The bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima, by comparison, was only a 16 kiloton explosion. If it happened today, we would get winds over 260mph in Aberdeen and a shock blast that would have flattened every tree in the area.

"We would probably survive – but only just."

Meteorites making a mark across the planet
THE Ullapool crater may be biggest yet discovered in the British Isles, but it is completely dwarfed by the world's largest known meteorite crater, the 300km wide Vredefort crater in South Africa.

The massive crater is believed to have been created when a 10km wide meteorite, larger than Table Mountain, slammed into the Earth some two billion years ago, vaporising about 70 cubic kilometres of rock.

The impact was so powerful that the rock beneath the impact point rebounded, creating a raised dome at the centre of the crater and generating a ripple of ringed crater rims which radiate out from the centre.

Its original impact may have created a crater up to 380km across, which consisted of three concentric circles of uplifted rock.

The Vredefort crater is far older than the Chixculub crater in Mexico which, with an age of 65 million years, is the site of a meteorite impact, which some scientists claim led to the extinction of the dinosaurs.

However, the best-known crater on Earth is the so-called "meteor crater" in Arizona, which is believed to have been created a mere 50,000 years ago when a mass of iron smashed into the present-day United States.

The meteorite impact created a 1.2km-wide hole in the ground, 170 metres deep.

It is the most visible space debris impact site on the planet.

To date, more than 170 meteorite impact craters or their remnants on Earth have been identified by scientists.


The full article contains 801 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 March 2008 11:54 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

,

27/03/2008 01:01:41
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

The Daleks,

Longmen 27/03/2008 01:13:09
The other theory going around is that it wasn't a meteorite that formed an impact crater 10km wide, but rather that Jackie Baillie tripped and fell over while visiting the area on holiday.

As I say, it's only a theory, but you never know.
3

Scotindy,

Los Angeles 27/03/2008 01:17:30
Great story, and a good view of LOOPALLU, sorry Ullapool!!!
4

Dave from Barra ©,

Western Isles 27/03/2008 07:13:52
Loopallu festival this year anybody? Apparently it's going to be a massive Rock show! ;-)
5

Ann from OzWest,

Western Australia 27/03/2008 07:20:46
They have just found another meteor crater here too in the north of this state.
6

donald,

glasgow 27/03/2008 07:39:23
Don't see that disturbing the inhabitants of Ullapool.
7

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 27/03/2008 07:45:01
I must say I'm a bit puzzled by this story.

If it is a single deposit, 6 to 22m thick and composed of rock fragments and shocked minerals, then I'm surprised anyone would consider it volcanic in origin. Why has it taken this long to come this conclusion? Perhaps it is not well exposed - I've never heard of it before.

I do wish newspapers would provide a reference to the source of articles like this so that folk can follow up the story more easily.
8

,

27/03/2008 07:51:45
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
9

Dave from Barra ©,

Western Isles 27/03/2008 07:54:46
Actually Slioch, your comment is very telling. It shows just how little you know about the country you live in. Yet, it doesn't stop you spouting second hand knowledge about a big place like the planet like you made the scientific findings yourself.

You have a loooong way to go yet old bean......
10

Shionnach,

27/03/2008 08:21:01
Slioch (one of our finest hills) may well of been the centre of this impact, so may be he knows more than we think!
11

Geraldine Firequeen,

27/03/2008 08:36:50
This is a badly composed sentence and makes it appear that the Earth hit the meteorite

"Geologists at Aberdeen and Oxford universities, who made the discovery, believe that the rock was formed by ejecta – material which was forced out of the Earth – by the meteorite, it hit 1.2 billion years ago"
12

Dave from Barra ©,

Western Isles 27/03/2008 08:42:53
11

Maybe the Earth DID hit the meteorite. It's NOT a stationary object.
13

Boy Wonder,

27/03/2008 08:48:29
My mother came from Ullapool ... this now explains a lot!
14

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 27/03/2008 08:50:01
#10 Shionnach

Yes, it gave me the mother of all hangovers!

Slioch, of course, is made of Torridonian sandstone, sitting mightily on its base of incredibly ancient Lewisian gneiss. Though, according to this report, I may be just a bit out of range, since the deposit is from Gairloch to the north, and Gairloch is to my north west. Anyway, I'm sure I would have noticed if I had a band of pseudo-volcanic ejecta passing through my midriff, which is (another reason) why I say I am puzzled.
15

fred bloggs,

Edinburgh 27/03/2008 09:16:21
Slioch, this the link:

http://www.physorg.com/news125763568.html
16

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 27/03/2008 09:29:10
#15 Fred Bloggs

Thanks Fred. Though it still doesn't say much more than the Scotsman.

BTW, if anyone is interested in reading a more detailed study of a suspected comet impact in western north America 12,900 years ago that probably caused the dramatic cooling and megafaunal extinctions known as the Younger Dryas, then see:

http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/0706977104v1
17

nabodican,

Rural Scotland 27/03/2008 10:21:55
Slioch - you are a sad person!
Best do as #8 Dave advises and stick to your IPCC reports.
18

fred bloggs,

Edinburgh 27/03/2008 10:26:18
OK Slioch, you stickler. Here's the link to the actual paper:

http://www.gsajournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-pdf&doi=10.1130%2FG24454A.1
19

Neil,

Glasgow 27/03/2008 10:48:52
We have been extremely lucky that, to the best of our knowledge, no such meterite has landed on any heavily inhabited place in historical times. Since 3/4 of the Earth is sea some historical Tsunamis may have been caused this way but we can't know. The Tanguska meteor if 1905 landed in possibly the least inhabited part of Siberia & thus did not kill anybody, or at least anybody known to the authorities. Nonetheless the world is getting ever more inhabited & it is a statistical certainty that something, with the power of an Atomm Bomb will someday.
20

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 27/03/2008 11:43:51
# 18 fred bloggs

Thanks again Fred.

#17 nabodican
Jumping in feet first, Nabodican?

Perhaps I should have explained that I once mapped some of the Torridonian rocks in the vicinity of Ullapool, so being surprised that I had never heard of this layer of ejecta is umm not surprising. However, I'm not interested in silly name-calling and derogatory remarks.

This is part of what the abstract that Fred linked to says, "The Stac Fada Member of the Precambrian Stoer Group in Scotland has previously been described as volcanic in origin. However, shocked quartz and biotite provide evidence for high-pressure shock metamorphism, while chromium isotope values and elevated abundances of platinum group metals and siderophile elements indicate addition of meteoritic material. Thus, the unit is reinterpreted here as having an impact origin. The ejecta blanket reaches >20 m in thickness and contains abundant dark green, vesicular, devitrified glass fragments.


I remain puzzled that this material had previously been regarded as volcanic. This is a classic World-famous geological area, crawled over by geologists, and this is a 20m thick layer containing shocked quartz, devitrified glass fragments, and elevated levels of platinum group metals. All of those are easy to detect and tend to indicate the results of an extraterrestrial impact.

So, how has it taken so long for this to come to light? Could it be that this is because of geology's former reluctance to ascribe catastrophic causes to past events and instead to follow in the straitjacket of uniformitarianism? Perhaps this layer of ejecta was previously ignored because the implications of its existence did not fit into the prevailing geological paradigm. Perhaps. Any views from anyone in the know?
21

Guthrie,

Edinburgh 27/03/2008 11:48:07
Dave- go and do something useful- slagging off other posters based solely on your apparent rage makes you look stupid and childish, again.
22

Guthrie,

Edinburgh 27/03/2008 11:50:00
Slioch, the impression I got from my university geology lectures was that the whole uniformitarianism vs catastrophism thing had been sorted decades ago by the simple expedient of admitting that the evidence supports both positions, and that exageration of one or the other viewpoint gets you nowhere.

But you are right, if they knew there was elevated Pt, Ir etc then they should have looked more closely for a crater.
23

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 27/03/2008 12:05:37
#22 Guthrie

Yes, I think that is correct, though remember it took some time for the Chixculub crater, as implicated in the demise of the dinosaurs, to be established. I would guess (and it is just a guess) that the ejecta layer would have been looked in the early part of the twentieth century, dismissed as volcanic (and therefore not particularly interesting) and forgotten about and not re-examined until young Scott Thackrey came along looking for a PhD subject - and stumbled upon this absolute peach!
24

Guthrie,

Edinburgh 27/03/2008 12:31:59
Yes, that seems about right. I'd have to check the dates, but I am sure a lot of the North west of Scotland was the proving ground for many world calss geologists many years ago, probably before they had a decent idea of what impact craters were about, and certainly before they had quick and easy analytical methods capable of detecting platinum group metals.
25

Scott Thackrey,

Aberdeen 27/03/2008 13:07:10
Hi Folks, just to answer a few questions raised. This deposit was an enigma for us for many years. It was initially interpreted as volcaniclastic deposit due to the accretional lapilli we observe in the deposit. Workers were happy that this was enough to suggest that it was of volcanic origin. In fact, I study a number of ejecta deposits around the world and have observed these round lapilli. We now know that layered ejecta (ground surge) behaves in a similar way to volcanic debris such as pyroclastic flows. When we reexamined the stac fada deposit we found a number of impact indicators. Primarily shocked minerals that are formed as a result of the impact. Furthermore, the chaps from Oxford found that the deposit had a geochemical anomaly commonly believed to be associated with impact events. I hope this clarifies a few of the issues raised. Oh and for the record, I stated 60 Kilotone for the hiroshima and not 16!
26

Douglas,

Bathgate (But WA for three more weeks) 27/03/2008 13:55:29
#5 Ann from OzWest: Yes, sorry, that was my fault. The holiday weekend empties fell out of the car on the way to recycle them> :o)
27

Guthrie,

Edinburgh 27/03/2008 13:59:56
Thanks for the comment Mr Thackrey.
28

westview,

under the table 27/03/2008 14:05:41
Just goes to show what an exciting country we live in, and with lots of areas almost unexplored due to the big land owners and events like the highland clearances. Wonder what else is still to be found in Scotland? Science is a fascinating subject and we need more cash put into space studies and exploration . It is daft for the human race to have all its eggs, literally ,in the one place , a planet in the fireing line of cosmic boulders.
29

Selgovae,

Scottish Borders 27/03/2008 14:30:48
#19 Neil

Thinking aloud here, but I'm not sure it's a statistical certainty. As meteorites strike planets, there are fewer and fewer meteorites remaining.(Assuming there isn't an infinite supply of meteorites.) We can therefore expect the frequency of strikes to eventually fall to zero. Not sure how to calculate the odds though.
30

Neil,

Glasgow 27/03/2008 15:24:41
29 True & that is why most of the craters of the Moon are billions of years old. However the planet & possibly the solar system is 4.5 billion years old. That makes this one 75% of the way through the Earth's history & the one that wiped out the dinosaurs nearly 99% of the way. That would cut the odds of another dinopsaur killer landing by about 1% which doesn't help much.

What we need is a space going civilisation - even one out beyond Earth's orbit since it is much easier to see a lump of rock when it isn't coming directly at you. Once we have such a civilisation spotting & diverting such rocks will be easy.
31

voltaire's janny,

27/03/2008 16:48:47
#11 Geraldine.

According to the priniple of relativity, whether the earth hit the meteor or the other way round is the free choice of the observer when choosing his her frame of reference.

I choose the meteor. An enormous planet came out of nowhere and smashed me to bits.
32

voltaire's janny,

27/03/2008 16:49:29
principle, shoulda said
33

Legacy,

NE 27/03/2008 17:10:09
1.2 billion years ago?
Pretty precise sort of a figure?

34

pehman,

sussex 27/03/2008 17:12:09
7 Slioch,

Hope this is of some help to you,

communications@ abdn.ac.uk

You'll need to take out the gap
35

Iain fae Elgin,

27/03/2008 18:16:29
"If it happened today, we would get winds over 260mph in Aberdeen and a shock blast that would have flattened every tree in the area.

"We would probably survive – but only just.""

With a 1km meteorite, is it not more likely that Aberdeen would be melted..? I take it he means the population of the world would only just survive, rather than that of Scotland.
36

jerrymanders,

Sitting in a crater. If it's good enough for light 27/03/2008 18:23:15
#35

Aye, we're doomed. Doomed I tell ye.....
37

Andrew Allan,

27/03/2008 18:38:12
meteorite - there was me thinking this was the meat,your rights - save Scottish mince campaign.
38

bogmon,

27/03/2008 19:21:43
Is Ejecta Biggus Diccus's alter ego?
39

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 27/03/2008 19:33:54
Just back.

Thanks #25 Scott for that info. and also to #34
pehman for that link.
40

Napoleon the cat,

in the litter tray 27/03/2008 19:47:18
Ian fae Elgin. Aberdeen wouldn't let itself be melted unless there was money in it for them. And anyway its made of Granite.

Westiew: Money on space studies won't improve geological knowlege - but living in one of the most geologically exciting countries on the planet will. Also look at the wonderful research done in NZ and Canada and marvel at achievements of the diaspora. We'll never know if there was a long term benefit or deficit in the clearances (this might be a slightly irrelevant argument if you were cleared to a Virginian plantation, I grant you)

almost as much fun as sri lanka, in fact....
41

,

28/03/2008 00:02:59
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
42

Hen Mc Stoorie,

Port William 28/03/2008 00:12:16
I still tend to think *2 has the right answer
43

copulatory expletive deleted,

28/03/2008 00:45:00
#42,

You're not right but I like your thinkng!
44

Drum Major,

Brisbane, Australia 28/03/2008 04:36:45
Geology & soil mechanics, I walked out of the exam room, turn my head on its left side, tapped on my right ear and the geology & soil mechanics fell out. Gee it felt good.
45

Kenny A,

28/03/2008 11:55:05
It was a huge big Sumo wrestler playing with his catapult that did it.

46

westview,

under a starry sky. 28/03/2008 20:35:23
*40*,Napoleon ,would it not be of benifit to Geologists if they could study the meteors ,commet cores, surfaces of moons etc before bits of them are scattered far and wide by hitting the Earth? Or should that be exo-geologists? Your point about Scots researching in far flung parts of our world is well taken. I just wish we had a government that would let Scots continue this tradition accross the Solar System and beyond.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.