Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


China hits back as blazing row over Sudan role mars Olympics build-up

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 February 2008
CHINA’S staging of the Olympics threatened to develop into a full-scale diplomatic crisis last night after Beijing’s leaders accused critics of its policy in Sudan of “ulterior motives”.
During one of just two weekly chances for journalists to ask the Chinese government about international issues, officials said they shared concern at the humanitarian crisis in Darfur.

Liu Jianchao, a foreign ministry spokesman, said: “It is understandable if some people do not understand the Chinese government policy on Darfur, but I am afraid that some people may have ulterior motives, and this we cannot accept.”

Mr Liu said China was working with the United Nations to resolve the crisis and providing aid to Sudan. “China is also concerned about the humanitarian issues there, but we have been playing a positive and constructive role in promoting peace in Darfur,” he said.

China has consistently said it opposes any attempt to “politicise” the Olympics, which begin on 8 August.

The latest argument was sparked this week after the Hollywood director Steven Spielberg pulled out of his role as artistic director of the opening and closing ceremonies of the games, citing China’s indifference to the humanitarian crisis in Darfur as his reason.

George Bush, the US president, said last night he would go to the OIympics, but added that the Chinese could “do more” to help in Darfur.

Asked if he supported Spielberg’s move, Mr Bush said: “I view the Olympics as a sporting event. On the other hand, I have a different platform to Steven Spielberg, so I get to talk to Hu Jintao [the Chinese president] and I do remind him he can do more to relieve the suffering in Darfur.”

Mr Bush added: “I’m not going to use the Olympics as an opportunity to express my opinions to the Chinese people in a public way because I do it all the time with the president.”

He added that he made a “seminal decision” when he chose not to commit US troops to Darfur.

Tessa Jowell, the Olympics minister, also waded into the row yesterday, saying it was the right time to pressure China to do more.

“I certainly think that it is reasonable to use this window between now and the start of the Olympic Games in August, when the eyes of the world will be on China, to increase pressure for China to act as a responsible global citizen in relation to Darfur and its relationship with Sudan,” she said.

William Hague, the shadow foreign secretary, called for Gordon Brown’s government to show more courage in tackling the crisis in Darfur.

In an article for website conservativehome.co.uk, Mr Hague said that in the seven months since he became Prime Minister Mr Brown seemed to have “forgotten” his pledge to put the troubled Sudanese province at the top of his foreign affairs agenda.

And he noted that David Miliband, the Foreign Secretary, did not mention Darfur in his high-profile speech on humanitarian intervention in Oxford earlier this week.

Mr Hague wrote: “Now is not the time for forgetting. It’s the time for swift, decisive and resolute action.

“The British government cannot do it all alone. China must also dramatically step up its efforts to stop this slaughter.

“We are not advocating a boycott of the Olympics, or using sport as a political weapon, but China could make a change.”

Fighting between government-backed militia and rebels in Darfur has killed more than 200,000 people and left an estimated 2.5 million displaced.

China has influence in Sudan because it buys two-thirds of the country’s oil exports while selling it arms and defending Khartoum before the UN Security Council.

The full article contains 634 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 15 February 2008 12:04 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Sudan
 
1

SouthernGent,

15/02/2008 02:03:50
The Olympics and politics don't mix. The athletes train for years and don't play politician. Leave politics in the political arena, not the sports arena.
2

Swordsman,

Dublin 15/02/2008 02:45:48
Nice one Southern Gent...Remember Scotland playing in a stadium in S. America that was a modern day version of Auschwitz?...Torture and arbitrary death was the norm of the day..Made me sick to my stomach.Ok for us here in the comfy chairs of Western Europe who bemoan the "intrusion" of politics into our enjoyment of the "amateur sport"...Go and have a rub down with a damp copy of"TheDaily Express" 'til you come to your senses...
3

SouthernGent,

15/02/2008 03:25:28
If you want to interject politics into the equation, do it prior to picking a venue, otherwise, don't punish the athlete for something not in their control.
4

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta, CA...bye Bush -Cheney..u. evil leaders. 15/02/2008 04:29:04
Hey Dragonhead Dude,

Where are ur comments .

Fighting between government-backed militia and rebels in Darfur has killed more than 200,000 people and left an estimated 2.5 million displaced.

China has influence in Sudan because it buys two-thirds of the country’s oil exports while selling it arms and defending Khartoum before the UN Security Council.

And we are still awaiting the execution report on your fellow Chines citizens we asked you for 3 months ago.

GC
5

Conan,

Chile 15/02/2008 05:34:55
Of course china should not be the venue for the modern Olympics, any more than should N. Korea, or Zimbabwe, or any of the other nation states that treat their people like slaves. Any and all supporters and participants in the these upcoming modern Olympics should be ashamed of themselves .... but I suspect they lack that capacity.

On the other hand, criticism such as mine is only valid when it comes from people who actively seek to avoid the purchase of Chinese-made goods.

Let us hope that the great Chinese people some dame manage to get rid of the communist mafia that currently controls almost every aspect of their lives.
6

,

15/02/2008 06:28:05
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

mr angry,

ayrshire 15/02/2008 07:58:21
Also since Britain and USA sell most of the weapons used in a lot of these places and are also doing absolutely nothing about Darfur, why is there no clamour for them to do something, or are they too busy finding WMD's in Iraq and chasing poppies in Afghanistan. Britain and USA should clean their own acts up before they come out with the sanctimonious drivel about others.
8

africanj,

Fujisawa, Japan 15/02/2008 08:44:23
Hu Jintao and Janjaweed leaders has been ancestry mixed in Xhunan Province? something to worry about in Darfur linking toward the Summer Olympic games. Some events will be held in Khartoum, Sudan in order to assume China's commitment to global citizenship and at the same time to avoid doping?
9

Number 6,

germany 15/02/2008 09:20:58
Western hypocrasy over China is embarresing.Just as the US veto's any complaint against Israel, China has chosen to defend Sudan. They need the Oil just as we need Saudi oil hence our silence and massive arms deals with one of the most oppressive countrys on earth. We are in no position to talk about Darfur, as
no one in the West has lifted a finger to help.

It's an African problem , to be sorted out by the African Union. Or do they really want the White/Yellow
man to do it for them ?.

Incidentally, the Chinese are also in Zimbabwe, getting the farms back up and running. Yes the bulk of Zimbawean exports will go to China, but they have built roads and schools and provided jobs in return. What have we done ?.
10

Fanling,

China 15/02/2008 09:46:15
#2, 3, 4, 8 & 10

Well reasoned points all. The indignant squad will never see beyond their own petty prejudices because it suits them to blindly spew sanctimony while studiously ignoring their own domestic bullies. The USA's record in South America is a classic example.

I wonder which one of the crew up above removed Media 1's sane and sensible post #7? A likely punt would be the know(bog)all #1 who has had my posts (and username) removed very recently. Watch this one vanish into the ether.


11

Lianachan,

Highlands 15/02/2008 11:27:34
As an existing commercial, and upcoming miltary, superpower, China is being established as the next Boogeyman.
12

Gusto,

15/02/2008 11:47:11
So just how much money has he and George Clowny, and the Madonna put into the Darfur problem I wonder?. Didnt hear him bitching about Irak, or the Lebanon invasion! The Games, ah, yes - lost the Olympic spirit when the US made marathon runners run in the hottest part of the day to match peak TV viewing time. Professional tennisplayers who earn millions take part in the olympics. Go make another movie, Spielberg - stick to what you CAN do.
13

Clive Hamblin,

Hove, Sussex 15/02/2008 11:51:24
The world's politicians and ours in particular, having made a mess of the world's affairs, are now turning to the Olympics - good natured of them, I suppose. When they've wrecked the Games, what will they turn their atention to next?
14

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 15/02/2008 12:30:30
God almighty, Spielberg's chosen country and a few accomplices are responsible for the deaths of countless hundreds of thousands, not to mention millions in Viet Nam, what a hypocrite.
15

,

15/02/2008 12:57:24
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
16

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 15/02/2008 13:02:28
China is CORRUPT!, CORRUPT!, CORRUPT!

Been to Beijing twice and NEVER, EVER AGAIN!

The Chinese sneeze in your face, they all smoke, they cought incessantly, and there are so many of them forget about orderly queues for things - everybody just flocks en masse everywhere.

BOYCOTT THE 2008 SUMMER BEIJING OLYMPICS!!!
17

Media 1,

Tim 15/02/2008 13:10:17
China may well be corrupt, but at least they are providing some sort of platform for advancement of the people! It will take time, but they are at least moving forward and creating, as opposed to doing nothing like Africa.
Sneezing, Smoking and coughing in ones face is rude, but it is not a valid enough reason to boycott the olympics. People flocking en masse everywhere is likely in a country of over a billion people.
I say GO FOR IT CHINA!
18

Adso,

15/02/2008 13:22:01
TimW

China is corrupt because the people have a different culture to you regarding smoking, coughing and queueing? That doesn't add up. Those are cultural differences rather than evidence of corruption surely?

Anyhoo ur handle says you are from canada. I've had canadians tell me that its rude to put deoderant or aftershave on when someone else is in the room - so intolerant!
19

Number 6,

Germany 15/02/2008 13:23:55
Should we be arrogant enough to boycott these games , or insult the hosts by making anti-chinese comments
once there, then qwe can expect the Chinese to recipocate when they come to London.
20

Neil,

Glasgow 15/02/2008 13:25:18
Our government has killed hundreds of thousands in Iraq. They have engeged in deliberate racial genocide & ethnic cleansing in Kosovo & Krajina. Does anybody suggest that any Chinese leader has shown 1,000th of the contempt for human rights ours have, that the dead of Krajina are better off than the people of Tibet or that western media that have, for 18 years, lied & censored to portray people they knew to be Nazis & knew to be publicly committed to genocide, as "moderate democrats", are now telling the truth about Sudan. Whenever you see our media/politicians talking about human rights it is a sign they would like to bomb somebody.
21

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 15/02/2008 13:27:31
Be careful about offending China. They have it in their power to create not only a recession in the US but a full blown depression. So there.
22

SouthernGent,

15/02/2008 15:13:36
#22

To do so would be to cut off their nose to spite their face. Thier own economy is based on trade with the US/EU.

For those wanting to boycott the Olympics, why not boycott their products if you want to make a difference. Last I checked, the EU/China trade deficit is $150+ billion, US/Cina is $250 billion.
23

AliceRocks,

Edinburgh 15/02/2008 15:31:31
I'll never understand why they were allowed to hold the Olympics anyway, with their track record - look at what has happened to Tibet and their own Falon Gong followers - they get away with MURDER.

#22 I've tried to boycott their products, but they are not so easy to spot now, the Made in China mark isn't on the outer packaging anymore, so you only realise what you've bought once you've got it home!

Dalai Lama for world leader.
24

Neil,

Glasgow 15/02/2008 15:44:10
Spook have you any evidence whatsoever that what is "going on" in Sudan is not primarily murders by the western supported rebel non-alliance?

I know that this is not how it is reported in our media but we both know our media is willing to tell any propaganda lie to support genocide where it is a "western interest". We also know that Sudan is one of the very few countries which has brought in Chinese contractors rather than the big western oil companies. This may be a coincidence & our support of Saudi & failure of our media to criticse them for ethnic & other crimes purely because Saudi is a democratic freedom loving state.

What do you think?
25

AliceRocks,

Edinburgh 15/02/2008 16:27:51
#22 - there is a full blown depression in Tibet because of what the Chinese government has done.
26

Neil,

Glasgow 15/02/2008 18:58:57
I don't know what is going on in Darfur. However I do know that over many years our media did deliberatly lie to portray the Bosnian Moslem leader as a moderate censoring any mention of the fact that he was an ex-Nazi who had publicly called for the genocide of all non-Moslem communities (60% of the population). They did heavily push the "Srebrenica Massacre" omitting the very strong evidence that it is largely or entirely a fabrication & censored any mention of the prior & undisputed massacre by the Moslem Nazi of at least 3,800 Serb men, women & children (though mainly the latter 2 since the men were in the army). I also know they portrayed the KLA as freedom fighters when they knew they were NATO armed scum recruited from drug dealers, Albanian secret police torturesr, pimps & ex-Nazis sent out to engage in genocide. I could go on for ages but check out www.tenc.net/

Knowing the western media's propensity to lie it would be immoral to punish anybody, Chinese, Sudanese or anybody else, purely on claims made by organisations which are proveably so corrupt. Also looking at the accusations against Sudan you will see how curiously unspecific they are - specificity would not prove it since ITN "accidentally" fabricated a video of a specific "concentration camp" which wasn't, but the lack of attempts even to produce this much evidence suggests it doesn't exist.
27

Udith Fonseka,

Sri Lanka 15/02/2008 19:31:29
Yes the Chinese govt is very concerned about the humanitarian crisis in Sudan,Chad,Kenya,Congo,Tibet,SriLanka,Nepal,and they are very concerned about animal rights,the environment,Falong Gong and your Kidney!!
28

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta, CA...bye Bush -Cheney..u. evil leaders. 15/02/2008 19:39:24
Hey Dudes,

Our Pres Bush said he will go to the 2008 OLYMPICS.

What a lousy creep he is .

He attacks IRAQ but ignores CHINA's genocide of the TIBET people.

Bye bye BUSH/CHENEY U evil leaders.

GC
29

tyson,

Severna Park 15/02/2008 19:39:51
Personally, I'm happy to see China take up the yellow man's burden in Africa. God know the Brits, Yanks, French and Portuguese have cocked it up. Can China do worse? As for Africans dealing with their own problems, that does not seem likely in the short term. Perhaps in fifty years, European colonialism will not be blamed for all of Africa's ills.
30

zigzag,

Canada 15/02/2008 19:59:50
#19, ADSo


What is deoderant and aftershave?

Help
31

Amparo de Glasgow,

15/02/2008 20:08:39
#12
You and I sometimes do not see eye to eye (although most folks here think I am some kind of right-winger and a militarist !!!) ... I occasionally express left-wing opinions too ... You ... I accept live in the Republic of South Africa ... so no doubt have a wealth of experience.

I am reasonably positive-thinking and dare I say confident that Africa can change ... however I dare say if I am proven wring you will say ...
" ahh telt ye hen ... did ahh no??...!!"

I look at it within the context of Black folks I have met in Britain; France and Spain ... Black women ... especially here in the UK are making an effort ... granted most of them are of Afro-Caribbean and Afro-American origins rather than Africans from Africa ... but please
... Media 1
... indulge me furra wee minute matey .

Pleeeeeezzz
I could be right ... and your point of view is equally valid mate ...!!!

WAIT AND SEE EHHHH?
32

Amparo de Glasgow,

15/02/2008 20:10:16
ooooooops I meant #16 ...!!
Ahhhh wuzznae lookin' ehh ...!!
33

Amparo de Glasgow,

15/02/2008 20:12:56
Media 1 ...

That wuzznae meant to be a discouragement by the way ...!!!!
You quite often have a very interesting point of view matey ...!!!
34

Yane,

15/02/2008 23:24:38
I don't know Media 1 - I always get tricked by you. I start off reading what seems your interesting take on things & then you'll go & throw in stuff about the problems in Africa being cos the white mob don't run the show no more. Then my interest just fades away...fades away...& fizzles. Can you think up anything else for this part of your theses?
35

Let's have the truth,

18/02/2008 04:55:33
# 28

"there is a full blown depression in Tibet because of what the Chinese government has done.

...What do you think about the situation in Iraq because of what Spielberg's government has done?
36

AliceRocks,

Edinburgh 18/02/2008 11:36:35
#39 - The war in Iraq was completely wrong - the only reason for war in Iraq was for oil. Which brings me back to Tibet - if Tibet had oil, there would have been US & UK governments trying to help, but as they don't have oil they don't care, and obviously seem happy to have Buddhist Monks, Nuns and Tibetans tortured etc.

FREE TIBET
37

Neil,

Glasgow 18/02/2008 12:54:14
Alice have you devoted 10 times as much time to saying FREE KRAJINA from Nazi control as you have to attacking China, of which Tibet has always been part?

If not you are showing considerable hypocrisy - for which our war criminal leaders will be pleased.
38

AliceRocks,

Edinburgh 18/02/2008 14:25:13
#41 - Tibet was its own country before China invaded - and who else is going to shout about what China has done to Tibet - the UK & USA don't give a sh*t cos there is no oil. China declared Tibet an autonomous region - they are also trying to breed out the Tibetan race by making them marry Chinese, the young Tibetans only get to go to college now, if they learn Chinese, so they are trying to rid the world of the Tibetan language. I have met many Tibetans who are sad that there is no Tibet anymore! In this day and age, they are still having to walk from Tibet to India for safety, sometimes losing limbs in the process!

I'm not being a hypocrite, there isn't enough space to shout about all the injustices in this world.

And I would still like the Dalai Lama as a world leader, although sadly, I don't suppose this will happen.
39

AndyM,

Columbia, SC, USA 18/02/2008 20:50:49
#39, AliceRocks, Edinburgh:

"the only reason for war in Iraq was for oil"

Y'know, repeating a lie a hundred billion times does not make it one bit more true than the first time. Please explain in cogent terms, using facts and logic instead of insults, how the war in Iraq was for oil.
40

AliceRocks,

Edinburgh 19/02/2008 09:34:30
#43 - You want me to explain - ok. Weapons of mass destruction in Iraq - where are they, did they ever exist or was this just an excuse for Bush to get back at Saddam for Bush snr. Saddam and Iraq had nothing to do with twin towers attack, but somehow, he seemed to get the blame - was this because, the real culprit (Bin Laden) had been trained by US to help them initially!

If the war in Iraq was really to do with helping the people, then why don't they intervene in say - Tibet! Answer - there is no oil!

And Blair & British government were just as guilty as Bush for this illegal war!
41

AndyM,

Columbia, SC, USA 19/02/2008 10:53:18
#44, AliceRocks, Edinburgh:

Interesting. In #42, you stated that "the only reason for war in Iraq was for oil," but in #42, you bring in Bush's desire to avenge his father and the 9/11 attack. So, clearly, since you yourself do not believe what you said, I cannot hope for a rational explanation.

I won't ask for your reply, as I am quite sure it will be nothing more than another rant, but as ill-advised as the war may have been (particularly in 20/20 hindsight), it was not illegal. And calling it illegal over and over and over again, ad nauseum, does not change the facts. The first Gulf War ended with a ceasefire, a ceasefire that was contingent upon Saddam's good behavior. A multitude of UN resolutions clearly pointed out that he was in violation, not to mention his abuses of the Oil for Food program. Any coalition member state had the LEGAL right to initiate force against Saddam's regime at any time it was shown that he had violated the terms of that original ceasefire.

BTW, when you suggest that we "intervene" in Tibet, do you really want war with China? Or do you actually think that, say, driving around with a "Free Tibet" sticker on your car makes a difference of any sort?
42

AndyM,

Columbia, SC, USA 19/02/2008 10:55:17
Sorry. Should have been:

... but in #44, you bring in...
43

AliceRocks,

Edinburgh 19/02/2008 11:37:31
I don't believe war solves anything. Maybe sanctioning China would do it (as they do to other countries) - if we all stopped buying their cheap cr*p. As Gandhi said "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind"
44

AndyM,

Columbia, SC, USA 19/02/2008 13:23:21
#47, AliceRocks, Edinburgh:

Perhaps you and I aren't that far apart after all. Recently, I was in the market for one of those lighters where the flame is several inches from my hand, and my local grocery store had them. Seven or eight different kinds, as it turns out. Number one, not one of them was refillable. Number two, every damned one of them was made in China. Well, I needed one, so I bought one, but I am now on the prowl for its replacement, one that meets my reuse-it and don't-buy-it-from-China philosophies.

(BTW, if anyone wants to weigh in on whether buying a box of extra-long matches would have been better, I would appreciate it.)
45

AliceRocks,

Edinburgh 19/02/2008 13:58:50
#48 - AndyM,Columbia - "reuse-it and don't-buy-it-from-China philosophies" - I'm glad we managed to agree on something. You gotta watch those lighters too - some of them have been known to go on fire for no reason!
46

AndyM,

Columbia, SC, USA 19/02/2008 14:31:27
#49, AliceRocks, Edinburgh:

Now, Alice, are you trying to tell me that with China's grand reputation for quality control, my lighter might pose a safety hazard? :)

Damnation! As if I didn't have sufficient reason to hate those "Made in China" decals. I guess I'll be buying some extra-long matches tonight...
47

AliceRocks,

Edinburgh 26/02/2008 14:43:33
I suppose, on a positive note, thanks to China invading Tibet, Buddhism is now everywhere!
48

Mashimaro,

China 14/04/2008 03:11:03
Human rights? Give me a break. It's the oil.
49

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 14/04/2008 13:56:09
#1

"So selling arms to Khartoum, who in turn supply the Janjaweed militias, is “playing a positive and constructive role in promoting peace”

....Look in your own backyard before criticising China for what your own government also does by selling arms to other less than humane regimes.

You are such a hypocrite. The condition seems to be a plague with some people.
50

First Lady,

18/07/2009 13:37:07
China always bounce back. A little row over Sudan is not going to slow these guys down.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.