Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Monday, 7th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Botched vasectomy ruined patient's life



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 22 May 2008
A MAN left in excruciating pain after a vasectomy operation has won the right to claim up to £1 million compensation for medical negligence.
Daniel Stalker, 51, of Dunbar, East Lothian, said he complained three times that the anaesthetic had not taken effect but, despite his pleas, the doctor proceeded with the operation.

Mr Stalker, a former soldier, suffered a nerve injury an
d later agreed to the drastic measure of having his testes removed, but this failed to alleviate the constant pain he has experienced since the operation 12 years ago.

At the Court of Session in Edinburgh yesterday, Lord Uist accused Dr Paul Dewart, a hospital consultant and a senior lecturer at the University of Edinburgh, of attempting a "cover-up" in a letter to Mr Stalker's GP by failing to make notes of the operation.

After the hearing, Elizabeth Stalker, 47, spoke of her anger at how her husband had been treated, saying it had "pretty much destroyed family life", leaving him largely bed-bound and with his daughter acting as his carer.

Lord Uist ruled that Dr Dewart, a consultant obstetrician and gynaecologist at St John's Hospital in Livingston, West Lothian, had done the "almost unthinkable" and had continued with surgery in the face of complaints from the patient.

The Court of Session heard Mr Stalker decided on a vasectomy when his wife was pregnant with their fourth child in 1996. Mr Stalker said that initially what he had experienced was "like a weak scratch from a cat" but Dr Dewart continued until Mr Stalker felt "a very, very sharp, excruciating pain" before doubling up and vomiting, reduced to tears.

Mrs Stalker said: "The medical authorities have tried to pull rank and cover this all up and I'm angry it has taken so long. They used to sort of laugh and say, 'Oh, here's the man who just came for an injection'.

"This is not about money – all we really want to do is make things easier by doing things like extending the ground-floor bedroom where Danny sleeps. Danny used to be a jolly, happy-go-lucky person who used to enjoy fishing and bowling, playing rugby and football and taking the older children camping. He did lots of charity work and we enjoyed nights out."

Mrs Stalker added: "We will have been married for 28 years in June, but we have not had any marital life since Aimee was born 12 years ago."

Dr Dewart, who estimated he had performed more than 1,000 vasectomies, said he did not remember Mr Stalker and insisted that he would never carry on with a procedure without ensuring the local anaesthetic had been effective.

"What we are talking about here is the centre of the doctor-patient relationship, the trust that an individual puts in his doctor, and I would not betray their trust," he told the court.

FACT BOX

• Vasectomy makes men sterile by keeping sperm out of semen.

• The vas deferens – the tube taking sperm from the testes to the penis – is cut so that sperm can no longer get into semen.

• It is usually carried out under a local anaesthetic.

• About one in 1,000 operations is unsuccessful.

• Even after a successful operation, about one in 2,000 men will become fertile again if the two ends of the cut vas deferens reunite.

• It is not a legal requirement to get your partner's consent.

• Most men have their vasectomy through the NHS, but waiting lists vary throughout the country.



The full article contains 596 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 22 May 2008 12:36 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Scullion,

Canada 22/05/2008 01:33:50
I'm inclined to agree with this poor sod. My doctor did mine so fast that I thought he was on piece work.
2

911 was an inside job.,

22/05/2008 07:46:40
It's still mutilation. Should be happy with what God gave you.
3

Shona,

Hamilton 22/05/2008 12:53:46
911, God gave us sex and the responsibility to create a sustainable future for our planet.
A Loving God would have no problem with us ensuring we are financially capable of feeding the children we have, and I seriously doubt he wants us to just stop having sex, as it's part of a deep and meaningful relationship - integral to the long-term enjoyment of the life he has given us.
In many circumstances, *not* having a vasectomy is downright irresponsible.
4

gotalottosay,

east lothian 22/05/2008 14:51:05
911 - if it had not been for the mistakes made, the poor fellow would not have required to have his testicles removed. Now If you are a man who it be your choice to have yours removed.

He only went for a routine operation and in my opinion he was acting responsibily by doing so given that he had 4 kids by that time and did not want his wife going through the agony of having any more - its awful the turn of events here.
5

Animal Doc ,

USA 22/05/2008 17:06:54
I wish him the best of luck with his civil action. While I do not blame him in the slightest, the very simple solution if a doctor is hurting you unreasonable while undergoing a procedure (particularly an elective one) is to say a very firm NO, and to make it clear that if they continue without extra analgesia or anaesthesia they are performing the procedure without consent. There is very rarely an excuse in this day and age for a medical procedure to cause undue uncontrolled pain. Some people feel threatened by a perceived sense of authority of medical professionals. One of my friends who has asthma walked out of a hospital when a surgeon insisted on performing a procedure under general anaesthesia when she was assured it would occur under local anaesthesia, having been advised by her asthma specialists not to accept a general anaesthetic except in an emergency, and I applaud her for it. If people are unhappy with how a doctor is doing something, they need to say no, and insist on a second opinion.
6

lawstudent,

Edinburgh 22/05/2008 17:55:06
I'm sure all of you guys would just have lain there too and waited until you were in agony to dare to speak up. Come on folks- lets face it im sure the million pounds will help ease his supposed pain. The only noteworthy part of this story- how far some people will go for money. And the flaws of the Civil Evidence (S) Act 1988.
7

Conan the Librarian™,

22/05/2008 22:28:57
What a balls up.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.