Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Black grouse thrown lifeline with £830,000 rescue project

View Video
Download Video

Video

Watch the black grouse's unique maiting dance.

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 August 2008
MORE than £800,000 is to be spent in Scotland to help one of our most majestic birds, the black grouse, The Scotsman has learned.
Famed for its spectacular courtship ritual, the black grouse was once widespread across the UK but is now one of the most rapidly declining bird species.

The Forestry Commission Scotland has revealed the largest ever project to help the bird, in a bid to restore numbers to the same levels as ten years ago.

Black grouse need areas of open space for their mating ritual, known as lekking, which involves the male parading with its white tail fanned open, while the hen looks on.

Some £830,000 will be spent between now and 2012 improving 50 sites important for the black grouse, mainly in the south of Scotland where habitat loss has been worst.

Populations will be monitored, predators such as crows, stoats and foxes controlled and fences – which can be lethal to black grouse when they fly into them – removed.

There will also be two large-scale trial management projects in Galloway and Fort Augustus.

And two viewing hides are planned for Galloway and Aberforyle, so members of the public can watch the fascinating lekking ritual, which usually takes place at about 4:30am. Gordon Patterson, biodiversity policy adviser for Forestry Commission Scotland, said: "We want people to enjoy and understand and be more aware of the wildlife and that will feed into more interest in conservation.

"Black grouse are spectacular to see but it has to be done sensitively so as not to disturb the birds."

There are about 3,500 males of breeding age in Scotland, down 29 per cent compared to a decade ago. The main reason for the decline is thought to be loss of suitable woodland habitat.

The plans to boost numbers are just one part of the Forestry Commission Scotland's aspirations for woodland, set out in its new biodiversity programme, which was due to be launched today by Mike Russell, the environment minister, during a visit to Galloway Forest Park.

The commission hopes to extend its 400,000 hectares of native woodland by 10 per cent by 2015, and manage more areas of privately-owned forest by tackling threats such as too many deer and invasive rhododendrons.

Mr Patterson said: "It's management that sustains the range of habitats and species that we have come to expect."

FACT FILE

THE black grouse is on the Red list of species of high conservation concern.

Over the past ten years numbers of the popular game bird have fallen by around 29 per cent in Scotland.

But numbers have dropped far more in certain areas – by 69 per cent in Lothian and Borders and by 49 per cent in Dumfries and Galloway and southern Argyll.

Black grouse prefer a mosaic of habitats, where relatively small areas of woodland, moorland and grassland meet.

Loss of suitable habitat means populations are becoming isolated into small pockets, which it is feared will result in areas of local extinction because black grouse tend not to disperse very far.

The weather can have a significant effect, as young chicks are very susceptible to cold, wet weather between mid-June and mid-July.




The full article contains 544 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 August 2008 2:04 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

yockel,

21/08/2008 07:42:27
They will never get their black grouse numbers up so long as there is disturbance. That includes the right to roam and experts monitoring. That having been said this article doesn’t read as though it’s written about black grouse.
2

dido-bendigo,

Scotland 21/08/2008 10:33:22
This is wonderful news! The Forestry Commission are to receive a large amount of tax-payers money to undo (in a small way) the damage to black grouse habitats that the FC caused (in a large way) in the first place! Public money - a penny a bucket-full! Do the top people in the FC get bonuses?

When are the FC going to restore habitats for golden eagles? Or would they rather spend their time encouraging companies to put wind-turbines on the last remaining upland areas that they haven't converted to a sitca slum? And I don't call clear-felling planted trees in the name of 'mitigation' an effective way of encouraging eagles, when their soaring areas are death traps!
3

Tweedmouth,

Coldstream 21/08/2008 10:42:13
So - let me get this right: the Forestry Commission spent 50 years destroying the habitat of the black grouse by planting wall to wall Sitka Spruce across Scotland. Meanwhile the lairds were blasting the hell out of the survivors for 'sport'. So, when the habitat is all but gone, and the toffs can't find enough poor wee birds to blast with shotguns - the Forestry Commission - and no doubt the toffs - say " Oh what a shame - we're sorry we wiped out this species by shooting and insane planting of alien trees; nevermind, now we'll spend £830,000 of YOUR taxes reversing the habitat destruction that WE were resposnible for."

And the toffs, weeping into their tweeds say: " it's so awful, we used to be able to shoot hundreds of these lovely birds - and now we can hardly shoot one in a month; so we'll stop shooting them and use £830,000 of taxpayer's money to restock the woods - until there are enough for us to shoot again!"

Of course, if the grouse ever do recover from the double whammy of the F.C.s moronic woodland policy of the last 50 years - and the toffs blasting them from the skies - it won't of course be the ordinary taxpayer who is allowed to shoot these poor birds. It will be fat German and American plutocrats - being charged £1000 a day to shoot these poor defenceless creatures; and who pockets the cash? The landed gentry of course.

It's a great system isn't it. One generation destroys the environment for private profit - then the taxpayer is forced to pay to restore the devastated woodlands - so that the toffs and the forestry quangpoistas can do it all over again!!
4

Boggle fey the Bog,

21/08/2008 10:51:44
Oh dearie me , an there wis me thinking that this wis a story about 'Black Label Grouse' ye know the malt whisky fae the makers o the Famous Grouse,
Sorry aboot that chaps, yin too many wee yins while watchin the Olimpics. ;-)
5

Saoghal Beag,

21/08/2008 13:16:46
tweedmouth, you have to differentiate between FC forestry and private forests. the FC implemented changes in forestation whihc include endenic species boundaries and open spaces while the private forests continued on dense continuos sitka/norway forests. The FC are by far the most reponsible of foresters trying to achive a balance between production and the environment.
6

dido-bendigo,

Scotland 21/08/2008 20:40:52
I wonder if some spokesperson for the FC would like to let us know if the Game and Wildlife Conservancy Trust are being consulted as international experts on black grouse conservation? The work of this charitable trust (funded mainly by private donation from field sporting supporters) is second to none (literally) in this field of research. Where they lead, others follow, including other wildlife charitable trusts!

Unfortunately the Government have seen fit to close down (I believe?) the Hill of Brathens research station at Banchory, another source of expertise that played an important part in environmental research in such fields.
7

Angus,

Alexandria 21/08/2008 22:33:16
The sooner the Forestry Commission is scrapped the better. They failed to provide the country with decent construction timber at a reasonable cost and now all they can do is exploit woodland for tourism - which should be discouraged, because of its environmentally damaging effect.

What the point of encouraging an activity to earn millions if it's contributing to the demise of the planet as we know it?


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.