Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Bill Clinton may pay high price for Hillary's job

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 19 November 2008
QUESTIONS about former president Bill Clinton's business dealings are clouding speculation that Barack Obama is poised to offer his wife, Hillary, the post of secretary of state.
Mr Obama's officials are now investigating Mr Clinton's business affairs, including those involving Kuwait, Morocco and Saudi Arabia, over possible conflict-of-interest issues.

The New York Times reported yesterday that two donors who gave $1 m
illion apiece for Mr Clinton's presidential library in Arkansas did so while under investigation by the Clinton administration's Justice Department in the late 1990s.

But party insiders say they expect an accommodation will be reached, under which Mr Clinton agrees to accept no more cash from donors without prior approval, if his wife is given the coveted post. He may also remove himself from the fundraising side of his charitable Clinton Global Initiative organisation.

Mr Obama has yet to confirm speculation that began at the end of last week that he will name Mrs Clinton, his opponent in the Democratic primary elections, as being in the running for the post with other candidates, including the New Mexico governor, Bill Richardson, a former ambassador to the United Nations.

But one party source said the failure to scotch the rumours was a sign that the plan was well advanced. "I think if the Obama people were not serious about offering her the job, they'd not have allowed this media speculation."

Any decision to appoint Mrs Clinton would be in line with Mr Obama's public declaration that he wishes to bring disparate elements into his cabinet. His officials have already signalled the intention to include one, or possibly two, Republicans in the cabinet, with the Bush administration's defence secretary, Robert Gates, expected to retain his post.

Congressional confirmation hearings pose a possible obstacle to Mrs Clinton's appointment, with her husband's past taking the starring role.

But with the Democrats enjoying comfortable majorities in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, there is unlikely to be an appetite to block any appointment put to them by Mr Obama.

For Mrs Clinton, the secretary of state role may turn out to be a poisoned chalice: foreign policy in the United States is made in the White House, and all the more so since Mr Obama lined up his foreign policy team early in the primary elections.

Mrs Clinton is not part of that group as, by contrast, the present secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice, is part of the Bush administration's foreign policy team.

Taking the job would also see her give up her Senate seat and much of her domestic power base, weakening any bid to challenge Mr Obama in the primary elections in four years' time.

£6.8m made in a year on the public-speaking circuit

BILL Clinton faces having to curtail a substantial part of his business dealings if his wife, Hillary, becomes US secretary of state.

Since leaving the White House in 2000 he has reinvented himself as a gatherer of world philanthropists and the world's most highly paid speech-maker. Last year he earned $10.1 million (£6.8 million) for 54 speeches; he got $425,000 for one hour-long speech for the billionaire investor Ronald Burkle.

The Clintons' tax returns, published this year, show that the couple, who have joint bank accounts, have earned $109 million since leaving the White House, 80 per cent of which came from Mr Clinton's paid speeches and most of the rest from the publication of memoirs.

Mr Clinton has earned plaudits for setting up two charitable organisations, the Clinton Global Initiative and the William J Clinton Foundation, both of which raise money for programmes tackling poverty and Aids. But critics say the cash given to his foundation by the governments of Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates and the King of Morocco pose conflict-of-interest issues should his wife become secretary of state.

Many of these deals will have to be suspended for his wife to accept the key foreign policy post.





The full article contains 677 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 18 November 2008 11:37 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Rob Bennett,

Point Piper Australia 19/11/2008 01:01:44
There's little doubt Hillary Clinton will be offered the prestigious position of Secretary of State. Her husband's dealings would have been fully scrutinized by the Obama team beforehand. Obama is a true professional and will leave no stone unturned.

I suggest the republicans stop their pathetic whinging and whining, sit back and enjoy the 8 year ride.
2

SouthernGent,

19/11/2008 02:04:34
Don't get ahead of yourself with that 8 yr thingy, as 4 will seem like an eternity if we keep bailing everybody out. Fair or not, there better be improvement in 2 yrs, or the masses will get antsy.
3

Denyse,

Somewhere, USA 19/11/2008 02:19:58
I don't think that she is a good choice, but it will depend on what Bill and she are willing to give up in order for her to take the position. It's better for Obama to have her as SOS rather than leave her in the Senate where she could work against him and run again in 2012 for President. As SOS, that wouldn't be an option.
Off topic but possibly of interest to some - Begich won the race over Stevens in Alaska, so there will be no special election to fill Stevens seat and no chance of Palin running for it.
4

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 19/11/2008 11:09:26
What does it matter? He's an EX-President. He's not in office.

What they should be looking at are the dealings of Bush Junior. He has caused far more damage in his term of office that the combined business dealings of ALL the ex-presidents put together.
5

AJ Fife,

19/11/2008 11:49:35
Who's gonna make Bill's tea?
6

Symon,

USA 19/11/2008 14:43:07
#5 AJ Fife
"Who's gonna make Bill's tea?"

Monica of course
7

Sandi,

San Diego 19/11/2008 15:02:39
Let's make it absolutely clear: there is nothing in any way illegal about any of Bill Clinton's "dealings" since leaving the White House. He has raised large amounts of money which have been and are continuing to be used for charitable work around the world. A huge amount is spent fighting AIDS in Africa. the "problem" for Obama is whether or not some of the donors would create a conflict of interest. Lawyers deal with this problem every day. If Hillary want s teh job, it will be resolved.

While I believe that Hillary Clinton would be an outstanding Secretary of State, I hope she stays in the Senate where she will be independent of the Obama administration. There, she can continue to fight for the causes that are dear to her as she has for the last thirty years.
8

SouthernGent,

19/11/2008 19:20:55
#7
Although I agree with a lot of what you tend to say, Hillary is a politician, first and foremost. Hillary will do what Hillary thinks is best for Hillary.

As for Bill. What we know about his dealings is not illegal, but its what we don't know that may be. This is the same man that pardoned Marc Rich. That story goes so deep, we will never know what really happened.
9

Lynne,

19/11/2008 21:51:53
#8

Except that the man he just nominated for AG has admitted to not being able to vet everyone of the 140 pardons for Bill Clinton, and if he had had more time, he would never have pardoned him.
Do we know if this is just rhetoric to get the post, or is it really what he thinks. We will never know.
10

drahcir,

piottsburgh, pa, usa 19/11/2008 22:00:45
it just shows how hypocritical politics and politicians are, if not criminal !!!!!

http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=goldieshome&view=videos

goldieshouse.piczo.com
11

D. Feste - Illyria, OH,

20/11/2008 00:19:21

#8 and #9 -

"What we'll never know" we conveniently embellish with
all manner of fantasy and prejudice.

Lock those gates ! Keep out the inevitable marauding hoards !
12

SouthernGent,

20/11/2008 00:47:08
#11
"we conveniently embellish "


Since you included yourself, we'll let you be the gatekeeper.
13

It's life but not as we know it,

The Oort Clouds 20/11/2008 14:21:03
It will all end in tears; Democratic presidencies always do.
14

Rob Bennett,

Point Piper Australia 21/11/2008 01:21:58
#2 Southern Gent
If Obama can keep your ship steady for 8 years it's good for everyone including the US. Power corrupts, and please correct me if I'm wrong but I believe the republicans have been in power for 28 of the last 40 years. Your country needs to change tack and set a new course and remember that North America is part of the world. The world is not the USA anymore, China has changed all that forever
15

Porry,

Puyallup, WA 22/11/2008 16:23:05
"'Who's gonna make Bill's tea?'

Monica of course."

Really, Symon? I was under the impression, Monica was responsible for the oysters.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.