Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


'Untouchables' jailed over gangland killing

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 May 2008
TWO masked gunmen who boasted that they were "untouchable" yesterday received the longest sentences ever passed in a Scottish court after they were found guilty of a gangland-style triple shooting.
Raymond Anderson and James McDonald armed themselves with handguns to blast Michael Lyons, 21, to death at the Applerow Motors MOT centre in Glasgow's Lambhill on the afternoon of 6 December, 2006.

They also left the victim's cousin, Steven L
yons, and his friend Robert Pickett badly injured. Judge Lord Hardie yesterday ordered the pair to spend a minimum of 35 years in jail – the longest "punishment part" of a life sentence ever handed down.

The Lockerbie bomber, Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi, was ordered to serve a minimum of 30 years for the murder of the 270 people who died when Pan Am Flight 103 exploded on 21 December, 1988.

The High Court in Glasgow heard that the garage's owner, David Lyons – the uncle of two of the victims – received a "ransom note" ten days after the shooting, demanding £25,000 of unpaid drugs money. Despite that, the jury heard the attack by Anderson, 46, a car dealer, and McDonald, 34, his right-hand man, appeared to have no clear motive.

They were caught following a lengthy surveillance operation. Police traced phone calls and bugged cars to eavesdrop into hundreds of hours of their conversations.

The pair had denied charges of murder and attempted murder. They had also denied being linked to a cache of military weapons, including machine guns and ammunition, stolen from army barracks. But the jury returned guilty verdicts against both after nearly two-and-a half days of deliberations.

Mr Lyons, 48, told how he saw the hitmen – wearing "old men" masks and dark, three-quarter length coats – coming into his Balmore Road premises, which is near a special needs school.

Mr Lyons said he and Michael sprinted inside the garage pursued by one gunman, who was firing at his nephew. Steven and his friend Mr Pickett escaped in their car towards the back of the garage while being chased by the second gunman, who was also firing. Mr Lyons described how he heard Michael's screams and saw him fall to the ground.

He added: "I went to pick Michael up, but I saw the gun still pointing at us." Asked by David Young, the prosecutor, what his reaction was, Mr Lyons said: "I had to run." He told how he saw Steven's car "flying past" him and crash into a fence.

Eventually, when the gunmen ran away, Mr Lyons said he went back to Michael, who looked "ghastly". He added: "There was no colour in him. I knew there was no hope. Looking at him, I was sure he was dead."

Steven Lyons, 27, said the shooting was "like a scene from a gangster movie". He continued: "I got hit in the leg. It snapped my bone and I just fell." His leg was in plaster for several weeks and he had to have part of a bullet removed from his back.

The trial had twice collapsed, once because a juror recognised a witness and another time because a juror recognised one of the accused.

James McDonald's QC, Donald Findlay, asked Mr Lyons during one of the aborted hearings if he believed that his car had been the target that fateful day. Mr Lyons replied: "Probably."

During the same hearing, Mr Pickett claimed that the "wrong people" were in the dock.

The 41-year-old – once a feared member of a Paisley crime gang who was jailed for 12 years for attempted murder in the 1990s – was in a coma for a month and lost a kidney after being shot.

The court also heard that David Lyons received a "ransom note" that was delivered to his home ten days after the shooting. It read: "The boys owe me £25,000 and I want what's owed to me. It's for drugs. They all know what it's about as they have got to pay the piper."

The note added:

"Drop off, 4pm Saturday. I'll draw you a map and X will mark the spot."

Mr Lyons said he did not pay the money and handed the letter to the police.

Anderson and McDonald came under surveillance in the weeks after the shooting. The pair were later seen at a house in the city's Garthamlock, where the sister of Anderson's girlfriend lived. It was there that a machine gun, grenades and ammunition were later discovered.

The pair were eventually linked to three machine guns, a bipod, a telescopic sight, ammunition and flares that had been stolen from the Catterick Garrison army barracks in North Yorkshire in 2004.

Police also bugged their vehicles and listened in to chats the pair had, which eventually led to their arrest. McDonald told a female that he was "on the run", how he was going to get 15 years and referred to having three machine guns. He also claimed his "big mate" was found with 500 rounds of ammunition.

Anderson and McDonald were also heard calling themselves "the Untouchables" and talking about the mysterious "piper", who was mentioned in the letter sent to David Lyons.

Lord Hardie branded the shooting "a cold blooded, premeditated execution".

SECURITY IS STEPPED UP

SECURITY at the High Court in Glasgow was heightened yesterday as the verdict was announced. Extra police patrolled the courtroom and corridors with more officers standing by outside.

Lord Hardie also ordered that McDonald and Anderson – who were flanked by four Reliance guards in the dock – be handcuffed.

The judge told the court that he agreed with Donald Findlay's closing remarks to the jury that "nothing in life is more serious than this, apart from terrorist activity".

Outside court, Detective Chief Superintendent Campbell Corrigan called the incident an "indiscriminate act of absolute barbarism".





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 May 2008 11:39 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Gun crime
 
1

A Better Way,

Edinburgh 03/05/2008 02:43:50
Labour could have wound this type up years ago, but they didnt. They were allowed to run riot over the heads of the ordinary Scottish People. How many Scots are now addicts because of this type of menace. We need the minority of Police who have been corrupt for years arrested and sentenced to similar terms as these scum. Much of the corruption and lack of compassion for their fellow Scots, has been learned by young Scots from the New Labour Party. We all know what actually goes on in the streets and this type drag us back twenty five years.

Smash the Youth Gangs and remove these scummy drug pushers to prison with key thrown away. Its Time to take back our streets and communities. No Scot should ever have to fear walking the streets, and no Scot should ever fear drug pushers selling their filth to Scottish Bairns.

Its our Scotland and its time we stood up and took it back from all who spoil our community.
2

Edwin & Mahnaz Bollier, Mebo Ltd,

Zurich/Switzerland 03/05/2008 04:35:49

! LOCKERBIE - the biggest fraud in the Scottish history!

Libya and his official Mr. Abdelbaset al Megrahi have nothing to do with the "PanAm 103 tragedy" over Lockerbie.

Please see the fraud, now published on our webpage:
http://www.lockerbie.ch
3

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 03/05/2008 06:38:16
1:- I don't think the police are corrupt - they just don't like solving proper crime now ... Why should they? The police chiefs can decide their own bonus on how 'well' they have done ... so you just target soft crime as you get better stats and fines from hammering motorists rather than waste resource chasing chainsaw murderers, rapists and drugs barons ... there ain't no money in that !?

The Police have lost the respect of the people because of their money grabbing.

The other thing I see in this sentence is that if you mock the justice system for what it is (an inept, floundering, conundrum that has more to do with the interpretation of deliberately complex 'law' than the basic premise of right and wrong these days) you end up with a sentence with a message attached to it saying thout shall not mock the law !

Now these assassins and the Lockerbie bombers deserve never to see the light of days again but for a judge to hand out a harsher sentence to a couple of small time crims than for blowing up a jet with hundreds of people on board is absurd and reeks of system concerned with upholding its dwindling respect.

Is there not a message that the squandering cash hungry authorities send you when you learn that if you don't pay your taxes you can get locked up for longer than if you kill someone ... You don't matter as much as your money and if you rebel you will be crushed.

A very sorry state of affairs which needs correcting.

The text below is from a document written in 1776 and the words are starting to have poignancy once again. This document was written against the British back then .... how little has changed ...

"Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.
But when a long train
4

Voldemort,

03/05/2008 06:40:00
continued ....... of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

Stirring stuff !
5

porcadian,

end of the tether 03/05/2008 17:13:07
It is terrifying to consider that this is an ultimate consequence of UK drugs policy of nigh 40 years.
In that time we have learned that prohibition, with a goal of eradication, is a catastrophic failure.

But.hey,successful cannabis growing prosecutions are increasing dranatically.

As a medicinal cannabis user(MS).I live in terror of the state

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.