Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


'They did nothing wrong' – royalists hail rehabilitation of Russia's last tsar

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 October 2008
MORE than nine decades after a Bolshevik execution squad gunned down the last tsar of Russia and his family, the country's supreme court has declared the imperial dynasty victims of political repression, marking the official rehabilitation of the house of Romanov.

The decision overturns a lower court ruling that classified the killings as plain murder, and exonerates Tsar Nicholas II and his family of the alleged crimes the Bolshevik regime used to justify their killing.

A spokesman for the supreme court
said it "had declared as groundless the repression of Tsar Nicholas and his family and rehabilitated them".

Tsar Nicholas, who ruled the massive Russian empire as an absolute monarch, died when he, his wife, Alexandra, and their five children were shot without trial in the town of Yekaterinburg, eight months after the October revolution of 1917.

Their descendants, who have been trying for years to get the authorities to acknowledge that the family was executed for political reasons, welcomed the court's ruling.

A spokesman for Grand Duchess Maria Vladimirovna, who led the campaign to rehabilitate the royal family, said she had "expressed her joy and satisfaction after the decision".

Alexander Zakatov, the head of the chancellery of Russia's self-styled Imperial House, said: "It was very important for our society that the crime committed 90 years ago was condemned, and that unfair accusations against the tsar and members of his family, that they were enemies of the people…should be removed.

"We have achieved victory. The law has been carried out and now we can draw a line under this with great satisfaction and happiness."

He said the grand duchess would soon be sent an official document recognising the tsar and his family as victims of Soviet repression. She planned to place the document alongside other historical artefacts in the imperial archive in Madrid.

Another branch of the Romanov family issued a statement saying: "The fact that the Russian state took the decision is a step towards repentance and the rehabilitation of all innocent Bolshevik victims."

By finding the tsar a victim of political terror, the court has completed the remarkable transformation of the discredited man who died with his family in a grimy cellar in the early hours of 17 July, 1918 on the orders of Russia's revolutionary government.

Throughout the years of the Soviet Union, government propaganda vilified the last tsar, giving him the derogatory nickname "Bloody Nicholas" and accusing him and his family of a litany of crimes.

But attitudes have gone through a volte-face since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. No longer a taboo subject, interest in the Romanov dynasty, which ruled Russia for 300 years until its bloody demise, surged, as Russians, for the first time, were able to appraise the role of the monarchy in Russian history, without the fear of repression or arrest.

When the remains of the imperial family, which were discovered in 1991, were reburied in St Petersburg seven years later, they were laid to rest with great solemnity and pageantry, while in 2000, the Russian Orthodox Church canonised the slain family as martyrs.

However, while there has been a resurgence of genuine interest, if not popularity, in the monarchy, political analysts have also argued that the rehabilitation of the imperial family has suited the needs of Russia's present leaders.

The country's former president, Vladimir Putin, gave his official weight to the rebuilding of some of the pillars that once supported the autocratic Romanov regime. During his two terms in office, the Orthodox Church also enjoyed a renaissance, while Russian nationalism was promoted, giving rise to criticism that, by promoting features of pre- revolutionary Russia, Mr Putin was trying to turn the office of president into a latter-day tsar.

His successor, Dimitry Medvedev, who, at 42, is Russia's youngest leader since Tsar Nicholas, is also reported to have an admiration for his imperial predecessor.

The court ruling, which places the burden of guilt on the Communists, will also help the Russian government discredit the current Communist party, one of the country's main opposition groups.

Support for the imperial cause, however, is unlikely to lead to a revival in calls for the monarchy to return.

Enthusiasm for the restoration of the Romanov dynasty to the imperial throne remains confined to only a few thousand Russians, while die-hard Communists continue to see them as criminals, and millions of other citizens place them somewhere in between.

The decision to classify the tsar as a victim of political repression came despite the possibility some of his descendents may now seek compensation from the state, which owns vast tracts of former imperial property including St Petersburg's Winter Palace, now the home of the world-famous Hermitage Museum.

But legal experts dismiss this, pointing out that, so far, nobody has been granted compensation for crimes committed during the Communist period.

German Lukyanov, a lawyer for the Romanov family, said the court's decision, which is final, was based on law and no politics were involved. "In the end, this will help the country, this will help Russia understand its history, help the world to see Russia observed its own laws, help Russia in its development to become a civilised country," he said.



Ignominious and bloody end of a dynasty

THE act of execution which saw the end of the Romanov family was in itself a messy, desperate affair – not a clean firing squad, but a hail of ricocheting bullets fired by nine Red Guards, at least some of whom where drunk at the time.

The Royal family, comprising Tsar Nicholas II, Tsarina Alexandra, their daughters, the Grand Duchesses Anastasia, Tatiana, Olga and Maria, and the Tsarevich Alexei, who had all been placed under arrest in March 1917, were at the time imprisoned in the Ipatiev House in Yekaterinburg, a militant Bolshevik stronghold.

At 2:33 am on 17 July, 1918, Nicholas, Alexandra, their children, their physician, and three servants were woken and taken into a basement room and shot.

Nicholas was the first to die. He was hit by multiple bullets to the head and chest. The last ones to die were Anastasia, Tatiana, Olga and Maria, who were wearing several pounds of diamonds within their clothing, thus rendering them bullet-resistant to an extent. They were speared with bayonets.

The bodies, after being soaked in acid and burned, were initially disposed of down a mineshaft at a site called the Four Brothers.

After rumours of their whereabouts started to circulate locally, the bodies were loaded on carts to be taken to another site.

One of the carts broke, however, and the decision was taken to throw the corpses into a sealed and concealed pit on Koptyaki Road, a cart track some 12 miles north of Yekaterinburg.

Notice of the Romanovs' deaths appeared in the national press two days later.

The telegram giving the order on behalf of the Supreme Soviet in Moscow was signed by Yakov Sverdlov, after whom Yekaterinburg was later renamed, Sverdlovsk.

While official Soviet accounts identified the local Ural Regional Soviet as taking the decision to kill the Romanovs, it has since become clear that the ultimate order to shoot them came from Lenin himself, not wishing, as Leon Trotsky put it, to leave the "(pro-monarchist] Whites a live banner to rally around".







The full article contains 1228 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 October 2008 10:58 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Russia
 
1

2dogs in D.C.,

02/10/2008 00:45:03
Well, that's a lot like telling the defenders at the Alamo,"Oops, our bad".Dead is dead, and it dont matter what you say after the fact.
2

Scullion,

Canada 02/10/2008 01:23:58
Revisionism and romance are allowed to blossom when the major players are long gone. Nicholas was the wrong man at the wrong time and, like Louis XVI , he (and his family) represented a regime that had to be obliterated to start afresh.
We cannot truly grasp the zeitgeist of the times as many a contemporary Western European democrat was also glad to be rid of them-until the Bolsheviks negotiatied peace with the Germans.
3

Richardinho,

02/10/2008 01:42:26
Let us not forget that the tsars were all dictators who ruled Russia with an iron fist, had a secret police, thought nothing about shooting dead defenseless demonstrators, and generally lived it up when most Russians lived in dire poverty. Unfortunately a lot of monarchists with rose tinted spectacles do forget this-or else they just don't give a damn.
4

Dragonhead,

Dalian,China 02/10/2008 01:58:50
Not a word of reproof for the Bolsheviks who murdered defenceless children in cold blood. A real political statement?Lefties usually air brush the crimes of their heroes, justifying them with smoke and mirrors.Condemnation by innuendo a la #4 Richardinho,or dyed in the wool, hanky wringing apologist for the Democrats of Europe.Who show a remarkable similarity to the appeasement at all costs Democrats of today.
5

Richardinho,

02/10/2008 02:06:29
#5 So just to confirm, you approve of the gunning down of about 1000 peaceful demonstrators in St Petersburg in 1905 by the Tsar's troops?
6

Guga II,

Rockall 02/10/2008 02:26:35
#3.

Not only have you not been taking your medication again, but I would suggest that its dosage be doubled in future.
7

Forward not Back,

02/10/2008 03:34:40
Anyone think this article sounds like the end of Animal Farm? "Four legs good, two legs better".
8

W Smith,

Middle East 02/10/2008 03:46:56
Strange how the Lefties (SNP and Labour) in Scotland are against the death penalty - unless its communists and/or Palestinians doing the executing.

Funny that.

BTW
Isn't Mr Salmond giving money to Islamfest to get in with the non-democratic arab muslim royal families (absolute monarchs) of the Gulf?

This is after his followers coming on line to express their hatred for the British constitutional monarchy!

The daft left-wing SNP can't have it both ways.
9

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta CA.. for more WAR VOTE McCain 02/10/2008 03:50:30
5
Dragonhead,
Dalian,China
----------------------
Hey dude blood is warm not cold ...dude !!!!

Dude we are still waiting answers from U.

U never gave us the answer to

How many Chinese are executed each year by Ur masters the CCP. The West say its 15.000 executions.

U never gave us the answer to:

How many Chinese women are forced to abort.

The West say its between 11 million and 13 million Chinese women that are forced to abort.

Has the cat got Ur tongue dude. Or did the CCP terror squad seal Ur lips with fear.

Do U have a backbone ?
Have a nice day Dude
10

Pilrig,

Livingston 02/10/2008 06:01:49
The airbrushing of Russia's past continues, Nicholas II is now a saint (official).
11

Pilrig,

Livingston 02/10/2008 06:02:43
10 - sober up
12

Conan the Librarian™,

02/10/2008 08:15:10
16
TT? Ah.
13

Boy Wonder,

02/10/2008 08:26:38
While I agree that Nicholas Romanov and his family were mudered and not "executed" ... let's not forgive the iron fist he and his ancestors employed during their rule of the Russias.

Monarchies can never be anything else but an enemy of the people!
14

Guga II,

Rockall 02/10/2008 09:11:59
#16.

TT? Does that mean total t w a t?
15

capy,

embra 02/10/2008 09:25:50
Well at least one Romanov wii come out of history well!
16

AJ Fife,

02/10/2008 09:30:52
Guga#19,

A fine display of accurate and no nonsense commenting!

Couldnae have put it better masel....
17

Itchy,

02/10/2008 11:48:04
The Tsar was a dictator only slightly more liberal than the Bolsheviks.
18

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 02/10/2008 11:57:43
Yet more incomprehensible and self-serving babblings from Mashimora in China.

Tsar Nicholas II was a bumbling idiot and murderous autocrat and Tsarina Alexandra was a closet nymphomaniac with an UNNATURAL allure for Rasputin.

Since they have been declared saints, I think the late Queen Mother Elizabeth should be canonised for enduring the machinations of that twit Princess Diana and The Queen should also attain sainthood for enduring the constant jibes of Boy Wonder and his ilk.
19

Lianachan,

Highlands 02/10/2008 12:18:48
Unintentionally hilarious, completely out of place anti-Salmond ranting by the usual suspects here. Why bother.
20

AJ Fife,

02/10/2008 12:22:32
TCW,

Isn't sluttish behaviour built into members of the European Royal Family community?

The unfortunate Tsarina wasn't alone in having a liking for lots of lower class sausage. Look at the examples of Queen Victoria, Princess Margaret and Charlie Big Lugs', extremely unfortunate breeding mate, Princess Di!
21

indune1,

Canada 02/10/2008 13:20:06
Hey there Tim-bits! I've finished playing in the Queensway traffic. Not a scratch on me, old son.

Sainthood for the Queen Mum? Absolutely! It would be put sales of Gordon's Gin through the roof.

Your rationale for the canonization of the Queen is somewhat flawed. Lillibet doesn't give a f*cking t*ss what Boy Wonder thinks or says.

No offence meant, Boy Wonder. Just stating the obvious.

Hello there Conan! Did you see my posting to you the other day?
22

Boy Wonder,

02/10/2008 13:35:35
#26. indune ... no offence taken. I don't give a f*ckin' t*ss what she thinks either!

Timbo is an unapologetic Monarchist. That's fine ... he can pay MY share of the tax to keep her then ... and I'll stop! Amd since he's in Canada (or so he claims) MY opinion as a Scots citizen counts far more than HIS does!!!
23

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 02/10/2008 13:50:36
Boy Wonder

I really, REALLY do live in Ottawa, the gloriously beautiful capital of Canada in the neighbourhood of Sandy Hill which is a diplomatic zone with about 40 embassies and the royal swans gliding down the Rideau River in the summer.

We in Canada also pay taxes for The Queen of Canada when HM is invited here.

Boy Wonder

You put yourself on to high a pedestal when you arrogantly proclaim that your opinion counts far more than mine or any other poster.

This is a democratic forum and the way you go on at times one would almost think you are an elitist prig and snob.

26 indune 1

A more appropriate tipple to have increase in sales if the QM is canonised would be Bombay Sapphire gin since it has a picture of Queen Victoria on it and the lat QM was the last Empress of India.

Now, Boy Wonder, don thy kilt and storm the bastions of Balmoral and make your views known. I believe HM and family are there now - or maybe it is at Sandringham.

No, I believe Sandringham in Royal Norfolk is reserved for Christmas festivities.
24

indune1,

Canada 02/10/2008 14:21:33

Boy Wonder - Now, now, don't come the huffy.

And by the way, Tim and I do live in Ottawa, our nation's capital, which is beautiful and especially at this time of year. Our opinions, which often differ, are the same on this matter. Put simply. our opinions do matter as much as yours.

In fact, if you style yourself as a nationalist then your opinion as to the British monarchy and its future is largely irrelevant.

By the way, I would suggest that you check the public records as to what it costs the people of the UK to support the Royal Household; divide that sum by the total population and you should arrive at what you, yourself pay towards that support.

The next step for you, the intrepid republican, is to publicly declare your intention to have that amount entered as a tax deduction.

However, you may want to inquire as to the overall benefit that the Monarchy provides to the UK economy (tourism, tea cups, dishcloths etc).

Tim - the Queen Mum's favourite gin was Gordon's though I agree with your view that Bombay Sapphire
(Mumbai Sapphire, just doesn't have the same ring to it!) is far superior. However, with autumns in full season it's back to the single malt for me.
25

Douglas,

Bathgate 04/10/2008 10:11:12
Girls, girls. Much as your opinions on royalty are riveting, there are some Russian billionaires embarking on a rose tinted campaign to soften up their fellow citizens so their profligate excesses will start to appear normal, just like the good old days.

26

Cabe,

17/07/2009 14:14:17
Tsars, Queens and Kings and all the rest are nothing but fortunate sons and daughters.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.