Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


'Splash' star makes waves as she sets sail on annual anti-whaling crusade

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 December 2008
AMERICAN actor Daryl Hannah is setting sail with a conservation group on its annual voyage to disrupt Japanese whalers in Antarctic waters.
Best known for her role as a mermaid in the 1984 film Splash, Ms Hannah is part of the militant Sea Shepherd Conservation Society's annual campaign to find, track and impede the whaling ships in the Southern Ocean.

The film star joined the Steve
Irwin, which was yesterday due to depart from the eastern Australian city of Brisbane, for the first week of the voyage.

Ms Hannah, who has also starred in films such as Blade Runner and Kill Bill, said more needed to be done to stop the Japanese from killing endangered species in the waters off Antarctica.

She said: "It is surprising and shocking to me that governments are not doing this work – that it is up to individuals and non-government organisations to uphold international law and protect endangered species."

The Steve Irwin, named after the Australian crocodile hunter who died in 2006 from a stingray barb, is the only vessel to attempt to follow the Japanese whalers on their whale hunt this year.

Greenpeace, which has sent ships to the Southern Ocean nine times in the past two decades to track the hunt, will not send a vessel this year, instead concentrating on its campaign within Japan to stop the slaughter.

The Australian government, which last year sent a customs ship to collect data on the killings that Japan says are for scientific purposes, will not send a boat either.

Monitoring will be left to New Zealand, which will send air force planes to oversee the whaling fleet in Antarctic waters.

Ms Hannah added that she believed the whaling industry could be shut down if activists pooled their resources to work together and governments enforced anti-whaling laws.

She said: "These guys (the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society] are the only guys out there actually fighting against illegal hunting. If Greenpeace would join forces with Sea Shepherd they would shut down the whaling industry right away.

"If they were really serious and held their convictions they could accomplish this."

However, Greenpeace, which has run an office in Japan for nearly 20 years, insists that political lobbying is more likely to win the day than direct action.

The Greenpeace spokesman, Willie Mackenzie, told The Scotsman: "Our campaign exposing the work of the whaling industry has secured vast public support, and we are also getting the people who fund the expeditions to question it.

"It is disappointing that Daryl Hannah has chosen to be negative about Greenpeace. If she wants to know more about what we do she is welcome to come and meet our guys and find out what they do on the ground."

Ms Hannah will mark her 48th birthday on board the Sea Shepherd's flagship vessel.

She had originally planned to stay for the entire four-month campaign, but filming commitments mean she will now only be available for the first week. She hopes to rejoin the campaign towards the end.

BACKGROUND

JAPANESE whalers plan to catch up to 935 minke and 50 fin whales in the weeks ahead. Japan, which aims to kill 1,000 whales a year using a loophole in a 1986 global moratorium that allows "lethal research" on the ocean giants, managed to make only about half its quota last season because of interference from activists.

Sea Shepherd's campaign, Operation Musashi, is the society's fifth voyage to derail the annual Japanese whale hunt in Antarctic waters.

Sea Shepherd has come under criticism from whalers and some conservation groups – including Greenpeace – over its threat to ram vessels to save whales.

Last summer, Sea Shepherd activists Benjamin Potts, an Australian, and Giles Lane, a Briton, were held captive for three days after they boarded a Japanese whaling vessel from the Steve Irwin. The incident heightened diplomatic tensions between Australia and Japan over the whale hunt.

In February last year, a Sea Shepherd vessel twice collided with a Japanese whaling vessel near a pod of whales.

The group's activists, who have also been dubbed "eco-terrorists", dumped a foul-smelling acid on another whaling boat, slightly injuring two crew members. Japanese police are still investigating.

However, the group claimed victory when the fleet could only return to Japan with 551 minke whales, just over half of the planned catch.







The full article contains 739 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

,

04/12/2008 00:26:08
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

2dogs in D.C.,

04/12/2008 00:52:20
Go,Captain Watson.Stop them cold.
3

Mystie,

Australia 04/12/2008 01:48:10
Thank you New Zealand for doing the right thing sending out aircraft from your Orion force to watch over what will be a very dangerous situation, when no one else has bothered to do so. The fully armed Japanese whale poaching fleet numbered seven ships last year. This year the Sea Shepherd's ship the Steve Irwin will be all alone out there. The Australian government has chosen not to send a ship to monitor the Japanese and have also given the navy two months leave, so they won't be available either, if needed, during the whaling period. Last year Captain Paul Watson of the Steve Irwin, was hit in the left side of the chest by a sniper aboard the whaling ship the Nishun Maru. Luckily his protective vest saved his life. The Australian government chose not to investigate this matter for fear of an economic backlash by Japan. They also disallowed their protective Kevlar vests from going through customs this year.
4

Mashimaro,

China 04/12/2008 10:41:10
#3 er last year your foam at the mouth racists injured a few Japanese sailors but Japan was gracious enough not to press charges... that is why someone shot at them.
The Japanese are not poaching in Aussie waters, if they are then it's up to your coastguard to deal with them. If they are in international waters then it's none of your beeswax what they do.
5

Mashimaro,

China 04/12/2008 10:46:38
The Sea Shepherd is not an environmentalist group, it's a racist vigilante group that injured four seaman by hurling acid over them. These terrorists brought about an extremely dangerous situation by making the decks of the nissan maru too slippery for sailors to work on while they were in high seas. At the time the Nissan Maru was fishing legally in international waters. Rein it in.
You are welcome to protect your seas and your borders to your utmost. But when you attack a ship in international waters you become a pirate or it can be regarded as an act of war. You have NO jurisdiction over international seas.
6

Symon,

USA 04/12/2008 13:14:45
#5 Mashimaro
The whales are majestic creatures that belong to everyone not just the Japanese. Torturing a whale for 30 minutes or so with a harpoon is unbelievably cruel.
7

Menkit,

NSW 04/12/2008 14:46:34
#5 Mashimaro, butyric acid is rancid butter. It is not like an acid that burns. It's basically just a stink bomb. Yet the Japanese whalers shot Captain Watson with a gun and it mangled his badge over his heart. That seems to mean nothing to you -you are so brainwashed, think for yourself!
The decks weren't slippery so much as stinky! That's why they stopped working.
There is nothing legal about Japanese whaling in Antarctica. They are violating the IWC moratorium on commercial whaling, killing endangered whales (CITES violation) in the Southern Ocean Sanctuary (IWC violation), also violating an Australian court order to cease and desist killing whales in Australian Territorial waters. The real terrorists are Japanese whalers.
Get this straight - Sea Shepherd is only doing the job that the wimpy Australian government won't do i.e. enforce the law against illegal whaling. If Sea Shepherd doesn't do this, it's bye bye whales since no species of whale has come close to recovering from 200 years of commercial whaling.
8

Mashimaro,

China 04/12/2008 15:02:54
#6 so it's okay to torture unmajestic animals?
Whales are food. No more no less. When they are in international water they belong to whoever kills them.
When they are in your country's waters you do what you like with them. When they are out of your country's waters you have no say.
9

Raganzi,

05/12/2008 03:26:13
#8 Mashimaro
"so it's okay to torture unmajestic animals?"
Which animals are you talking about, please be more specific
10

Mashimaro,

China 05/12/2008 04:19:38
#7 It is not basically just a "stink bomb". This off the web.
Harmful if swallowed or inhaled. Corrosive. Extremely unpleasant smell may cause nausea. Liquid may burn skin and eyes. Readily absorbed through the skin. Severe skin, eye and respiratory irritant.
They were not in Australian territorial waters, they were in international waters.
These fundamentalists attacked the whalers and they defended themselves.
11

Mystie,

Australia. 05/12/2008 05:34:54
Mashimaro it is NOT ok to torture ANY animals. But you know this already. You are feeling defensive and grabbing at straws (the 'racist' card) because you know deep down that killing whales is wrong. You truly have been brainwashed if you believe that whales are food. Who says so? What authority do they have to declare that? None whatsoever. If you've been following the issue closely as many of us have been, you will know that the Nishun Maru did indeed venture into Australian waters and slaughter whales within Australian territorial waters, as well as elsewhere. This arrogant disregard for the law is an insult to Australia. So who are the antagonists here? Illegal whaling ships that are militarily armed (one of which had a sniper on board last year) or pacifists saving lives?
12

Mashimaro,

China 05/12/2008 10:47:36
#11 Killing whales is not wrong. It's just the fashion to be anti whaling. Whales are food, people have eaten them for centuries. Who are you to say they are not food?
The Sea Shepherd group are NOT pacifist. In 1979 they rammed the whaler Sierra and the following year they bombed it and sank it. Pacifists are they?
The year after that they sank two whalers in a Spanish harbour Ibsa I and Ibsa II.
In 1986 they shot at police in the Faroese islands. Yes, with a rifle. They also poured fuel into the sea and tried to ignite it.
In 1986 they sank two whalers in Reykjavik. In 1991 they rammed a Mexican fishing boat and the captain of that boat reported then that they were armed with rifles.
“The business of Sea Shepherd is confrontation, whereby these sailor activists try to provoke others to attack. Crying self-defence in these circumstances is like the gunfighter who starts a quarrel to justify duelling his enemy.” (The Seattle Times, July 1, 1991).
By 1993 the Sea Shepherd had sunk eight ships.
In that year they fired a CANNON at a Japanese whaler. It also rammed a Taiwanese fishing ship.



13

Leftie,

UK 05/12/2008 11:42:12
#12 Mashimaro
The killing of whales is very wrong indeed especially considering the suffering these creatures have to endure before they actually die. It's barbaric sir.
14

Mystie,

Australia 08/12/2008 01:11:03
Because something has been done for a long time doesn't make it ok. You didn't answer my question, what authority does anyone have to declare that whales are food? We are made of muscle and flesh too, does that mean we should eat humans? Some tribes ate humans in the jungle years ago, so does that mean we should still do it today? No. Most of us have evolved past doing these things so it is NOT ok to perpetuate acts like these.

The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society have never sunk a ship with people on board. They have never hurt a single human or non human animal. They have never caused blood to be shed. A ship, in case you hadn't noticed, is not a sentient being and does not bleed.

Last year the Nishun Maru was armed with military weapons, they also had a sniper who shot Captain Paul Watson in the left side of his chest. This is attempted murder! Luckily his bullet proof vest saved his life. Is this the act of law abiding, harmless people? No, it is the act of illegal, barbaric, arrogant cowards. Cowards afraid of a little rancid butter.
15

Mystie,

Australia. 08/12/2008 01:33:59
ps: 'Unmajestic' is not a word.
16

Mystie,

Australia 08/12/2008 03:47:18
I can't believe you're saying just because a few whale killers got sore eyes (temporarily) from the rancid butter, that justifies one of their snipers shooting the Captain of the Steve Irwin with a rifle!
If the purpose is to kill, then the act is wrong, plain and simple.
17

Mashimaro,

China 08/12/2008 07:09:27
#13 Then find better ways to kill them. But I would bet the way horses are slaughtered or even cattle, is a lot more distressful for the animals than whaling.
18

Mashimaro,

China 08/12/2008 07:10:18
#16 Did you not read what I wrote before. This is a terrorist group that fires on fishermen and rams their boats.
19

Mystie,

Australia 09/12/2008 04:52:29
Are you saying you're concerned about cattle being killed? Are you vegetarian? (I highly doubt it). Did you get your false information from the Japanese terrorist ship Nishun Maru? Because it was their slaughter ship that fired on the Steve Irwin. The Steve Irwin was not armed with sniper rifles, only stink bombs made of rancid butter. Therefore they counld not 'fire on' anyone. You are misinformed. You'd better start doing some independent research instead of listening to the wrong pro-whale-killing propaganda.
There is video proof that the whale killers rammed the Sea Shepherds smaller ship. Sure the Sea Shepherd has rammed whale killing ships in the past but no one was ever hurt and no blood has ever been shed. If it saves lives then I say ram those evil ships, they have no heart, they don't bleed.
20

Mashimaro,

China 09/12/2008 06:19:45
#19 if you want ships to be rammed, don't cry when people get shot. Ramming a ship is a violent and life threatening act. Any captain would be quite within his right to defend his crew and his ship.
The FBI defines terrorism as “the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property, intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.” The objective of Sea Shepherd’s campaigns is, according to their press releases, to force the governments to give up whaling and to cause the whalers undue expense by way of repairs, safety measures and increased insurance costs, in order to make them give up their occupation.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.