Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


T in the Park

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

'Female snip' to transform women's lives



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 April 2008
WOMEN wanting to be sterilised will be offered a 30-minute "female snip" as a result of pioneering work by Scottish doctors.
The new procedure avoids the need for abdominal surgery under general anaesthetic and long recovery times. Doctors predict more women will now opt for sterilisation and fewer men will undergo vasectomies.

Current surgery for sterilisation involves
clipping the fallopian tubes through small incisions made via the abdomen under general anaesthetic.

The procedure usually leaves patients with two small abdominal wounds and a recovery time of up to a week. The procedure, which carries a risk of failure or complications, is not suitable for many women.

The new technique has been developed at Edinburgh Royal Infirmary. Doctors insert tiny coils in the fallopian tubes through the cervix, which means women do not need to undergo surgery.

A camera, called a hysteroscope, is then used to see into the womb and locate the openings of the fallopian tubes. Measuring 4cm long and less than a millimetre wide, the coils block the tubes, thus preventing eggs from entering the womb.

Dr Sue Milne, Associate Specialist in Reproductive Medicine at the ERI, has piloted the technique on 20 patients in recent weeks.

"The traditional sterilisation is a big operation and it involves a general anaesthetic and hospital admission. The tubes are clipped and that is the accepted method in most countries."

But she said the failure rate is high, and there is a one in 200 chance of pregnancy. There is also a three in 1,000 chance of damage being done to the bowel or blood vessel.

"That is why we are so excited about this new technique, which has a much lower failure rate," she said.

Milne added that the procedure, called Essure hysteroscopic sterilisation, can be performed in the outpatient clinic.

"The patient just takes over-the-counter painkillers an hour before the procedure. The vast majority of patients don't need any anaesthetic. Afterwards they are fine to go home."

The woman is not immediately sterilised but the blockage in the fallopian tubes takes place over the next three months as the tissues in her fallopian tubes grow into the coil, so she must use another form of contraception in the meantime.

Milne believes the ease of the technique will make it popular among women. Among couples looking for permanent contraception, vasectomy is usually the first line of treatment because it is a more straightforward procedure with fewer serious side-effects, but Milne believes Essure may change things for the future.

She said: "Essure widens the number of women who could have sterilisation. Up until now we have encouraged men to go for the snip because of the risks of sterilisation to women.

"Vasectomy has until now been the less invasive form of sterilisation but Essure is challenging that so it is almost similar to the vasectomy."

Sterilisation is usually performed on women in their 30s and 40s who want a permanent method of contraception.

An estimated 1,500 women undergo sterilisation each year in Scotland compared with around 3,300 men undergoing vasectomies.

Essure is also slightly cheaper at £700 per patient. The traditional procedure costs around £950.

Audrey Burnside, clinical nurse manager for NHS Lothian's gynaecological services, described the procedure as a "landmark achievement in female sterilisation".

She added: "It allows women to undergo sterilisation with minimum pain and disruption to their lives. We are delighted to become the first centre in Scotland to offer the procedure, and we hope to be able to offer it on a more permanent basis within the next year."

A spokeswoman for the Family Planning Association yesterday said: "We really welcome this and we would like to see it made available across the NHS in Scotland. This hospital is really leading the way."





The full article contains 638 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 April 2008 7:32 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 27/04/2008 00:35:31
OK! sounds fab, if it is what the Woman wants done at the time!

One Question though, because you don't mention this, do you! WHY,??

OK I will ask!

What if in later years, the Woman's Circumstances change and she wants this procedure reversed, to be able to, 'Have-a-Baby' is it, ..'NO-CHANCE',?

Clips can be removed and the tubes joined again, but this procedure sounds like a large part if not all the tubes will be permanently damaged, and the Woman will never get her chance to change her mind!

Why was this dismissed in you article!,?

Or is it the case as usual,!

All Women are a Medical Experiment, lets try this one,?

My last Question is maybe already answered, is it not,?

With your, 'NON' reference about reversal procedures!
2

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 27/04/2008 00:59:36
Its age old,...'HISTORY'!

Lets, ...'mess-about' with a Womans reproductive system!

WE WILL AND ALWAYS,..'DO'..GET AWAY WITH ANYTHING!

WOMEN TO THE,..'SLAUGHTER'!
3

2Right,

On Location 27/04/2008 03:23:00
Bet Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini wishes she had snipped her tongue when she appeared on the videos linked below:

http://shirleymckie.myfastforum.org/Lord_Advocte_Makes_It_To_You_Tube_On_Disclosure_about130.html
4

Haggis MacBagpipes,

Central Canada - ex Perth & Glesca' 27/04/2008 06:56:13
#1-&-2..Charles Linskaill, Edinburgh

Why am I not surprised, Charles, to see your name in here making a comment...Are you looking for a way out instead of giving the DYW what she wants, but now it is more of a case of, "What Charles wants." like holding 'IT' up for ransome so that you can get your own way in any situation with DYW, in any discussion with her?
Cheers, Have a good Sunday.
Haggis MacBagpipes™©
5

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 27/04/2008 08:13:09
Let's make the snip obligatory for numpties on the social. (Male version, too)
6

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 27/04/2008 11:16:42
Haggis MacBagpipes @above,

"Are you looking for a way out instead of giving the DYW what she wants",?

Answer:...Not atall!

Just asking the simple Question!

Is the Procedure revesible,?

All too often, circumstes do change and we regret what choices we made, just like,.'Katie Price'.. wanting a,

'Breast Reduction'

But,..'Alas' its all going wrong now!

My Breasts are Quite fine BTW! :-DD

And I wasn't,..'stupid-enough' to have a vasectomy years ago!

But,..'Alas' its still gonna take a miracle for DYW and I to have the dream of a Baby!

Have a nice day, 'Haggis'
7

scuirle,

Derry 27/04/2008 16:36:13
Charles - It seems no less reversable for men to 'get the snip' so this to me seems like equal footing.....
8

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 27/04/2008 17:12:19
scuirle @above,

Yep I know this, hence my reference to vasectomy @10.

Many years ago, I had a,..'close-shave' on that subject!

Glad I never went through with it! :-)
9

Fifemeg,

Fife 28/04/2008 16:10:09
Some women are capable of realising that "permanent" means just that! I was sterilised years ago, a doctor said he wasn't keen on me having the op in case anything happened to the children I already had and I wanted more to replace them!!! I could have whacked him. After I (calmly) explained nothing on this Earth could have "replaced" my children, he agreed to the op. Nearly thirty years ago and not one day have I ever regretted it. Sometimes we women know what we want :-)
10

Suzi B,

28/04/2008 17:26:27
Essure is a good concept and has been available in other countries for a while so it may be pioneering for Edinburgh but it isn't a world first by any means.
I feel a bit anxious at the 'women just need to take over the counter analgesics prior ro rhe procedure' advice. For some women this may be the case but for others over the counter analgesics won't touch the pain that comes with the fitting of Essure into the fallopian tubes. If you think about the anatomy and purpose of a fallopian tube-that is to contract and move a fertilised egg along to the uterus, anything sitting in there as a foreign body is going to cause muscular contractions-so there is a fair chance that some women are going to find the after effects of the procedure quite painful. I would hate to think that people might not be prepared for pain and that medical professionals might then not take their complaints seriously.
The Essure website in Australia gives statistics about the experience of the people in clinical trials and although the majority of women coped fine with the pain, there was still some who did suffer severe pain.(4%) It appears that their study group was less than 1000 so that represents a sizeable amount of women. Long term, 99% of women were happy with their experience so clearly it is a good option for permanent female sterilization but it isn't exactly a 'lunchtime procedure'!
11

boudica,

Glasgow 28/04/2008 17:54:00
Did they do long study of the after effects of sterilisation as it a known fact that a lot of women can and do suffer from depression for years after this op
12

Manfrediz,

US 28/04/2008 18:30:47
I had this procedure done last year here in the United States. They have been doing it here for about 5 or 6 years I think. I have 2 children and we knew we didn't want any larger family than that and I didn't want to continue with pills indefinitely. The procedure was done in my doctor's office, was a little more uncomfortable than a pap smear (more pressure in that area) but was over in about 10 minutes. I went home with only a slight cramp every once in awhile for a day and minor bleeding. The next day I was back to all my normal activities. I went for my 3 month check and my tubes were fully blocked so I stopped taking pills for good. I feel great and so far seem to have no side effects from it. My periods now are pretty much like they were before I ever took pills. It is not reversible though so you have to be sure. I would recommend it if you are.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.