Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 5th September 2008

Free Capercaillie CD

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Hospital C difficile deaths: the patients let down by those they trusted



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 August 2008
CONDITIONS at a hospital where 18 patients died after contracting the Clostridium difficile bug were yesterday described as "disturbing" and "appalling" by Scotland's health secretary.
An independent review strongly criticised facilities at the Vale of Leven Hospital in Dunbartonshire, where 55 patients were diagnosed with C difficile between December and June.

A shortage of hand basins, a lack of isolation facilities, beds cram
med close together and "shabby" surroundings were all condemned in the review.

Another report also published yesterday, which studied cases of the infection across Scotland, found that during the same six-month period of the Vale of Leven outbreak, 285 deaths were linked to C difficile across the country.

Health chiefs at the Vale of Leven now face tough questions about the circumstances which led to the deaths of 18 vulnerable patients in their care – nine where C difficile was the main cause and nine where it was a contributory factor.

The dead included Ellen Gildea, Margaret Gaughan, Alister Johnston and Sarah McGinty.

In response to calls by relatives for a full public inquiry into the outbreak, Nicola Sturgeon, the health secretary, said she had referred the report to the Lord Advocate, who had asked the area procurator-fiscal to consider whether further action should be taken.

The procurator-fiscal would have the power to call for a fatal accident inquiry into the deaths and could also consider whether there was a case for criminal proceedings.

Yesterday, the families of the deceased renewed their demand for a public inquiry into the outbreak as the best way of resolving what went wrong.

Ms Sturgeon said the report of the independent review team, led by Professor Cairns Smith from Aberdeen University, made for "disturbing reading".

The report criticised the surveillance systems in place to flag up increases in cases of C difficile in the hospital.

The health secretary said excess cases were found in January, February and May this year.

"These peaks should have triggered action but there was not an effective local surveillance system in place," she said.

A separate report by Health Protection Scotland (HPS) found that deaths linked to C difficile were significantly higher at Vale of Leven than the national average during the period studied.

The reasons for this high rate include the fact that many of the cases involved a strain of the disease called 027, which causes more serious illness.

The state of the hospital facilities and infection control procedures, as well as other health problems suffered by patients at the hospital, were also linked to the high mortality rate.

Ms Sturgeon said: "With regard to the state of facilities and procedures at the Vale of Leven, the picture painted by the review team report is appalling and completely unacceptable.

"As the report makes clear, it is a picture of a hospital suffering the consequences of ten years of uncertainty about its future.

"It identified a lack of clear focus and leadership in relation to infection control, a poor standard of physical fabric in the hospital, with inadequate hand hygiene and patient isolation facilities, beds placed too close together and a shabby appearance, even where cleaning was of a high standard.

"This was compounded by poor staff morale and deficiencies in knowledge and training around infection control in general, and C difficile in particular," she said.

Ms Sturgeon said the absence of clear lines of professional responsibility had "fostered an environment where there was inadequate management of clusters of cases at ward level, or awareness of problems at higher levels".

There was also a lack of knowledge among staff about infection control measures.

Ms Sturgeon acknowledged the extent to which questions over the hospital's future, including the withdrawal of several services, had led to neglect.

She said: "I can't answer for what happened in the period before I took office, but I am determined now, as I have been over the last year, to ensure that (the] hospital does not continue to suffer death by a thousand cuts."

Yesterday's report by HPS, which studied cases across Scotland, found there were a total of 3,174 cases of C difficile reported between December last year and June this year.

There were also 86 deaths where the infection was mentioned as being the underlying cause, and a further 199 where it was a contributory factor – amounting to a 9 per cent fatality rate.

Rates of C difficile were also found to be higher than expected at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary. However, unlike Vale of Leven, staff were aware of the increase, which was linked to a large outbreak of the norovirus.

Increases were also identified by staff at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy and Wishaw General Hospital in North Lanarkshire.

One hospital, Woodend Hospital run by NHS Grampian, had a higher level of deaths linked to C difficile.

Ms Sturgeon, whose grandmother battled C difficile in the last days of her life, said while the statistics were reassuring in terms of rates across Scotland, the number of deaths linked to C difficile was still not acceptable.

And she announced moves to improve surveillance and introduce a "zero tolerance" policy on poor hand hygiene, alongside other infection control measures.

Tom Divers, the chief executive of NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, apologised to patients and families affected by the C difficile outbreak at Vale of Leven.

He said he recognised the concerns of relatives that they were not kept properly informed, adding that he had ordered immediate improvements, including improved hand-washing facilities and better bed spacing.

Yesterday, the families of the dead welcomed the report, but maintained their call for a full public inquiry.

Michelle Stewart, whose mother-in-law died in the outbreak, said: "We are pleased we have got an apology from the health secretary and the health board. But only a full public inquiry will answer all the questions that we have."

Ross Finnie, health spokesman for the Scottish Liberal Democrats, said the Vale of Leven report was "damning in its conclusions".

Patrick Maguire, the solicitor representing families affected by the Vale of Leven outbreak, said:

"The families' main concern is for a public inquiry to be held into this outbreak."

Hugh Pennington - Scotland is still playing catch-up with C difficile

THESE reports raise several issues of concern regarding Clostridium difficile in Scotland's hospitals.

There are a number of proposals made as a result of what was found to have gone wrong at Vale of Leven, such as improved hand hygiene measures and better surveillance.

But I am slightly pessimistic as to whether these measures on their own will be sufficient to tackle the problems with C difficile we are now facing.

A zero-tolerance approach to non-compliance with hand-hygiene is admirable, but achieving 100 per cent compliance is difficult as there will always be situations where staff are too busy.

In the case of Vale of Leven, there were simply not enough wash basins in the right places and this is clearly something that needs to be addressed with urgency, as does the provision of single en-suite rooms.

Improving surveillance of C difficile is also essential. The systems currently in place failed to pick up what was happening at the Vale of Leven until it was too late. Tracking the spread of infection using state-of-the-art fingerprinting methods is a must. The reports do not mention it.

Even if a higher number of cases had been identified, there is no system that links those cases to the outcome, such as if it results in a death.

Having such a system could help alert hospitals to problems at an earlier stage so they can take action to stop further patients falling ill.

There is a big issue in Scotland in that we are behind England in terms of getting to grips with C difficile. They started their mandatory national surveillance system two years before we did and we are now playing catch-up.

The problem with the independent review by Cairns Smith is that it was put together in a very short space of time and could not go into great detail of what happened at Vale of Leven.

In principle I would support a full public inquiry.

The remit of such an inquiry could be widened to tackle issues such as death certification, so we can get a better idea of deaths linked to many infections, not just C difficile.

It could also make recommendations on the clear action Scotland needs to take to tackle hospital acquired infections.

At the moment we are simply following England in tackling these problems and we clearly need to be focussing more attention on reducing the death toll from these infections in any way we can.

Countries like Holland and Norway are streets ahead of us.

• Hugh Pennington is Scotland's leading microbiologist.

'Cramped, stuffy and shabby' say visitors

VISITORS to the Vale of Leven Hospital during the outbreak of Clostridium difficile described a place lacking in investment, with shabby surroundings and a stuffy environment.

The Dunbartonshire hospital, built in the 1950s, is typical of many from this time, with a series of wards with smaller bays caring for several patients in close proximity.

Like other NHS facilities, the hospital has seen services cut, as some aspects of care have been centralised elsewhere. The maternity unit closed in 2002, shortly followed by A&E. The report noted that the hospital had been under threat of closure for more than ten years and said uncertainty about its future led to a lack of investment.

Michelle Stewart, whose mother-in-law, Sarah McGinty, died with C difficile in February, said the bays where the patients stayed were stuffy and cramped. "There was not much room to move in the wards. When my mother-in-law was sat in her wheelchair next to the bed, nobody could get to the sink to use that."

Another visitor to the hospital, who asked not to be named, said:

"There were boxes of gloves and aprons right next to patients. Sometimes visitors would sit on the boxes because there was not enough chairs on the ward.

"There was also a laundry storage unit nearby where they were constantly collecting clean laundry. It was always left open with people passing back and forth. In the bay my mother was on before she died there was no sink."

AT A GLANCE

• Fifty-five patients at the Vale of Leven Hospital developed Clostridium difficile in the six months December 2007 to June 2008. 18 deaths were linked to the infection. Uncertainties about the longer term future of the hospital led to lack of investment in the upgrading and maintenance at Vale of Leven.

• Facilities were "inadequate for effective patient isolation and infection control" and there were frequent patient transfers between wards and other hospitals, increasing the risk of infections spreading.

• The death rate linked to C difficile as recorded on death certificates was higher than expected during the six-month period studied.

• There was no system at the hospital for analysing rates of new cases of C difficile to identify if these exceeded expected limits.

• There was a lack of leadership and supervision, clarity of roles and responsibilities at the hospital.

• Facilities were inadequate in terms of hand washing, accommodation with toilets, appropriate spacing between beds, clinical and storage space.

Health service chiefs who must come up with answers

SENIOR health bosses in NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde must take action on the failings which led to the outbreak of C difficile at the Vale of Leven hospital.

Tom Divers, chief executive of the health board, has apologised to the families of those affected by the outbreak at the hospital.

On a salary of £139,000, he is the one with responsibility for ensuring the restoration of public confidence in NHS services in the area.

Another key figure is the board's chairman, Andrew Robertson, who earns a part-time salary of £38,532.

But there will also be tough questions for senior facilities and clinical managers over failures at all levels.

Dr Syed Ahmed, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde's consultant in public health medicine, chaired the C difficile outbreak control team at the Vale of Leven hospital after the cases were discovered.

He admitted that, from an infection control point of view, it was "clear more could have been done to identify the risks earlier and potentially reduce the spread of infections".

And he said improvements in infection surveillance and control measures might have cut the incidence of C difficile infections.

Yesterday, when asked if she was looking for resignations as a result of the Vale of Leven outbreak, Nicola Sturgeon, the health secretary, said she was more concerned about learning lessons.

She said there was a history of neglect going back many years at the hospital. "I am much more interested in getting this right than trying to have an exercise of apportioning individual blame," she said.





The full article contains 2174 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 August 2008 9:40 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Hospital superbugs
 
1

subrosa,

08/08/2008 00:04:37
And not a peep from Jackie (let me finish Glenn) Baillie. Isn't she the MSP for this area?
2

,

08/08/2008 00:24:21
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Teofilio Cubillas,

08/08/2008 00:30:38
"This is far worse than simply an SNP MP MacAskill getting arrested for being drunk and disorderly outside Wembley stadium for Scotland v England. Far worse indeed. It is even worse than the poisoning campaign conducted by an SNP member against English MPs."

Not quite as bad as trying to burn down a hotel full of sleeping residents though.
4

Ike,

Glasgow 08/08/2008 00:33:48
Unpopular, politically impossible and sad though it may be, the problem is one of complacency and poor standards among the nurses and auxiliaries. There is now overwhelming evidence that proper hygene standards are ignored either through laziness or an arrogance that ensuring cleanliness is beneath our nursing staff. Once "angels', this group has been so politically pampered for a generation that the result is that nurses now have zero tolerance with patients, zero tolerance with visitors and - it would appear - zero tolerance for cleanliness.
5

A Better Way,

Scottish Republic 08/08/2008 01:42:21
Andy Kerr certainly has a hell of a lot of explaining to do. Perhaps he was too busy trying to shut down A&E hospitals and travelling to London funded by undeclared expenses provided by Mac Donalds to actually do his job properly.

As for Big Bums, Keep taking your tablets ya loon. Try and seek some help laddie, you could be dangerous to your local community. Are you sure your not Gordon Brown, who seems to be 80p short in the pound lately.
6

ptdoug,

08/08/2008 01:46:22
Ike~4

It is not, and never has been, Nurses responsibility to clean hospitals. And nor should it be.

They are highly trained, many doing 4 year degree courses at university, at great expense to the taxpayer... to use them as skivys would be an insult and criminal.

Also, there is no such thing as auxiliaries in todays NHS.

Private contractors have been hired by Hospital managers to keep the hospitals clean. It is their job to ensure the private contractors are delivering. If they have hired the cheapest (cowboy) contractors in an effort to cut costs and make themselves look good (maybe pick up a bonus)... I ask you... who's fault is that? The nurses???

Your post is a disgrace.

If there is laziness and/or arrogance it is certainly not from the nurses.... it's from the bean-pushers now in charge of our hospitals.

It would be more appropriate for THEM to come down from their ivory towers and get down on THEIR knees and scrub out toilets.... whilst the nurses get on with nursing the patients

7

Ike,

Glasgow 08/08/2008 02:08:03
ptdoug 6

You believe your myth? Notwithstanding who is paid to physically clean, the nurses must ensure cleanliness. And they clearly do not! Why? Because it is now someone's else's responsibility. You miss the point... it is the nurse's clear obligation to her/his years of expensive training to ENSURE hygenic wards for the doctors who have been even more-expensively trained, and whose skills are undermined - to the great distress of patients and relatives, I should remind you - by unclean wards. You have allowed yourself to be seduced by the idea that the Health Service exists for the benefit of its employees. Let me remind you that it exists to treat our illnesses and return us to good health as quickly as possible. My posts are no disgrace - the disgrace lies within this huge, unmanageable, increasingly neglected monolith called the NHS. Pray tell how any nurse worth their training could possible accept a dirty ward? NO. There's no excuse for it. It's just another example of people sidestepping their responsibilities... no doubt because they have been allowed to do so.
8

Pilrig.,

Livingston 08/08/2008 05:36:14
2 - a slaver
9

bettylou,

arkansas USA 08/08/2008 06:12:16
I worked for the NHS ( one year at the Vale of Leven) for 20 years before emigrating to the US. I work in Intensive Care...when we identify C Diff in a patient, we immediately initiate isolation procedures which are strictly enforced, all of our patints have single rooms. We also isolate patients with flu, mrsa and certain respitory infections.These isolation policies are part of our annual testing and are in force throughout the US.Each of our rooms have wash basins and alcohol foam, as well as foam outside each room. There are always gloves available. The cleaners are also instructed on isolation procedures, There is never an excuse for poor hygiene.Why would a nurse or doctor not wash their hands after any patient contact? Do they not understand how disease is transmitted? Time to remember why you went into healthcare and stop putting your patients lives at risk. Carol Boles.
10

klaxxon,

Houston,TX 08/08/2008 06:20:54
This just reinforces many of the reasons NOT to have socialised, government controlled medicine.
11

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 08/08/2008 07:08:32
If the hospitals accept less than excellent cleaning standards from the cleaners, then who else should be blamed but the hospitals?
12

Helmut Smegma,

Edinburgh. 08/08/2008 07:50:01
All ancilliary services are now outsourced to the lowest bidder.Price is the main criterion.Quality,service and value for money no longer matter.
13

The Spectator,

08/08/2008 08:02:49
klaxxon # 10

How much does it cost you to visit your doctor?
14

C U Jimmy,

Mauchline 08/08/2008 08:40:17
After having to visit Crosshouse and Ayr Hospitals, I noticed that in all the toilets, some used by both staff and visitors, none displayed a 'Now Wash your Hands' notice, in particular the ward for new born babies in Crosshouse , the toilet was being used by visitors and staff, I brought this to the attention of Ayrshire and Arran health authority and I received a reply that they would look into the problem and get back to me, that was over a year ago and I'm still waiting.
I also brought this to the attention of 'The Scotsman' but never got a reply.
If the National Heath people were serious about hygiene and infection control they would see that making these notices mandatory is a very cost effective was of helping to cut the spread of infection and disease.
15

The McKellarator,

08/08/2008 09:21:50
#14 Write to the Ayrshire Post and Killie Standard's letters page, then you might get a response.

Ps doesn't Cathy doll live in Mauchline?
16

Toast,

08/08/2008 10:19:53
Time for corporate manslaughter charges that might shake the administrators out of their apathy and get them to ensure that resources are maximised.
17

JennyA,

Scotland 08/08/2008 10:26:55
In England ALL C diff cases in patients over 2 years old must be reported. In Scotland only patients over 65 are part of the mandatory surveillance scheme. I was younger; so MY case doesn't matter then?? In England all positive C diff cases are instantly recorded on to a web based surveillance programme by microbiology lab staff. This gives an instant warning of any worrying C diff clusters and will trigger urgent infection control actions in these hospitals. In Scotland this will NOT happen for another year. WHY NOT?? This system COULD have saved lives at the Vale of Leven. What exactly ARE the HPS staff doing to control and monitor C diff?? I have been told that their HAI systems to monitor and control outbreaks are 'excellent'. Does that mean that increasing numbers of patients dying unnecessarily from superbugs in our NHS hospitals is OK then?? In England they are AT LAST getting to grips with this problem. The C diff numbers are going down. In Scotland they are going UP UP UP. There were 285 deaths involving this dangerous pathogen between December 2007 and May 2008.
It is a particularly horrific way to die, just as harrowing for the relatives to witness as it is for the patient. I consider myself fortunate to have survived it but most of us are damaged in some way.
18

jones, ken,

wormit 08/08/2008 10:32:05
I agree with Ike. The responsibility for hygeine lies with the nursing and medical staff but they now seem so powerless to act. A ward should be under the sole command of a full-time senior nursing sister. The cleaning can be done by public or private employee, it doesn't matter provided somebody has firm control over their actions. Loss of control is part the underlying problem.
19

Matt M,

Edinburgh 08/08/2008 10:39:39
The report into the Vale of Leven is undoubtedly damning but the Health Protection Scotland Report shows that it is far from an isolated case with alarmingly high incidences of C-diff in hospitals in Aberdeen, Kircaldy and Wishaw. It's a huge black mark against Nicola Sturgeon that she did not insist on a mandatory web-based reporting system as was introduced by her counterparts in England in January. A full and independent public enquiry is needed to find out who is responsible for this and how we can get C-diff rates down in Scotland as they have managed in England and elsewhere in Europe.
20

The McKellarator,

08/08/2008 11:09:12
Matt, England and Wales don't exactly come out with glowing reports.

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/117287.php


Between 2002 and 2006, 6,201 deaths in England and Wales involved MRSA and 15,683 deaths in England and Wales involved C. difficile.
21

Madame Ecosse,

Edinburgh 08/08/2008 11:24:35
Leave off the legend Sturgeon. Matt, you had to spoil it. I was loving the fact that over this forum and the Herald she'd got off unscathed until #19.
22

Scottish 'N British,

08/08/2008 12:20:51
A full independent inquiry is required.
23

Scottish 'N British,

08/08/2008 12:21:36
That should have read

A full independent public inquiry is required.
24

Bewildered,

Glasgow 08/08/2008 12:22:57
I agree with No.18 that it doesn't matter who employs the cleaners as longs as proper standards are set, agreed and monitored by NHS professionals. The debate on cleanliness should not be confused with conracting in or out ; that is a quite separate debate.
It is amazing how politicians set up enquiries which will find fault with anyone but them. Well done Ms Sturgeon. Has she no responsibiliy for the lack of clarity on the Vale of Leven's longs term strategy ?
I suspect she and many other politicians before her must accept responsibility.
25

Man On Corstorphine Omnibus,

Edinburgh 08/08/2008 13:57:21
Referring this case to the Lord Advocate should not prevent disciplinary proceedings taking place against those deemed responsible. But they wont - as Sturgeon so much as admitted on Newsnight when she said she wanted to "more forward, not back".

This is a typical comment from a wee public sector jobsworth solicitor (which she in fact is), who has never had to produce, or work to, a balance sheet in their lives. If we overspend - who cares? If a manager or employee is negligent - "lessons will be learned" (while those responsible will keep their jobs and their taxpayer-subsidised pensions).

If the public sector junkie wing of the SNP (of which Sturgeon is a part) ever gain complete control - this will be a foretaste of the "new Scotland". Heaven help us.
26

Terryer,

Kettle Falls,WA, USA 08/08/2008 17:43:01
I may not live in Scotland today but I possibly could in the future and I plan a visit soon.

I praise you Scotlanders for steping forward to speak of your concerns. BUT, you and the PRESS must follow-up on this "Inquiry" and not let it fall-between-the-cracks. Your life is too important for it to be taken away by someone who is incompentent to do their job. Anyone in the health profession knows how important "cleanliness" is whether it be day-to-day living or in a health care profession.
27

subrosa,

08/08/2008 19:18:32
# 6 ptdoug: It is not, and never has been, Nurses responsibility to clean hospitals. And nor should it be.

They are highly trained, many doing 4 year degree courses at university, at great expense to the taxpayer... to use them as skivys would be an insult and criminal.

I think you're insulting nurses. Nursing involves cleaning didn't you know? During my many stays in hospital last year I watched two types of nurses working - one an older nurse and one a younger one.

The older one, when a patient was discharged, spent well over 15 minutes washing down and disinfecting the bed, the bedstead, the legs, the bedside cabinet, the wall containing the switches and wardrobe and the easy chair.

The younger one (highly qualified as you say and has been a nurse for 3 years) spent 5 minutes cleaning and making the bed. The rest of the appropriate environment wasn't touched. When one of the women asked her why not as her colleague did it the reply was "She's old fashioned" and that was that.

I know who all of us in the ward wanted to look after us and she was certainly no skivvy just because she cleaned and thoroughly. It's part of nursing cleaning similar as it's part of keeping a family home. Do you have a skivvy in your house? I don't because I regard cleaning as part of the responsibility of keeping my family healthy.
28

subrosa,

08/08/2008 19:35:45
# 17

I think you're not quite up to date with the recording of clostridium difficile in Scotland. As from 1 April 2007 it was mandatory every case was recorded not just the over 65s.

I don't think the English system would have saved anyone at the Vale of Leven. It is only beginning to work well in the past few months and that is the reason Scotland decided to wait before considering it most seriously.

My opinion of the problem at Vale of Leven is that the place has been allowed to get this way over the past 10 years and no politician or local person made a strong enough complaint. Who is the MP and MSP for that area? Surely they could see there were problems without having to be handed a list of numbers. Surely they can see dirt? The place was filthy not just dirty. I think the dirt etc of Vale of Leven has been ignored for many years. From the photographs I've viewed that dirt has accumulated over years not months.

As regards Nicola Sturgeon she is playing it low at the moment in order to get urgent action and to make the people who should have been on top of this do it now. Then perhaps she will quietly get rid of them because of their negligence if the Lord Advocate's report is in favour.

Would you rather she sacked many staff, who are capable of controlling this problem but haven't done so, or make these staff get things under control THEN take action?

The numbers of c.diff cases in Scotland is reducing now, thankfully. That can easily be verified if you google it.

I also speak as a survivor of c.diff so I do know what I'm talking about as I keep a very firm eye on everything about this dreadful bug and in particular what is happening in Scottish hospitals. I was told when it was diagnosed 'You have a wee infection". When I enquired what it was I was told. My response wasn't appreciated by the nurse because she didn't expect me to know anything about c.diff but I did.

With your point about about c.diff damaging a person I ent
29

subrosa,

08/08/2008 19:38:09
With your point about c.diff damaging a person I entirely agree. I have had to have two operations relating to it and I'm left with some of the health problems of a person 25 years older than me.

I wouldn't wish clostridium difficile on my worst enemy.
30

Kitti Kat,

Newtown Square 08/08/2008 21:41:45
As an American who has been in the hospital many times, I can vouch for #9's description of our hospitals. I can't imagine how any health care facility would have a "shortage" of wash basins (here all SEMI-Private , no wards where I live) rooms have sinks, etc. Give me good old private medicine anyt ime.
31

Kitti Kat,

Newtown Square 08/08/2008 21:48:26
For !3 who asked #10 what a doctor's office visit costs. Most insurance policies cover trips to the docs with (PERHAPS) a small deductible paid by the patient. My insurance does not insist on hme getting a "referral" to a specialist and I can go to whomever I want when I want. Some policies require a referral from one's gp which is no problem. We get appointments in a reasonable amount of time =- no waiting months for cat scans, etc. as one of my relatives in \Scotland has had to do. You pay for your care whether you think so or not. You \have high taxes to pay for lousy (in a lot of cases) care. NOT by doctors but by the pols who run the NHS> The ten dollars that I pay for a co-pay to see the doctor whenever I need to is small change compared to the high taxes that an NHS(god forbid we get one) will cost me.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.