Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Train timetable shows major fare increases arriving soon

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
29 November 2006
RAIL passengers travelling to and from Edinburgh are facing fare hikes of as much as 12 per cent in the new year.
All of Britain's train operating companies have announced new ticket prices, which come into effect on January 2.

Passengers travelling long distances from the Capital to destinations such as London and Aberdeen are facing the biggest price rises
. The cost of a normal day return on the flagship Edinburgh-to-Glasgow route will increase by 70p.

But the cheapest ticket to London with GNER will rise from £22.30 to £25 - up 12 per cent - when it is booked online. Saver return tickets will generally increase by just over four per cent across Britain's rail network. Passenger watchdogs have criticised the fare increases, which come only six months after First ScotRail put up some rush-hour tickets by ten per cent.

Robert Samson, from Passenger Focus, said: "We are concerned about the impact on long-distance travellers.

"For passengers on trains from Edinburgh to Aberdeen, this equates to a 15 per cent rise in the last few months, which people will find hard to take.

"However, for shorter journeys in the rest of Scotland, the fare rises are as expected."

Regulated fares, which mainly include saver and season tickets, are to increase by 4.3 per cent on First ScotRail, GNER and Virgin Cross Country, with the exception of services within Strathclyde, where there will be no increase.

That means a saver return ticket between London and Edinburgh rises from £94.10 to £98.20.

Unregulated fares set by the train operating companies will rise by an average of 4.3 per cent on First ScotRail and Virgin Cross Country trains.

On GNER services they will rise 5.5 per cent. On the few Virgin West Coast trains that serve Edinburgh, the hike will be 6.6 per cent.

The new fares mean a return ticket on Edinburgh's CrossRail network from Waverley to Newcraighall will increase by 10p, while there will be a 40p hike for off-peak tickets between the Capital and Glasgow. A weekly season ticket on the route will go up from £65.20 to £68.

Britain's main rail union said the price increases would drive more people off trains and into cars.

RMT general secretary Bob Crow said: "The Government talks about the climate challenge and the importance of reducing carbon emissions, but allowing never-ending above-inflation rail fares rises will only result in more polluting road traffic."

Liberal Democrat shadow transport secretary Alistair Carmichael, added: "Passengers will be exasperated by these fare increases, whilst levels of overcrowding on their trains continue to get worse."

But the changes were defended by the Association of Train Operating Companies, which said the cash was needed for "ongoing improvements".

Peter Williams, First ScotRail's commercial director, said: "Our value-for-money strategy continues. The average fare increase over the past 15 months was limited to 4.5 per cent - despite the huge rises we have faced in diesel and electricity costs."

A spokesman for GNER added: "Travel by GNER remains very good value when compared to airlines and private cars, based on cost-per-mile."



The full article contains 553 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Paul Voltaire,

http://paulvoltaire.spaces.live.com 29/11/2006 15:12:24

12% is way above the rate of inflation.
I am sticking with cheap flights to London!

2

Michael Laing,

Edinburgh 29/11/2006 15:31:15

"Train timetable shows major fare increases arriving soon"

What have major fare increases got to do with train timetables? Are such naff, cheesey and inaccurate headlines really necessary?

Also, why the insistence on referring to Edinburgh as "the Capital"? In reference to Edinburgh, 'capital' is a simple noun; the capital 'c' is not required.

As to the subject of the report, ATOC may want us to believe that the massive fare-rises are to fund "ongoing improvements", but I would suggest that two more likely reasons are to generate profits for the shareholders of the private companies that now operate our railways, and to fund their contractual premium payments to the government, which amount to a tax on rail-travel. So much for our present government's commitment to cutting pollution and CO2-emmisions!

3

Brad,

Glasgow 29/11/2006 17:33:40

You'll not get to London and back for £25, PV! At least, not once you add taxes/charges and the cost of getting into the city from the airport...

... that said, try finding many £25 fares on GNER!

4

Repton,

edinburgh 29/11/2006 19:16:29

Should never been privatised.Services like gas electricityand rail are things that should always been part of the public services.The Tories were wrong to do this but Blair and co have done not one thing to get it back.What did Blair do when he was chosen as leader,drop Clause 5.I`m not a socialist but not all socialist things are wrong.This being a prime example.

5

Marianne,

Linlithgow 30/11/2006 01:40:19

#2 - "Also, why the insistence on referring to Edinburgh as "the Capital"? In reference to Edinburgh, 'capital' is a simple noun; the capital 'c' is not required."

That's because of the insecurity there is in Edinburgh about its status. The idea is that if Capital (when it should be capital, small 'c') is shouted often enough and enough people see it in print then some outsiders might actually believe it...

Hence why the Scotsman stable of papers print it in almost every page they produce (and often multiple times in a single article).

It reflects the natives being in denial about being just the 2nd city of Scotland and the real capital being located in the major Scottish city 40 odd miles away to the west.

Ken whit ah mean, likesy?


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.