Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 30th August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

My son's bed is ready for him



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 11 January 2008
WHEN Corrine Mitchell takes her seat in the Criminal Court of Appeal in Edinburgh early next month, she will be torn by a mixture of highly-charged emotions.
After standing by her son ever since he was convicted of the horrific murder of Dalkeith schoolgirl Jodi Jones four years ago, she has become a figure of hate.

Now she is daring to hope that she will soon be counting the days until he is free. Luke Mitchell, now 19, who has served four years at Polmont Young Offenders Institution, will walk into the Criminal Court of Appeal in Edinburgh early next month for the start of an eight-day hearing that will shape the rest of his life.

"I'm not sure I really know how to feel about the appeal," Mrs Mitchell said. "I'm excited that it's going ahead, but I'm concerned too, because you just do not know what might happen."

Her son's legal team claims it has new evidence to back its argument that Luke Mitchell – aged 14 at the time of Jodi's murder in June, 2003 – was not his girlfriend's killer.

If the trio of judges accept his lawyers' suggestions of two other potential suspects in the case, Mrs Mitchell's son may be on his way home. If they don't, he will return to prison to serve the rest of his sentence – a further 16 years.

"I really hope his legal team are on the ball because in my opinion his trial lawyers really screwed up," says his mother, 47, speaking from the family home in Newbattle. "I don't know what will happen, if he'll be freed at the end of the appeal or if he'll have to wait. But his bed is made up and ready for him."

Jodi was apparently on her way to meet her boyfriend in the late afternoon of June 30, 2003 when her killer pounced as she walked along a path behind Newbattle Community High School, which would have taken her towards Luke Mitchell's family home.

It was just before midnight that night when a search party, which included Luke Mitchell, discovered her mutilated body behind a wall on the countryside path.

She had been stabbed around 20 times and her body systematically disfigured. Several months later Jodi's boyfriend was charged. He was convicted of her murder after a High Court trial, in January, 2005, after which the judge branded him "truly evil".

Since then he has languished in his cell at Polmont, and despite the 60-plus miles round trip, his mother has rarely missed her weekly visit. "He seems to be taking things in his stride," she says, referring to her most recent visit on Tuesday evening.

"But then, he's really got no choice. He could just stand there, biting his fingernails and looking terrified, but what's the point?"

Despite the approaching appeal, Christmas was miserable, she adds. "I crawled through Christmas and New Year – it was horrible to get up to an empty house on Christmas morning knowing Luke was waking up in a prison cell.

"He chose to work at Christmas and New Year – I suppose to keep his mind occupied. He has a job in the laundry.

Christmas was pretty miserable. Christmas dinner was a slab of turkey roll – it's not the place anyone would choose to be."

By February 5, the waiting should be over and Luke Mitchell will once again appear in court.

The court is expected to hear claims from his defence team suggesting a drug user at Newbattle Abbey College in Dalkeith at the time is one of two potential suspects.

"The trouble was the police had already decided from the minute Jodi's body was found that it was Luke that did it," says Mrs Mitchell, whose caravan business and home were subjected to attacks in the wake of her son's conviction.

"This suspect, I've been told, was known about at the time of Jodi's death but he wasn't investigated. Their minds were already made up that it was Luke and they didn't bother to consider anything else.

"As far as I'm concerned, the police involved should go on trial because they have ruined two families' lives – our lives and Jodi's family's lives too.

"The investigation let everyone down – people in Dalkeith too, who now have to wonder if the person that killed Jodi is still out there and could do it again."

She has not considered compensation should her son win his appeal. Instead, she is more concerned at how he will adapt to life on the outside as a young man at the centre of one of Scotland's most notorious murder trials.

"Luke has been in jail for four years now. He went in as a 15-year-old, now he's 19 and a young man," she says.

"But he doesn't know how to be a typical 19-year-old. He hasn't been into a pub with his pals, he's not been out clubbing.

"It's going to be a long process for him when he comes out because he was just a laddie when he went inside.

"We know, too, that people will recognise him and there'll be jibes. He'll get a lot of attention – and who knows how anyone would cope with that? We'll probably stay at home, petrified. I certainly wouldn't except the police to offer him any support or help in dealing with people who want to have a go at him. They are the last people Luke would want to be around him after what they've already done to him."

Detective Chief Superintendent Craig Dobbie, who led the murder inquiry, vigorously defended the police investigation.

Mr Dobbie said that every care was taken to ensure every single piece of evidence from the crime scene was recovered.

The investigation into Jodi's death was one of the biggest ever carried out by Lothian and Borders Police. Officers interviewed more than 2000 people in the course of the inquiry and took DNA samples from members of the public who were in the vicinity of the murder scene on the night she was killed.

The full article contains 1021 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 11 January 2008 12:19 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Jodi Jones murder
 
1

Local Worker,

11/01/2008 12:04:07
All the best - I hope the truth come out
2

john 1,

11/01/2008 12:18:37
It was her killer who ruined her folks life not the police. Get real
3

Black Five,

edinburgh 11/01/2008 12:58:34
The police don`t think it was anyone else .This woman had an unhealthy lifestyle with this boy.He was also allowed at 14 to smoke cannabis and distribute it round the school.Some parent she is.That woman is to blame for her son being locked up.
4

Finbarr Saunders,

11/01/2008 13:03:12
"But his bed is made up and ready for him."

I wonder if all the bottles of his urine are still stored underneath?
5

,

11/01/2008 13:07:39
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

Speedy Gonzales,

Edinburgh 11/01/2008 13:09:25
Also, is it normal for folk to BBQ their clothes? This was reported soon after the investigation started that the mother burned clothes outside on the BBQ, on the day of Jodi's disappearance, witnessed, allegedly, by a few neighbours. Most peculiar!
7

Heartfelt,

EDINBURGH 11/01/2008 13:15:27
I don't know the laddie but I was always uncomfortable with his conviction, based of course on media reporting. He was too easy a target. #1, spot on - as long as the truth comes out. At the end of the day, a young life was tragically ended in horrible fashion - an uncertain conviction of anybody won't soften this hard fact.
8

Heartfelt,

EDINBURGH 11/01/2008 13:15:49
I don't know the laddie but I was always uncomfortable with his conviction, based of course on media reporting. He was too easy a target. #1, spot on - as long as the truth comes out. At the end of the day, a young life was tragically ended in horrible fashion - an uncertain conviction of anybody won't soften this hard fact.
9

Bobby Mo,

Edinburgh 11/01/2008 13:26:18
#5 - not the same person.
10

Speedy Gonzales,

Edinburgh 11/01/2008 13:43:23
#9, I stand corrected, apparently he was only smoking cannabis there, someone else interfered with the corpse.
11

Johnny Yen,

11/01/2008 13:43:23
The police knew exactly who it was from the off. They just had to prove it. They did.

As far as I see it Mummy should have gone down too, He didnt burn his own clothes after all and she lied at every chance. If thats not obstruction I don't know what is.

He's a scumbag and guilty as sin. The courts agreed then and will again. I really feel for Jodi's family, the hell this appalling woman and her spawn are forcing them to go through again.
12

Speedy Gonzales,

Edinburgh 11/01/2008 14:02:06
#9
http://edinburghnews.scotsman.com/edinburgh/Boy-kicked-in-door-of.2514796.jp
Guy sitting next to me at work is adamant that the unnamed 15yo is indeed Luke.
13

Bobby Mo,

Edinburgh 11/01/2008 14:23:20
It might well be, and if so, then very shortly after he was arrested and charged in connection with the girl's murder. I suspect that, assuming it was Mitchell at the graveyard incident, such things served to sway the police to the opinion he committed the murder. Wouldn't be surprised if the jury were also party to a little "inside information".
Still proves nothing.
I refuse to believe ANY first-time killer could murder someone and leave so little evidence. The FBI, for what it's worth, were of the same opinion.
14

John Knox furr First Meenister,

High St, Embra 11/01/2008 14:28:21
And don't forget how he killed his dog. And the serated knives he showed off to his pals.
I suppose we'll have to put up with this p!sh now that Richey is no longer a story.
15

Bobby Mo,

Edinburgh 11/01/2008 14:36:49
Killed his dog? Must have missed that.
16

GorgieX1,

11/01/2008 14:51:27
#3

your a gem....beacuse he smoked hash, he's a killer and his mother a bad parent...beat it moron
17

GorgieX1,

11/01/2008 14:52:01
#5 no wrong person again
18

GorgieX1,

11/01/2008 14:55:49
#12

think you might find he was in jail then??

#14

again come off the glue, do any of you peple actually believe that this guy is guilty?
#11
i think you are somewhat correct the police had thier ideas then they manufactured evidence to fit....the truth will out
19

Jingsitsme,

EDINBURGH 11/01/2008 14:59:39
I find it hard to believe he is innocent - totally innocent.

There's something not right with all this goings on and I hope the true story comes out.

This Luke doesn't sound like a 'normal' teenager' with all the goings on and his mother to allow him such lee-way is questionable.

Questions re his brother were never pursued and I do find it odd that apparently on the evening of the murder the mother was burning stuff in her back garden late at night.

I do hope the proper facts are found then we can all rest but I wonder if they ever will.

I'm sure we don't know the half of it and it must be very difficult for the police. I hope the truth once and for all....
20

John Knox furr First Meenister,

High St , Embra 11/01/2008 15:06:16
The death of his puppy is even alluded to in a submission to the Scottish parliament by the SCPCA ..

http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/committees/education/inquiries/pvg/pvg-CrueltyToAnimals.pdf

I don't know the guy but a good pal of mine at work from Bonnyrigg knows a great deal. His son was unfortunately a pal of Luke's - and was obviously questioned a great deal by the police. It was seriously disturbing stuff. He was suspect No1 for very good reasons.
21

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 11/01/2008 15:19:47
The trial and the verdict were a disgrace to Scottish justice. No evidence was brought forward other than purely circumstantial claims, augmented by the crudest of character assassination.

I have no idea whether Luke Mitchell was a killer. What I do know is that he was not proved to be so at his trial.
22

Speedy Gonzales,

Edinburgh 11/01/2008 15:22:34
#18
He certainly wasn't in jail. That was the night/day Jodi was murdered, 30/06/03. Mitchell was in the graveyard that night, smoking(whatever it was)as he had been several times before.
His mum stood and testified as a witness that he was in his house on the very same night.
23

Black Five,

edinburgh 11/01/2008 15:32:38
Gorgie x1 You want the get real.Smoking hash at 14 with your parent`s consent is not good parenting.This mother by all acconts is an applling person.There was even a case for incest during the hearing.Bottles of urine ,now digging up corpes,murdering a puppy.The guy sounds verty disturbed at the best.The comments of the guy whose son knew him sounds bad too.I`d say the police were not far of the mark with this guy.
24

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 11/01/2008 15:34:57
#23, none of this, even if true, proves him to have been a murderer.
25

Finbarr Saunders,

11/01/2008 16:06:43
I think this thread has been invaded by his silly, wee goth admirers!

He's a convicted murderer and he's a weirdo.

Rest assurred, there's no miscarriage of justice here.

Even if he gets out on some obscure legal technicality, do you really think that he'll be able to lead anything approaching a normal life?
26

Gopher,

edinburgh 11/01/2008 16:22:12
The appeal will prove once again that the the police and pf office are incapable of securing a sound verdict and he will be released and sue for compensation for wrongful imprisonment.
27

Sands,

11/01/2008 16:59:15
Lots of research shows people who kill animals go on to kill people. AS A PARENT HIS MOTHER HAS SERIOUS PARENTING ISSUES THAT ARE NOT HEALTHY AND THE BOY HAS SHOWN SOME VERY ODD TENDENCIES. iF HE DID NOT KILL jODI, HE STILL DOES NOT SOUND A STABLE, PERSON
28

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 11/01/2008 17:07:35
#27, what does this have to do with his appeal? Even if he is not a stable person, would this justify his being imprisoned for 20 years if he didn't murder Jodi Jones?
29

billy11153,

edinburgh 11/01/2008 17:11:07
i dont know if this guy did comit murder but at the trial there was no solid proof against him ,he is surly a weird person ,his mother seems to be a bit dodgy to but does that make him guilty of murder what about our fair scotish law supposed to be the best in the world the crown get 3 chances at you, defendent only gets 1. i dont think our law is fair a good Q.C.would have the crown case tied up
30

The Judge,

11/01/2008 17:39:55
More free money for Donald Finlayson QC.
31

Dood,

11/01/2008 17:48:33
#29 - no solid proof against him?????? I'd maybe go back and read about the trial again. There was sufficient to convict him and to jail him for life.

And #11 Gorgie. Aye, that's right, the polis are just ALWAYS manufacturing evidence in such serious cases in this country. Have a word eh?
32

Dood,

11/01/2008 17:52:11
Oh aye, and while I'm on my high horse!!!!

#26, Gopher.

It's an appeal. It's his right. It may not be successful.

And what fault exactly is it of the Police? I seem to remember that in this case they were commended for their efforts by the community concerned in what was a horiffic and harrowing case. They put the case to the Procurator Fiscal who secured a conviction. End of.
33

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 11/01/2008 17:52:34
#31, there was no proof. Just a lot of silly abuse about urine, tattoos, etc, designed to make him look like a villain.

The trial was a travesty of justice that made me ashamed to be a Scot.
34

chump,

11/01/2008 18:08:15
By all accounts that i have heard of his intial trial, for people who sat through the whole thing, there was no doubt that he committed this murder. And if he is so innocent, why did he not give evidence? If it were me in his position, no matter what my bigoted Lawyer tried to make me do, i would have spoken in court.

And surely the fact that he was convicted, on numerous pieces of circumstantial evidence is testament to the Police Enquiry. His trial went on for weeks, but everyone seems to think he was locked up because he smokes hash/ had a tracker dog/ burns clothes/ and was in a relatioship with Jodie. The truth is there were hundreds of witnesses/other pieces of evidence which weren't all reported in our classy media.

For all you lot on here adament that he didn't do it- where's your proof? He is a convicted murderer, for possibly the worst killing of this century in Scotland. He will not win his appeal.
35

Butterfly,

dalkeith 11/01/2008 18:09:09
Get real- for a 14 year old to commit a perfect murder without any DNA evidence to be found is just impossible. If luke did murder jodi surely he would have picked up something on him e.g blood or scratches/ cuts on him as it was proved jodi put up an extensive and violent fight against her attacker, but luke should nothing on his body or clothes to prove he was there.
The press have hounded luke from day one and made his life hell by making him out to be the only suspect despite being someone else also in the frame.
As for the way he acted in his private life, smoking hash and having an obsession with satanism. You cant tell me as a teenager you havent tried these things, i myself went through a gothic stage, hanging around in graveyards and listening to marilyn manson but this doesnt make me unstable and potentially about to go out and kill someone. Its all part of growing up, trying things and going through stages. It should never have been used as the basis for the load of circumstantial evidence that was heard in court. Where was the real proof?

i just hope the truth comes out in february and this case can be finally laid to rest.
36

valleyjim,

The A8000 11/01/2008 18:14:01
The poor psychotic b-----d is as guilty as sin. He should be locked away indefinately since we don't have the death penalty.
37

Julian,

EDINBURGH 11/01/2008 18:24:07
#35 Butterfly,

It is alleged his clothes were burnt and he had plenty of time to clean himself as it was hours before the body was discovered and days before he became an official suspect. So, the lack of this evidence proves nothing.

And as for any scratches he may or may not have had, that proves nothing either.
38

The Fly Fifer,

Fife 11/01/2008 18:37:44
Yep he is guilty, much of the evidence in such cases never makes the press for two reasons, it is lengthy and secondly only the gory stuff is what is looked for.

His mother, and I use the word with advisement, indeed allegedly was implicated in incest, the drugs issue is not good, but as others have said an incestuous junkie is not necessarily a murderer, but in this case the police, courts and jury got it correct.
39

Butterfly,

dalkeith 11/01/2008 18:38:13

#37 Julian

yes exactly this all proves nothing, its just all circumstantial!
40

John Knox furr First Meenister,

High St, Embra 11/01/2008 18:38:25
#33 It was a jury that heard the evidence. They decided. it's not perfect but no one's come up with a better system. So you'd let him off; OK. You can't always catch a murdered holding the smoking gun.
41

buttons,

nova scotia,canada 11/01/2008 18:52:18
What happened to our society?My husband and Idebated over this case and thought that Luke Mitchel was wrongly convicted in the first place.Another case of nail the person closest!We hope that he is cleared of a wrong doing,which will not go down well with Lothian & Borders Police.He should have been giving a fair trial in Edinburgh.Waiting with baited breath on this one.There are lots of STRANGE kids out there.
42

chump,

11/01/2008 19:02:49
#41

Everyone in Scotland has an opinion on this case, but unless you heard all the evidence, or had close dealings with the case, opinions are all they are. As someone else pointed out, the jury convicted him (quickly). And remember, the Crown has to prove beyond all reasonable doubt that he committed the crime. The jury must have been pretty convinced.
43

The Fly Fifer,

Fife 11/01/2008 19:17:12
41 and 42 yes it was a quick call and they heard and saw the evidence. he went down for this and will do the time.
44

Helen,

11/01/2008 20:52:08
Butterfly....I'm a forty something who has never smoked cannabis and never dabbled with satanism. Decent kids don't do stuff like that. His teachers expressed concern at the nature of some of his written work, and his mother seemed happy enough to let him be tattooed underage and to let him smoke cannabis and keep bottles of urine in his room. Not a normal upbringing and not a normal teenager.
Whether he did this or not (and I believe he did) he is clearly a danger to society.
45

Butterfly,

dalkeith 11/01/2008 20:59:33
helen... try living in the area then, you obviously dont know what kids are like nowadays!
46

big man,

Edinburgh 11/01/2008 21:22:42
Luke was convicted on evidence, why did his mum burn stuff in the BBQ at that time of night ? , i can understand as a parent protecting you siblings, but am sorry to say it all stinks, just because his trial was in Edinburgh, doesnt mean to say he didnae get a fair trial, at the end of the day if Luke Mitchell is freed, it won't be long till someone has a go at him, maybe resulting in a fatal incident, maybe would be better for all if the Mitchell family went south, think of his victims family 1st before you thik of Luke Mitchell, after all who is paying for Donald Finlay QC ???
47

Butterfly,

dalkeith 11/01/2008 21:38:21
#46 big man... I agree too true!
48

Farmernot,

in darkest Midlothian 12/01/2008 12:33:50
At the trial the brother was in the house at the time Mrs Mitchell said Luke was cooking. The brother admitted to downloading adult material at the same time. Prosecution asked that if anyone else was in the house at the time would you have downloaded said material.....Shane ( the brother !!) answered no .......so Luke was not in the house then ? No was the answer.

So mother and Luke lying through their back teeth......also there was a positive id of Luke at the top of the path in Easthouses at the same time.

Jury got it spot on.......guilty as sin......and a perjured mother to boot.

If he even gets off with it the local hoods will have the lad lynched within days.

Mrs Mitchell has probably not done herself any favours with th lawfirm stating that they had screwed up.........Donal included ????
49

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 12/01/2008 16:01:43
> At the trial the brother was in the house at the time Mrs Mitchell said Luke was cooking. The brother admitted to downloading adult material at the same time. Prosecution asked that if anyone else was in the house at the time would you have downloaded said material.....Shane ( the brother !!) answered no .......so Luke was not in the house then ? No was the answer. <

What a load of drivel. I expect that every teenage or early 20s boy in the land will have downloaded adult material while members of his family were in the house.

Of all the stupid, unconvincing pieces of "evidence" brought forward at this travesty of a trial, this was probably the silliest.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.