Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


The critics may not think so, but for the kids, JK is still top of the charts

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 November 2006
IT IS five years since Scotland's most celebrated author has won a major literary prize in her own country. But when children had the chance to vote yesterday, JK Rowling triumphed.
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince was voted best Scottish children's book, for readers aged eight to 12 in a poll of 3,000 schoolchildren, backed by leading literary organisations. They chose from a judges' shortlist of three titles.

In a message sent by "owl" and read by her editor, Emma Matthewson, the author pleaded pressure of work for not turning up for the ceremony at the Royal Mail Awards for Scottish Children's Books.

"Thank you so much for this award. I'm sure any writer will agree that it's always reassuring to receive recognition for your work, but it's particularly meaningful when the decision has been made by the readers themselves," she said.

"To them, I'm enormously grateful and delighted that Harry Potter continues to give so much pleasure.

"I'm sorry I am unable to receive this award in person today, but I currently have my head down writing the final book, which is coming along nicely."

The first Royal Mail Awards for Scottish Children's Books have evolved from the Scottish Arts Council for children's books. JK Rowling has not won an SAC prize since 2001, when Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire was one of five books listed for a £1,000 prize, when the author accepted the accolade, but not the cash.

This year's runners-up were Deep Water, by Debi Gliori, and The Sign of the Black Dagger, by Joan Lingard. The shortlisted titles were read by young people in reading groups at schools, libraries and bookshops across Scotland this term.

Margaret Ann Macleod, who reviewed the Harry Potter book with the Western Isles Libraries, wrote: "There were no weak parts at all! I will definitely vote for it as it has me really gripped and passed the test with flying colours. Well done, JK Rowling - a real toe-curler!"

Mark Lambert, chief executive of the Scottish Book Trust, said: "These prizes have not been determined by a closed council of book people. This reflects what kids are reading and enjoying in Scotland.

"The shortlist was created by a panel, but then it was up to the kids.

"I think it's fantastic. She's as popular in Scotland as she is in the rest of the globe. It's a wonderful thing and a true reflection of what the kids voted for."

Little Lost Cowboy, by Simon Puttock and Caroline Jayne Church, won the up to seven years category. It tells of a poor cowboy, Coyote, who has lost his mummy and finds some friends to give him advice.

But another startling winner yesterday was Roxy's Baby, by the veteran children's author Catherine MacPhail. The story runs from teen pregnancy to organ trafficking, and came out top in the 13-16 category. "It is very strong meat," said Ms MacPhail.

"The book is about a girl who's a bit of a rebel, finds out she's going to have a baby and goes to London."

Page 1 of 1

 
1

Heidegger,

Fife 28/11/2006 07:38:00

Until someone starts writing books fit for
children to read, children's reading should
be vigorously discouraged. There is a prev-
alent belief that reading is per se good for
a child, but the "reading" seldom amounts
to more than skimming accompanied by
fantasy, & this leads to a lifetime of
intellectual ineptitude & spiritual inanity.

2

Chris, Edinburgh,

28/11/2006 08:16:52

#1 - What do you define as a book 'fit for children to read'?

3

Allan2000,

Edinburgh 28/11/2006 09:53:40

#1 What are you talking about? Given that every scientific study has clearly demonstrated that reading of any kind is good for children (as is fantasy, aka the ability to use the creative parts of our minds), your comment clearly demonstrates ignorance beyond belief. Ms Rowling should be given the highest accolades not only Scotland, but the UK and the rest of the world can give, not for her writing (it is actually pretty bad), but for encouraging an entire generation of children throughout the world to read.
Shame on you for suggesting that children should be discouraged to read.
Shame.

4

Cadgers,

Perth 28/11/2006 10:40:20

#1 I'm speechless!! Roll on "intellectual ineptitude & spiritual inanity" ;-)

5

Hermioneee,

Norwalk 28/11/2006 20:13:28

What studies are you leanrning from? Evry scientific study has said that reading is in every way good for a child- it increases the capability of the brain and definetly does not lead them to" a life of, how did you say so ignorantly, " intellectual ineptitude and spiritually inanity". I've been reading for as long as I can remember, and books that have definetly been above my age group readning level, and I've remained an A/B student for my entire school career, and I have a very clear idea about my spiritual life, thank you very much!

Fantasy influences children to be creative- who wouldn't want that! I definetly do not appreciate you sayning that Jo Rowling has led the chilldren of the world to intellectual ineptitude and spiruitual inanity, because she has quite done the pposite by getting billions of children worldwide to read and actually love it. My sister is dyslexic, and she's reading the first Harry Potter now, instead of just watching the movie or listening to the audio, and she's enjoying it. I love Jo Rowling's work, I love children's books, I love reading, I love everything that promotes it. Your comment clearly displays an amount of ignorance which leads me to think that maybe you didn't read as much as a child- who knows?

I agree with Alan2000, except for one note- do not say that Jo's writing is " pretty bad" as though stating it for an obvious fact, because it is most definetly NOT a fact, nor one that many citizens of the world would agree with. I happen to love Jo's writing, even the fan letters she writes out, because in my OPINION, it is the most brilliant thing I have ever read. Don't state opinion as fact, especially when it is of negative aspect.

6

Heidegger,

Fife 28/11/2006 21:04:56

Francis Crick, a man who could tell the
difference between a scientific study
& an educationalist's flatulence, had a sign
in his rooms that said "Reading rots the mind". Too true, too true.

7

Ginny18,

FL, USA 28/11/2006 23:29:28

Fife, for real, get a life, seriously "reading rots the mind"!!! I never thought someone could be that retarded, not even Bush Jr.

8

Chris, Edinburgh,

29/11/2006 08:55:20

#6 - still waiting for an answer to the question I posted in #2.

9

Heidegger,

Fife 29/11/2006 16:13:37

#8 - I've no idea, whatsoever. All the child-
ren's books I've ever read have been unfit
for human consumption.

10

Hermioneee,

Norwalk, CT 29/11/2006 23:31:20

What children's books have you read, then, Heidegger? and what about them made them "unfit for human consumption"? Francis Crick might have been a scientific genious, but he certainly wasn't one in childrens literature, in my opinion. And as a young child, Francis Crick found his love of experimenting with science through books he read- in that case, how can reading " rot the mind"? I'm not understanding how you can say that the reading of a child damages their intelect and spiritual ideas, when dozens of scientific studies have roven so- and no, those studies are not "and educationalists flatulence"...

11

Chris, Edinburgh,

30/11/2006 08:45:08

#9 - so you want someone to start writing books fit for children to read but you have no idea of what constitutes such books? Hmm... Reading may rot the minds of a few but it will stimulate the minds of the many. Reading helps learning, as centuries of education across the world have shown.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.